Commentary by Jerry Lanson

SALISBURY, Connecticut — This is a quiet, community-oriented, affluent village in the state’s northwestern corner. But yesterday, No Kings Day, in the lexicon of sprawling, nationwide protests against the Trump Administration’s assault on the Constitution, drew about 100 people to the intersection of two roads opening onto the two-block long main street.

They gathered with signs and determination at 11 a.m., Saturday, one of hundreds of protests across the country. “Resist Like It’s Germany in 1938,” read one poster, a reference to the rising repression of Jews and others there in the days before World War II.

Given the Easter holiday weekend, the sweep of protests nationwide Saturday seemed quite remarkable, even if crowds were somewhat smaller than the millions who came out nationwide April 5. Yet some leading elected Democratic leaders continue to be clueless, plotting strategy for the 2026 midterms instead of recognizing that the Constitutional crisis is right now, a moral abyss marked most strikingly by ICE’s arrests and sometimes deportation without charge or due process of documented immigrants and occasionally citizens.

The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the 29-year-old Maryland father of three disabled children shipped to an El Salvadoran gulag has come to symbolize this growing phenomenon. Though he was arrested by mistake (as acknowledged initially by the Trump Administration), though the Supreme Court voted 9-0 that the administration should “facilitate” his return home, Donald Trump and his Justice Department have steadfastly refused, saying that only El Salvador’s dictator can decide to release him. It’s a ludicrous and dangerous position. The U.S. government is paying El Salvador millions of dollars to jail deported immigrants and to expand its prisons, presumably, as Trump told President Nayib Bukele, so that “homegrown” Americans can be sent there.

Yet The New York Times reported Saturday that California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom considers the Abrego Garcia affair the "distraction of the day,” a comment that shows a singular disinterest in the Constitution and rule of law. Newsom, and other Democrats who share that view — they reportedly fear “playing into Trump’s hands” — should be ashamed, both for their moral spinelessness and their stupidity.

The case of Abrego Garcia is no “distraction.” It is the clearest measure to date of whether our democracy has a chance of surviving until the next election.

Law is the foundation of democracy. Abrego Garcia is a human being who cannot be discarded so Democrats can focus on tariffs. And Abrego Garcia surely is not and will not be alone. Again, Donald Trump wants to ship citizens to El Salvador's jails.

If Abrego Garcia is abandoned in El Salvador, no one will be safe. As Ezra Klein wrote in the NYT this week, the emergency is now. Democratic leaders like Newsom must stop being clueless and instead, like Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who journeyed to El Salvador in an attempt to free Abrego Garcia, shout out his case for freedom, calling on the public to stand behind them.

Only then can we hope to continue to have free and fair elections, not only in 2028, when Newsom hopes to be president, but in 2026. Less than 100 days into the Trump Administration, it is jarringly clear that if we hope to restore some semblance of democracy, time is short.

Lanson is author of Jerry’s Substack.

_____
MONDAY 4/21/25

By Todd Lassa

The Supreme Court’s 7-2 vote Saturday to temporarily stop the Trump administration from deporting another 50 Venezuelan immigrants without due process under the Alien Enemies Act should have the White House concerned. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were the two justices siding with President Trump. The president’s appointees from his previous term, Amy Coney Barret, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch joined Chief Justice John Roberts to side with Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson in keeping what was likely planned as another flight to El Salvador to permanently imprison these 50 immigrants in the notorious CECOT facility (above), according to The New York Times.

Roberts, Thomas, Alito and the three Trump appointees, after all, last year gave the president virtually absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for any official acts in their 6-3 ruling on Trump v. United States. But SCOTUS’ temporary order offers some hope against the concern that the Trump administration’s swift attempt to fulfill the president’s key campaign promise is fueling a Constitutional crisis.

“The government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court,” SCOTUS said in its unsigned brief (per NYT).

Even before this order there was some concern among the pro-MAGA that Justice Coney Barrett was not a reliable pro-Trump vote on the bench, and that she and Roberts alone could subvert at least some of the president’s executive orders and actions. 

Of course, this Saturday’s order was an emergency, “stop-gap” temporary ruling, and the majority could ultimately side with the White House. But it serves as an indication that despite Trump v. United States the judiciary isn’t ready to hand over all its power to the executive quite yet.

On this page, you will find two very different takes on the Trump administration’s deportation policy, with Rich Corbett arguing for the dire need for strict immigration enforcement in the right column and Jerry Lanson arguing for the rule of law in the left column. 

Here’s your chance to comment on this critical issue. Email your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line, so we may post your comments in the appropriate column.

_____
MONDAY 4/21/25

Commentary by Rich Corbett

The Supreme Court’s 7-2 emergency order, halting the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport immigrants, erodes national sovereignty. This unsigned ruling, opposed only by Justices Thomas and Alito, delays critical deportations under a law designed to empower decisive action against border security threats. By prioritizing judicial oversight over executive authority, the Court undermines the president’s ability to protect American communities from the consequences of unchecked migration.

Illegal immigration imposes a staggering $150 billion annual burden on taxpayers, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (2023). The Court’s decision risks emboldening open-border policies, incentivizing further illegal entries and straining public resources. Conservative principles demand robust enforcement of immigration laws to ensure public safety and economic stability, yet this ruling creates uncertainty, leaving communities vulnerable to the impacts of lax border control.

Congress must act swiftly to clarify the Alien Enemies Act’s scope, reinforcing the administration’s authority to secure the border. Activist courts should not obstruct lawful measures that prioritize citizens’ interests. Conservatives call for bold, unapologetic policies to restore order and safeguard the nation’s future against the perils of illegal immigration.

Corbett writes about myriad issues at My Desultory Blog.

______
MONDAY 4/21/25

Commentary by Sharon Lintner

If Mahmoud Khalil is deported, it will signal the end of free speech in the United States. The mere fact that he has been detained jeopardizes our First Amendment rights. [Khalil is the graduate student from the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, facing deportation over leading pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University over the war in Gaza.]

