Whether you’re left or right, conservative or liberal, progressive or pro-Trump, your civil comments on Thursday night’s CNN interview with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are welcome here. We treat readers’ comments in the same manner that traditional newspapers handle letters to the editor, which means no false facts or personal attacks and none of the conspiracy theories or extremism that social media sites like X-Twitter, Telegraph and Facebook allow while hiding behind Section 230.

We are your safe space for civil discussion among conservatives and liberals. 

To submit your comments, use the Comment section in this column or the column on the right, or email editors@thehustings.newsand please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

And please be sure to sign up for our free newsletter at https://thehustings.substack.com.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Todd Lassa

Vice President Kamala Harris has been in a precarious position since she became the Democratic Party’s last-minute presidential candidate in late July. It should not be a surprise or even a disappointment among her supporters, at least, that she waited a week after formally accepting that nomination at the Democratic National Convention before her sit-down interview along with her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, by CNN’s Dana Bash.

Democrats have been clamoring for an agenda that would be new and fresh and a departure of some sort from President Joe Biden’s. Republicans have wielded this alleged lack of clarity by the Harris/Walz campaign as a political weapon.

We learned this Thursday evening: The Harris/Walz campaign will not back off Bidenomics. It is, after all, not just the Harris/Walz agenda but also the Democratic Party agenda. Harris will not be distracted by Republican candidate Donald J. Trump’s often gender- and racially charged personal attacks. 

The Harris/Walz campaign will continue to support and arm the Israeli government, but acknowledges the suffering of the Palestinian people in Gaza, with constant, ongoing efforts to reach a ceasefire in the war. The desire for a ceasefire to happen during the Biden administration, before the November 5 election in order to secure support by Democrats threatening to withhold their votes over the war seems wishful thinking as negotiations between the Israeli government and Hamas continue to go nowhere.

The vice president made it clear she will continue to push back against Republicans’ attacks on her work as “border czar” (even the question of whether Harris had that designation is contentious) by calling out Trump for killing the bipartisan border bill. She said she would name a Republican to her cabinet, like Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama -- but not Donald J. Trump -- before her.

Harris told Bash she has opposed a fracking ban since 2020 (when she joined Joe Biden’s campaign – and after she signed on as senator from California to the New Green Deal in 2019, which included a ban on fracking) and she is “very proud of the work that we have done that has brought inflation down to less than 3%, the work that we have done to cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for seniors,” adding that Trump said he would “do a number of things, including allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Never happened. We did it.”

A Harris/Walz administration would invest in small business, reinstate the $6,000 child tax credit and promote affordable housing, including with a tax credit for first time home buyers. This is essentially a modification of Bidenomics, the middle-up economic policy that for three-and-a-half years, with investment in clean energy and transportation and in the nation’s infrastructure has slowly been reversing the “trickle-down” supply side Reaganomics of the previous 40 years.

“My values have not changed,” Harris said Thursday night. Though if she and Walz prevail in November and they can advance some of these initiatives through Congress next year the term “Bidenomics” could transform into “Harrisnomics.” 

-- FRIDAY, Aug. 30, 2024

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

What did Mike Pence do while serving as vice president? There was the important act of obeying the law on January 6, 2021. But other than that?

[PLEASE SCROLL DOWN this column for reader comments on the interview --Ed.]

What did Joe Biden do except make a remark that resulted in President Obama having to come out an announce his support of same-sex marriage?

Arguably Dick Cheney did more while in office than even he would probably admit to.

Al Gore, of course, invented the Internet, but that was before he moved into Number One Observatory Circle.

And Dan Quayle’s contribution to the polity was making it clear that there needs to be greater support for elementary education, particularly when it comes to spelling skills.

The point is, vice presidents don’t do a whole lot outside of ceremonial activities. Yes, the Constitution has it that the vice president is the president of the Senate, “but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.” A tie-breaker. Swell. 

Then there is the 25th Amendment. Section 1 puts it tersely: “In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.”

