Left-Column Responses to Our Substack Discussion of President Trump’s Anti-Democratic Actions ...

Scroll this trackbar near-right to read more comments ...

Always a Snake

Credit for referencing Spy. Indeed, there were those back then who knew the snake was a snake and were willing to say so. I suspect news operations today stick with mealy-mouthed euphemisms for “lie” in order to maintain their self-imposed fantasy of “objectivity.” One can also imagine the hell-fury that would descend on those outlets that actually call the snake a snake. Even equivocators such as CNN (and soon, it seems, CBS) would rather pay off Trump than give his supporters more reason to call them “fake news.”

--Randall Patnode

via Substack

•••

No Need for House, Senate

I have been calling my senators and my congressman every couple of days, reminding them that they were Americans BEFORE they were Republicans, and before they were elected representives of the people. This week, I will remind them that, if this keeps up, all 535 members of Congress will be rendered surplus to requirements and sent home to their old jobs. The king and his court will rule. Is that what you really want?

--Jim McCraw

via e-mail

_____________________________________________

Submit your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate whether you lean left or right in the subject line.

Other news and issues ripe for your comments include the Trump White House’s new 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum and its plans for reciprocal tariffs and the ongoing drama surrounding DOGE chief Elon Musk’s scrutiny of federal departments and agencies. 

And what about Trump naming himself chairman of the Kennedy Center? 

Don’t miss Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s commentary, “How is Trump Helping Grocery Buyers?” in the right column and email your comments, favorable or against, to his comments as well.

Meanwhile, read Substack on The Hustings here.

_____
MONDAY 2/10/25

"He's not getting anything," President Trump said of DOGE Chief Elon Musk in a Fox News interview with Brett Baier Sunday. "In fact, I don't know how he can devote time to it -- he's into it."

MONDAY 2/10/25

Steel and Aluminum – President Trump promises a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum from every trading partner, The Wall Street Journal reports. Canada in particular is a major importer to the US of the metals. Trump also will announce reciprocal tariffs to be detailed Tuesday or Wednesday, and to take effect “almost immediately.”

“Very simply, they charge us, we charge them,” he told reporters on Air Force One on the way from Florida to New Orleans for Super Bowl LIX. 

Musk is ‘terrific’ … In an interview with Fox News’ Brett Baier recorded at Mar-a-Lago before he flew off to the Super Bowl, President Trump called a federal court’s temporary halt on the Department of Government Efficiency’s access to Treasury Department records “crazy.” 

“I’ve had great help with Elon Musk, who’s been terrific,” Trump told Baier. 

Trump predicted the Kansas City Chiefs would win Super Bowl LIX. The Chiefs lost to the Philadelphia Eagles, 40-22.

•••

CFPB Shuts Down – Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were informed Monday the Washington headquarters will be closed this week and that they must work remotely, NPR’s Morning Edition reports, citing an internal email it obtained. On Saturday night, CFPB employees were instructed by the agency’s new acting director, Trump Office of Management and Budget director and Project 2025 co-author Russell T. Vought, that they should “stop virtually all their work.” 

The White House initially replaced Biden CFPB appointee Rohit Chopra as director with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
MONDAY 2/10/25

(He Doesn’t Know, Either)

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

Near the end of his Super Bowl interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Donald Trump was given a question that he should have had an answer to, as it was the sort of thing that he flogged on the campaign trail when he wasn’t doing a disturbing dance.*

Baier asked him when the American people can expect prices to go down for things like groceries and energy, whether they need to be patient.**

Trump responded: “No, I think we’re gonna become a rich. . .Look, we’re not that rich right now. That’s because we let all these nations take advantage of us.”

Then he noted the trade deficits with Mexico and Canada.

Let’s break this down.

  • He didn’t come near to answering the question. When will it be cheaper to buy a dozen eggs and a tank of gas? He had no answer to that.
  • What does becoming “a rich” have to do with the price of a bag of burgers at McDonalds or the kilowatt hours on a home electric bill?
  • “How is it that “we’re not that rich right now”? America has the highest GDP in the world. The world.
  • And what’s this about letting “nations take advantage of us”? They have things for sale, whether it is petroleum from the Alberta oil sands or avocados from Jalisco, and Americans buy them. Turns out that they have more we want to buy than they want to buy from us. So, are they taking “advance of us” or are we providing an insufficient number of things they want to buy? Econ 101, folks.

The fact that Donald Trump can’t answer a simple question without going into a rant about victimization is something people who thought their lives would be made better by his election need to hear.

==

*Can you imagine the outrage that would have echoed far and wide were Barack Obama, when he was president, spent a fraction of the amount of time dancing on stage that Trump does? If you saw your grandpa on a stage making those moves, wouldn’t you quickly escort him off?

**Remember when Trump made it seem as though on Day One he was going to make magic happen such that we would all be in a Golden Age? While he and Elon Musk have done much to deal with what seems to be substantive issues (and they are substantive to the people who have lost their jobs or who are suffering because we no longer think it is good to help people who are less fortunate), he hasn’t done anything that would help regular Americans. Like this from Trading Economics: “Eggs US increased 1.28 USD/DOZEN or 22.03% since the beginning of 2025, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Historically, Eggs US reached an all time high of $7.09 in January of 2025. source: USDA.” On January 17, before he took office, a dozen eggs cost $6.12. On January 24, in office, they were up to $6.55. And by January 30, $7.09. Somehow putting tariffs on goods coming from Canada and Mexico aren’t going to do much to make things more affordable. In fact, lots of things will cost American grocery and gasoline buyers more. Which means they will have less money for eggs that evidently aren’t becoming less expensive.

_____
MONDAY 2/10/25

Commentary by Sharon Lintner

Elon Musk gaining access to US Treasury files is as unbelievable as it is unsettling.

The only question I have is "why?"

Trump is treating the highest office in the land like his TV show. He hires and fires in an attempt to show political muscle, but ends up rattling the cages of his own people, as well as of world leaders. 

This is like an elaborate game for Trump and his wealthy cronies. Unfortunately, the reality is that we have no idea what the implications will be of Musk having access to the nation’s most sensitive and guarded information. It's too early to tell what damage could be done, but whatever its extent, it will more than likely be irreversible.