No more independent thinking, no opposing views without fear of severe, life changing retaliation.  

There's plenty more I'd like to say, but as I write this I'm wondering how long it will be until we cannot write about or verbally express a dissenting position?  That thought alone proves we are no longer free and cannot count on the protection of the First Amendment. 

The day that we pause and question whether it's safe to express our opinion is here: Today is that day. 

_____________________________________________

Send your COMMENTS by email to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

_____
WEDNESDAY 4/16/25

UPDATE – After first being denied access, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) (right) was able to meet with Kilmar Abrego Armando Garcia Thursday in El Salvador after the Salvadoran-born Marylander was deported by the Trump administration in March due to an ‘administrative error’ to the country's CECOT prison. Scroll down this column for more.

OUR WEEKEND UPDATE – The Supreme Court put the brakes, temporarily, on the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport immigrants, early Saturday (per The New York Times). 

“The government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of the court,” SCOTUS rule in an unsigned order. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito dissented in the 7-2 emergency order.

•••

Ceasefire, No Ceasefire – So much for ending the war in Ukraine on “day one.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio has left a meeting over a ceasefire deal between Kyiv and the Kremlin, with French President Emmanuel Macron, with little prospect for ending the war, or at least for obtaining a ceasefire commitment with Russia. 

“If it is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we need to move on,” Rubio said upon departure, according to The New York Times. The Trump White House will decide “in a matter of days whether or not this is doable in the next few weeks.”

No deal, deal … But a minerals deal between Kyiv and Washington is still on, according to The Kyiv Independent, which reports on a government memorandum that says Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal will visit D.C. with Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent Tuesday, April 21 to iron out technical details. The deal, which the newspaper describes as a joint reconstruction investment fund as part of an economic partnership, is to be completed by Saturday, April 26.

Upshot … So President Trump, whose State Department and special envoy first negotiated the failed ceasefire exclusively with Putin’s Kremlin gets to claim a win as the UK and European Union nations rush to fill in for the quickly retreating US assistance to Kyiv. 

•••

Fed Chair Has 12 Months – Will Jerome Powell still be chairman of the independent Federal Reserve when his term ends May 2026? President Trump clearly thinks not; that the executive who appointed Powell during his first term has the authority, the right, to fire him now. Even after naming Powell Fed chair in 2018, Trump quickly grew frustrated over the Fed’s conservatism toward lowering interest rates to boost Trump’s economy. 

With his well-documented naming of “yes-men” (and women) loyalists up and down the federal government, Trump has “for months privately discussed firing Fed Chair Powell,” according to The Wall Street Journal

But can he? The big debate in the business press is whether or not the president has the right, the authority. As the Fed digs in and potentially raises interest rates rather than lowering them in coming months as Trump’s tariff policy fuels inflation, we are almost certainly about to find out. 

Count on this … So long as the tension between inflation from tariffs and Fed interest rate policy continues as economists expect, Trump will test that known unknown of whether he has that authority.

•••

The CECOT Files – Headline in The New York Times Thursday evening reads, “Maryland Senator Meets With Wrongly Deported Man in El Salvador.” 

Here’s the thing: Headlines are limited by space, but Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran who was living in Maryland when he was deported in what the Trump administration calls an “administrative mistake” is one of more than 260 Salvadorans and Venezuelans rounded up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement without due process in March and flown to the prison, defying a federal judge’s order to turn the airplanes around.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) told NPR’s All Things Considered Thursday he was turned away from CECOT by Salvadoran soldiers about three kilometers short of the prison but was later allowed to meet with Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia for lunch in a hotel lobby. 

“Now that he’s been confirmed healthy,” said President/Cool Dictator Nayib Bukele, whose government has received $6 million, or $25,000 a head to imprison the immigrants flown out of the United States, “he gets the honor of staying in El Salvador’s custody (per NYT).

[60 Minutes reported April 6th that a review of criminal records found that 179 of 238 Venezuelans among those flown to CECOT had no criminal arrests, let alone convictions.]

Van Hollen said he called Abrego Garcia’s wife “to pass along his message of love.”

Meanwhile … The Trump White House continues to claim that Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 member and that even his wife and children back in Maryland are safer with him in a foreign prison, as the president has floated the idea of flying “violent” criminals who are American citizens to CECOT.  

--TL

_____________________________________________

THURSDAY 4/17/25

Fed Fight – President Trump is amping up the pressure on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, suggesting the chairman’s term should end before it’s over in May 2026. This is, as you may have guessed, about the tariffs.

“Powell’s termination cannot come fast enough!” Trump harumphed on social media Thursday morning, according to The Wall Street Journal. Powell “is always TOO LATE AND WRONG!” 

The president claimed, without evidence, that the US is taking in a lot of money from the tariffs.

Powell on Wednesday told the Economic Club of Chicago the Fed needs to make sure any price increases from tariffs do not lead to continuing inflationary pressures. 

“We’re never going to be influenced by any political pressure,” Powell said. “People can say whatever they want. That’s fine. That’s not a problem. But we will do what we do strictly without consideration of politics or any other extraneous factors.”

•••

Security for Peace – Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff are on their way to Paris to join with European and Ukrainian officials to talk security guarantees for Ukraine, per The Kyiv Independent. This time, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, who opposes such security guarantees for the country he invaded three years ago, is not in on the discussions.

Ahead of Rubio and Witkoff’s arrival, Ukraine’s head of the presidential office, Andriy Yermak, said Ukrainian and European officials “exchanged views on the next steps toward achieving a just and lasting peace.” Such steps include implementing a ceasefire, a reassurance force and effective security architecture for Ukraine.

Meanwhile … Rubio and his aides have shuttered the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub, which has tracked global disinformation from such foreign actors as Russia, China and Iran, The New York Times reports. Closing the office had been in the works pretty much since the beginning of Trump 47, as the State Department in March cancelled 80 contractors for it. Another 40 or so employees of the Hub were placed on paid leave as of Wednesday.