Section 4 is a bit more robust as it says, in part, “Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.”

While we’ve seen Section 1 in action since 1963, with Johnson succeeding Kennedy after the assassination, and in 1974, when Nixon resigned and Ford assumed the office, Section 4 hasn’t happened. Which is probably a good thing.

Which brings me to the Kamala Harris CNN interview. The observation about the vice presidency and warm spit comes to mind.

There are those who tie Biden’s policy to her, as though she had something to do with them. 

In the early 1920s, when Warren Harding was president, there was a bit of a change for the vice president. As the White House Historical Association puts it: “As vice president to President Warren G. Harding, Coolidge had little to do aside from presiding over the Senate, although the gracious Harding invited him to regularly attend cabinet meetings.”

Presumably the vice president’s role in the cabinet is not unlike that of a tourist.

There are those who seem to think that Harris should break with Biden in a big way. But realize that she has to work with the man until noon on January 20, 2025 no matter who wins the 2024 election, so it is probably better to be civil.

Did she do well during the interview with Dana Bash. Yes.

But what is probably more to the point is to make a comparison between that press conference and, say, Donald Trump’s at Mar-a-Lago on August 12.

He opened, “Hello, everybody. Well, thank you very much. Appreciate your being here. Just a statement before I talk about debates.”

Then rolled into things including, “I think that our country is right now in the most dangerous position it’s ever been in from an economic standpoint, from a safety standpoint. Both gangs on the street and frankly gangs outside of our country in the form of other countries that are frankly very powerful. They’re very powerful countries and we don’t know what we’re doing.”

Gangs that are very powerful countries?

And: “We have a very, very sick country right now. You saw the other day with the stock market crash. That was just the beginning. That was just the beginning. It’s going to get worse. It’s going to get a lot worse in my opinion. . . .”

On the day of that press conference the Dow closed at 41,086.81. On the day of Harris’ press conference it closed at 41,577.97.

While past performance is not indicative of future results, a Dow that’s been over 40,000 since mid-May doesn’t seem sick.

He went on and on until he got to the debates.

“With all of that being said, I think it’s very important to have debates and we’ve agreed with Fox on a date of September 4th. We’ve agreed with NBC, fairly full agreement subject to them on September 10th, and we’ve agreed with ABC on September 25th.”

Turns out that the September 4 Fox debate was, for example, something that the “we” he used was inclusive of him and only him.

The point it, Trump gives a press conference and pretty much makes a whole lot of stuff up and the general response is a shrug and a “that’s just Trump.”

If we think press conferences from presidential candidates are important, shouldn’t we hold them to some standards?

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_____________________________________________

On the Harris/Walz CNN Interview

In a country like ours, it is difficult to believe that the best and brightest that Democrats have to offer in 2024 is Kamala Harris. What happened to the party who produced presidents like Kennedy, Clinton, Obama and frankly even Joe Biden? A couple of them never missed a chance to talk to the press or explain their political positions and policies. As a Reagan conservative, I disagreed politically with the last three, but I never doubted their ability to serve as POTUS. Donald Trump and JD Vance face the media every day and are clear about their positions and policies. Like them or not, Americans know where they stand, and voters can at least be confident that Donald Trump knows how to serve as president at home and abroad. 

After watching Kamala Harris uncomfortably struggle her way through “The First Interview” with Tim Walz filling in the gaps, there is little reason to be confident that she has a “clear” plan or positions that Americans can confidently believe. Just because Harris tells us that “she’s been very clear” … she has clearly flip-flopped on several positions. I’m left thinking it was just another word salad and filled with way too much chit-chat that covered little substance of importance to Americans.

--Rich Corbett

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Dear left and right, liberals and conservatives, pro-MAGA and progressives, we seek your opinions on our center-column political news aggregate and right- or left-column commentaries. Up for discussion most recently are…

What questions are most important for CNN’s Dana Bash to ask Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in their first joint interview Thursday evening?

