One of our contributing pundits of the left comments on Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s column on the right, “Economic Issues or Recalcitrance?” Scroll down this column to find out how you, too, can join the discussion.

No Surprise – Quite the roundup. In other words, a shit show. No surprises there but tell me how a graduate of Penn can fake economics like this. Something in the water at the White House no doubt. – Kate McLeod

•••

How to Comment

Democrats have had to do little more than watch as MAGA splits from President Trump on the issue of release of the Epstein Files. Conservatives who want Attorney Gen. Pam Bondi to release the client list she said five months ago she had on her desk for review believe it will at least reveal connections to Democratic elite and at most prove the conspiracy theory of a global elite sex trafficking.

In last year’s presidential race Trump also promoted the theory that Epstein did not commit suicide while in federal custody but instead was killed by the “deep state.”

Photos of Epstein hanging out with former President Bill Clinton often pop up, but on the left side of social media, so too do photos of Epstein with Trump, from when the future president was a real estate developer.

If you’re on the right side of the political divide, do you think Attorney Gen. Pam Bondi should release everything she has on Epstein? If she refuses to do so, should she step down or be fired?

If you’re on the left side of the political divide, what are your thoughts about the fallout from this apparent split between Trump and the MAGA faithful? 

Email your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line, irrespective of your position on a specific issue, so that we may post your comments in the proper column.  –Editors

_____
WEDNESDAY 7/16/25

CBS Cancels The Late Show With Stephen Colbert – But did President Trump cancel the host? CBS announced The Late Show will end in May 2026 – the show itself and not just Colbert as hoar. He recently criticized his employer for its $16 million settlement with Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with then-VP Kamala Harris. CBS says the cancellation is a financial decision, but many – as the president would say – question whether Colbert’s fate was part of that settlement.

FRI-SAT 7/18-19/25

Trump v. Murdoch – Perhaps buoyed by his success in reaching settlements with ABC News and CBS owner Paramount – including cancellation of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert -- President Trump has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit in Florida late Friday against The Wall Street Journal, its owner Rupert Murdoch and two reporters for its Friday scoop that Trump in 2003 sent a lewd 50th birthday greeting to Jeffrey Epstein, NPR’s Weekend Edition Saturday reports. Trump says he has never drawn pictures in his life and is not responsible for the birthday message and its drawing described in the WSJ report. 

Meanwhile, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) has introduced a bipartisan bill calling for the Justice Department to release all files from the Grand Jury investigation of Epstein, who committed suicide while in federal custody from a conviction of sexual abuse of underage girls. 

It would not be the first time a defamation lawsuit hit Murdoch’s properties. In 2023, Fox News paid Dominion Voting Systems $787.5 million for false reports about voting machines manipulating the 2020 presidential election in favor of Joe Biden over then-incumbent Trump. --TL

_____________________________________________

FRIDAY 7/18/25

Happy 50th, Jeffrey Epstein – Ghislaine Maxwell collected special messages from friends – including Donald J. Trump -- and family for a special, leather-bound 50th birthday book for Jeffrey Epstein, in 2003, The Wall Street Journal reports, citing documents it has reviewed. That was three years before Epstein was first arrested over charges he had sexually abused underage girls.

“The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy – like others in the album,” the WSJ exclusive reports. “It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker.”

A squiggly signature, “Donald,” appears below the drawing’s naked waist, “mimicking pubic hair.”

President Trump responded in an interview with the WSJ Tuesday evening that he would sue the Murdoch-owned newspaper “just like I sued everybody else,” responding that he has never drawn anything and did not send a message to Epstein.

DOJ Fires Prosecutor Comey … The WSJ scoop appears two days after Trump’s Justice Department fired without cause Maurene Comey, daughter of former FBI Director James Comey and prosecutor in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, as well as the recent trial of Sean Combs (per The New York Times). Comey had worked for nearly a decade in the Manhattan prosecutor’s office, formerly known as the Southern District of New York. --TL

_____________________________________________

THURSDAY 7/17/25

CPI Rises to 2.7% -- Trump tariffs pushed the Consumer Price Index up to 2.7% in June. Read Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s commentary, “The Cost of Inputs Rising” in The Gray Area. Scroll down with the trackbar on the far right to read details of the CPI at “Tarifflation Kicks In.”

Senate Approves Clawback – The Senate passed a Trump administration request to rescind $9 billion in foreign aid and Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding Congress had previously approved for the 2025-26 fiscal year. Vote was 51-48, with Republicans Lisa Murkowski (AK) and Susan Collins (ME) voting with Democrats, Roll Call reports. Sen. Tina Smith (D-MN) missed the vote as she was taken to hospital with an unspecified illness.

While Democrats in the bill’s vote-a-rama had tried and failed to pass amendments that would retain up to $1.1 billion in CPB funding, according to NPR’s Morning Edition, senators did restore funding established in the Bush 43 administration for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and barred additional recissions for agricultural and nutrition assistance for some countries. 

The recissions bill now goes to the House, which has until Friday for passage.

•••

Perhaps This Isn’t The Apprentice – President Trump showed about a dozen House Republicans a draft letter Tuesday night saying he would fire Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, The New York Times reports. It’s a threat to which he has alluded to for months, even before his January inauguration. 

On Wednesday the New York Stock Exchange tanked on the news temporarily, prompting Trump to back down again, saying he was “highly unlikely” to fire Powell, The Associated Press reports. 

Biden’s fault, again … “He’s a terrible Fed chairman,” Trump repeated Wednesday, as what he says is a rejuvenated economy deserves lower interest rates (which would reduce the federal deficit interest payments). “I was surprised, frankly, that Biden extended him and put him in,” Trump said, referring to the former president, who kept Powell on after Trump appointed him Fed chairman during his first term.

Epstein, Epstein, Epstein … As the Jeffrey Epstein files, real or not, continue to split MAGA and Trump, the president is now calling the issue a “Democratic hoax.” Trump says he has “lost faith in certain people” because “they got duped by the Democrats.”

--TL

_____________________________________________

WEDNESDAY 7/16/25

Recissions Up – The Senate began a vote-a-rama Wednesday to cut $9 billion in foreign aid and Corporation for Public Broadcasting appropriations already approved for 2026-27 in a recessions package, ahem, requested by the Trump White House. On Tuesday the Senate passed, 51-50, a procedural vote on the recissions package only with Vice President Vance casting the tiebreaker, Punchbowl News reports.

Republican Sens. Susan Collins (ME), Lisa Murkowski (AK) and Mitch McConnell (KY) joined all 47 Democrats against the test vote. 

With Collins appearing staunchly against the package and Murkowski a potential “no” vote because of her concerns over losing remote local Alaska radio stations from the CPB cuts, McConnell’s vote – he retires from the Senate in 2027 -- will be key. Congress must pass the bill by Friday, or the White House must spend the funds as appropriated. Democrats warn that if the recissions bill is passed it will affect bipartisan agreement on the next appropriations bill in the coming months.

“The recissions package has a big problem,” Collins told reporters. “Nobody really knows what program reductions are in it.”

•••

Epstein File Lives – We might learn more from the so-called Epstein Files as President Trump has left the issue open to Attorney Gen. Pam Bondi, despite her recent efforts to shut it down (per The Guardian).

“She’s handled it very well, and it’s going to be up to her,” Trump said early Tuesday. “Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release.”

Trump’s comments came as House Speaker Mike Johnson sided with MAGA who want Bondi to release everything she has on Epstein, who killed himself while in 2019 while in federal custody on child trafficking charges.

Or did Epstein kill himself? 

That was the subject of a “deep state” conspiracy theory Trump exploited in his 2024 presidential campaign. 

In February, Bondi told Fox News’ America Reports she had Epstein’s client list “sitting on my desk right now to review. …” But apparently after a review she concluded that Epstein did commit suicide and was not killed by a deep state cabal, and the list, which MAGA faithful and more extreme conspiracy theorists believe contains the names of mostly Democratic elites should not be released.

Her hot-potato drop of the case drew the ire not only of those clinging to Pizzagate but also of FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. 

Last weekend, before his statement that more documents could be forthcoming, Trump Truth Socialed: “One year ago our country was DEAD, now it’s the ‘HOTTEST’ Country anywhere in the World. Let’s keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that no one cares about.”

In his rare split with the president Tuesday, Speaker Johnson told podcaster Benny Johnson; “I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there. … We need DOJ focusing on the major priorities, so let’s get this thing resolved.”

•••

Grijalva’s Daughter Wins Primary – Adelita Grijalva handily won the Democratic primary Tuesday to run in a special election in September to replace her late father in a deep blue Arizona congressional district, according to Roll Call. Grijalva, 54, garnered 62% in the primary to face small-business owner Daniel Butierez, winner of Tuesday’s GOP primary, for the seat of her father, Raúl M. Grijalva, who died in March while in office, from complications of lung cancer treatment.

The senior Grijalva defeated Butierez by 27 points last November to retain his seat in a district that stretches from the US-Mexican border into Tucson and parts of Metro Phoenix.

Grijalva defeated four other Democrats in the primary, including social media influencer Deja Foxx, 25, who took 21% of the vote, and former state Rep. Daniel Hernandez, with 15%. 

On CNN Tuesday evening, CNN pundit Van Jones gave a shout-out to Foxx as the future of the Democratic Party even as she was projected to lose to Grijalva.  –Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
WEDNESDAY 7/16/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

Kevin Hassett is the White House National Economic Council Director.

That is a fairly impressive title.