--TL

_____________________________________________

Judge Orders Expedited Discovery

WEDNESDAY 4/16/25

UPDATE: Judge James E. Boasberg has found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in contempt for deportation flights of mostly Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador’s CECOT prison (per The New York Times). The case is now almost certainly headed to the Supreme Court.

Boasberg, judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia has attempted in vain to determine from administration officials whether White House officials were deliberate in ignoring the judge’s order to turn two airplanes carrying migrants around and back to the US before reaching El Salvador.

“The court does not reach such conclusions lightly or hastily,” Boasberg wrote in his 46-page opinion. “Indeed, it has given defendants ample opportunity to explain their actions. None of their responses has been satisfactory.”

Saving Abrego Garcia – US District Judge Paula Xinis Tuesday ordered an expedited discovery process to determine what the federal government has and has not done to return to Maryland, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia from El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison for terrorists, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. The Trump administration admits it made an “administrative error” in throwing in Albrego Garcia with some 260 alleged “gangsters” in two flights to the prison, but continues to claim, without providing evidence, that Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang. 

Abrego Garcia’s attorneys say he has no criminal record.

“It is a fact now, of this record: Every day he is detained in CECOT is a day of irreparable harm,” Xinis said from the bench (per NPR). 

Judge Xinis’ expedited discovery directs attorneys for the Justice Department and for Abrego Garcia to conduct depositions within one week of Joseph Mazzaro, acting general counsel and Robert Cerna, acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office director. 

The case is most certainly headed back to the US Supreme Court, which already has ruled 9-0 that the government must “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return to the US.

Senator intervenes … Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) is off to meet Salvadoran President Nayib “World’s Coolest Dictator” Bukele this week to discuss return of Alberto Garcia, according to the senator’s website

•••

MTG Blames Dems for Disrupted Town Hall – Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (D-GA) blames Democrats for disrupting her town hall in Cobb County, Georgia, Tuesday, calling the incident “selfish”, The Hill reports. Such opinions, she said, are for the voting booth. 

At least six protestors were removed from the town hall, three of which were arrested and two of those stun-gunned. 

“I’m not intimidated by the Democrats who tried to shut down my town hall tonight,” MTG said.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

______
WEDNESDAY 4/16/25

So long as we can continue to publish, your civil comments backed by facts are welcome here. Which means, both the right column and the left column. 

For this column, conservatives of both the pro-MAGA and the anti-Trump stripes are welcome.

For the left column, we welcome moderates and the far left, and everyone in-between.

Please keep in mind that for either column, you are not expected to repeat, or always agree with, the talking points of “your side.” 

Send your COMMENTS by email to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

The Hustings is designed to spark civil discourse and honest debate among citizens who will certainly disagree on news and issues. Scroll down with the track bar on the far right to read recent debates and commentaries including …

Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s “This is Strategy?” questioning the White House whipsawing of tariffs, specifically the temporary suspension of tariffs on Chinese-imported smartphones, computers and semiconductors. 

Contributing Pundit Rich Corbett on how tariffs could prompt the return of American manufacturing in “Should the US Play the Tariff Game?”

In the left column, do not miss commentaries by contributing pundits Hugh Hansen, Sharon Lintner and Jim McCraw under the heading “About Those Tariffs.” Macaulay has a column about long-term implications for the US’s future economic leadership in the corresponding right column, “Trump Trashes Trust.”

_____
WEDNESDAY 4/16/25

Commentary by Jerry Lanson

In a letter Monday to the Harvard University community, President Alan M. Garber said that the university had rejected the ever-expanding demands of the Trump Administration to control what’s taught and learned on campus in exchange for continued federal research support.

He wrote: “Late Friday night, the administration issued an updated and expanded list of demands, warning that Harvard must comply if we intend to ‘maintain [our] financial relationship with the federal government...’

“They include requirements to ‘audit’ the viewpoints of our student body, faculty, staff, and to ‘reduc[e] the power’ of certain students, faculty, and administrators targeted because of their ideological views. We have informed the administration through our legal counsel that we will not accept their proposed agreement. The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.

“The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government. It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI. And it threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge. No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

Just what comes next in the university’s standoff with the Trump administration is uncertain. While Garber made clear the university’s willingness to investigate and address legitimate concerns about anti-semitism — the Trump administration’s hypocritical rationale for its attacks on top universities — he also made explicitly clear that the university would not accede to the administration’s demands. His letter ended: 

“Freedom of thought and inquiry, along with the government’s longstanding commitment to respect and protect it, has enabled universities to contribute in vital ways to a free society and to healthier, more prosperous lives for people everywhere. All of us share a stake in safeguarding that freedom. We proceed now, as always, with the conviction that the fearless and unfettered pursuit of truth liberates humanity -- and with faith in the enduring promise that America’s colleges and universities hold for our country and our world.”

The release of Garber’s letter’s came within an hour or two of a second major piece of news: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele announced that he would not release a Maryland father of three wrongly deported to a notorious jail there. Bukele was meeting with President Trump, who smiled approvingly as Bukele spoke, The New York Times reported.

Bukele’s statement — and Trump’s approving acquiescence — sets up a Constitutional crisis with the Supreme Court, which last week ordered the administration to “facilitate” the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The US has acknowledged the Maryland man was wrongly deported, but insisted it couldn’t bring him home without El Savador’s approval.

Garber’s statement pits the oldest, wealthiest and arguably most prestigious university in the United States against a president who has seemed determined to eviscerate the independence of American higher education.

The New York Times reported Monday that, “Mr. Trump and his top aides are exerting control of huge sums of federal research money to shift the ideological tilt of the higher education system, which they see as hostile to conservatives and intent on perpetuating liberalism.”