Do you think the latest indictment filed against Donald J. Trump for alleged efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election will go anywhere? Should it?

Mark Zuckerberg says the Biden administration “pressured” him to censor certain COVID pandemic content on his Facebook. What do you think?

Be sure to sign up for our free newsletter at https://thehustings.substack.com.

To submit your comments, use the Comment section in this column or the column on the right, or email editors@thehustings.newsand please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

_____

TONIGHT – The Democratic Party presidential ticket of VP Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz sit for their first joint interview on CNN at 9 pm Eastern with chief political correspondent and anchor Dana Bash.

THURSDAY 8/29/24

Federal Violation? – It was a prime opportunity for the Trump/Vance campaign: Take the former president to Arlington National Cemetery for a wreath-laying ceremony that would highlight the third anniversary of the tragic withdrawal from Afghanistan by the Biden/Harris administration, that resulted in the killing of 13 US service members. The Trump/Vance campaign posted a 21-second TikTok video of the ceremony that “likely violates” federal law prohibiting the use of military cemeteries for campaigning purposes, NPR, which scooped the story of the wreath-laying on Monday’s All Things Considered

A cemetery official or officials tried to prevent Trump staffers from filming and photographing in a section where recent US military casualties are buried, a source told NPR, but campaign staffers verbally abused and pushed an official aside. 

Campaign spokesman Steven Cheung responded to the cemetery staffer’s statement, saying; “We are prepared to release footage if such defamatory claims are made.”

•••

Still a Tight Race – We hope you weren’t expecting to see any clarity in the Harris v. Trump presidential race after their parties’ conventions concluded. A new Emerson College/The Hill poll shows the two in a tight race, still, with Harris leading in three key states, but only within the margin of error.

In Georgia, Kamala Harris leads Donald J. Trump 49% to 48%; in Michigan, she leads 50% to 47% and in Nevada, she leads 49% to 48%. 

Trump leads Harris in Arizona, 50% to 47%. He leads in North Carolina 49% to 48%, and in Wisconsin, 49% to 48%. 

The two candidates are tied at 48% in Pennsylvania.

--TL

_____________________________________________

WEDNESDAY 8/28/24

Reindicted, and We Knew You Would – After the Supreme Court granted the former president immunity for all official acts under his administration in a 6-3 ruling, a federal grand jury has reindicted Donald J. Trump on four felony charges connected to his efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election. The 36-page indictment issued by special counsel Jack Smith removes some specific allegations and removes those alleged co-conspirators from the original indictment, who were working in the administration at the time, according to Politico.

The original 45-page indictment issued in August 2023 was threatened by SCOTUS’ decision July 1. 

The four counts of the new United States of America v. Donald J. Trump are…

Count 1: Conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Count 2: Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding.

Count 3: Obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding.

Count 4: Conspiracy against rights.

More to come from SCOTUS … Promoting her memoir, Lovely One in an interview Tuesday with Managing Editor Nora O’Donnell on CBS Evening News Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said she’s as “prepared as anyone can be” for the November 5 presidential election to end up in the US Supreme Court.

“I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide immunity for one individual under one set of circumstances, when we have a criminal justice system that had ordinarily treated everyone the same,” she told O’Donnell.

•••

Zuckerberg Hedges His Bets – Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says he was “pressured” by the Biden administration to censor some content around COVID-19 early during the pandemic. You know, the conspiracy theories, bleach-ingesting cures and “satirical content” allowed to run free in social media sites like his Facebook thanks to Section 230. The White House denies Zuckerberg’s claims.

“He knows it’s not true,” veteran tech journo Kara Swisher told CNN’s The Source Tuesday evening. Swisher says Zuckerberg is hedging his bets because Kamala Harris will forget about his assertion, but Donald J. Trump will not, and already has threatened him. 

