By Todd Lassa

Most arguments were familiar to anyone paying attention to the presidential race between former Vice President Joe Biden and President Donald J. Trump, but the first debate of the election season quickly devolved into something never seen on non-fiction television. At one point, moderator Chris Wallace of Fox News called out President Trump’s campaign for his constant violation of an agreement to let each candidate speak for two minutes uninterrupted.

Trump’s apparent plan was to steamroll both Biden and moderator Wallace. Biden called Trump a “clown” even before the debate really fell apart. 

When later in the debate, Wallace and Biden both pressed Trump to denounce White supremacists, Trump told the Proud Boys to “Stand back and stand by,” but put all the blame on antifa for sparking what he described as violent protests in cities across the nation.

The incumbent said he fixed the Veterans Administration and described the Obama/Biden administration’s attempt to do so a failure. Biden used this as an opportunity to bring up Trump’s criticism of U.S. troops who have died for our country as “losers” and “suckers” (as described in a story in The Atlantic). He noted his late son, Beau’s service in the Army, which in turn gave Trump the opportunity to raise the issue of Biden’s other son, Hunter, repeating accusations largely discredited, that Hunter landed a lucrative job with Ukrainian energy company Burisma thanks to the former vice president’s influence.

Trump said Biden’s program to reduce carbon emissions by producing sustainable energy jobs is actually the Green New Deal, and that Biden is beholden to the Democratic party’s far-left. 

Biden slammed Trump’s “It is what it is” comment about U.S. coronavirus fatalities, now more than 200,000. “It is what it is because of who you are. You panicked,” Biden said. “I laid out back in March what we should be doing,” Biden continued, “then I laid out back in July what we should be doing . . . . Get out of your bunker – your sand trap.”

Trump repeated his assertion that his Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Robert Redfield made a mistake when he estimated it will be Summer 2021, instead of late this October, before the U.S. has an effective, widely distributed vaccine.

Touting what he considers his greatest achievement, Trump said, “We built the biggest economy in history. We closed it because of the China plague. The fact is, we closed it down and now we’re reopening it. He will shut it down again.” He repeated his charge that Democrats want to re-close the economy to assure Biden’s victory Nov. 3, and he insisted that unsolicited mail-in ballots are fraudulently affecting the election and called on his supporters to monitor polls. 

“If he loses, he’s going to go,” Biden responded. “He can’t stay in power.”

The next debate is October 7 at the University of Utah, between running mates Mike Pence and Kamala Harris.

Please address your comments to editors@thehustings.news

—–

By Bryan Williams

I stopped watching cable TV news more than a decade ago, and anyway, because of my two-hour evening commute in the Pacific time zone instead listened to the first presidential debate of the 2020 season on National Public Radio.

The lack of visuals intensified the cacophony of people talking over each other, and all three men on the debate stage at Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University did just that. And yes, President Trump started it and was the worst offender. What to think of 2020’s version of John McLaughlin (Trump) and Eleanor Clift (Biden)? 

Biden didn’t fall into guffawing senility as portrayed in so many YouTube videos, and he did a good job staying on topic and speaking articulately, was bright at times, and made some clean platitudes. I’m sure Biden looked nice too, but he wasn’t able to land a knockout punch. It wasn’t the storybook performance his supporters might have hoped for.

Trump, predictably, put on a bombastic show, and I laughed out loud at many of his quips and retorts. Did he knock it out of the park? Yes and no. He could have hit Biden harder on a lot of the former vice president’s more glaring racial remarks from earlier in the campaign season. Statements like, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or for Trump, then you ain’t black,” and his comparison between political diversity in the Hispanic community, versus the Black community still makes me blush. 

Trump could have better connected some of his points about the way California is being run to what Biden has in store for the United States. I was able to connect those dots, and I’m sure others following the debate were able to as well. Those dots point to Joe Biden’s plan to move the nation toward what my home state is already: A bureaucratically bloated, ultra-liberal, high-tax, pie-in-the-sky progressive dystopia. Trump said, “What they’ve done in California is just crazy,” and he is 100-percent correct.


Williams is a mental health professional in California, and was involved in local, state, and federal Republican politics from 2005-2019.

Please address your comments to editors@thehustings.news

—–

This is representative of the Left-Column commentary The Hustings will soon present from among a collection of contributing pundits.

Four of the nine justices on the U.S. Supreme Court have been nominated by presidents (George W. Bush and Donald J. Trump) who lost the popular vote for their first terms, but won via the Electoral College. There will be five, more than half the court, if the Senate votes to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Trump’s choice, which would be his third nominee. 

“To jam this nominee through the Senate is just a raw exercise in political power,” Biden said Sunday. 

The certain hard-right conservative majority on the Supreme Court that surely would result with the nomination of someone like Amy Coney Barrett or Barbara Lagos would be chosen by a minority of voters; both of President Trump and of the 53-member majority from predominantly low-population states. Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine) have said they will not vote for Trump’s nominee before the election, but it is time for two more Republicans to join them. 

-30-

Please address your comments to editors@thehustings.news

—–

By Todd Lassa

Lines have been drawn in what could be the biggest political battle since The Reconstruction, following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Friday. President Trump says he will nominate a woman to Ginsburg’s seat this week and expects the Senate to approve his choice before the presidential election, just 43 days away. 

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden called on the Senate to honor Ginsburg’s wishes, as the progressive icon told her granddaughter, Clara Spera, before her death, as NPR reported. 

Ginsburg told her granddaughter she requests that “I will not be replaced until a new president is installed,” NPR’s Nina Totenberg reported. 

But by Sunday, NPR was reporting that Trump followers’ “Build the Wall!” t-shirts had been supplanted with “Fill the Seat!” shirts. The argument that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who blocked President Obama’s nominee to replace the late Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia, with Merrick Garland for nine months leading up to the 2016 election was being hypocritical in pushing Trump’s expected 2020 nominee seemed resolved by Sunday as representative of the state of our Red and Blue political gulf. 

Even if the Senate fails to approve Trump’s nominee before the election, there is a very good chance the Republican majority could push her through before the January 20, 2021, inauguration.

Thus the November 3 presidential election, which is already underway in various states with early and mail-in voting, appears to hinge on Trump’s replacement for Ginsburg. The U.S. Supreme Court begins its new session on October 5, when it will take up a case on a Trump administration challenge to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), and may even have to consider challenges to the outcome of the presidential election, which most analysts and pundits agree will not be settled on November 3.

-30-

Please address your comments to editors@thehustings.news

—–

This is representative of the Right-Column commentary The Hustings will soon present from among a collection of contributing pundits.

President Trump says he will name a woman to the Supreme Court to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg this week, The Wall Street Journal reports on its front page. A commentary on the Journal’s op-ed page argues that the 2016 presidential and 2018 midterm elections, the latter of which retained a Republican majority in the Senate, negates Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s alleged hypocrisy regarding the chamber’s handling of the nominee. 

Voters “showed clear preference for Trump’s nominees,” the editorial posits. 

Meanwhile, The New York Times Sunday quoted a voter on how Trump’s support for anti-abortion judges has built support by evangelical voters.

“This is why we wanted this guy,” the evangelical voter said.

-30-

Please address your comments to editors@thehustings.news

—–