The administration’s threat to withdraw $9 billion of promised funding to Harvard and to defy the Supreme Court’s order sets up dual fronts in Trump’s effort to assert a level of authoritarian power never before seen in this country.This column originally appeared in Jerry’s Substack. Reprinted by permission.

_____________________________________________

Tariff Debate

There is a lot of opinion to read on this page and we hope, to spark your comments on President Trump’s wild global trade war. 

In today’s right column, be sure to read Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s “This is Strategy?” questioning the White House whipsawing of tariffs, specifically the temporary suspension of tariffs on Chinese-imported smartphones, computers and semiconductors. 

Scroll down with the far-right trackbar to read an alternate right-column take; Contributing Pundit Rich Corbett on how tariffs could prompt the return of American manufacturing in “Should the US Play the Tariff Game?”

As if these two opposing position columns are not enough to prompt your response, you can scroll further down the page to read left-column opinions by contributing pundits Hugh Hansen, Sharon Lintner and Jim McCraw under the heading “About Those Tariffs.” Macaulay has a column about long-term implications for the US’s future economic leadership in the corresponding right column, “Trump Trashes Trust.”

Send your COMMENTS by email to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

_____
MONDAY 4/14/25

TUESDAY 4/15/25

No Return –Just in time for baseball season, it was reminiscent of the century-old “Who’s On First?” routine. Think Abbot & Costello & Orbán. First, the Supreme Court had ruled that the Trump administration must “facilitate” return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador’s CECOT prison for terrorists, as the White House admits he was transferred there by mistake. 

President Trump, seen above meeting in the Oval Office Monday with El Salvador’s “self-styled world’s coolest dictator” Nayib Bukele – a description that so far Trump’s people have not challenged – told reporters that El Salvador first has to release Garcia. Trump passed the issue on to US Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“That’s up to El Salvador if they want to return him,” Bondi said. “That’s not up to us. That’s not up to us. If they want to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.”

To which Bukele replied (this exchange per The Atlantic); “I hope you’re not suggesting that I smuggle a terrorist into the United States. That is preposterous.”

It should be noted that by admitting Garcia, who has lived in Maryland since 2011, was transferred to CECOT by mistake, there is no evidence he is a terrorist or a gang member, though the White House now seems to want us to believe he is, by repeating with no proof that he is a gang member. It also should be noted that the US is paying El Salvador to imprison 261 alleged gangsters, most from Venezuela, there. 

Who’s next? … Trump suggested to Bukele that “home-growns are next,” though he subsequently clarified that to mean US citizens guilty of the most violent crimes, like pushing commuters in front of approaching New York subway trains. 

Who’s guilty? … It must be noted that Trump has had a tenuous grip of the concept of due process going back at least to 1989, when he called for the death penalty for the Central Park Five before they went to trial (they were exonerated in 2002) in full-page ads placed in The New York Times, New York Daily NewsNew York Post and Newsday

Constitutional crisis … Trump may not be the “world’s coolest dictator,” but he is ignoring due process while interpreting – pardon the use of this term – liberally SCOTUS’ ruling on Garcia’s return.

Satirist’s take … “I did not think he would get this authoritarian this fast,” host Jon Stewart said of Trump on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show Monday night.

Crisis? … Agree? Disagree? that the Trump White House has gone full-authoritarian and that we are in a constitutional crisis? Email your thoughts to editors@thehustings.news.

•••

Fed Cuts Off Harvard – The Trump administration Monday night froze more than $2.2 billion in federal funds to Harvard University, NPR’s Morning Edition reports, for refusing to eliminate DEI, failing to give merit-based admissions priority over race-based considerations and for being “supportive of terrorism or anti-Semitism.”

Read contributing pundit Jerry Lanson’s commentary, “Harvard Takes a Stand” in the left column.

--TL

_____________________________________________

MONDAY 4/14/25

'World's Coolest Dictator' Visits Trump White House

The ‘self-styled world’s coolest dictator,’ El Salvador’s president, Nayib Bukele, Monday becomes the first Latin American leader to visit President Trump at the White House, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. This photo is from a slick video Bukele’s administration posted on Elon Musk’s X-Twitter of the Trump administration’s deportation and imprisonment of hundreds of alleged Venezuelan and Salvadoran ‘gang members’ to El Salvador’s high-tech CECOT gulag, a ‘terrorism detention center.’

•••

Trade War Escalates – China has suspended export – to anywhere globally -- of a “wide range” of critical minerals and magnets, The New York Times reports, threatening to choke off supplies necessary for the automotive, aerospace, semiconductor and military contractor industries. Beijing is drafting a new regulatory system as part of its official retaliation for President Trump’s April 2 tariffs.

This comes after Trump pulled back on 145% tariffs on Chinese goods for smartphones, computers, semiconductors and other electronics in a rule issued late last Friday. 

For now … The White House’s delay Friday is, indeed, only a delay, Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick told ABC News’ This WeekSunday; New, special semiconductor tariffs will come in “a month or two.” [READ: Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s take, “This is Strategy?” in the right column.]

“All those products are going to come under semiconductors, and they’re going to have a special focus type of tariff to make sure that those products get reshored,” Lutnick told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl. “We need to have semiconductors, we need to have chips, and we need to have flat panels – we need to have these things made in America.”

•••

Russia Escalates War on Ukraine – Russia is “mocking” the 30-day ceasefire negotiated between the Trump administration and Ukraine -- but not Russia – Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski told Polish radio Monday according to The Kyiv Independent. Sikorski condemned Russia’s recent deadly attacks on Ukraine, including missiles on the city of Sumy that killed at least 34 and injured 119, and an April 4 attack on Kryvyi Rih that killed 20, including nine children, and injured more than 70. 

In an interview broadcast Sunday on CBS News’ 60 Minutes, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy urged President Trump to visit his country and talk to its citizens and soldiers.