“I think he’s the most equivocating executive in tech,” Swisher said, noting he is ready to be “Trump adjacent” without going as far as X/Tesla/SpaceX chief Elon Musk if the ex-president wins the November election.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

One of the knocks against Kamala Harris thus far is that she hasn’t participated in interviews with legacy news organizations. Arguably she hasn’t participated in any interviews with new media organizations, either.

But the likes of the Times and the Post and NBC and ABC treat this like not merely an affront to the people’s need to know, but to their fundamental importance to the polity.

So Harris’ ghosting their conference rooms is something that they repeat. Just like Donald Trump.

They treat it like she doesn’t respect them. He clearly doesn’t respect her. 

In the case of Them it is interesting that there was less angst and anguish over the fact that Trump didn’t give his first press conference this year until August 8, a couple weeks after Biden dropped out of the race.

The day Biden dropped out, July 21, Harris announced she was running. Trump announced he was running for president on November 15, 2022. So if we take the Trump metric of 633 days, Harris has until April 14, 2026.

This is not to say that I don’t think it is a good thing for her not to talk to the media. She should.

But it is to say that those legacy organizations need to understand that their editorial boards are not quite as influential as they once were. For example, about 36% of the U.S. population is between the ages of 18 and 44 and there are probably more than a few of them who never consult the legacies. Never.

According to a recent article in The Drum, a publication that follows the media (old and new), “During this election cycle, digital is expected to attract $3.46bn in spend, or about 28% of total spend in the cycle.”

That means, of course, that 72% is not being spent on digital.

But then The Drum goes on to point out this about the $3.46bn spend: “This represents a 156% uptick from 2020 levels.”

Few things go up 156% in four years. And if it scales that way, come 2028. . . .

Team Harris knows where the money should be directed. And, of course, Team Trump likes to keep things close, so there’s always lots of advertising space available on Truth Social.

This, of course, isn’t about ad spending. It is about communicating.

To what extent do politicians, especially those going for the highest offices, “owe” the public something more than “I’m _________________ and I approve this message”?

I’d submit a lot.

And not only during campaigns. And not only to accredited media.

Consider the Prime Minister’s Questions in the UK. Every Wednesday when the House of Commons is sitting the Prime Minister shows up at Westminster and takes questions for about 30 minutes. Not only does that show what the PM knows and thinks, but it also does the same for the House members.

But of course, this is after the people in question have been elected to office and the concern here is Harris’ so-far resistance to a sit-down interview with Lester Holt or Maggie Haberman or whomever.

While this will certainly happen between now and the election, its importance is in inverse relation to the concern expressed about it.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Sign up for our free newsletter at thehustings.substack.com.

Be sure to scroll down this page to read our coverage/news aggregate/analysis of the Democratic National Convention last week, on this page and go to Page 4 to read our coverage/news aggregate/analysis of the Republican National Convention.

We’re especially interested in your opinions, for posting in the left and right columns, on what effect you think the Federal Reserve’s coming September interest rate cut, and the effect the once-again failed talks to negotiate a ceasefire in Gaza will have on the November presidential race. 

This is also your chance to tell us why you agree or disagree with Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s latest commentary, “Who’s the Real Cheater?”

Also, be sure to weigh in on what job you think Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would get in a second Trump administration.

Comment in the appropriate column, left or right, depending on your leanings. Or email us at editors@thehustings.news and indicate your leanings in subject line. Conservative on some issues and liberal on others? Use that subject line to tell us you are a “centrist” overall, but lean “right” or “left” on the issue in question.

_____

Donald J. Trump plans to name Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (pictured) and Tulsi Gabbard, who ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, as honorary presidential transition team co-chairs to help select Trump's policies and personnel, a Trump campaign senior advisor tells The New York Times.

TUESDAY 8/27/24

To Trial or Not to Trial – Once considered the strongest of myriad cases against ex-President Trump, The New York Times uses the word “moribund” to describe the Justice Department’s classified documents case since Federal Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed it in July under the argument that Jack Smith was not approved by Congress to be its special counsel. Smith on Monday filed with the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta to overturn Cannon’s ruling, which came like a MAGA celebration on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.