We are trapped in a surreal moment, or at least I hope it's only a moment. 

_________________________________________________

Your Opinion Here or There

Your civilly stated comments on President Trump’s desire to turn the Gaza Strip into a US-held “Riviera of the Middle East,” the Justice Department’s compiling of a list of FBI agents and officials who investigated the January 6th attack on the US Capitol, latest Senate confirmation of Trump cabinet members, or on Elon Musk’s DOGE-takeover of the Treasury Department’s payment system (see “Downsizing Government Bloat and Spending Transparency” by Rich Corbett, in the right column) are not only welcome, they are encouraged. No echo chambers or false equivalencies here.

Or you may want to comment on recent news or a recent issue we have not sufficiently covered, if at all. 

Whether you agree or disagree with Corbett’s column on the right, we want to hear from you, too. Please submit civil comments to editors@thehustings.news and indicate whether you lean left or right in the subject line, so we can post your remarks in the proper column. NOTE that your comment on a specific issue does not have to align completely with your political leanings – you may be a conservative who disagrees with “Downsizing Government Bloat and Spending Transparency,” for example, or you may be a liberal who does agree with Corbett. We recognize that political philosophies are more complicated than that.

Also, please be sure to read our free Substack on The Hustings.

_____
WEDNESDAY 2/5/25

DOGE staffer Marko Elez, rehired by Elon Musk after having resigned over racist social media posts was said to have read/access status for Treasury documents, according to WIRED. Scroll down for details.

SATURDAY-SUNDAY 2/8-9/25

UPDATE: Most Trump administration officials, including “special government employee” Elon Musk and his DOGE tech bros are blocked from access to sensitive US Treasury records for at least a week, according to Politico. US District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan issued his “middle of the night” ruling early Saturday on a lawsuit filed by 19 Democratic state attorneys general alleging DOGE’s access as allowed by the Trump administration and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent violates the law, endangers personal information and grants DOGE ability to unconstitutionally slash government spending already approved by Congress. 

Meanwhile … DOGE chief Elon Musk says he will rehire Marko Elez to his team of young tech bros ravishing the US Treasury’s payment system. 

--TL

_______________________________________________

FRIDAY 2/7/25

Can We Reconcile? – After a couple of weeks of Elon Musk’s DOGE ravishing the US Treasury and throwing USAID on the federal scrapheap, the Occupational Health & Safety Administration likely next and the Education Department to follow, the question must be asked: Would we notice a government shutdown if Congress doesn’t pass a budget reconciliation bill by March 14?

Yes, we would, House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-OK) told Politico in a brief interview last Tuesday.

“I don’t think anybody thinks a shutdown is a good thing,” Cole said. “But the politics are such that we could certainly stumble into one without meaning to.”

But House Republicans are racing to finish a “massive” budget reconciliation bill Friday, NPR reports. Thursday evening, the House GOP spent three hours in a meeting to push forward the reconciliation bill they’ve been talking about since before President Trump’s inauguration (he attended the meeting for the first hour, telling congressmembers to “get it done”). 

Optimism for reaching a deal doesn’t seem high among the House GOP. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) are ready to miss Super Bowl LIX in New Orleans and work through the weekend, Roll Call reports.

“We are almost there. A couple of final details that we’ve got to work out,” Johnson said.

A major sticking point is how to score the budget. Trump’s top priorities for the budget reconciliation package are a permanent extension of his tax cuts plus new tax breaks and spending. Those priorities would push the budget up by a couple of trillion dollars to nearly $6 trillion, according to the Roll Call report. Republicans have been trying to window-dress that expensive package with revenue from “expected” economic growth, spending cuts from Trump’s executive orders and potential revenue from tariffs. 

The in-party fight is between “unconventional” scoring methods that conflict with Congressional Budget Office scoring, or the budget cuts and economic growth that would cut $2 trillion from the federal debt over the next 10 years.

Meanwhile, the House Freedom Caucus … continues its push to raise the $36 trillion statutory borrowing cap rather than have to make concessions to Democrats over the next five-plus weeks before a government shutdown. Trump has long called for removing the cap, possibly for his entire four-year term. 

Where is the Senate? … Senate Republicans are preparing their own reconciliation bill for markup next week with Trump priorities immigration and border security, military spending and domestic energy production. 

Where are the Democrats? … Willing to let Republicans fall over each other, apparently. But if and when House and Senate Republicans get their act(s) together, Democrats will not have the vote to stop them.

•••

Treasured No More – Marko Elez, 25, resigned from Elon Musk’s quasi-government Department of Government Efficiency Thursday, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told The Wall Street Journal after the newspaper revealed in a scoop his since-deleted social media account spewed racism and eugenics. 

“Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool,” Elez posted in July, according to the WSJ’s review of archived @nullllptr posts.

The WSJ’s report does not specifically name Elez as the DOGE programmer who had “read/access” status – not just ability to read files, but also to write within them -- for the Treasury, which was reported earlier in the week by WIRED and NOTES ON THE CRISIS. Before Elez stepped down, US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington signed off on a temporary agreement that allowed Elez and another DOGE operative, Tom Krause, “read only” access to Treasury Department records. 

Most recent @nullllptr post was in December according to the WSJ report, when Elez wrote, “99% of Indian H1Bs will be replaced by slightly smarter LLMs, they’re going back don’t worry guys.” “LLM” refers to an AI language model. H1Bs are the visas Musk has advocated in opposition to hardcore Trump administration anti-immigration advocates such as Stephen Miller. 

Elez, a Rutgers University graduate who had worked for Musk’s SpaceX and its Starlink services, as well as on artificial intelligence for X-Twitter, had earlier posted “Normalize Indian hate” and in November, “You could not pay me to marry outside my ethnicity,” according to the WSJ. Insert quips about how much someone would have to be paid to marry Elez here.

--TL

_______________________________________________

Fed 'Resignation Deadline' Deferred -- THURSDAY 2/6/25

UPDATE: US District Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. granted a request by labor unions to pause until Monday the Trump administration’s “deferred resignation” offer, NPR’s All Things Considered reports. O’Toole will hear arguments of the case 2 p.m. Monday.  