“You think you understand” Russia’s war against Ukraine (which Trump promised to end on his first day in office), Zelenskyy told Scott Pelley. “Look, and then let’s move with a plan to end the war.”

•••

Arson on Penn Governor’s Mansion – Gov. Josh Shapiro and his family were evacuated from the Pennsylvania governor’s mansion early Sunday morning after a man scaled the property’s fence and ignited fires in the piano room and kitchen, LNP/Lancaster Online reports. State police have charged Cody A. Balmer, 38, with criminal homicide, aggravated arson, burglary and five related offenses after he allegedly started the fires with two beer bottle Molotov cocktails. Balmer told police he attempted the fires out of hatred for the Democratic governor and said he had planned to attack Shapiro with a sledgehammer.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
MONDAY 4/14/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

All of a sudden, the tariffs on smartphones, computers, semiconductors, and other electronics made in China received exemptions — not free passes. (There’s still the 20% tariff on Chinese goods predicated on the fentanyl issue.)

A few things need to be thought about in the context of a message that came from the US Customs and Border Protection agency. 

Why did Donald Trump do this? Is it because of his admiration for Xi Jinping? Unlikely.

Rather, it is probably because he knows that people care more about iPhones than they do about him and were the full-blown tariffs — as in 145% -- applied to them, people wouldn’t get angry at Tim Cook.

They’d blame Trump.

Second, note how this is seemingly a knee-jerk reaction.

Also notice how this retraction was not done by Trump with a flourish of a Sharpie. No, it came in a bulletin.

He certainly couldn’t be seen admitting that maybe the tariffs on iPhones would be le unpalatable to the American public.

(How much? The Wall Street Journal cited numbers from a research firm that calculate the parts of a 256 GB iPhone Pro costs Apple $550. So tariffs are applied to that number, not the number you find at an Apple store. In the case of that phone, the price is $1,099. So if Apple wants to recoup the money it is paying for tariffs, that gets added to the $1,099. Let’s say it is the 145% (the aforementioned 20% plus the remainder that will show up a few sentences from now): $550 + 145% = $797.50. Add that to the current $1,099 retail price and you get $1,896.50. And it should be noted that on April 10 the Consumer Price Index showed the price of a dozen eggs reached a new high, $6.23. Remember when Trump was running and said he would reduce prices?)

On April 2, so-called “Liberation Day” (liberation from what? 401(k)s?), a 34% tariff was announced on Chinese goods imported to the US. So what did the Chinese do a couple days later? They applied 34% tariffs on US goods. What did Trump do? He increased the tariff on China to 84% on April 8. 

Trump in his executive order on that: “In my judgment, this modification is necessary and appropriate to effectively address the threat to the national security and economy of the United States.”

Protecting national security is core to what a president should be doing.

So how does that square with this, from an executive order signed on April 4 about protecting TikTok:

“During this period, the Department of Justice shall take no action to enforce the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the “Act”) (Public Law 118-50, Div. H) or impose any penalties against any entity for any noncompliance with the Act, including for distributing, maintaining, or updating (or enabling the distribution, maintenance, or updating) of any foreign adversary controlled application as defined in the Act.”

Ah, maybe protecting the public from a “foreign adversary controlled” app is overrated.

Back to the tariffs.

What did China do in response to Trump raising the stakes?

It increased the duty on US goods to. . .84%.

What did Trump do? He raised the tariff on China to 125%. (With the other 20% tariff that gets to 145%.)

The explanation for this one:

“In my judgment, this modification is necessary and appropriate to effectively address the threat to US national and economic security posed by the PRC’s contribution to the conditions reflected in large and persistent trade deficits, including PRC industrial policies that have produced systemic excess manufacturing capacity in the PRC and suppressed US domestic manufacturing capacity, which conditions are made worse by the PRC’s recent actions.”

The ”large and persistent trade deficits” come from American companies buying lots of stuff from China that they sell in the American market.

The “industrial policies that have produced systemic excess manufacturing capacity in the PRC” “suppressed US domestic manufacturing capacity” only because US manufacturing companies didn’t — and don’t — have the same kind of support from their government to build factories.

The Trump Administration talks a lot about reducing regulations on companies. In some cases this is good, as it can facilitate getting things done with no red tape tripping them up. In other cases, the old phrase about “the fox guarding the hen house” comes to mind. Let’s face it, not all corporate managers are good actors.

But for the good ones: Just imagine how much time is being wasted by people at American companies right now trying to figure out their supply chains — only to have Trump swerve and remove some tariffs while adding others.

Business runs on facts and numbers, not on whims.

Funny thing: Nowhere does Team Trump indicate how many manufacturing jobs are going to be made in the US as a result of the president’s tariffs.

Nowhere is it pointed out that it takes years to build, equip and launch factories, so all of the talk about “temporary pain” is nonsense: Years of pain.

In addition to which: If companies build new factories in the US you can be absolutely sure that they are going to apply Industry 4.0 principles to it, which means AI, lots of automation. . .and not a whole lot of people.

Again, something that doesn’t get pointed out. 

And then there’s this from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on ABC’s This Week on the subject of the suspension of the tariffs on the silicon-based products from China: 

“We need to have these things made in America. We can’t be reliant on Southeast Asia for all the things that operate for us. So what he’s doing is he’s saying they’re exempt from the reciprocal tariffs, but they’re included in the semiconductor tariffs, which are coming probably in a month or two… . So this is not like a permanent sort of exemption.” 

Again, look at this: The tariffs are (mainly gone) from these products — but then they are likely to be back. When are they going to be back? Well, it might be one month or it might be two. Or maybe it will be next week

Trump has a persona of being a good businessman.

Anyone who ran a business like this would hear two words: “You’re fired!”

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_____
MONDAY 4/14/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

Quick quiz:

  • Who is Jaime Harrison?

Answer:

  • Harrison is the former chair of the Democratic National Committee. He was in that position from January 21, 2021 until February 1, 2025. Which means he was head of the DNC when Trump beat Harris. Harrison ran for the U.S. Senate in South Carolina in 2020. He was hammered by Lindsay Graham.