Hassett has a PhD in economics from the University of Pennsylvania, so presumably he knows considerably more than the average person about the subject, which is a good thing given that the purpose of the NEC is to provide advice to the president about economic policy matters, both domestic and international.

Hassett was a guest on ABC New’s This Week on July 13. He was interviewed by Jonathan Karl.

And right off the bat it became clear that Hassett must have missed some history classes.

Karl asked about the president’s announcement of a flurry of tariffs on August 1.

Hassett answered, in part, “the thing about President Trump, if you go back and look at his history, that he became one of the most successful, if not the most successful, businessman in the 20th century.”

Let’s see. . .

Warren Buffett. Bill Gates. Sam Walton. Andrew Carnegie. John D. Rockefeller.

Donald Trump?

Then there’s this:

Hassett said that when he is talking to negotiators from other countries, “what I am trying to get — the message we’re all trying to get across is this is about America getting itself ready for the golden age by getting our house in order, by getting our tariff and trade policy and tax policy exactly where it needs to be for a golden age.”

There has long been a debate about whether economics is more of an art than a science.

Listening to Hassett it sounds as though it is neither but some sort of fanciful fiction: “a golden age.” 

We will all ride bejeweled unicorns on streets paved with crystals while wearing red ballcaps. . . .

Karl questioned Hassett about the announced 50% tariffs on Brazil. Karl noted:

“Brazil had a $6.8 billion surplus last year. In fact, the US hasn't had a trade deficit with Brazil since 2007. I mean, almost two decades. So why, why, why are we putting a punishing 50% tariff on Brazil?”

Hassett responded: 

“Well, bottom line is the president has been very frustrated with negotiations with Brazil and also with the actions of Brazil. In the end, though, you know, we're trying to put America first. I think that a lot of people, when I'm talking to negotiators from other country is at some point they'll say, ‘What did we do wrong?’”

So let’s see: The president is frustrated, so even though there has been a trade surplus with Brazil (i.e., they buy more of our stuff than we do of theirs), he is going to stick it to them. By offending our customer, doesn’t that put America in a secondary place?

Does Hassett (or the president) know that even though Brazil is, along with America, in the Western Hemisphere, China is Brazil’s largest trading partner? Do they know that the B and C in the organization established to provide an alternative to Western-dominated economic institutions BRICS are Brazil and China? Does the US really want to push Brazil further into that space?

And the whole “when I’m talking to negotiators from [an]other country is at some point they’ll say, ‘What did we do wrong?’” is nothing short of pathetic: What seems to be lost is that the US is buying things from other countries because we want those things — those other countries aren’t doing anything “wrong” — although the way Trump is applying tariffs will make some of them realize that trading with the US may fit into that category.

Finally, the 50% copper tariffs.

Why?

Hassett: “The bottom line is that if there is a time of war, then we need to have the metals that we need to produce American weapons, and copper is a key component in many American weapon sets. And so, as we look forward to the threats that America faces, the president decided that we have plenty of copper in the US, but not enough copper production.”

Presently the US produces more than half the copper it needs. Presumably if there were a war of the magnitude that required more copper it would be diverted from applications like electric vehicles. Oh, wait, the elimination of the tax breaks for EVs in the budget bill is taking care of that. 

Of the sources of imports, 31% come from Canada, which used to be a good thing before that country apparently starting doing something wrong. 

What Hassett doesn’t mention is that transforming copper ore into copper is something with all manner of nasty things associated with it like arsenic, lead, mercury, radioactive materials, slag piles. . . .

Not the sort of stuff you’d associate with a “golden age.”Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_____
WEDNESDAY 7/16/25

New York City’s Democrats have nominated socialist Zohran Mamdani as its mayoral candidate. He will face incumbent Eric Adams, the Democrat-turned-independent and ally to President Trump, Republican Curtis Sliwa and potentially former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the November election.

This list of opponents raises the question; Is New York City ready for a socialist mayor? And what are the implications for the national Democratic Party and its upcoming midterm candidates, as well as its 2028 presidential candidate? We discuss these questions in our latest Substack here.

Following is commentary by our resident Manhattan contributing pundit. To submit your own COMMENT email editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

Ready for a Non-Criminal – I am so ready for a non-criminal to run our fabulous city. Someone who actually works for all the people and not just the moneyed. Those who value money over the working people who make this city run, make me gag. The other night I was walking to the theater on E. 59th, a location I rarely visit and I hyper-noticed these gigantic retail spaces selling tiny luxury “designer purses” – for how much, $2,000 or thereabouts – and it struck me; What a total waste of space, energy, money. –Kate McLeod

_____________________________________________

More Comment on Tax and Spending Bill

Cruelty -- This bill is big, alright, but it is far from beautiful for most Americans. There is so much cruelty in it, it makes me want to sit down and cry. The cruelty starts with the cuts to Medicaid of course, but it also includes an enormous amount of money to recruit and train ICE agents, Trump’s version of the Geheimrat Staats Polizei -- Gestapo -- so he can roust anybody, anywhere, anytime. No other president has ever, ever thought we needed a secret police organization of this size and scope. That, coupled with his stated intention to deport American citizens tells me all I need to know about the Republican MAGA Party. The Republic is finished. –Jim McCraw

•••

Agree? Disagree? – Voice your opinion in these very columns by emailing your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line so we can post them in the appropriate column.

_____
FRIDAY 7/11/25

CPI +2.7% in June – The Consumer Price Index rose 0.3% month-over-month in June, for an annual rate of 2.7%, up from 2.4% in May, the Labor Department reports. All items less food and energy were up 0.2% for the month and up 2.9% for the year. [CHART: Bureau of Labor Statistics]

TUESDAY 7/15/25

Trump and Putin -- Asked in a phone interview with BBC News whether President Trump was “done” with Russian dictator/President Vladimir Putin, Trump said; “I’m disappointed but not done with him.” 

Does Trump trust Putin? 

“I trust almost nobody to be honest with you.”

Ceasefire or tariffs ... That’s the latest offer from President Trump, who has grown tired with Russia dictator/President Vladimir Putin sweet-talking him about a ceasefire deal then going on to bomb Ukraine harder than before. 

“I’m disappointed in Vladimir Putin because I thought we had a deal two months ago, but we’re not there yet,” Trump said in a White House meeting with NATO Secretary Gen. Mark Rutte. 

Trump has ordered sale of 17 Patriot defense systems to NATO for defense of Ukraine, NPR’s All Things Considered reports. The arms are already in Poland and are ready for transport into Ukraine. Trump’s favorable reception at a NATO summit in The Hague last month in which most of the alliance’s European nations agreed to pitch in 5% of their GDP to the organization has gone a long way in swaying Trump away from Putin.

Trump also is threatening “secondary tariffs” of 100% on Russia’s trade partners, such as China and India, two of Russia’s major oil customers in 50 days if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine.

•••

Go Ahead; Cut the Ed Dept. – In an emergency docket ruling the Supreme Court Monday granted the Trump administration the ability to continue cuts to the Education Department, according to SCOTUSblog. The predictably 6-3 decision puts on hold a lower court ruling to require reinstatement of 1,400 Education Department employees already fired earlier this year as part of Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s efforts to reduce the size of its workforce.

The brief, unsigned ruling blocked US District Judge Myong Joun’s May order to block the firings. In his decision, Joun wrote that the Trump administration’s “true intention is to effectively dismantle the Department.

Congress was created by the Education Department, and opponents of the Trump administration’s actions believe only Congress can dismantle it. 

The decision will “unleash untold harm,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her 19-page dissent, also signed by fellow liberal justices Elena Kagen and Ketanji Brown Jackson. --TL

_____________________________________________

Mexico and the EU

MONDAY 7/13/25

The Tariff Saga Continues – One of the few companies that has not benefitted from the bull market on Wall Street in the face of President Trump’s tariff drama is President Trump’s own social media company, Truth Social. Shares in DJT (the stock’s symbol) hit $42.91 on January 13, but by last Friday, sunk by 2.17% for the day to $18.52 per share. Not making anyone’s 401k great again.

And yet Trump took to that very same Truth Social Saturday to post two letters to the European Union and Mexico alerting them that they face 30% tariffs on their goods coming into the US, beginning August 1, The New York Times reports.

Trump’s tariff level on Mexico previously was 25%.

Both Mexico, which is our largest source of imports, and the EU, which as a trading bloc of 27 nations is the world’s third-largest economy, have been in “intense” trade negotiations with the US, according to the report. Trump already had imposed a 10% “base line” tariff on the EU, whose policymakers were hoping to negotiate for certain important products.

The EU has a prepared retaliatory package that would apply to about 21 billion euros or $USD 25 billion Tuesday (unless EU officials pull a “Taco” – er, EUaco?). 

Another loose end is whether the new tariff on Mexico would exempt any products that trade under Trump 45’s USMCA trade agreement.

•••

Obituary: David Gergen – David Gergen, the inside-the-Beltway advisor who wrote speeches, created communications strategies and helped set the agenda for Presidents Richard M. Nixon, Gerald R. Ford, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, died Thursday in Lexington, Mass. He was 83. 

Gergen was credited with “softening” Reagan’s rhetoric and suggested his rhetorical 1980 campaign question: “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”  --Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____________________________________________

Texas, Canada, Gaza and Ukraine

FRIDAY 7/11/25

Trump to Texas – President Trump heads to Texas Friday, where heavy July 4 flooding in Kerr County has claimed at least 120 lives, with more than 170 still missing, according to The Associated Press. Trump purposefully delayed his visit, saying he did not want to get in the way of rescue efforts. Trump also has been quiet about earlier statements he will shut down the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which coordinates aid to states hit by such natural disasters.