Deadline – More than 40,000 of the nation’s 2 million federal employees, roughly 2%, have accepted the Trump administration’s offer to keep pay and benefits through September 30, if they resign by Thursday, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. But also on Thursday, Massachusetts US District Judge George A. O’Toole Jr., a Clinton appointee, will consider a request from labor unions to issue a temporary restraining order and stay the deadline, in a video hearing set for 1 p.m. Eastern. The lawsuit was filed by the legal group Democracy Forward.

•••

To Access, or Not to Access – Marko Elez, the 25-year-old ex-SpaceX programmer and current member of Elon Musk’s quasi-governmental DOGE, which has taken over US Treasury and much of the rest of federal government, was given access to Treasury online files, WIRED magazine reported on Tuesday. In the day-plus since, the Trump White House has refuted news Elez has “read/access,” and DOGE has access Treasury’s $6 trillion worth of payments in “read-only” mode.

Pertinent terms for reporting purposes are “read only” access and “read/access.” The former means that Elez can only read the Treasury files. Confusingly termed “read/access” means Elez can manipulate the files. 

This is important because newsletter NOTES ON THE CRISIS reported Thursday, Day Seven of the Trump-Musk Treasury Payment Crisis of 2025,” that Elez did indeed have read/access status since Saturday, February 1, when initially reported Tuesday, and it appears to have been rescinded since for “read only” access. The newsletter, written by an anonymous federal employee, cited “a source familiar with the situation” in reporting Elez’s “read/access.”

Even “read only” access by DOGE and Elez poses “enormous security risks and the ability to exploit extremely, absurdly, sensitive information to the benefit of Elon Musk, Trump and his inner orbit” or anyone else with whom Musk feels like sharing information.

On Wednesday, according to NOTC, Treasury reacted to media and public alarm over the access by revoking Elez’s “read/access” and allowing him “read only” instead. WIRED narrowly scooped the newsletter on Elez’s “read/access” status Tuesday, the newsletter notes. 

Two labor unions, the American Federation of Government Employees and Service Employees Union International, and the Alliance for Retired Americans, filed suit in federal court in Washington Monday to stop DOGE access of any sort, naming Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Treasury and the Bureau of Fiscal Service as defendants in the civil action (per Newsweek). 

--TL

__________________________________________________

Expanding Expansionism

WEDNESDAY 2/5/25

UPDATE: A block of President Trump’s January 20 executive order preventing the children of migrants without permanent legal status from receiving birthright citizenship in the US was furthered by District Judge Deborah Boardman at a hearing in Greenbelt, Maryland, Wednesday, The Hill reports. 

Unless Boardman’s ruling is overturned by an appeals court, birthright citizenship will remain intact up to when she can issue a final ruling on the merits of the constitutional case put forth by plaintiffs in the suit against Trump’s EO, which is expected to take months. A federal judge in Seattle had previously put the EO on hold in a ruling that was set to expire Thursday.

•••

Middle Eastern Riviera – There’s Greenland and the Panama Canal, and Canada as our 51st state (does the GOP figure they’re more likely to get one or two US senators out of our neighbors to the north, than from Washington, D.C. or Puerto Rico?). Now you can add the Gaza Strip to the list of foreign lands that interest the otherwise isolationist President Trump, who is floating the idea of taking it over, clearing it from the rubble of the Israel-Hamas war, and developing it, economically, The Hill reports. 

Trump Hotels for all our lands? 

Certainly, a better US investment than continuing to supply arms to Ukraine.

“The US will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job – whether we’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site, level the site, and get rid of the destroyed buildings, level it out,” Trump said in opening remarks of a joint White House press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – first foreign leader to visit Trump 47. “Create an economic development that will supply untold numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area, do a real job, do something different.”

Trump said it could become the “Riviera of the Middle East.” Certainly without any Palestinians, who would be exiled to a nearby Arabic state. Not a bad or crazy idea from Netanyahu’s point of view.

“You cut to the chase,” Israel’s prime minister said. “You see things others refuse to see.”

Trump saw that something in a year-old YouTube video interview of his son-in-law and former senior advisor Jared Kushner, from the Middle East Initiative of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. 

Kushner, whose private equity firm at the end of Trump’s first term four years ago received a $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, said February 15, 2024; “Gaza’s waterfront property, it could be very valuable to, if people could focus on kind of building up, you know, livelihoods. You think about all the money that’s gone into this tunnel network and all the munitions. If that would have gone into education or innovation, what could have been done?” (Kushner’s YouTube comments were first reported by The Guardian last year.)

Did senior Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri have buyer’s remorse for spending all that cash on fighting Israel by building tunnels in the Gaza Strip and filling them with munitions? 

“We regret Trump’s statements,” Abu Zuhri said about Trump’s interest in turning the Gaza Strip into the ‘Riviera of the Middle East.’ 

“We consider this a recipe for creating chaos and tension in the region,” he said (per Newsweek).

•••

FBI v. Retribution – The FBI Agents Association and the Center for Employment Justice filed separate lawsuits in a Washington, D.C. federal court Tuesday, to block Justice Department leadership from compiling lists of agents who investigated the January 6thattack on the US Capitol plus criminal investigations of Donald J. Trump (per Politico). The suits argue that the DOJ’s lists of FBI agents are part of a retaliation campaign.

For example, the FBI Agents Association’s lawsuit points to calls by Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, after his pardon by President Trump, for the punishment of the agent who investigated his 1/6 involvement, resulting in his prosecution for seditious conspiracy. Once the Justice Department releases the FBI agent’s name, his or her personal information will be available permanently for anyone who wants to avenge Tarrio’s prosecution, the suit contends.

The Center for Employment Justice’s suit cites screenshots of the Justice Department’s three-page survey the center says is intended to identify thousands of FBI agents who worked on politically sensitive cases. 

Meanwhile… In related news, the Senate Tuesday confirmed by 54-46 vote Pam Bondi, an experienced prosecutor who is nevertheless a Trump loyalist, as attorney general, per Roll Call. All Republican senators plus John Fetterman voted for Bondi while all Democrats, except for Pennsylvania’s senior senator, voted against.