Second question:

  • Who is Ken Martin?

Answer:

  • Martin is the current chair of the DNC, having succeeded Harrison in February. Prior to heading up the DNC, Martin was the chair of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party. That party was formed in 1944. One of the supporters of the formation of the DFL was Hubert H. Humphrey. Humphrey was hammered by Richard Nixon in the 1968 Presidential Electoral College: 191 votes versus Nixon’s 301.

Third question:

  • Who is the current visible leader of the Democratic Party?

Answer:

  • I don’t know.

There had been the thought that somehow when Martin took the role at the DNC he would be out there, leading the Democrat response to whatever Trump is doing. That would be more than a full-time job.

Like him or not, you’ve got to acknowledge that Trump is certainly an active senior citizen by nearly any measure.

But maybe Martin is doing lots of things out of the broadcast, and more importantly, social media eyes. That is not good.

An argument could be made that the Lewis-Martin-like combo of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the visible face of the Democratic Party. Which is fine, assuming that the party imagines it can give up on the center and right electorate.

This is also the case with, say, Gavin Newsom. Not only do plenty of Americans look at California with more than a modicum of suspicion, but Newsom is undoubtedly a bit too slick for the majority of the voters.

James Carville had suggested that the Democrats just let Trump collapse on his own. But were that to happen (and arguably, if the markets continue to fall and the counter-tariffs take a big bite out of things like soybean sales from the great state of Louisiana (yes, we’re looking at you, Mike Johnson), then this may happen), remember:

Nature abhors a vacuum.

And the Dems would have no one in place to take the mantle of leadership. . .which would leave things in the hands of JD Vance.

Not exactly the kind of alternative that the Democrats have in mind.

But given what they haven’t done, it seems they’re not all that keen on winning.

And on that subject, remember that in 2016 Trump said:

“We’re gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you’ll say, ‘Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it anymore, Mr. President, it’s too much.’ 

And I’ll say, ‘No it isn’t. We have to keep winning. We have to win more!’”

Even when he isn’t winning he’s still winning vis-à-vis today’s Democratic Party.

_____
FRIDAY 4/11/25

<<<This is not a debate.>>> Contributing Pundit Rich Corbett, in the right column, responds to Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s commentary from last week, “Trump Trashes Trust” and left-column contributors’ “About Those Tariffs” with his column supporting the White House tariff policy. Meanwhile, Macaulay finds himself in the left column, where he laments lack of Democratic Party leadership in resisting Trump. Submit your own COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news.

US-China Tariffs Settle In – China raised its tariffs on US imports to 125% as the Trump White House clarified that its total tariff level on Chinese imports is 145%, The Wall Street Journal reports. 

Beijing says that’s enough: “Even if the US continues to impose higher tariffs, it would be economically meaningless and would become a joke in the history of the world economy,” China’s tariff commission said in a statement. 

There is much truth to that, if only because China is largely an export nation – the basic reason for the Trump White House’s aggressive tariff policy on the country to begin with – selling us computer semiconductors, “fast fashion” and something like 60% of everything sold at Walmart. 

Bonds. Treasury bonds … Meanwhile, APM’s Marketplace Morning Edition reports that President Trump’s clawback on reciprocal tariffs Wednesday, which for an afternoon reversed Wall Street’s steep slide in share values, had as much to do with concern over bond values as for stock values. Usually, bond values rise when stock prices fall, but after Trump’s initial tariff announcement last week, both stocks and bonds took a dive, indicating investors were losing confidence in US Treasury bonds.

Uh oh, Canada … WSJ further reports that Canada’s new prime minister, Mark Carney, will counter “unjustified” US tariffs of 25% on steel, aluminum – make that “aluminium” – and autos and inflict “maximum pain.” The puck drops here.

•••

‘Big, Beautiful,’ Complicated – The House passed the blueprint, already approved by the Senate, for President Trump’s all-in-one “big, beautiful budget” bill Thursday on a knife’s-edge 216-214 vote, with Republican Reps. Victoria Spartz of Indiana and Thomas Massie of Kentucky joining all Democrats in opposition (per Politico). Now comes the hard part: Finding at least $1.5 trillion in spending cuts while offsetting the 2017 Trump tax cuts and other White House priorities, without worrying Social Security and Medicare recipients. 

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, of South Dakota, acknowledged to reporters that his Republican colleagues are divided over how to achieve all the above, according to The Hill.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
FRIDAY 4/11/25

Commentary by Rich Corbett

Tariffs have long been a divisive topic in economics. For decades, mainstream economists have championed free trade, arguing that tariffs — essentially a tax on imports ultimately paid by consumers — hinder economic growth by disrupting the free flow of goods across borders.

For most of my life, I’ve been a proponent of free — but fair — trade. I believed in the principle that “a rising tide lifts all boats,” and that less government intervention and lower taxes were the best ways to empower consumers. Free trade not only fosters economic efficiency but also reduces the likelihood of conflict by creating mutual interdependence among nations. In contrast, tariffs — as a form of taxation — distort markets by placing a thumb on the scale.

Yet, not everyone agrees that tariffs are the villain they’re often made out to be. Some see them as a legitimate tool to address the downsides of globalization, unfair trade practices, and the protectionist barriers used by other countries.

Let’s begin with the conventional wisdom. Economists have traditionally viewed tariffs as a net negative. When a country imposes tariffs on imported goods, it drives up prices for its own consumers. The result? Less competition, higher costs, and a drag on efficiency. Free trade, on the other hand, encourages specialization — countries focus on producing what they do best, and consumers benefit from cheaper, higher-quality products. This logic has driven decades of trade liberalization, from the creation of the World Trade Organization to sweeping agreements like NAFTA.