•••

Tariff-Watch – President Trump overnight threatened a new tariff of 35%, up from 25%, on Canada except for goods that comply with the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement from his first term, The Wall Street Journal reports, adding that Dow Jones stock futures are down for the day. (What that means is, expect another bad day on Wall Street to temporarily counter the stock market’s overall enthusiasm for the administration’s laissez-faire policies.) 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney says he will work with the White House to clinch a trade deal by August 1.

•••

No Gaza Ceasefire – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu left Washington Thursday without a Trump administration-brokered ceasefire in Gaza. Haaretz reports that “Differences even appeared” between President Trump and PM Netanyahu during two separate White House meetings held a day apart. 

Foreign relations is hard … It appears the Trump White House is coming to the realization that when it comes to brokering peace in Gaza and in Ukraine, neither Netanyahu, nor Russian dictator/President Vladimir Putin are interested in helping the US president keep his promises about quickly working out “deals.” 

Voicing his “disappointment” in Russia (and Putin), Trump told NBC News moderator Kristin Welker Thursday in a phone call for Sunday’s Meet the Press Trump said; “I think I’ll have a major statement to make on Russia on Monday.”

Trump is making something of a concession on his campaign promise to cut off military weapons aid to Ukraine.

“We’re sending weapons to NATO, and NATO is paying for those weapons, 100%” he told Welker. “So what we’re doing is the weapons that are going out are going to NATO, and then NATO is going to give those weapons [to Ukraine], and NATO is paying for those weapons.” –Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
FRIDAY 7/11/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

If you wanted to — or didn’t want to, put your fingers in your ears and go “nah-nah-nah” to block out the information — hear a clear statement of why Team Trump is not in the least bit serious when it comes to tariff announcements, just consider the 50% tariffs that are to go into effect August 1 on Brazil.

Trump, according to The Washington Post, sent a letter to Brazil’s president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that says, in part: “The way that Brazil has treated former President Bols naro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace. This Trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!”

The middle school grammar aside, here’s the question: If the point of the tariffs is to Make America Great Again by making it more cost-effective to produce in the US rather than import the goods, then is the announcement of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods a prime example of why that isn’t the case?

Trump has a problem with the treatment of Bolsonaro, someone he evidently likes, so he is going to “punish” Brazilian producers by applying the 50% tariff (even though it is ultimately the American consumer who is going to pay the tab).

And we don’t need to point out that the US isn’t exactly environmentally apt for growing coffee outside of, say, Kona.

But that doesn’t matter: Up the price from the beans from Brazil! They are bad, very, very bad, plenty of people say so, when it comes to Bolsonaro.

Who cares if US companies pay more for products that have been found to be more cost-effective to import than produce (even if they can be produced in the US)?

The whole approach to tariffs that has been exhibited by Team Trump is something that shows this is more a matter of whim than studied policy.

Where do the numbers come from?

It was shown on “Liberation Day” that the initial list had absurd numbers because of the silly approach to calculation (take the US trade deficit with a country, divide it by the amount of US imports, divide that by two and round up). And if the US had a trade surplus with a country, there was a 10% tariff simply to be able to sell goods in the US.

Indeed, the US does have a trade surplus with Brazil. The US Trade Representative’s office says we sold $7.4 billion more than Brazil sold to us in 2024, The Wall Street Journal reports.

None of this takes simple supply-and-demand into account, however.

There are 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Hey, let’s apply 50% to copper, too! Perhaps Stephen Miran and Peter Navarro can take out a copy of the Periodic Table of the Elements and find more things to apply tariffs to.

Although credit must be given to the first Trump Administration for “Operation Warp Speed” and the creation of COVID vaccines, perhaps no one currently in the White House realizes that Pfizer worked with BioNTech to develop the vaccine based on mRNA technology from BioNTech. And BioNTech is a German company.

So now Trump throws out a number — 200% -- that is the potential tariff on pharmaceuticals.

And take into account that the 2026 budget is going to cut about 40% of the funding for the National Institutes of Health — and about 90% of the monies spent by the NIH is for basic research and early-stage drug discovery and development.

What are the odds there will be another pandemic within the next five years?

Consider this from Yonatan Grad, a professor of immunology and infectious diseases at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health:

“Is there another pandemic coming? Yes. When? Which pathogen? How severe will it be? No one can say for sure. But the big demographic changes that are coming, due to climate change as well as economic and other factors, will alter the landscape and create new risks, both for new pathogens to emerge and for known pathogens to re-emerge.”

Yes, he’s from Harvard (grrrr!). And the mention of climate change may raise red flags for some people, but whether it is real or not (it is), people are migrating from places where there is too little rain or too much rain, for example, and may be bringing with them new or old pathogens into places near you.

(The Environmental Protection Agency budget is being cut by 50%, because apparently the environment doesn’t need a whole lot of protection.)

Going back to the language quoted from the WaPo in the letter: This whole approach is not predicated on any planned policy, just personal petulance.

Is this the way statesmen are supposed to behave?

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_____
FRIDAY 7/11/25

Commentary by Jerry Lanson

I first visited Lenox, Iowa, in the summer 1972 when Kathy and I were moving from Connecticut to Denver.

Kathy’s grandfather, a lifetime farmer, was quiet and in poor health. But her grandmother, the town poetess, embraced me as a kindred spirit even though I was a New Yorker by birth, a city boy and an Easterner. Soon she was driving us both around the grid of dirt roads that intersected the fields of this small farming community, “visiting” an hour or two here and there with friends and neighbors to introduce us over cookies and a glass of lemonade.

It was a way of life, slow, neighborly, grounded in community. Whatever squabbles might flare from time to time, the farmers relied on each other and likely still do. Iowa back then also voted Democratic nearly as often as Republican. (A Democrat defeated an incumbent Republican for the US Senate that year though Republicans controlled the state senate.) Today the state is overwhelming red in its representation.

I was curious how independent Iowans reacted to the mean-spirited cuts in health insurance and food resources under the big, ugly bill that just squeaked past the Congress to become law. I also wondered how the sharp escalation of ICE raids nationwide has played out in farming communities that rely on undocumented immigrants for work in the fields and meat-packing plants. The time to “visit” seemed right when Donald Trump visited the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines the day before signing his bill into law, complete with a military flyover at the ceremony.

I started by stopping by the Ames Tribune in the town where Kathy’s mother grew up. Her father was the town doctor there and, during the Great Depression, helped feed those without enough food. The paper, printed since 1919, today is published by Gannett six days a week.

Money mattered in the news on Saturday, July 5. The lead story was headlined, “Burning through budgets: rising costs strain Iowa fire departments.” Below that was a story headlined: “Trump signs tax-cutting, debt boosting bill in White House ceremony.” And on the letters page, I ran across the headline, “Concerns with the Billionaire Bonanza Bill,” a reference to the trillions of dollars in tax cuts the rich will receive in the next decade in Trump’s new law.

Wrote the first letter writer, “SNAP (food) payments will go down even though Iowa food banks cannot keep up with the current demand. Local food purchase programs were cut, hurting both school children and farmers. Enormous Medicaid cuts will cause some rural hospitals to close and services to be reduced. Medicaid helps fund over 40% of births, so pressure on OB-GYN services will be especially intense.”

Lower down on the home page, I found an interesting headline reporting on Trump’s visit to the fairgrounds. It read: “Trump: ‘We’ll ‘put the farmers in charge’ when deciding to deport undocumented ag workers.”

His words flew in the face of ICE actions nationwide in recent weeks and the administration’s vow, after vacillating, to make no exceptions to meet concerns of farmers and GOP business owners about the arrest of law-abiding workers.

“If a farmer’s willing to vouch for these people, in some way, Kristi, I think we’re going to have to just say that’s going to be good, right?” Trump said to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose agency oversees ICE. “You know we’re going to be good with it. Because we don’t want to do it where we take all the workers off the farms.”

That presumably became the placeholder for this week’s policy in what the newspaper described as “a string of conflicting messages from the administration on the issue.”

The article added, “Perpetually short of labor, Iowa is the leading U.S. producer of pork and eggs and a top source of beef, turkey and milk. At large meatpacking plants scattered across the state and in livestock operations, immigrants are a major source of labor.”

According to multiple news reports, ICE since Trump took office has arrested law-abiding workers in significantly greater numbers than those who have violated any laws.

From Ames in Central Iowa, I headed southwest to the Sioux City Journal, published by Lee Enterprises. National news at the paper takes a decidedly back seat to local photo-driven stories. But the opinion page did feature a “mini-editorial” headlined “Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill should be headlined the Big Beautiful Billionaires’ Bill.” I couldn’t read more because of a paywall, but it the headline certainly seemed to convey that the paper is none too happy with the GOP’s signature legislation.

It was time to stop by the Des Moines Register,the state’s dominant newspaper. It drew Trump’s ire and a lawsuit when its respected pollster appeared to find a late surge for Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign. Among its lead stories July 3 was one headlined, “5 Takeaways from Donald Trump’s Speech at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines.” It read a bit like a White House press release, the first takeaway being, “Trump says there’s ‘no better birthday present for America than ;the big beautiful Bill.” The article was accompanied by a picture of Trump 2028 and Gulf of America hats.

But, referring to the states’ two US senators, the editorial in the same edition cut a different tone with the headline “Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst abandon Iowans in need.” Both Republican senators voted for Trump’s bill.