Others … Ex-Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is headed for certain confirmation as Trump’s director of national intelligence after the Intelligence Committee forwarded her nomination, 9-8 along party lines. That confirmation is certain, because Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who voted against Pete Hegseth as Defense secretary said she supports Gabbard, Roll Call reports. Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) also was considered a holdout, but has confirmed his support for Gabbard, who came under mostly Democratic pressure for her support of whistleblower Edward Snowden and a 2017 visit to Syria with then-dictator-leader Bashar al-Assad.

Former Rep. Doug Collins (R-VA) was confirmed 77-23 by the Senate as secretary of Veterans Affairs.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
WEDNESDAY 2/5/25

Commentary by Rich Corbett

In a time when government spending often raises concerns about waste, fraud, abuse and inefficiency, Elon Musk and the DOGE team’s use of “read-only” access to Treasury data can be viewed as a proactive step toward enhancing accountability. The fundamental argument rests on the premise that taxpayers deserve transparency regarding how their funds are being used and managed. 

Those concerned about hearing “read-only” access and knowing computer “whiz kids” are even dipping their toes into Treasury computers containing that much personal data and information have reason to be concerned. If I were “dictator” and allowing this kind of access, it would only be copies of the data, on a system not actually used to process payments and to engineers who have security clearances.

Public funds are, by nature, meant for the benefit of all citizens. When government agencies operate with a level of secrecy that conceals mismanagement, external scrutiny becomes a necessary check. Musk’s team, leveraging AI assisted auditing resources and expertise, aim at shining a light on possible fiscal inefficiencies, and holding each government department or agency to a high standard of accountability. 

Actions of DOGE underscores the importance of reviewing public spending, particularly when traditional oversight channels, sorely missing in Congress, prove inadequate no matter which political party is in power.

Elon Musk and the DOGE team’s initiative to scrutinize runaway government spending, when viewed through the lens of public accountability, represents a necessary measure to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not squandered. By shining light on how public funds are being used, Americans clearly recognize Washington, D.C. needs more effective oversight than the business as-usual status quo.

_____
WEDNESDAY 2/5/25

Commentary by Joel Postman

These are likely the most politically polarized times of the last 100 years. A popular suggestion is that we need to end the divisiveness and seek common ground. There is, however, a tragic and fatal flaw in this notion. 

The dialogue no longer consists of varying views on a particular policy, legislation or political maneuver. More often than not, the conversation starts with anger, name-calling, an outright lie or the assertion of a morally abhorrent point of view. There are not always good people “on both sides.” 

This is an environment in which common ground cannot be achieved, and in fact, the intent of this approach is to avoid doing so. These are not genuine arguments in the traditional sense. They are not entered into in good faith. Thus, this ends the dialogue in which a reasonable person would engage.

_______________________________________________

Your Comments Here and There

Scroll down this page with the trackbar on the far right to read Monday’s column on the Trump tariffs, “Where’s the Deal,” in the right column and Sharon Lintner’s “From Tariffs to Tyranny” in the left column.

In Tuesday’s center column, we are calling out DOGE chief and special government employee Elon Musk’s assault on our democracy. Combine Musk’s takeover of the US Treasury, his accusation with no proof of widespread corruption at the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and his slander of anyone who disagrees with him voiced on his personal social media plaything, X-Twitter, and it is evident he is pushing the nation’s tech oligopoly into authoritarian-dictatorship territory without the checks and balances that were put in place by the nation’s Founding Fathers.

In short, we are calling out Musk’s threat to our democracy in the neutral center column. 

Be sure to voice your opinion in an email to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

_____
TUESDAY 2/4/25

By Todd Lassa

Trump tariffs of 25% on our USMCA partners Canada and Mexico were front and center as World’s Richest Man Elon Musk took over the payment system of the United States Treasury and accused the US Agency for International Development (USAID) Monday of not cooperating with requests for information on how it spends taxpayer dollars. The Trump White House – or was it Musk himself? – handed control of USAID to Secretary of State Marco Rubio as he was flying from Panama, where the administration wants to retake control of the canal, to El Salvador to negotiate over that country taking back undocumented immigrants to our country.

The Alliance for Retired Americans, whose Social Security and Medicare payments are now visible to DOGE, along with the American Federation of Government Employees AFL-CIO, and Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, have filed suit against Treasury and its secretary, Scott Bessent, to stop the handover to Musk and his group of 19-24-year-old insurgents.

Meanwhile, the White House has named Musk, who was not elected to anything or been subject to confirmation hearings or security clearances but did contribute a quarter-billion-dollars to the Trump campaign a “special government employee,” status that’s good for 130 days, according to NPR’s Morning Edition.

In just the 16 days since Trump’s inauguration, the special government employee has granted Marko Elez, a 25-year-old engineer who has worked for two of Musk’s companies, direct access to the Treasury Department systems “responsible for nearly all payments made by the US government,” WIRED reports, citing two sources.

After Rubio met with Panamanian officials, he said of USAID; “Everything they do has to be in alignment with the national interests and the foreign policy of the United States.”

The Trump White House seeks to retake the Panama Canal because the president says it’s under Chinese control. (It’s not – China operates two ports at the canal.) While tariffs against Canada and Mexico were put on-hold Monday, presumably so Trump could re-negotiate a USMCA treaty that does more to change the North American Free Trade Agreement signed under President Clinton than rearrange countries’ names so that “US” is first, the 10% tariff on Chinese goods has stuck. China responded with targeted tariffs of 10% on coal, crude oil, farm equipment and some SUVs, Minnesota Public Radio’s Marketplace reports. China also has placed export controls on such vital metals as tungsten and is investigating Google as a monopoly.  

Meanwhile, China’s Belt and Road Initiative is gaining power and influence in much of the African continent, which is where USAID has concentrated much of its non-military assistance since it was established in 1961.

This raises the question of whether Musk, who grew up in Apartheid South Africa, thinks he knows what he is doing, whether his financial interests are guiding his work as DOGE chief and special government employee (Forbes reports that USAID spent $1 million on terminals from his satellite Internet provider Starlink last year) or whether he is misinformed because he is listening to President Trump?