Smith is unlikely to be able to bring the case to trial before the November 5 presidential election, and many expect the case to end up in the Supreme Court anyway, where justices already ruled prior to Cannon’s ruling that a president has absolute immunity for all official acts. 

If he wins a second term, Donald J. Trump certainly will fire Smith and close the case. But since President Biden stepped down from his re-election bid the chances that Trump will not have his own Justice Department in place next January have evened out, making it a bit more likely he could face trial for holding boxes of classified documents in Mar-a-Lago storage rooms and bathrooms.

--TL

_____________________________________________

MONDAY 8/26/24

After the DNC – The Harris campaign has raised more than $540 million in the month or so since the vice president became the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate, Al Jazeera reports. Meanwhile, NPR senior political editor/correspondent Domenico Montenaro says Vice President Kamala Harris has the edge over former President Donald J. Trump in the Electoral College race, based on current polling, with leads in the crucial swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin and ties in Georgia, North Carolina and Nevada. 

That’s based on Montenaro’s analysis of polling by FiveThirtyEight and The Hill/DDHQ.

No ceasefire… But this comes as negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza ended in Cairo Sunday with no deal, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. Israel has since launched a “pre-emptive” strike against Hezbollah targets early Monday after Israeli military officials warned Iran-backed militants were about to strike. Hamas, which did not participate in the Cairo talks, has objected to changes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu keeps making to July’s framework agreement. 

And so it goes… A week after the Democratic National Convention refused to allow critics of Israel's war on Gaza to speak, the Harris campaign is stuck with the Biden administration’s refusal to use arms sanctions to force the Israeli government into an agreement with Hamas for release of hostages and a ceasefire in Gaza.

Then there’s the economy… The Consumer Price Index dropped below 3% last month, leading Wall Street and especially, the Biden-Harris administration, to anticipate next month’s meeting of the Federal Reserve as it is expected to finally lower interest rates. 

At the Kansas City Federal Reserve’s annual Jackson Hole, Wyoming, conference last Friday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said, finally, “The time has come for policy to adjust,” (per The New York Times).

“The direction of travel is clear, and the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook and the balance of risks. We will do everything we can to support a strong labor market as we make further progress toward price stability.”

That “further progress” was accompanied last week by a discouraging Labor Department report that it had overestimated the number of jobs added in the year ending in March by 818,000 (during the previous decade, such annual updates added or subtracted, on average, 173,000 jobs, the NYT says). 

Does this help Harris?... A Fed rate cut will be no “October surprise” but will be a potential September boost to the Harris campaign. That’s if voters feel the rate cut, which is expected to be between a quarter- and a half-point, and whether they associate any such good vibes to the current administration. 

The current Fed rate ranges between 5.25% and 5.5%.

This good economic news has translated to an ever-steady bull market on Wall Street, but Donald J. Trump – who wants to grab control of the Fed if he wins a second term – has claimed he not only deserves credit for the bull market under his administration, but also that the current bull market is the result of Wall Street anticipating his win again in November.

•••

RFK Jr.’s Prez Bid – Now that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pulled out of the presidential race in swing states so he could endorse Donald J. Trump, the question is; What does he get from Trump in return? Kennedy’s withdrawal as an independent candidate answers the question, of course, of whether he was more a threat to Trump or to Kamala Harris. 

It’s a question only pundits and pollsters who were trying to maintain some balance made – we have known for months that anti-vaxxer RFK Jr. would pull votes from Trump and not Biden-Harris.

Place your bets… Our prediction: RFK Jr. is US Surgeon General under a second Trump administration. Of course, if Kennedy’s endorsement of Trump doesn’t result in a win, we will never find out.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

In 2016 no one, it seems, reportedly not even the campaign itself, thought that Donald Trump would win the election.

But he did. But that didn’t make him entirely happy.