As for Lenox. It’s too small, with a population of only 1,372, to support a newspaper. I imagine much of the news there still spreads through “visiting.” Kathy’s grandma Alice got to meet both our daughters before she died years later. On our earlier visits to the farm she taught both of us to appreciate leftovers, meticulously stowed in the refrigerator meal after meal, and re-served until everything was eaten. In 1974, Alice was thrilled when I entered journalism school a several hours away at the University of Missouri in Columbia.

I can only hope I’ve lived up to her standards as the Lenox town poetess.

Jerry’s Substack is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Jerry’s Substack that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.

This column first appeared in Lansion’s Substack From the Grassroots.

_____________________________________________

Your Turn

There may be a no more definitive expression of our nation’s political debate than arguments about tax and spending. Conservatives, and most Republicans, have been on a quest to cut taxes and spending since President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal, while liberals and most Democrats argue a country as rich as ours deserves a strong social “safety net” for those who do not get a sufficient share of the wealth.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, in which Republicans in the House and Senate are carrying out President Trump’s agenda, especially extension of his 2017 tax cuts mostly benefitting the rich, upends this conservative-liberal split – kind of. The bill Trump signs on Independence Day will blow up the federal deficit and raise the debt ceiling – unless you buy the “dynamic” scoring of the budget argument that the tax cuts for the rich will trickle down to the middle- and lower-classes via investment and good-paying jobs.

From that perspective, the pro-OBBB argument is much like arguments for President Reagan’s supply side economics. 

Confusing. Even head-spinning. We know. But that’s why today Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s commentary criticizing the tax and spending reconciliation bill is in the right column along with pro-MAGA contributing pundit Rich Corbett’s commentary on why the OBBB will spur the US economy.

It is why we ask you to indicate your political leanings in the subject line when you email your COMMENTS on this and other news and issues to editors@thehustings.news.

--Editors

_____
INDEPENDENCE DAY 2025

President Trump celebrates passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill at the Iowa State Fairgrounds last week [from a White House video].

•President Trump imposes a 50% tariff on Brazil, despite our trade surplus with the country, in support of ex-President Jair Bolsonaro. Read Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s take at our Substack.

THURSDAY 7/10/25

Trump Is Catching On – Almost half a year after Trump 47 Day One, the president is starting to play hardball with Russia’s dictator/President Vladimir Putin on ending the war in Ukraine. After President Trump reversed what appears to have been an unauthorized halt of US arms moving through Poland into Ukraine, Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Thursday for the 58th Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN) foreign ministers meeting, where he had “a frank, important conversation” on the sidelines with Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov, The Guardian reports. 

“I echoed what the president said, both a disappointment and frustration at the lack of progress,” Rubio told reporters. 

Agence France-Presse reported that Lavrov had shared a “new idea” on Ukraine, but Rubio said the “new idea” was not one that would automatically lead to peace but rather “could open a door to a new path.” 

Meanwhile … Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy Thursday called on Europe to launch a Marshall Plan-style reconstruction strategy for his country, on Day One of the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome, The Kyiv Independent reports.

“We need a Marshall Plan-style approach,” Zelenskyy said, “and we should develop it together. Rebuilding Ukraine is not just about our country. It’s also about your countries, your companies, your technology, your jobs.”

Quite the antithesis of the “my country first” approach being practiced in Trump’s isolationist US.

Zelenskyy’s remarks came after another heavy overnight attack on Kyiv by Moscow, in which drones and ballistic missiles killed two. In its largest-ever drone and missile strike on Ukraine, Moscow over the last couple of days dropped 18 missiles and about 400 drones on Kyiv, including 200 Shahed-type “kamikaze” models on the capital, killing 12 and injuring 60, according to Zelenskyy.

Back on the Hill … Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) hopes to pass “tough” sanctions against Russia by the Senate’s August recess via a bipartisan bill sponsored by Trump ally and hardliner on Russia Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), The Hill reports. –TL

_____________________________________________

WEDNESDAY 7/9/25

First Elon, Now Putin? – President Trump Tuesday accused Russian dictator/President Vladimir Putin of “meaningless” gestures toward peace efforts in Ukraine, as well as lobbing “a lot of bullshit” at the US and his administration, per The New York Times

Why wouldn’t Putin lob the B.S., after Trump admitted his promise to end the Russia-Ukraine War on Day One was a joke? Since then, Putin has taken advantage of unrealized ceasefires and Trump’s promise to cut off military aid to Ukraine to up his military’s attacks in order to have more of Ukraine under Russian control when (if) an agreement finally is reached. 

Trump’s comments come as he has announced the US will resume Biden administration-arranged arm shipments to Ukraine that had been held up in Poland. CNN reported Tuesday that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the shipments held from Ukraine without informing the White House.

[Read “Trump Brings His Art of Tariffs to Ukraine” at our Substack.]

•••

Take That, Copper – President Trump will impose a 50% tariff on copper, a core electrical component also found in many home appliances, he said at his Tuesday cabinet meeting. Trump did not say when the copper tariff would take effect, USA Today reports, and there was no such executive order listed at whitehouse.gov Wednesday.

“I believe the tariff on copper, we’re going to make 50%,” Trump said. 

Watch out, Pharma … It gets much tougher on pharmaceuticals, which Trump said would face tariffs at “a very high rate, like 200%,” according to the report. The president said such a tariff would not go into effect for at least a year, to give pharmaceutical manufacturers time to prepare – presumably to move manufacturing from Northern Europe to the US.  --TL

_____________________________________________

TUESDAY 7/8/25

Hey! It’s Taco Tuesday – Here’s the latest, so start planning, importer/exporters. Japan, South Korea and South Africa are among the nations that will face tariffs of as much as 40% in tariffs by the Trump administration, which has delayed their implementation from Wednesday to Friday, August 1, The Guardian reports. Is that new deadline firm? asked a reporter.

“I would say firm, but not 100% firm,” Trump replied. “If they call up and they say we’d like to do something in a different way, we’re going to be open to that.”

The latest:

Bangladesh: 35%

Bosnia and Herzegovina: 30%

Cambodia: 36%

Indonesia: 32%

Japan: 25%

Kazakhstan: 25%

Laos: 40%

Malaysia: 25%

Myanmar: 40%

Serbia: 35%

South Africa: 30%

South Korea: 25%

Thailand: 36%

Tunisia: 25%

•••

Netanyahu Nominates Trump – What came out of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s White House meeting with President Trump Monday? The two discussed Gaza’s future (will Netanyahu’s Israel run it after he ends the war? We don’t know just yet) and Israel’s relationship with its Persian Gulf neighbors, The New York Times reports. 

They both celebrated US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, the selfsame facilities which Trump argues the strikes “obliterated.”

Then Netanyahu announced from the Blue Room where reporters were gathered that he had nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. 

“He’s forging peace,” Netanyahu said, “as we speak, in one country in the region after another.

Trump compared his Defense Department’s strikes on Iran’s nukes to President Truman’s nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, at the end of World War II. 

“That stopped a lot of fighting and this stopped a lot of fighting,” Trump said.

Netanyahu has talks scheduled through Thursday with Vice President Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). –TL

_____________________________________________

MONDAY 7/7/25

On Again – President Trump’s 90-day hold on his April 2 tariffs end Wednesday, but it appears the rest of the world will have three more weeks to iron out a deal as dozens of letters go out to those countries informing them of their rates, Monday. Trump said last week new tariff rates could be between 10% to 70%, with payments due August 1, according to The Wall Street Journal

“President Trump’s going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don’t move things along, then on August 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN’s State of the Union Sunday.

The administration has two tariff deals so far; With the UK, where auto import tariffs have been cut from 27.5% down to 10% and aerospace tariffs have been eliminated, and Viet Nam, where direct imports have a 20% tariff and imports that transfer through Viet Nam are 40%.

“We have far more than 170 countries,” Trump said per the WSJ. “And how many deals can you make? And you can take good deals, but they’re much more complicated.”

Hitting BRICS … Trump also has threatened an extra 10% tariff on countries he says align with ‘anti-American’ BRICS policies. The original BRICS members are Brazil, Russia, India and China, but more recently Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethopia, Indonesia and Iran have been added and are meeting at the organization’s annual summit in Rio de Janeiro.

•••

Party On, Elon – Former DOGEmaster Elon Musk said on X-Twitter Saturday he has officially formed his America Party, a response to President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill and its effect on the federal deficit, The Hill reports. 

“By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it,” Musk tweeted. “When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we have a one party system, not a democracy.” 

Tesla shares fell 7% in pre-market trading Monday, CNBC reports. --Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____________________________________________

Beautiful?

INDEPENDENCE DAY 2025

Trump’s Independence Day Celebration – As anticipated, President Trump holds a bill-signing ceremony on Friday, July 4th, for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the tax and spending reconciliation that passed in the House Thursday after the Senate version contributed an extra $0.9 trillion to the federal deficit for the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), tried to delay its passage as long as he could, speaking for more than eight hours on Thursday before its 218-214 passage, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. There were two Republican defections in the vote, according to Roll Call; budget hawk Thomas Massie, of Kentucky, and Brian Fitzpatrick, whose Pennsylvania district backed Vice President Kamala Harris in last November’s presidential election.

Conservative Republicans who back the president’s agenda contained in the bill say the its $3.3 trillion extra contribution to the federal deficit over the next decade, according to the CBO, is not “dynamic” scoring in that it does not consider what all those tax cuts extended to the wealthy and to corporations will do for business investment and good-job growth. Their argument against a “socialist” type of higher taxes for the wealthy and corporations, combined with federal regulations and “choosing winners” via green energy incentives goes back past Reaganism, to conservative arguments against FDR’s New Deal.