For the last half-year at least, anti-Trump Republicans and Democrats have been warning of a technoligopoly and of the danger to our democracy of a second Trump term. 

The technoligopoly took over in the time between the presidential election and the inauguration. It turns out that since the inauguration, we have not been able to keep our democracy.

_____
TUESDAY 2/4/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

What Donald Trump is saying about our economic relations with Canada are complete, unmitigated bullshit.

Too bold or strident?

Hardly.

This man, with his evident lack of understanding of how trade works, is going to cause all manner of pain to everyday working Americans, many of whom voted for him, and everyday working Canadians who didn’t.

Truth Social: “We pay hundreds of Billions of Dollars to SUBSIDIZE Canada. Why? There is no reason. We don’t need anything they have.”

All nonsense.

The billions of dollars in question are related to things that Americans buy from Canada.

Here’s how it works:

Someone makes something you want. There is a price on that. You pay the price.

They get the money. You get the product.

If the U.S. buys more from Canada than it sells to Canada, then that is because Americans want more Canadian products and Canadians want fewer American products.

The situation as it exists isn’t some sort of situation where Canada is dumping products or selling them for less than cost.

It is simply that AMERICANS BUY MORE STUFF FROM CANADA.

This is a choice. They are not, in his words, “ripping us off.”

“We don’t need anything they have.”

While someone might argue that buying a minivan built in a factory in Windsor, Ontario, might not be a necessity, odds are that petroleum that goes into existing minivans is something that we need. Sure, we are producing more oil than any other country — 13.2 million barrels of oil per day (funny Biden didn’t get credit for that, which he deserves, which is good or bad depending on you view of CO2 emissions) — but some of the 5.2 million barrels that Canada pumps is necessary because some US oil refineries are setup to process it. Do the people who work in those US refineries need their jobs? Do people in the Midwest who pump the resultant gas into their tanks need that fuel?

According to Trump’s thinking, no.

He went on: “We have unlimited Energy, should make our own Cars, and have more Lumber than we can ever use. Without this massive subsidy, Canada ceases to exist as a viable Country. Harsh but true! Therefore, Canada should become our Cherished 51stState. Much lower taxes, and far better military protection for the people of Canada — AND NO TARIFFS!”

This is how a freedom-loving country behaves?

Either you do what we want you or you cease to exist?

This is how a country that gave rise to the Greatest Generation, women and men who sacrificed their lives for the freedom of others simply because it was the right thing to do, treats our closest ally and neighbor?

This is shameful.

In Trump’s response to The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board’s essay titled “The Dumbest Trade War in History,” he writes, in part:

“THIS WILL BE THE GOLDEN AGE OF AMERICA! WILL THERE BE SOME PAIN? YES, MAYBE (AND MAYBE NOT!). BUT WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AND IT WILL ALL BE WORTH THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID.”

Yes, there it is, an admission that people visiting Kroger, Walmart, Mobil, and elsewhere are going to feel the pain of rising costs. 

Do he and his billionaire enablers care about an additional 50 cents per gallon at the pump? Do they ever even go into a grocery store?

How do a whole bunch of people who have to scrimp to get by — and I’m not talking about the poor in the country, who seem to be entirely irrelevant to Trump — make America great?

It won’t be long before people, regular people, people who go to work every day in factories and warehouses and supermarkets and doctors’ offices, experience “THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID.”

What is not at all clear is why that price must be paid.

That’s because this is complete, unmitigated bullshit.

Note: Although there has been a 30-day “pause” on the threatened tariffs, the foregoing still stands. The consequences of tariffs on the American people would be bleak. And for those who are concerned about the well-being of friends, it wouldn’t be helpful for people in Canada and Mexico, either.

However, one thing has now been established: America cannot be trusted by other countries in the world. Treaties evidently have no meaning. Working relationships can be dissolved with the stroke of a Sharpie.

The United States has played a pivotal role in the world following World War II largely through its engagement with the rest of the world, politically, economically and militarily.

But what we are seeing now is a destruction of that by a group of people who clearly have no understanding of the way many of the countries have integrated.

In effect, the isolation that Trump is talking about isn’t going to Make America Great Again.

It will make America North Korea.

_____
TUESDAY 2/4/25

Commentary by Sharon Lintner

Until now, there has never been a moment when I believed the United States could slip into tyranny. 

At this point, we can't make this right, we can't change this. Our power and ability to prevent this from happening ended on November 5, 2024 and for the first time, I fear my own government. 

Rapid fire chaos is creating a new level of anxiety for the working class. The tariffs will cripple our economy and cause an unnecessary loss of money for those who need it most. I fear this will be life-changing for the vast majority of people. 

It's no longer "of the people, by the people, for the people," it's against the people.

_______________________________________________

Read our Substack newsletter here.

Email your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line, so we can post your opinions in the proper column. 

_____
MONDAY 2/3/25

MONDAY 2/3/25

UPDATE -- Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Monday morning she has reached a deal with the Trump administration to delay tariffs against her country, The New York Times reports. The 25% tariff on Canada and the 10% tariff on China are still on, so far.

Son of Smoot-Hawley – Tariffs threatened, tariffs delivered. They will be delivered on Tuesday and it looks like they are not to be dismissed as negotiable. Nor is President Trump about to be talked out of them by the more rational of his aides. 

“This will be the Golden Age of America! Will there be some pain? Yes and maybe (maybe not). But we will make America great again, and it will all be worth the price that must be paid,” Trump wrote on his social media site, Truth Social (per The Hill) Sunday. “We are a country that is now being run with common sense – and the results will be spectacular!”

Tariff Tuesday will impose a 25% tax on goods from Mexico and Canada, including, for example, auto parts and components that typically cross borders several times before being put together in US-assembled cars and trucks. 

Chinese goods face a 10% tariff Tuesday.

Except… The tariff on sour, heavy crude oil from Canada, refined primarily in the Midwest, will be 10%. Trump certainly doesn’t want to turn off Michigan and Wisconsin’s swing voters who swung for MAGA last November. 