Because he thought Hillary Clinton received too many votes (while she lost in the Electoral College, she actually had some 2.9-million more Americans vote for her; he claimed that was a result of “large scale voter fraud”), in May 2017 he signed an executive order creating the “Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.” It included noted voter-fraud-claiming enthusiast Kris Kobach and Hans von Spakovsky of the outfit that brings you “Project 2025,” The Heritage Foundation.

What did this fair-and-balanced investigatory commission find? Well, evidently nothing. So Trump disbanded it in January 2018.

However, then-press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders maintained the commission ended because many states didn’t provide the requested data. And that there is some “substantial evidence of voter fraud” although no evidence of the evidence was provided.

We all know what happened regarding the 2020 presidential election results.

Long before the election Trump claimed that it was going to be “fixed.” Which is somewhat odd when you think about it. That is, he held the levers of power and wasn’t afraid to use them. If the election was going to be “fixed,” wouldn’t it have been fixed in his favor?

Be that as it may, Biden trounced Trump in terms of the popular vote, garnering some 7-million more than Trump.

You can understand why the man may have blown a gasket seeing a number like that.

Clearly there had to be massive cheating involved . . . but cheating only as it related to the top of the ticket because down-ballot Republicans generally did well, thank you very much.

The Heritage Foundation swung into action. And discovered, for example, four cases of fraud in the Arizona 2020 election — one of which was a Republican casting a Republican vote for her deceased mother. (And you thought only corpses in Chicago vote.)

When the Republican-hired Cyber Ninjas reviewed the results of the 2020 election in Arizona it found . . . 360 more votes for Biden. Clearly that was a team of stealthy ninjas because no one saw that coming.

Despite Trump’s request to the Georgia Secretary of State for the discovery of 11,780 votes that would shift the results from Biden to Trump — a.k.a., “fixing” the results — Heritage found no election fraud in the 2020 Georgia election.

So were there to have been fraud at any scale in Georgia, it would have been the result of Trump requesting it.

Not surprisingly, even when it seemed to be a Biden-Trump rematch in 2024 Trump started warning of “cheating” in the forthcoming election. Now, with Kamala Harris showing significant signs of strength he has significantly amped up his claims of cheating. (It is well known that when people get older their ability to sleep soundly through the night decreases. Not only is Trump 78, but on those sleepless nights he must be vexed by the 306 to 232 Electoral College votes Biden won and the 81,283,501 popular votes Sleepy Joe got to his 74,223,975.)

Claims like Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ “substantial evidence of voter fraud” are simply unfounded. There is no evidence.

Which brings us to the whole issue of cheating, which Trump claims will be rife. Although this could be construed as him thinking he won’t win, if he does and he doesn’t get the numbers that his pal Vladimir Putin got in his last election — 88% -- then that will only be because of cheating.

But there is something to be considered here. Just as it seems odd that Trump was claiming the fix was in against him during the 2020 election — when he was in charge — it is also odd that there is sufficient evidence — evidence beyond a reasonable doubt — that he is a man for whom cheating is not out of the question when it comes to personal benefit.

Remember: Last May he was convicted in New York on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

“Falsifying” — like what he and his associates claim has been done regarding vote totals.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Your thoughts are welcome on Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ stemwinder of an acceptance speech Thursday night. Can she extend her honeymoon period past the Democratic National Convention?

Also, be sure to scroll down with the scrollbar on the far right side to read this week’s coverage of the DNC, including Thursday’s coverage of running mate Tim Walz’s acceptance speech and Wednesday’s coverage of Tuesday’s Harris/Walz appearance in Milwaukee. 

Add your Comments to the left or right column, appropriate to your leanings. Or email editors@thehustings.news and please indicate whether you lean left or right in the subject line. Or go to our free Substack newsletter site at thehustings.substack.com and post your comments there.