The data supports this view: global economic growth has surged under freer trade. However, for many Americans, the benefits of globalization have come with a bitter aftertaste — lost jobs, shuttered factories, and the growing perception that the system no longer works in their favor. This is where tariffs reenter the conversation.

When manufacturing jobs vanish in regions like the Rust Belt, the promised retraining programs and new opportunities often fail to materialize. Meanwhile, foreign competitors sometimes enjoy advantages such as lax labor standards, government subsidies, or currency manipulation — conditions that feel less like fair competition and more like exploitation.

From this perspective, tariffs become a counterpunch. The United States, with its vast consumer market, has leverage. Why not use it? Under President Trump’s “Liberation Day” declaration, tariffs were used as a tool to protect American workers and to pressure trading partners into fairer deals. Consider the trade war with China: tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods were intended to address long-standing issues like intellectual property theft and trade imbalances. Whether they succeeded fully remains a matter of debate.

Beyond the economic implications, tariffs carry political weight. They convey strength — a willingness to stand up for the “little guy” against the impersonal forces of globalization. This has made them particularly appealing in current US policy, especially in sectors such as steel and aluminum, which have strong constituencies in politically significant states. Tariffs are now seen not only as an economic tool but also as a matter of national security — critical to ensuring the country’s industrial capacity in the event of another global conflict.

Still, tariffs carry broad economic costs. They raise input prices for businesses and ultimately increase costs for consumers. Retaliation is another risk — as seen when American soybean farmers lost export markets during recent trade disputes. The tension is inescapable: tariffs are a high-stakes gamble, not a silver bullet.

To free-trade purists, tariffs are an outdated and blunt instrument. To others, they represent a means of reclaiming control in a global economy that has left too many behind. As international trade continues to evolve, the debate over tariffs isn’t going away. In fact, they remain a fixture in global economic policy — whether the United States embraces them or not.

Whether viewed as a strategic lever or a flawed relic, tariffs force us to confront the trade-offs in today’s deeply interconnected world.

Corbett writes about a variety of subjects, including tariffs and the economy, at My Desultory Blog.

_____
FRIDAY 4/11/25

Commentary by Jim McCraw

I didn’t expect very much. After all, The Villages, the world’s largest retirement community, with some 150,00 people (including the added developments of Middleton and Eastport), located in central Florida, is about as Republican as you can find anywhere, with a huge military, police, fire, EMT and nursing population in Republican Ron DeSantis’ state, represented by Republicans Rick Scott and Ashley Moody in the Senate and Daniel Webster in the House. Trumpians all.

But I was wrong. Old Mill Run, Morse Boulevard, and Stillwater Trail, three major arteries in the Lake Sumter Landing part of The Villages, were, by 1 p.m. Saturday, mobbed with 5,000 sign-carrying, t-shirt-wearing Hands Off! protesters of every political stripe, probably because of Trump’s threats to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Veterans Administration health system.

Sumter County sheriffs cruised through the area every 10 minutes or so just to show a presence that wasn’t needed. Sympathetic drivers honked their horns, waved their arms out their car windows, showed thumbs-up and/or camera phones all afternoon long. As I roamed around the area, I saw more and more truly clever and smartass t-shirts and homemade signs, and I felt a bit like I was back in Washington, D.C. in 1970 when Vietnam was raging and we were all pissed off. It felt really good, really inspiring to see so many concerned citizens exercising their First Amendment rights. Yes, there was one guy circling in an SUV with Trump World signs and American flags on it, but all he got was The Finger every time he came by. What a day. What a downright historic day.

McCraw is a contributing pundit for The Hustings. He lives in The Villages, Florida.

_____
TUESDAY 4/8/25

The Consumer Price Index was -0.1% for March month-over-month, for an annual rate of 2.4%, easing from February’s 2.8%. The Labor Department credits lower gas prices last month for much of the decrease; Its CPI for all items less food and energy was 2.8%. [Bureau of Labor Statistics chart]

THURSDAY 4/10/25

<<<In the left column: Contributing Pundit Jim McCraw on a successful Hands Off! rally at The Villages, Florida. [PHOTO: Jim McCraw]

In the right column: Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay on TikTok>>>

Don’t miss The Gray Area: Contributing Editor Charles Dervarics analysis of the Trump Tariffs.

•••

UPDATE: There doesn't have to be a morning after. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell below 40,000 points early Thursday, off 832.69 points, or nearly 2% just before 10:30 a.m. ET. The more volatile, tech-heavy NASDAQ was down more than 3%.

Turns Out Wall Street Likes Free Trade – The Dow Jones Industrial Averages ended Wednesday up 2,963 points, or +7.87%, to 40,608.45 as the tech-heavy NASDAQ finished +12.16%.

•••

Tariffick or Tarrifying – The Trump White House will hold international court the next 90 days as trade representatives come to Washington to negotiate tariffs downward. Meanwhile, the base tariff of 10%, tariffs of 25% on import autos and a 125% tariff on – attention, Walmart shoppers – all Chinese goods remain. 

C’mon, let’s get yippy … President Trump told reporters Wednesday he suspended his reciprocal tariffs just hours after they kicked in because people were getting “yippy.” Presumably, this includes people on Wall Street, where the tariffs announced last week sent stock prices on a steep slide. 

Down-Schiff … Democrats in Congress will begin investigating Trump’s Truth Social post hours ahead of his tariff-suspension announcement that it’s a good time to, essentially, get over your yips and start buying shares at bargain prices, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said Wednesday (per Newsweek).

Trump’s Truth Social post read, “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY! DJT.” 

Schiff posted a video on X-Twitter saying, “So the question is between that tweet and Donald Trump’s announcement that he was reducing the tariffs on most other nations apart from China, the question is who knew what the president was gonna do and did people around the president trade stock knowing the incredible gyrations the market was going to see?”

•••

Trump Targets His Own (Ex-) Men – President Trump has issued directives to his Justice Department to investigate his first administraiton’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency chief, Christopher Krebs, and former senior Homeland Security department official Miles Taylor, Politico reports. 