Canadian retribution … Our northern neighbor will impose a 25% tariff Tuesday on US orange juice, peanut butter, wines, spirits, beer, coffee, appliances, apparel, footwear, motorcycles, cosmetics, pulp and paper, Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joy announced Saturday.

“A detailed list of these goods will be made available shortly,” according to the Government of Canada -- as if the above list is lacking in detail.

Mexican retribution … Our southern neighbor will impose tariffs of 5% to 20% on pork, cheese, fresh produce, manufactured steel and aluminum,” The Guardian reports, citing various sources.

Chamber of doom … US Chamber of Commerce Senior Vice President and Head of International (his full title) John Murphy said in part in a release: “The President is right to focus on major problems like our broken border and the scourge of fentanyl, but the imposition of tariffs under IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) is unprecedented, won’t solve these problems, and will only raise prices for American families and upend supply chains.”

Bipartisan oppo … In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, former Sen. Phil Gramm (R-TX), a non-resident senior fellow at The American Enterprise Institute, and Clinton administration Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, now a Harvard University professor and president-emeritus, called out what they see as the folly of the Trump tariffs and compared it with the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs of 1930, which most economists then – and now – blame for triggering the Great Depression. 

Gramm and Summers wrote that “tariffs don’t have a predictable effect of reducing trade deficits, and trade deficits aren’t necessarily an adverse economic development. Indeed, trade deficits often arise as foreign investors choose the US as a preferred destination for their capital.”

DOGE grabs purse strings … While everyone’s attention was focused on the impending tariffs, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent late Friday handed over full access of the federal payment system to lieutenants of the quasi-governmental Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chief/SpaceX/Tesla CEO/X-Twitter-owner and World’s Richest Man Elon Musk. This hands Musk and DOGE a “powerful tool” to monitor and potentially limit government, according to The New York Times.

Before Bessent handed Treasury’s combination code to Musk, top Treasury official and career civil servant David Lebryk had resisted handing access over to DOGE. Lebryk was put on leave, and then suddenly retired last Friday, sources told the NYT.

So, yes, this does appear to be a significant maneuver by the Trump White House in trying to fulfill its quest of replacing non-partisan career civil servants with acolytes of the president. 

But wait, there’s more … If nothing else, the Trump White House earns kudos for its efficiency in making its grab for maximum power with minimum checks and balances. Also on Friday evening, the new administration forced out “dozens” of FBI officials, including chiefs of several field offices as well as agents who worked on the investigations of Trump’s federal criminal cases, according to The Hill, which reported earlier Friday that five executive assistant FBI directors were told they were being demoted. 

“It is deeply alarming that the Trump administration appears to be purging the most experienced agents who are our nation’s first line of defense,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
MONDAY 2/3/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

In the runup to the 2016 presidential election, one of the things Donald Trump repeatedly railed against was the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

It was awful. Horrendous. The worst-ever.

Also, NAFTA was signed by Crooked Hillary’s husband, so that may have had something to do with it.

Trump assured everyone that when he made it to the Oval Office he would create a better deal. A fantastic deal. A deal the likes of which no one ever, in the history of mankind, had ever witnessed.

He negotiated the USMCA, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

There was a clue in the name that has been overlooked.

The North American trade bloc was a wonder of the world, economically speaking. By facilitating the movement of goods across the borders, there were levels of availability and efficiency the likes of which no one ever, in the history of mankind, had ever witnessed.

Still, it was a bad, bad deal, Trump told us. He’d do better. Much, much better.

In the new deal Trump, the man who brought back a phrase from 1940, “America First,” insisted that the name of the treaty put the United States first. 

Forget “North America.” It is literally “America First.”

Suddenly there was a fracture in what had been somewhat seamless.

So here’s a question for all those who think Donald Trump is a businessman par excellence: If he is the Best Dealmaker of All Time, why is a deal he made and that went into effect in July 2020 a bad deal, at least so far as Donald Trump is concerned?

Trump is applying the tariffs to goods coming into the US from Canada and Mexico because of a trumped-up “national emergency.”

The claim is that there are fentanyl and illegal aliens pouring over the borders.

So the US is ignoring a trade agreement crafted under Donald Trump. It is simply applying 25% tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico.

That’ll show ‘em!

According to Trump, this will also have the effect of bringing in all manner of revenues into the coffers of the government.

What he doesn’t say is that those revenues are going to come out of the pockets of Americans who buy everything from avocados to Chevy Silverado pickup trucks.

Americans will be First when it comes to paying for the breaking of the seamless trade between the three countries.

Remember when Trump claimed that he was going to lower prices for consumers, something that the criminal Biden organization was incapable of doing?

According to the Yale Budget Lab, (including the 10% increase in China tariffs) the prices of imported natural gas will increase 9.8% (did any one mention that it is winter in the US?), motor and vehicles and parts by 6.9% (analysis from Kelley Blue Book has it: “New-vehicle prices increased for the fourth straight month in December and, at $49,740, were near the all-time record set in December 2022” — yes, let’s increase that!), electricity by 4.7% (this might trouble Elon a bit), cereal grains by 4.2% (eggs are still increasing in price; now cereal). . .and on it goes.

According to the non-profit Tax Foundation, which was founded in 1937 by a group of corporate executives from the likes of General Motors and Standard Oil, so certainly not some sort of left-wing group, the consequences of the tariffs on Canada and Mexico amounts “to an average tax increase of more than $670 per US household in 2025.”

In addition to which, the tariffs will have the effect of reducing full-time employment of 286,000 US jobs because of the alleged “national emergency” that Canada and Mexico represent for the U.S.

Donald Trump is going to raise prices for Americans. His actions will increase inflation. Gas prices will go up. Food prices, up. Want to build a new garage? You might want to skip it because the wood will be more expensive, as will the car that goes in it. And on it goes.

This is a deal for the American people?

Macaulay is pundit-at-large.

_______________________________________________

Read our Substack newsletter here.

Email your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line, so we can post your opinions in the proper column.

_____
MONDAY 2/3/25

Here at The Hustings we are looking to promote civil, echo chamber-free commentary and discussion of current political news and issues. Our center column is devoted to factual news and news aggregate, and we call ourselves out whenever we publish a mistake or a factual error. 