Trump has successfully carried this further for his supporters, easily slipping from calling Democrats “socialists” to calling them “communists.”

Democrats and some Republicans argue the bill’s Medicaid cuts and other federal safety net cuts will hurt many of the same citizens who voted for Trump’s populism. Those Medicaid cuts will result in the shutdown of hospitals across the nation, most of them in poor rural areas, they argue. 

Also notable is that after decades of debt-ceiling resistance from Republicans in Congress, leading to several federal government shutdowns and near-shutdowns over the years, the One Big Beautiful Bill raises the ceiling for Trump by $5 trillion.

Meanwhile … Jeffries has said that Trump “ran up more debt than any other president in American history,” a statement that PoltiFact calls “mostly false.” 

According to the website The Balance, covering economics and fiscal policy, 

President Obama rang up $6.781 trillion to Trump’s $6.6 trillion in debt, though Obama took eight years to spend that, while Trump 45 took just four years to fall $181 billion short of his predecessor.

--Todd Lassa

_____
INDEPENDENCE DAY 2025

As usual, Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay and contributing pundit Rich Corbett have very different conservative perspectives on the merits, or lack thereof, of the One Big Beautiful tax and spending bill …

Murkowski Got It Right -- The thing about the budget bill is it shows just how mendacious the majority of Republicans have become. Note how when essentially every organization that runs the numbers announces the bill is not going to be good for essentially anyone but the higher tax brackets (and in the long run not for them, because when the deficit balloons, the economic status of the US is going to be in a very bad place), they announce that those organizations don’t know what they are talking about — even though they use the numbers from those organizations when they work to their advantage.

And a word about Lisa Murkowski, who has been reviled for her “yes” vote.

Actually, Murkowski is the only Republican who got it right. She made it clear she wasn’t going to vote for the bill until she got what she wanted for the people of Alaska. And she got it. If every other Senate Republican recognized they work for the people of their states and not for their apparent Liege Lord, they would have held out for things, too. And a consequence of that would probably have been a rethinking of the whole bill and something better would have been the result. —Stephen Macaulay

A Promising Step Forward -- Congress has taken a bold and commendable step by passing the "One Big Beautiful Bill," a transformative piece of legislation on its way July 4th to President Trump’s desk. This bill, while not without room for improvement, charts a path toward economic vitality by prioritizing business incentives that will drive growth and opportunity across the nation. Personally, I would have preferred more aggressive spending cuts to streamline government operations and reduce waste, but the bill’s focus on empowering businesses to innovate, expand, and create jobs is a powerful catalyst for prosperity. By fostering an environment where entrepreneurs and companies can thrive, this legislation sets the stage for a robust economic resurgence that will benefit communities from coast to coast.

A cornerstone of the bill’s economic promise is its commitment to continuing the 2017 tax cuts, which are imperative for maintaining stability and confidence among businesses and individuals alike. These tax policies have proven effective in spurring investment and job creation during the first Trump administration, and their extension ensures that Americans can continue to reap the rewards of a dynamic economy. The bill also offers tax savings for service workers and those counting on every dollar from tips and overtime pay. Many Social Security-dependent Americans get a tax deduction that benefits lower income seniors struggling most as the cost of living rises. These measures provide meaningful relief to hardworking workers and retirees on fixed incomes. Coupled with President Trump’s tariff policies, which are bringing jobs back to American workers by incentivizing domestic production, the bill strengthens our manufacturing base and gives priority to the needs of our labor force, ensuring that economic gains are shared broadly.

As it heads to the President’s desk, this legislation inspires optimism for a future where American workers and businesses are empowered to succeed. Let us celebrate this milestone and encourage ongoing efforts to build an economy that lifts all Americans. --Rich Corbett

_____
INDEPENDENCE DAY 2025

Commentary by Jerry Lanson

I spent four summers right before and during college working either in or right outside the entrances of our National Parks. At 18, a new high school graduate, I pumped gas at Flagg Ranch, located a few miles south of Yellowstone National Park and just north of the Grand Tetons. At 19 and 21, I worked as a bell hop and desk clerk at Grand Lake Lodge, on the western slope of Rocky Mountain National Park. And at 20, I worked at Many Glacier Hotel in the heart of Glacier National Park, rotating between day and night shifts as a desk clerk and night watchman.

These were life-shaping experiences. For one thing, in 1968 in Colorado, I met the girl who would become my wife of nearly 54 years. During these summers I also climbed the Grand Teton and rafted on the Snake River in Wyoming, climbed Longs Peak and Snowmass Mountain in the high Colorado range, and hiked miles of trails on multi-day treks in Glacier, making noise in wooded areas to let the bear know we were coming. There were steak rides, mini-golf soirees, poker games and trips to Frontier Days and the Calgary Stampede, rodeos where cowboys would hone their craft and show their skills.

But what has stayed with me most so many decades later is the natural beauty of the parks, their lakes, forests, pristine streams and snow-covered mountains, all under big western skies that seem to stretch forever.

Sadly, America’s National Parks are endangered these days, in part because of growing crowds and the ravages of climate change, but most starkly because of accelerating cuts in the National Park Service staff and maintenance budgets. As NPR noted in a story this week, “as visitors flock to [the] parks, deep cuts leave rangers and wildlife at risk.”

The National Park system has been around since 1916. Today there are 63 National Parks and 423 National Park sites, which include the parks, national monuments, battlefields and other designated locations. In 2024, a record 331.9 million individuals visited these sites in aggregate, the largest number ever, according to the National Park Service.

Despite this, the Trump Administration has proposed a 30% cut in the National Park budgets. By May 22, according to an article by the National Park Conservation Association, the Park Service already has shed 13% of its staff under the Trump Administration as a result of “pressured buyouts, deferred resignations and early retirements.” Then, the House version of Trump’s big budget bill cast the parks “into even further crisis,” the Conservation Association reported.

Now, as the Senate version of the same budget bill enters its home stretch, it is not a question of whether, but how deep, cuts will be. Trump, the association writes, has proposed an additional $1 billion cut in the National Park Service budget in 2026 – even though visitors to the parks contributed $55 billion to the U.S. economy in 2023 alone.

These cuts are potentially so catastrophic that even some Republican senators from western states are squirming, The Hill reports. One is Steve Daines, senator from Montana. Daines, who is up for re-election in 2026, told The Hillthat he wants“to make sure [the parks are] adequately funded.”

The question is, what’s adequate? There has been no indication that either Daines or other western Republican intend to cast a nay vote when Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” comes up for passage, possibly this week.

Nor will cuts stop within the parks. The administration also proposes to sell as much as three million acres of federally managed public land outside the parks over the next five years. These, too, are treasured by fishermen, hunters, campers and hikers.

But it is the National Park sites that are the true gems of this country’s natural beauty. In a June 3 article, the National Parks Conservation Association noted the devastation they are facing.

The administration’s proposed $1 billion National Park Service cut, if enacted, “would be the largest cut in the agency’s 109-year history,” the association says.

The administration has moved to scale back efforts to preserve the environment within the parks. One example is the reversal of a move to phase out the sale of single-use plastics in the parks.

The Trump Administration, since taking office, has fixated on rewriting American history to sharply reduce if not wipe out the role non-white and non-male Americans played in our history, going so far as to remove words like “black” and “female” from web pages across the government.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in mid-May issued a secretarial order and timeline for National Park Service and other Interior staff to review, identify and remove, “images, descriptions, depictions, messages, narratives or other information (content) that inappropriately disparages Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times).”

Just what that means presumably will be determined by this administration.

I haven’t been back to the National Parks in the Rockies since my wife, daughters and I celebrated our 25th anniversary at Grand Lake Lodge, where we met and worked 57 and 55 years ago. We stopped there on a cross-country train trip from the Bay Area to Boston and back. Once again we found ourselves driving over Trail Ridge Road, traversing the pass over the Continental Divide.

I couldn’t help but think back on the half-dozen times my new girlfriend that first summer drove me over this treacherous 48-mile road between Grand Lake and Estes Park so I could visit a foot specialist. After my appointments, we’d often have pizza, take in a drive-in movie and make the long drive back to catch a few hours sleep before work at 6 a.m. 

It was the start of a romance that’s still unfolding.

Lanson’s commentary first appeared in his Substack From the Grassroots.

_____
FRIDAY 6/27/25

US Economy Adds 147,000 Jobs – More good economic news for the Trump White House, as 147,000 jobs were added to the economy in June, the Labor Department reports. Not surprisingly, the federal government lost jobs while state government picked some of them up. Health care also added jobs, as unemployment ticked down slightly to 4.1%, from 4.2% in April and May. [CHART: Bureau of Labor Statistics]

THURSDAY 7/3/25

UPDATE: The House passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act for tax and spending in the 2026 fiscal year, 218-214, NPR reports. On to the Resolute Desk in time for President Trump's Sharpie-intensive Independence Day celebration.

Rules of the Game – The House approved rules governing floor debate early Thursday for the Big Vote on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Trump White House-endorsed tax and spending bill the president wants to sign by Independence Day, tomorrow, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. The 219-213 passage of this procedural hurdle followed 20 hours of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) cajoling Republican holdouts – with President Trump intervening -- nearly all of them hardline budget hawks and some of whom wanted material payoffs in the form of amendments favorable to their individual districts, though they were told it was too late in the process for that.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), a “surprise centrist defector,” was the sole Republican “no” on the procedural vote, Roll Call reports.