The directive to scrutinize Krebs reads, in part, that he “is a significant bad-faith actor who weaponized and abused his Government authority.” The Trump White House accuses Krebs of suppressing conservative viewpoints and “covertly worked to blind the American public” about the controversy around Hunter Biden’s laptop, “falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen,” and “skewed the bona fide debate about COVID-19 by attempting to discredit widely shared views that ran contrary to CISA’s favored perspective.”

--TL

_____________________________________________

WEDNESDAY 4/9/25

UPDATE: Stocks Surge on 90-Day Tariff Delay -- Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent Wednesday announced a 90-day delay on tariffs for most countries, while increasing the US tariff on China to 125%, The Associated Press reports. As of 2 p.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 2,503 points, or +6.65%, to 40,148.36. The tech-heavy NASDAQ was up 9.6%.

They’re Called 'Reciprocal Tariffs' – And China has raised its tariffs on US imports from 34% to 84%, matching President Trump’s latest tariff on Chinese goods. Except … Trump has retaliated on the retaliation – yes, that’s a trade war – by raising tariffs on China to 104%, The Wall Street Journal reports. Beijing’s 84% tariff is to take effect Thursday.

Does it matter?... This is a sort of easy one between Trump and Xi Jingping. China doesn’t let many US imports in, with companies like Apple and General Motors having major production capabilities there. GM produces in China for Chinese consumers, for example, where its sales have fallen precipitously in the last decade as the country boosts its own, home-grown auto industry. 

This will hurt … But American consumers will feel the pinch with these US and Chinese tariffs hitting electronics, home goods and apparel hard, Mary Lovely, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told NPR’s Morning Edition.

Semiconductor exemption … Apple and other such tech companies that source semiconductors from China are alright, for now, as Trump carved out an exemption for Chinese-sourced semiconductors last week, according to WIRED. However, three days after the initial relief from this carve-out, the White House published a list of the exemptions that does not include many types of chip-related goods.

This may help … About 70 countries have approached the White House to begin negotiations. This means Trump will get exactly what he wants from the tariffs; World leaders coming to him for these negotiations, giving him the chance to display his Art of the Deal chops. 

--TL

_____________________________________________

Negotiating Tariffs?

TUESDAY 4/8/25

UPDATE II: Poof. At the end of the day, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent's trial balloon about negotiating downward the Trump White House's stiff tariffs did not claim back any of the value lost from the stock market slide of the past half-week. After a healthy rally Tuesday morning, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped into the red by mid-afternoon, closing at 37,645.59 points, off 320.01, or -0.84%. Meanwhile, the White House says tariffs of 104% on Chinese goods are set to take effect after midnight Tuesday.

UPDATE: Bargain-hunting or bullish, again? As of 12:15 p.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 875.25 points, or 2.31%, to 38,840.45. The tech-heavy NASDAQ was up 2.28%.

China’s Not Negotiating – President Trump says he will add another 50% tariff on Chinese imports if Beijing doesn’t drop plans to retaliate against extra US levies. Beijing responded thusly, The Wall Street Journal reports, citing the country’s Commerce Ministry: “If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.”

But maybe Trump is … US stock futures and global equities look to claw back ground lost in the last three trading days after Trump signaled to reporters, as he met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Monday, that he is willing to discuss lower tariffs with Japan, Israel and other countries, according to the WSJ. Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent indicated he would give Japan priority in trade talks.

Trump says he will not suspend tariffs while negotiating over them, however.

•••

Alien Enemies On, for Now – The Supreme Court issued a narrow procedural ruling Monday night that allows the Trump administration to continue deporting migrants under the Alien Enemies Act, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. The ruling overturns, for now, a lower court ruling that would have put a temporary stop to the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. CBS News’ 60 Minutes reported Sunday that 179 of 238 Venezuelans flown to CECOT three weeks ago have no criminal records nor even of criminal arrests.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
TUESDAY 4/8/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

Back in April 2024, when members of Congress actually did things besides (a) robotically following their Dear Leader or (b) acting like a flock of decapitated chickens, they passed a law that gave ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns and operates TikTok, nine months to sell the social media platform.

Joe Biden signed it right away.

The bill has it that the sale was to be complete by January 19, 2025.

There was something of a sweetener in the bill for ByteDance. If there was a sale in process when the clock ran out of time, there was a three-month extension.

On January 19, there was no deal in the offing. 

TikTok went dark.

People throughout the country found themselves confused and bereft. 

But Donald Trump, Sharpie in hand, to the rescue.

Day One he signed a 75-day extension to keep the toks tiking.

That means ByteDance and whomever had until April 5.

Well, that hasn’t worked out, either.

So Trump has signed another 75-day extension.

Two things about this.

  1. Congress passed a bill. The then-president signed it. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law banning TikTok. Yet Trump has simply chosen to ignore that. And the Republican-led Congress has let him do it. According to an essay published by the National Constitution Center on Article II, Section 3 by Marshall and Prakash, there is something known as the “Take Care Clause.” The authors note: “The Take Care Clause is arguably a major source of presidential power because it seemingly invests the office with broad enforcement authority. Yet, at the same time, the provision also serves as a major limitation on that power because it underscores that the executive is under a duty to faithfully execute the laws of Congress and not disregard them.” (Emphasis added) So what is Congress doing about Trump ignoring this law? Nothing.
  2. The name of the bill in question is the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act.” That “Foreign Adversary” bit refers to China. The reason it was enacted was because there was concern the Chinese are hoovering up all manner of data about American citizens as well as using the platform to perform acts of undue influence. Said more simply: TikTok represents a NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT—to put it as Trump should put it on Truth Social.

Why is it OK that the president (a) ignores the law and (b) permits a “Foreign Adversary” to have access to an estimated 33% of the U.S. population?

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_____
TUESDAY 4/8/25