You can do your part in moving on past “news” on social media to news on civil media, by submitting your COMMENTS to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

Lately, we are very interested in your opinions about Senate confirmation hearings for Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., President Trump’s nominee for Health and Human Services secretary, as well as Trump’s since-rescinded freeze on federal funding assistance on myriad programs already approved by Congress, and his buyout offer to federal government employees. Scroll down with the trackbar on the far right (no political pun intended) to read these center-column news items.

There also is much to be discussed about Trump’s firing of 17 inspectors general last week, as well as his pardon of more than 1,500 January 6th Capitol rioters, including several convicted for violent acts against police during the insurrection.

As you move south on this page, be sure to check out “Shocking FOP Support for Trump” and “Inauguration to Avoid” in the left column, and “Our Leader at Davos (Virtually)”, “Pardons, Promises and Presidential Powers” and “The Return of the Gilded Age?” in the right column.

_____
WEDNESDAY 1/29/25

Bipartisan Pushback – Physician and Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) joined Democrats in heavy grilling over anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (pictured) on the second day of confirmation hearings for President Trump's nominee for HHS secretary (NYT). Cassidy, who could provide a crucial fourth Republican vote against RFK Jr.'s nomination, did not indicate how he would vote. Senate hearings also were held for controversial nominees Tulsi Gabbard, for director of National Intelligence and Kash Patel, for FBI director.

FRIDAY 1/31/25

President’s Favorite Word – On Saturday we could find out just how beautiful President Trump’s favorite word, tariff, is. That’s when the White House will, or maybe will not, impose tariffs of 25% on goods crossing the border from Canada and Mexico (per NPR’s Morning Edition). 

These tariffs may very well turn out to be yet another The Art of the Deal-style negotiating tactic Trump is using to call out what he says is unfair trade, as well as illegal drugs and immigrants crossing the border, even after his first administration negotiated the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) from the 1990s. 

That's what US businesses are hoping. Describing negotiations as a “fluid” situation, Trump aides are working on “several offramps” to avoid enacting such tariffs, The Wall Street Journal reports, citing unnamed sources.

If the tariffs are triggered, they will raise prices on everything from guacamole to gasoline, NPR notes. Automobiles, even if built in US plants have parts and components that come from Mexico and Canada, and typically cross the borders several times before final assembly, also will be hard-hit. Speaking to Wall Street analysts Tuesday for General Motors’ fourth-quarter and full year earnings report, CEO Mary Barra said that plant flexibility allows the automaker to shift production of its highly profitable full-size trucks between Mexican, Canadian and US plants.

“What we won’t do is spend large amounts of capital without clarity,” Barra told analysts. 

If nothing else, we should get some clarity on tariffs this weekend.

--TL

__________________________________________

THURSDAY 1/30/25

Trump Blames DEI for Crash – Less than 15 hours after an American Airlines flight carrying 64 passengers and crew from Wichita, Kansas, collided with an Army Black Hawk helicopter over the Potomac River as it approached Reagan National Airport, President Trump was ready to call out cause of the tragic accident. 

“We don’t know what caused this crash, but we have some pretty strong opinions,” he told reporters in his first appearance in the White House briefing room since his return to office.

“I changed the Obama standards from mediocre at best, to extraordinary,” during his first administration, Trump said, referring to standards for hiring air traffic controllers. After Trump left office in 2021, “Biden changed them back to lower than before.” But among Trump’s myriad executive orders since returning to the White House last week was an EO that would once again raise those standards, he said.

How?

Trump was referring to diversity, equity and inclusion programs for all federal agencies, including the Federal Aviation Administration “eliminated” by one of his first EOs. Such DEI policies, Trump suggested, allowed the FAA to hire air traffic controllers with hearing, vision and even psychological disabilities. 

New administrator … Meanwhile, Trump has named Chris Rocheleau as interim FAA administrator, according to The Wall Street Journal, filling a vacancy opened when Mike Whitaker, who had served in the position for less than a year, stepped down just prior to Trump’s inauguration.

History lesson … The FAA has dealt with air traffic control staffing issues for over 43 years. Barely half a year into his first term, the president for whom Reagan National Airport is named fired air traffic controllers en masse over a dispute with their labor union. Prior to the dispute, air traffic controllers in the US were hired in staggered years. But with the need to hire replacements for 11,345 striking Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization members all at once in August 1981 came the end of the staggered retirements. 

•••

More Hearings – Two more Trump White House nominees, like RFK Jr., face perhaps the toughest Senate hearings since Pete Hegseth was confirmed as Defense secretary last week. Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is nominated to become President Trump’s National Intelligence director, so she appears before the Senate Intelligence Committee Thursday, while Kash Patel, nominee to become FBI director, answers to the Judiciary Committee.

•••

Chaos is Working – The Trump White House’s executive order that would have clawed back up to $2 trillion in funding for programs the administration does not like, since rescinded following a federal judge’s temporary suspension issued Tuesday, has set Washington back on its heels. But the Democratic Party appears to be on top of Trump’s unconstitutional executive order, despite all the ensuing chaos. 

“It’s called impoundment, and it is illegal,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, told NPR’s Steve Inskeep on Morning Edition Thursday. The president cannot single out certain allocations passed by Congress, though it has been tried in the past, she said. But instead of fighting it in court, the Trump administration is trying to stoke confusion.

“His administration has made it clear they don’t think the (impoundment) law should be there,” Murray said. “So instead of fighting it in court, what they’re doing is saying ‘we’re just going to – we don’t believe it’s a good law, so we’re not going to do it.’”

•••

Menendez Gets 11 Years – Bob Menendez, Democratic senator for New Jersey from 2006 to 2024, was sentenced to 11 years in prison for his conviction last year on bribery, fraud and illegal foreign-agent charges, The Wall Street Journal reports. The 71-year-old career politician told a packed New York federal courtroom Wednesday; “I have made more than my share of mistakes and bad decisions, but I believe in my half-century of public service I have done far more good than bad.” --TL

_______________________________________________

WEDNESDAY 1/29/25

UPDATE – President Trump has reversed his controversial order that froze federal funding assistance for programs already approved by Congress in a memo released Wednesday, signed by acting Office of Management and Budget Director Matthew Vaeth. The reversal came after behind-the-scenes pushback from congressional Republicans, according to The Hill. (Scroll down to "Frozen funds.")