In addition to increasing the federal deficit by $3.3 billion over the next 10 years according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the tax and spending bill raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion in order to avoid yet another potential government shutdown this summer, according to NPR.

Democrats contend the bill extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts for the rich while taking from the poor and middle class. The CBO also calculates that 11.8 million Americans will lose health care coverage from Medicaid cuts in the bill, which includes work requirements for some recipients.

“People in America will die,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who was continuing to speak and hold up the final vote for more than five hours by mid-morning Thursday, said.

MAGA Republicans say the CBO should use “dynamic” calculations instead of its “static” calculations, which would take into consideration the way tax cuts for the rich will stimulate investment and job growth. 

When a reporter asked President Trump after his tour of Florida’s “Alligator Alcatraz” with Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) whether the Medicaid cuts target 11.8 million citizens for waste, fraud and abuse, Trump had this reply, according to PolitiFact:

“No, I’m saying that. I’m saying it’s going to be a very much smaller number than that, and that number will be waste, fraud and abuse.”

--TL

_____________________________________________

It's Not Over Yet

WEDNESDAY 7/2/25

Needs More Cuts – But wait, there’s more. 

President Trump hopes to sign the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the budget reconciliation bill that contains pretty much all his legislative agenda, by Independence Day. And wouldn’t Trump’s Big Beautiful Sharpie Signature be a nice Fourth of July birthday celebration, huh?

But shortly after the Senate’s passage of the bill early Tuesday, 51-50 with Vice President Vance needed to break the tie, Rep. Andy Harris (R-TN), chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, and Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), a member of the caucus, announced they would vote against a key procedural vote set for Wednesday to move the reconciliation bill forward, The Hill reports.  

All Reps. Harris and Norman need is a third congressmember to sink the bill’s progression, and they say they have several more allies in the House. The procedural involves setting parameters on the bill’s debate.

“Look, Mr. Musk is right, we cannot sustain these deficits, he understands finance, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress,” Harris told Fox News Tuesday, referring to Tesla/SpaceX/Starlink CEO/exiled DOGE-founder Elon’s criticism of the bill (and plans to “primary” its congressional supporters). “And I believe the Freedom Caucus will take the lead in making further progress.”

Regression? … What, exactly is “progress” given that the Congressional Budget Office has scored the House’s hit on the federal deficit at $2.4 trillion over the next decade only to be topped by the Senate version’s $3.3 trillion cost.

•••

Trump Wins Lawsuit Settlement – Paramount Global will pay $16 million to Donald J. Trump’s presidential library fund in an out-of-court settlement over his lawsuit regarding a CBS News 60 Minutes interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris prior to last November’s elections. Under the settlement, Paramount will not admit any wrongdoing.

Trump’s lawsuit regarded the editing of an answer Harris, his opponent in the presidential election, gave in the interview. Her answer was edited differently for the 60 Minutes broadcast and for Face the Nation earlier. 

Trump’s attorneys argued the edits made Harris look less confused than she was while causing anguish and confusion for his supporters. Though Trump’s lawsuit clearly was without merit, in the end, the settlement is good for Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone’s efforts to sell the company to Skydance Media without resistance from the Trump administration’s Federal Communications Commission.

--TL

_____________________________________________

One Big Passed Budget

TUESDAY 7/1/25

Senate Passes OBBB – The Senate passed its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill reconciliation budget, 51-50, with Vice President Vance casting the tiebreaker. The vote came after Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) held overnight discussions with Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and other GOP leaders to discuss changes softening the effect of Medicare and nutritional assistance cuts to Alaska, and for slower phase-out of clean energy tax credits, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina – who announced days ago he will not seek re-election in 2026 – voted with Democrats. 

•••

Defunding Planned Parenthood – As the Senate proceeded through its vote-a-rama Monday its parliamentarian handed the Republicans a win in determining eligible for budget reconciliation One Big Beautiful Bill language that would block Planned Parenthood from Medicaid funding for services in addition to abortion, Roll Call reports, which already is outlawed by the annual Hyde amendment appropriations rider. This follows a Supreme Court ruling last week that Planned Parenthood and its patients could not sue to challenge a state’s decision to exclude the provider from federal Medicaid funds because of its abortion services. 

Democrats had tried to block the OBBB provision, citing the so-called Byrd rule restricting what can be included in reconciliation.

•••

Twitter Feud – President Trump and Elon Musk split up without having a prenup, and now it’s coming back to haunt the GOP. After the Tesla/SpaceX/Starlink CEO spent about $275 million to get Trump elected and appoint himself DOGE chief, Musk now is trying to stop the Senate from passing the One Big Beautiful Bill budget built around the president’s own agenda. 

Musk says that if the bill passes the Senate, he will form a new “America Party” toot suite and “primary” Republicans, The New York Times reports. Never mind that if it’s a new, distinct party, it seems Musk’s candidates would have to wait to next November’s general election to challenge Republican House and Senate members. 

“Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!” Musk tweeted on his X-Twitter. “And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.”

So maybe it means Musk will fund candidates under something called the America Party and run them in GOP primaries? Whatever the case, it’s a potential windfall for Democrats who think they probably do, but given they will be going up against MAGA acolytes might not, have an advantage in taking back the House and Senate in 2026. 

By late Monday, according to the NYT Musk had endorsed Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a budget hawk who joined 213 Democrats in voting against the House version of the bill, which passed 215-214 late last month.

Trump, being one who never backs down from a social media war, whether on his own Truth Social or in this case on X-Twitter, where he easily out-capitalized Musk, tweeted back; “Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!—DJT” –TL

_____________________________________________

MONDAY 6/30/25

SCOTUS Rules – The Supreme Court on Friday handed President Trump a big victory by ruling a single federal district court cannot hold up an executive order for the entire nation. The ruling entails Trump’s attempts to end birthright citizenship but did not rule directly on the 14th Amendment issue. Scroll down this column for details.

•••

Vote-a-Rama – Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Rand Paul (R-KY) and Thom Tillis (R-SC) appear to be the only three remaining holdouts against the Senate’s version of the One Big Beautiful Bill, which Roll Call says is likely to reach a vote Monday. President Trump says he would like to sign the bill by July 4th, but before it even gets to a Senate floor vote, the Vote-a-rama will allow its members to propose unlimited amendments.

In the latest version of the Senate bill released early Saturday, provisions that would benefit Alaskan whaling captains and support rural hospitals may be swaying Murkowski to Trump’s side, The New York Times reports. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) needs just one of the three to help pass OBBB, and Murkowski already has joined the majority to move the bill forward through a couple of procedural votes.

But on Sunday the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office scored the hit the federal deficit would take from the Senate version at a minimum of $3.3 trillion over the next decade, which is $900 billion more than its score for the OBBB passed by the House 215-214 last month.

Two other key holdouts, Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Josh Hawley (R-MO) announced their support for the Senate bill by late Friday. The president spent a rare weekend in Washington and played golf Saturday with Sens. Paul, Tillis, Eric Schmidt (R-MO) and Budget Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC), according to Roll Call

If Murkowski folds on the budget, Rand seems to be the holdout that opponents of the bill can count on, though erstwhile über-MAGA and budget hawk Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) also is not a certainty for either side. As for fellow budget hawk Tillis, Trump has threatened him with a primary challenge for his 2026 election campaign and Tillis has since announced he will not run for re-election next year, The Hill reports.

Democrats did what they could to gum up the works by calling for a full reading of the 940-page bill, which went on into Sunday. Then Democrats challenged Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham’s (R-SC) use of a “current policy” baseline scoring the 2017 tax cut extensions, according to The Hill.

“This is the nuclear option,” ranking Budget Committee Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), said. “It’s just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C. lingo.”

And Republicans are going beyond nuclear. Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) and other Republican hardliners called on the Senate Sunday to ignore rulings from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough that would remove several key provisions of the bill.

“Great Congressman Steube’s 100% correct,” Trump Truth Socialed. “An unelected Senate Staffer (Parliamentarian) should not be allowed to hurt the Republicans (sic) Bill. Wants many fantastic things out. NO! DJT.”

•••

Nuclear Argument – Rafael Grossi, head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency, is contradicting President Trump’s assertion US strikes on Iran have “obliterated” the country’s nuclear weapons capabilities, saying that Iran could produce enriched uranium in months, Semafor reports. Trump meanwhile on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures refuted Iran’s claims that it had moved its enriched uranium stockpiles ahead of the attacks.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____________________________________________

FRIDAY 6/27/25

Victory for Trump – The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that district courts likely exceeded their authority in blocking President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, NPR reports. The ruling, with the court’s three liberal justices dissenting, does not rule on the 14th Amendment regarding birthright citizenship, but essentially says that district courts cannot make decisions for the entire nation. The ruling does take power from district courts in issuing injunctions to restrict executive branch actions. 

The ruling is the first of six to be issued by SCOTUS on the final day of its 2024-25 term. More to come.

•••

You Say ‘Obliterated,’ They Say ‘Not Quite’ – Thursday morning’s Pentagon press conference in which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reiterated the Trump White House’s claim that it had thoroughly wiped out Iran’s nuclear weapons program in the US Air Force attack last weekend has done little to tamper the debate over the bombings’ effect. Thursday afternoon, the administration briefed the Senate Subcommittee on Homeland Security, in this case, to members from both sides of the aisle.