_____

FRIDAY 8/23/24

There was much familiar in Vice President Kamala Harris’ acceptance speech for her nomination as Democratic presidential candidate. And yet, there was much new in its execution. As a former prosecutor and San Francisco district attorney, Harris no doubt has made countless closing arguments. But her national performances as a speaker have heretofore been less than engaging, until now. 

Harris began, as many politicians do, with anecdotes about her late mother and her family’s humble middle-class upbringing in the flats of the San Francisco area’s East Bay.

“She taught us to never complain about injustice, but to do something about it. Do something about it.”

And … “And never do anything half-assed.”

Her speech was not the least bit half-assed, even as she riffed on familiar themes. Much of the Harris/Walz campaign is about preventing a “tyrant,” ex-President Trump, from returning to power, though she did outline some specific agenda items.

“In many ways, Donald Trump is an unserious man. But the consequences of putting Donald Trump back in the White House are extremely serious,” she said.

Harris continued, “we are not going back … And we are charting a new way forward, with a way forward for the middle-class,” a defining goal of her presidency. 

As president, Harris intends to “create an opportunity economy,” she said, offering labor, small enterprise and businesses “the chance to compete and the chance to succeed,” with a federal program to provide capital for entrepreneurs and small businesses. 

Her plans for a middle-class tax cut contrasts with “another (Trump) tax break that will add $5 billion to the national deficit.” 

There’s also legislation restoring Roe v. Wade that a President Harris would sign, along with the bipartisan border bill that Trump killed because he wanted to keep the issue for his campaign.

But it’s on the international issues that must have been terra infirma for her.

“Five days before Russia attacked Ukraine, I met with President Zelenskyy to warn him about Russia’s plans to invade,” Harris said. “I helped mobilize a global response – over 50 countries – to defend against Putin’s aggression. And as president, I will stand strong with Ukraine and our NATO allies.”

Then she tried to make up some ground lost to “uncommitted” Democratic voters on the issue of a ceasefire in Gaza, saying “now is the time to get a hostage deal and a ceasefire deal done,” adding that she always stands for Israel’s right to defend and arm itself, while acknowledging “so many innocent lives lost” in Gaza, filled with hungry, desperate people. “President Biden and I are working to end this war.”

--Todd Lassa

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

ICYMI, Donald J. Trump has returned to Elon Musk’s X, the social media formerly known as Twitter, to try and take some steam out of Kamala Harris’ DNC pep rally. He did manage to keep the capital letters to a minimum …

“Kamala implemented policies that put prices through the roof. Then when inflation got out of control, she sat by and did nothing to stop it. If she wins the Presidency, the middle class will be priced out of existence. #Comrade Kamala: We can’t afford her as President.”

Meanwhile … “The Republican Party is no longer conservative. It has switched its allegiance from the principles that gave it purpose, to a man whose only purpose is himself.”

-- Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), one of two Republicans on the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and one of several Republicans to address the Democratic National Convention this week.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Much going on for political animals this week, what with the Democratic National Convention at the United Center, and a special appearance by presidential nominee Kamala Harris and vice presidential nominee Tim Walz at Milwaukee’s Fiserv Forum, site just a month earlier of the Republican National Convention.

There’s much to discuss, and whether you identify as “conservative” or “liberal,” anywhere along the American political horseshoe, we want The Hustings to be your vessel for civil debate. Speeches from Wednesday’s DNC are covered by Contributing Editor Charles Dervarics in Thursday’s center column. 

Scroll down with the scrollbar on the far right side to read Wednesday’s coverage of Tuesday’s Harris/Walz appearance in Milwaukee. 

Add your Comments to the left or right column, appropriate to your leanings. Or email editors@thehustings.news and please indicate those leanings in the subject line. Or go to our free Substack newsletter site at thehustings.substack.com and post your comments there.

_____

By Charles Dervarics

The speeches ran long again Wednesday on a celebrity-filled night in Chicago, but fortunately for Democrats, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz showed he’s a former football coach who knows the value of a powerful pep talk.