Trump Offers Federal Employees Buyouts – The Trump White House offered a buyout for nearly all federal employees, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. The art of this deal is that career bureaucrats will get paid through September if they resign now. President Trump is looking to replace non-partisan federal bureaucrats, many with years to decades of experience, with workers who agree with his vision for the country. 

Frozen funds … The buyout offer comes hours after Judge Loren AliKhan, a Washington-based federal judge appointed by President Biden, issued an emergency administrative stay to block President Trump’s temporary freeze of about $3 trillion worth of federal funds, grants and loan disbursements that was to take effect at 5 pm Eastern time Tuesday. The judge’s order blocks the freeze until Monday, February 3. The Democracy Fund had filed a lawsuit to stop the executive order.

As with the federal buyouts, the president appears to lack the authority for such moves.

Trump’s federal funding freeze was aimed specifically at DEI programs, “woke gender identity” and the Green New Deal according to The New York Times, though opponents feared it would block state health agencies from Medicaid reimbursement. State officials believed pre-school community health centers, food for low-income families, housing assistance and disaster relief were at-risk, according to the report.

Just prior to Judge AliKhan’s ruling, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller appeared on CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper and said the order would not affect any government services, entitlements or individual benefits, but was directed at left-wing chiefs of non-governmental agencies (NGOs) who were funneling such funds into immigration and “child trafficking.” 

“Either Donald Trump gets political control over this government and ends waste, abuse and fraud on the American people,” Miller told Tapper, “or, we let bureaucrats autopilot federal spending.”

What does this mean? … Every Republican and Democrat knew going into last November’s presidential election that a second Trump term would mean 1.) A better-organized White House full of cabinet secretaries and aids happy to carry out whatever policies Trump thought reasonable; and 2.) Far greater presidential authority at the expense of the legislative and judiciary branches. 

All anyone can remember from the weeks after Trump’s first inauguration in 2017 is his “Muslim ban” of travel into the US by certain foreign nationals. 

In The Atlantic, Jonathan Lemire writes that the strategy for a flurry of Trump EOs was determined at an early January gathering at Mar-a-Lago, where incoming Chief of Staff Susie Wiles suggested staggering the orders out over the first few weeks in office. 

A unanimous source who had attended the meeting said Trump responded: “No. I want to sign as many as possible as soon as we show up. Day One.”

Trump was a very green political novice when he became president eight years ago, but he learned a lot about the way the federal government runs from his first administration’s seasoned Washington aides, advisors and cabinet secretaries – the ones who were to keep Trump’s authoritarian tendencies in-check. 

Last year, he won his non-consecutive re-election by promising to blow up the federal government, and now with a flailing, leaderless Democratic Party warning of a constitutional crisis, Trump prevails. His political victory is certain even if just a couple of these executive orders survive federal courts.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
WEDNESDAY 1/29/25

Commentary by Stephen Macaulay

In the multiple times Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) has been on Meet the Press with Kristen Welker, he has rolled over her like a rolling pin making the crust for a pecan pie. She asks a question. He provides an answer, more often than not, an answer that is not even remotely associated with the question.

Any attempt on her part to follow up is dismissed with a combination of annoyance and contempt.

Somewhere, Tim Russert is rolling in his grave.

Despite Graham’s hard line of supporting whatever Donald Trump says — a line without a bit of deviation — he keeps getting booked on the show. Wash, rinse, repeat.

He says whatever it is he wants to say, which is generally what he presumably thinks Donald Trump wants him to say.

She asks questions that get unanswered.

And then she thanks him for being on the show with enthusiasm that borders on gushing.

But to her credit, on January 26 she asked Graham a question and got an unexpected answer. Not simply unexpected in that the answer had something to do with the question, but because what he said.

Welker: “Do you believe that President Trump was wrong to issue these blanket pardons to the January 6th defendants?”

First Graham makes a bit of a swerve: “Number one, he had the legal authority to do it.” 

Note she didn’t ask if it was legal but whether it was right, a difference with distinction. 

Here is where not only where Graham answers the question, but where he shows that he has a spine: “But I fear that you will get more violence. Pardoning the people who went into the Capitol and beat up a police officer violently I think was a mistake, because it seems to suggest that's an okay thing to do.”

He knows that beating up police officers in the Capitol is wrong, and he said it.

Then the spine collapses: “Kamala Harris wanted to raise bail money for people burning down Minneapolis. You know, Biden pardoned half his family going out the door.”

Banged them both! The boss would be pleased about that. (And to be clear, notice he said Harris “wanted to,” not that she did. As for the Biden pardons, there were five pardons to siblings and spouses for "ANY NONVIOLENT OFFENSES against the United States which they may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through the date of this pardon." Which can’t be said about those who took part in the January 6th attack on the Capitol were convicted of.)

Graham concluded his answer by repeating: “But as to pardoning violent people who beat up cops, I think that's a mistake.”

The final question Welker posed was about the Trump Administration’s firing of 18 inspectors general. Legally there is supposed to be 30 days’ notice.

Welker: “Do you think he violated the law?”

Graham: “Well, technically yeah. But he has the authority to do it. So, I’m not, you know, losing a whole lot of sleep that he wants to change the personnel out. I just want to make sure that he gets off to a good start. I think he has. I’m very supportive of what he wants to do with America …”

So let’s see.

Trump violated the law.

But he has the authority? Um, in what country would that be?

Section 3, Article II of the U.S. Constitution has it that the president must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

It is the president’s job to make sure that the laws are upheld, not violate them.

And so the spine collapses again.

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings.

_______________________________________________

Voice your COMMENTS on President Trump’s attempt to freeze funding approved by Congress. 

Let us know what you think about Trump’s buyout offer for most federal employees. 

EMAIL editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

_____
WEDNESDAY 1/29/25