“I walk away from that briefing still under the belief that we have not obliterated the program,” said ranking member Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), per Daily Beast. “The president was deliberately misleading the public when he said the program was ‘obliterated’ because it is certain that there is still significant capability and significant equipment that remain.”

Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC) accepts the Trump White House’s assessment.

“By destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities, by using B-2 bombers, helping Israel, but delivering a decisive blow, which was bold and brilliant, President Trump let every other adversary in the world know Joe Biden doesn’t live in the White House anymore,” Graham said on Fox News’ Hannity. “There’s a new sheriff in town. … He’s been strong, he’s been measured. … He wants peace, but it takes two people to have peace. …” 

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
FRIDAY 6/27/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

Tesla stock price year-to-date is down (at least for the moment) by about 22%. 

Elon Musk’s net worth is approximately $410,000,000,000. Yes, a lot of zeros, so even were his net worth to decline by 22%, that would be $319,800,000,000. Still a lot of zeros.

Since January 1, 2024, NASA has used SpaceX for three crewed missions, one in March 2024, one in September 2024, and one in March 2025. There were several other missions with SpaceX rockets (e.g., SPHEREx, PUNCH, EscaPADE).

NASA is presently dependent on SpaceX. United Launch Alliance had a NASA mission back in December 2023. Blue Origin has just been doing things like launching Katy Perry.

Donald Trump has recently claimed that Musk “gets a lot of subsidies” and that perhaps if these firms are under the DOGE chainsaw there is “BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED.”

Tesla offers five electric vehicle models: the Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, and the Cybertruck.

Depending on the trim, there are 8 variants that permit purchasers to obtain a $7,500 tax credit.

Now if the Senate language of the budget has held (it passed 51-50 Tuesday), the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles will end September 30. The House, surprisingly, is a bit more generous: it would run through the end of 2025, and for automakers who have sold fewer than 200,000 EVs over the years will have vehicles that can qualify for the credit until the end of 2026.

Tesla’s share of the US EV market is just over 40%. It was over 50% not that long ago, but there is (a) more competition from other vehicle manufacturers and (b) the whole “Elon is a ****” movement.

Still, Tesla is doing well in the market. Should the tax incentives for EVs be eliminated, that bill won’t be particularly “Beautiful” for General Motors, Ford. . .or Tesla. Arguably it will have less of an effect on Tesla simply because it has a bigger piece of the market.

Additionally, unlike traditional automakers, Tesla has done things like suddenly adjusted pricing in a notable way (down and up: because it is more efficient in its production that other automakers, it has higher margins on its vehicles, which can be trimmed and still come out ahead, though not as far) and Tesla hasn’t done things like advertise. (GM spent some $3 billion in 2024 on advertising, so evidently it works. 

(Were Tesla to start spending on ads, it, too, might reap the benefits.)

So: (1) NASA is dependent on Musk. (2) Musk’s automotive fortunes (shrinking though they are) will not be devastated by the language in the budget bill, regardless of what passes.

Trump probably doesn’t understand that.

And Musk probably doesn’t understand that a purpose of a government is to help support the people who it governs. He may like DOGE. The majority of Americans don’t.

Both men have demonstrated they have little tolerance for those who don’t wholly agree with them. Consequently, their relationship is one that is intrinsically fraught with the seeds of failure.

And both men seem to have a world view that has it that people are out to screw them.

They’ve popularized the mantra “waste, fraud and abuse,” and even though it is repeated over and over and over again, there has been little in the way of what can be considered meaningful evidence — meaningful from the point that there could be “BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED.”

Sure, Trump could cut off SpaceX. But in 2024 a full 75% of SpaceX’s revenues came from commercial launches, and as indicated, 100% of NASA’s launches were on SpaceX equipment. 

NASA could be shuttered — and as it represents ~0.5% of the 2025 federal budget, there is “NO BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED.”

Trump’s threats to Musk are not as chilling as they would be to anyone else who doesn’t happen to be the richest person in the world. 

If the beef between the two really gets big, there is the possibility that Trump could nationalize SpaceX, and thereby reduce about 40% of a source of Musk’s wealth — and probably tank the stock market as investors see the treatment of private enterprise. (Why these people aren’t more concerned about tariffs being placed on things like Kia minivans because Trump invoked emergency powers predicated on national security grounds is curious, so it is hard to predict what they will do.)

As previously mentioned, if all incentives for electric vehicles are eliminated, Ford and General Motors will be impacted most at the showroom. And if, as is likely, they do go away, then this puts the US in a position that is substantially behind China in advanced technology.

According to a recent study by the International Energy Agency — a study pre-the-likely-elimination-of-incentives in the US, as well as the lifting of the California emissions waver — by 2030 electric car sales in China will be 80% of the total.

Europe? “Carbon dioxide targets support the achievement of a sales share close to 60%.”

The US? “Around 20% . . . less than half the share projected for 2030 last year.”

The billions invested by GM and Ford in electrification will be worth far less than they are at the moment. Which could be construed as “BIG MONEY TO BE LOST.”

Do either of these men understand that?

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_____________________________________________

Your Turn

MONDAY 6/30/25

Was the Trump administration’s bombing of Iranian nuclear weapons facilities last weekend “obliteration” or something less? What do you think of Trump’s pivot from isolationism to a more neocon approach?

What do you think of the White House’s policy toward national parks, including its 30% cut in funding and plans to sell off some public lands?

Whether you lean right or left, pro-MAGA, never-Trumper, moderate liberal or progressive, we seek your civilly stated COMMENTS. Email The Hustings at editors@thehustings.news and please indicate whether you lean left or right, or leave a comment in the appropriate column here, so we can post your opinions in the proper column.

_____
FRIDAY 6/27/25

Best Opportunity -- I have a somewhat positive emotional response to the USAF strikes. At the same time, I know that is partly because I do not have the patience conducting diplomacy requires -- especially with a posturing, lying entity like Iran. I doubt very much whether DJT has that patience either. Still, the depleted state of Iran's proxies made this the best opportunity for the foreseeable future. -- Hugh Hansen

Email your COMMENTS on the Israeli-Iran war and the United States’ bombing of nuclear sites in Iran, to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings – left or right, liberal or conservative, etc. – in the subject line.

_____
MONDAY 6/23/25

Call him ‘Daddy’ – President Trump left the NATO summit Wednesday in a good mood about NATO nations’ commitment (except Spain) to spending 5% of their GDP on defense. Scroll down center column for more …

THURSDAY 6/26/25

Defending Operation Midnight Hammer – Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth held a news conference Thursday morning praising “the highly successful strikes in Iran,” in a strike-back against a leaked initial intelligence report that Operation Midnight Hammer did little damage to Iran’s nuclear weapons program (per The New York Times).

“If you want to know what’s going on at Fordow, you’d better get a big shovel,” Hegseth, who appeared with Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine at the Pentagon, said. DefSecHeg also cited a statement by International Atomic Energy Agency Director Gen. Rafael Mariano Grossi Thursday that the strike on three key Iranian sites last weekend “caused enormous damage.”

Meanwhile … On NPR’s Morning Edition former Trump 45 national security advisor John Bolton said Iran has achieved a lot of progress on its nuclear arms facilities, and he believes the work to destroy it is not done. (In fact, Bolton has long suspected that Iran may have some nuclear operations in North Korea.) However …

“These targets that were struck clearly are the targets that deserved to be struck,” Bolton told Steve Inskeep.

•••

NATO Butter-Up – Ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague earlier this week, President Trump was showing off a note from NATO Secretary Gen. Mark Rutte calling Trump “Daddy” after the president criticized Israel and Iran for continuing strikes heading into their fragile ceasefire after their “12 Day War.”

“Mr. President, dear Donald. Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else has dared to do. It makes us all safer,” (per The Associated Press). 

“You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening. It was not easy but we’ve gotten them all signed to 5%!”

That refers to NATO nations’ commitment to spending 5% of their annual Gross Domestic Product on defense – Trump has demanded NATO nations increase their contributions in order for the US to ease up on it since before his first administration.

--TL

_____________________________________________

WEDNESDAY 6/25/25

Sore Thumbs – Operation Midnight Hammer, the US military’s strike last weekend on three of Iran’s facilities didn’t do much to slow Tehran’s development of nuclear weapons, likely setting it back only by months, according to an early intelligence assessment by sources briefed on it described to CNN. 

The report Tuesday evening by the news network drew outcries from MAGA faithful. Speaking Wednesday morning from the NATO summit in The Hague, President Trump said the intelligence was “inconclusive” and preliminary. Trump maintained the strikes on Iran caused “total obliteration.”

Check that leak … The FBI has begun an investigation of how the preliminary assessment of the attack on Iran became public, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced at the NATO summit, The Wall Street Journal reports. Trump, meanwhile, called minimizing the bombings’ success “disrespectful.”

Ceasefire, meanwhile … Despite the president’s comments about Israeli and Iranian leadership not knowing what they are doing, or perhaps because he made those comments as he left for the NATO summit Tuesday, the ceasefire between the two countries is going swimmingly so far.

•••

Cuomo Clobbered in NYC Mayoral Race – Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo came in a distant second to democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in Tuesday’s rank preference New York Democratic primary, The New York Times reports. With 93% of the vote in, Mamdani took 43.5% of the rank preference vote to Cuomo’s 36.4%. State assemblyman Mamdani’s 70,465 vote margin was decisive enough for Cuomo, who resigned as New York State’s governor in 2021 amidst allegations of sexual harassment, to concede without waiting out a second round in the rank preference. 