In a folksy 18-minute address, Walz introduced himself to the nation as a farm boy, veteran, teacher, and (by the way) a politician whose humble roots will serve him well as Kamala Harris’ Vice President. He also highlighted his background as a high school football coach, with members of his state championship team — in their team jerseys — coming out on stage.

That was just the start of the football analogies. Of the tight presidential race, he said, “It’s the fourth quarter, we’re down a field goal but we have the ball and we’re driving downfield. Our job is to get into the trenches and do the blocking and tackling.”

Of the Republicans’ Project 2025, he said not to take the GOP’s word that they are abandoning this governing blueprint. “When somebody takes the time to draw up a playbook, they’ll use it.”

He also drew wide applause by proclaiming “never underestimate a teacher” when citing his gubernatorial accomplishments such as paid family leave and free meals for school-age children. “While other schools were banning books from their schools, we were eliminating hunger at ours.”

With shouts of “Coach, Coach” from the crowd, he also offered his takes on these hot-button issues:

On Abortion: Regarding reproductive rights, he said Minnesotans have a rule: “Mind your own damn business.”

On Guns: He described himself as a hunter who’s “a better shot” than many Republicans in Congress. Still, he has signed gun safety laws as it’s “our first responsibility is to keep our kids safe.”

With Walz’ nomination complete, the last remaining task for Democrats is Harris’ speech Thursday where she will accept the nomination for president. 

•••

Oprah Winfrey, Stevie Wonder and John Legend were among the celebrities on stage Wednesday for speeches and music. Winfrey noted that she’s not a registered Democrat but urged fellow independents to support Harris. She said character and values “matter most of all.”

•••

The night’s speakers also included Republicans critical of Trump, including Geoff Duncan, lieutenant governor of Georgia from 2019 to 2023. Duncan talked about Trump’s detailed efforts to undermine Georgia’s 2020 election tally, which led to Republicans repeatedly protesting at Duncan’s home when he did not want to alter the results. 

“These days our party acts more like a cult — a cult worshipping a felonious thug,” he said. “If you vote for Kamala Harris in 2024, you’re not a Democrat. You’re a patriot.”

•••

Former President Bill Clinton left the Oval Office in 2001, but last night he noted that he’s still younger than Donald Trump. It’s one of the ways the presidential race has changed in the past month, with Trump now facing questions about his ability to serve as president as he nears age 80. 

Clinton returned to familiar territory though, by claiming the GOP nominee cares more about himself than the country. “The next time you listen to him, don’t count the lies. Count the I’s.” 

Clinton was known to be a fast-food aficionado — satirized on Saturday Night Live among others — and he leaned into this Wednesday night. Noting that Kamala Harris worked at McDonald’s when she was young, the former president was glad that a President Harris would set one new mark: “She will break my record for the president who spent the most time at McDonald’s.”

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

One of the raging debates between Republicans and Democrats is whether presidential candidate Donald J. Trump plans to adopt Project 2025, The Heritage Foundation’s 900-some page document outlining how the next president could restructure federal government. This seems a good time to share a fundraising email distributed March 21 of this year. 

The email is “signed” by Kevin D. Roberts, president of Heritage and author of the just-released book Dawn’s Early Light -- Taking Back Washington to Save America (with forward by JD Vance).

The Heritage fundraiser begins, “Next year, we have an opportunity to dismantle the deep state. … The deep state is a rebel group of individuals exercising power independent of and over our political leaders. …But it will all depend on whether you join the fight this year or sit on the sidelines. … (Recipient), since you’re a committed patriot, I know you won’t sit on the sidelines.”

“And through The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 initiative, you will defeat the deep state and its tyrannical, anti-American plans.” (Author’s emphasis.)

Through Project 2025 you will:

  • Create public policy solutions to America’s problems like rampant crime, high prices, and illegal immigration.
  • Train thousands of patriots to serve in the next presidential administration.
  • Replace the deep state’s leftist bureaucrats with these patriots so they can implement policies that will save our country.

_____