Candidate Brad Lander, who cross-endorsed with Mamdani and appeared with him as a guest on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert Tuesday took 11.3% of the vote. 

Pundits have been characterizing the Democratic primary as an indication of the direction of the party going into next year’s midterms. US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) both endorsed Mamdani in the race, but even with past New York mayors having (failed) runs for president, the mayor’s constituency is pretty distinct. 

Mamdani faces perennial Republican candidate and Guardian Angels co-founder Curtis Sliwa as well as New York’s ethics-challenged current Democratic mayor, Eric Adams, who is running for this November’s election as an independent. Cuomo also has floated the possibility of running as an independent.

--TL

______________________________________________

Israel-Iran Ceasefire, Moscow-Style

TUESDAY 6/24/25

This is How the Ceasefire Between Israel and Iran Went – President Trump announced a ceasefire deal. There were no details and some skepticism of whether Israel and Iran agreed, but on Tuesday, both nations said they had agreed to stop fighting, NPR reports. 

Then, in a statement to NPR, the Israeli military accused Iran of firing two missiles toward Israel after the ceasefire was to take effect. Israel said the missiles were intercepted. Iran’s state media reported a denial by Iran that it fired missiles after the ceasefire deadline.

Israeli defense minister Israel Katz ordered the military to “respond forcefully” anyway, and “continue the intensified operations targeting regime assets and terrorist infrastructure in Tehran.”

Trump expressed his anger toward both parties, though primarily Israel, when departing for the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague, according to Morning Edition.

“You know what we have? We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck their doing,” Trump said (NPR redacted the naughty word in its report).

“Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen. I’m not happy with Israel.”

Then on Truth Social: ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME NOW.

--TL

_____________________________________________

US Attacks Iran's Nuclear Sites (With Updates)

MONDAY 6/23/25

UPDATE III: President Trump says in a social media post that Israel and Iran have agreed to a "complete and total ceasefire," the BBC reports, that could lead to the end of the war.

UPDATE II: Iran signaled Qatar about its attacks on Al Udeid ahead of launching the missiles, NPR’s All Things Considered reports, an indication it needed to take some action but did not want to go to the extreme of a potentially deadly bombardment. But that keeps open the question of what Iran will do next.

UPDATE: Iran has fired missiles at the Al Udeid base in Qatar, the US’ largest base in the Middle East (The New York Times). Qatar reports its air defenses have intercepted Iran’s missiles, and the US Defense Department says there are no reports of injuries from the counterattack.

Sucker Punch? – Is there something in The Art of the Deal playbook that you distract your subject with a “two week” warning, that you will take that long before your next move, only to bombard the other party after a couple of days?

Probably not. But the tactic might prove effective, as President Trump indicated after Saturday’s B-2 bombings of Iran’s nuclear weapons development sites, in particular the Fordow nuclear material enrichment facility north of Tehran.

“I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success,” he said in a special address to the US 10 p.m. ET Saturday (above, with Vice President Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio). 

Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei responded without referring to the US, saying instead that Israel made a “grave mistake” and “it is being punished right now,” The Wall Street Journal reports. 

Analysts are concerned about the potential for Iran blockading the Straits of Hormuz – or worse, targeting US bases in the region.

Meanwhile… Vance has signaled that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is in-tact and in the country’s control – so, not addressed by the “spectacular” success.

“We’re not at war with Iran,” the vice president told NBC News’ Kristen Welker, on Meet the Press. “We’re at war with Iran’s nuclear program.”

It’s that stockpile, and Iran’s work enriching it to become the world’s seventh nuclear superpower that is the impetus for Israel’s military attack on the country more than a week ago, and now the US response last weekend. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed for decades that Iran was on the brink of developing nuclear weapons.

On April 16, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi issued a warning ahead of his visit there that Tehran was “dangerously close” to building a nuclear bomb. On Monday, Grossi called an emergency meeting to demand Iran give clarity on the whereabouts of its nuclear material, the Deutsche Presse-Agentur press agency reports.

History … This has raised the question of whether President Obama’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015 was effective. By the time Donald J. Trump began his first term as president a couple of years later, the IAEA’s monitoring of Iran’s nuclear power program indicated the JCPOA was successfully preventing Iran from sufficiently enriching uranium for military purposes.

That’s the basis of the argument that continues to this day, between conservative neocons and MAGA Republicans on the right, and Democrats and Republicans overall, as the Trump administration continues to talk dealmaking for a new agreement that may, or may not, be much like JCPOA, with Iran.

Can the Trump administration convince Tehran to return to the negotiating table even after Israel’s missile attacks and clear calls for regime change? After the US attack, there are serious doubts about that – but Trump apparently thinks it’s still possible. We probably won’t have to wait two weeks to find out.

New red hat? … Rubio joined Vance Sunday in denying “regime change” as the Trump administration’s goal. But the president on his own social media outlet indicated something somewhat different.

“It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why would there be Regime Change??? MIGA!!”

•••

Correction – Our Wednesday, June 18 report on the then-potential US strike misidentified the bomber capable of dropping GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs on Iran’s nuclear weapons sites.  It was, and is, the Northrop B-2 bomber.

We’ve also since learned of a dispute over the spelling of Iran’s underground uranium enrichment facility. The New York Times spells it Fordo, while The Associated Press and CNN spell it Fordow. Zelensky – Zelenskyy.

We are sticking with “Fordow” with the “w.”

•••

No Joke? – “America’s Finest News Source” The Onion “republished” its recent editorial, “Congress, Now More Than Ever, Our Nation Needs Your Cowardice,” apparently only in The New York Times and coincidentally a day after the US Air Force bombed Iran’s nuclear weapon sites under authority of President Trump, but without consulting Congress. 

The full-page ad, which was in the NYT only on Sunday and not in any other newspapers, says; “Each passing day brings growing assaults on essential liberties like freedom of speech and due process. Meanwhile, our delicately assembled legal system faces a constant barrage of threats. Even as this issue reaches publication, the US military has been deployed against peaceful protesters. We teeter on the brink of collapse into an authoritarian state. That is why, today, The Onion calls upon our lawmakers to sit back and do absolutely nothing.”

Editors of the satirical newspaper note a copy of the issue containing this editorial was delivered to every member of Congress. 

Publicity stunt? Advertorial for The Onion’s recently revitalized print edition? Perhaps.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
MONDAY 6/23/25

What’s Next -- Funny thing about some of the coverage of the bombing of the Iranian nuclear facilities. Commentators claimed Donald Trump executed an amazing head-fake.

That is, on June 19 he said he would give Iran two weeks to come to the negotiating table.

Within two days — possibly before the name cards for the participants could be printed — the missiles flew with impactful consequences.

(Claims he made about “obliteration” are, not surprisingly, unfounded: on Monday (June 23) Israel attacked the Fordow Uranium Enrichment Plant. Was the facility mere smithereens, the Israelis wouldn’t have bothered.)

Ha! He tricked them, just as much of the media were tricked by the B-2’s flying west out of Missouri: Has Waze affected their ability to read maps?

Rather than a feint, isn’t it possible that Trump decided to pull the proverbial trigger on Saturday evening (Washington, DC, time) just because? 

Is there any sense Trump has a plan vis-à-vis Iran?

Sure, he went to Truth Social almost immediately with his rants and threats. And the likes of Marco Rubio went on the Sunday shows mimicking his master.

As this is being written there are reports Iranian missiles are hitting US bases in the Middle East. Should this be a surprise? 

And by the time you read this there will be more Truth Social bluster.

But will there be an articulation of what the US commitment is going to be? Claims about being at war with the Iranian nuclear program isn’t going to cut it. 

What blood and treasure are we going to spend dealing with the Iranian regime?

This is not to question whether the attack should have taken place.

But it is to question whether Trump had something in mind before he put on a suit, slapped on a MAGA ball cap and went to the situation room Saturday evening. --Stephen Macaulay

Peace Through Strength -- The debate over whether to strike Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites is now behind us, as Tehran has suffered a significant setback in its pursuit of weapons-grade material. The United States military displayed impressive precision and professionalism in carrying out the orders of our ever-engaged commander-in-chief.

For many, the choice seemed binary: Either act decisively to prevent a nuclear Iran, or risk facing a far more dangerous regime emboldened by atomic leverage. Those of us who lived through the Cold War remember the constant threat of nuclear conflict — and the relief that followed the Soviet Union’s collapse. Unfortunately, the decades since have seen the rise of new nuclear threats, with Iran chief among them.

It is reasonable to hope that the recent B-2 strikes will not only stall Iran’s nuclear ambitions but also serve as a strong deterrent to its leadership — discouraging future aggression toward Israel, Western democracies, and continued support for terrorist proxies.

America cannot afford to project weakness. Under President Trump, the United States demonstrated a clear willingness to apply maximum pressure — politically, economically, and militarily — without rushing into prolonged entanglements. Critics may still call for restraint, but history shows that appeasement has rarely tempered radical regimes.

President Trump’s doctrine of peace through strength provided a strategic roadmap: one where America leads from a position of resolve, not retreat.

Avoiding war is always preferable. But ignoring Iran’s nuclear ambitions invites far greater peril. While some hesitate to act, President Trump understood that decisive leadership today can prevent the devastating conflicts of tomorrow. --Rich Corbett

Email your COMMENTS on the Israeli-Iran war and the United States’ bombing of nuclear sites in Iran, to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings – right or left, conservative or liberal, etc. – in the subject line.

_____
MONDAY 6/23/25