By Ken Zino

Virginia Thomas is a clear and present danger to democracy, based on publicly available information about her lobbying role promoting the overthrow of the legally and fairly elected president. It’s just the latest twist of the seditionist plot that is unfolding as the House Select Committee’s docudrama continues.

Worse, Ginni Thomas’ husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has already ruled in a case* where he had distinct personal and financial conflicts of interest. He didn’t recuse himself, because the authority to decide such conflicts of interest lies within the Supreme Court. 

Perhaps, I shouldn’t be surprised over this latest travesty. No surprise that the January 6 Committee now wants Ginni Thomas to come forth and discuss her active role in the Stop the Steal Movement that led to the insurrection. 

“We have sent Ms. Thomas a letter, asking her to come and talk to the committee,” the chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) told reporters after the three-hour public hearing last Thursday. Thompson and committee vice chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) said it was time for her to come in voluntarily to provide testimony to the nine-member panel after investigators discovered communications between her and John Eastman, the Trump personal attorney that the panel painted last Thursday as a key architect in the attempt to get Pence to reject the Electoral College ballot count on January 6.

This occurs while The Department of Justice is apparently deep into its own criminal investigation of the insurrection. It has requested the January 6 Committee provide it with transcripts from more than 1,000 interviews. The committee has publicly said there is a “cooperative process” with the department. Presumably, if or when Gini Thomas is interviewed, the tapes or transcript will also be headed DOJ’s way. It’s looking to me that she too will need an effing-good criminal lawyer. 

It’s also clear more legal actions concerning the insurrection will be forthcoming. Moreover, the last stop before becoming a guest of the federal prison system is, ahem, the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court? The final say on all forthcoming insurrection matters will or could come from the same court that decided Dred Scott was property. The Supreme Court that also once claimed racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution if the facilities for each race were "separate but equal." 

The Supreme Court that Clarence Thomas now is on.

So here we are on the sane side of the looking glass, once again bewildered. Go ask Alice; How this can be? 

*In 2021, Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court to block the turnover of documents from his White House to the January 6 House Select Committee, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the documents were vital to investigators. On January 19, 2022, the Supreme Court published its ruling, which said that of its nine members, only Justice Thomas had voted to approve the former president's request. This allowed the presidential records of former President Donald Trump to be transferred to the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

(TUE 6/21/22)

Tune in your favorite news outlet (so long as it’s not Fox) 1 p.m. Eastern time Tuesday for the House 1/6 committee’s Hearings Part IV and see Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) explain how and why he did not ‘find’ the 11,780 votes necessary to turn over his state’s 16 electors to Donald J. Trump. 

Our democracy for a MAGA hat … Committee member Adam Schiff (D-CA) told the Los Angeles Times he will show evidence Tuesday that ex-President Trump’s then-chief of staff, Mark Meadows, wanted to send autographed “Make America Great Again” hats to people conducting an audit of the presidential election results in Georgia.

•••

Fascism of MAGA … In case the Texas GOP platform unveiled at its convention last weekend wasn’t a sufficiently scary warning about looming authoritarianism, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) told ABC News This Week host George Stephanopoulos that his wife received a death threat in the mail. “I’m not worried personally,” said one of the two Republicans on the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection. “It threatens to execute me as well as my wife and my 5-year-old child.”

•••

Greitens’ ‘RINO hunting’ video de-Facebooked … Facebook has removed an ad from GOP Missouri senate candidate Eric Greitens in which he appears with a gun alongside other men in combat gear and says, “we’re goin’ RINO hunting.” The former Navy Seal concludes his campaign commercial with, “Join the MAGA crowd  -- get a RINO hunting license.” Twitter has let the ad remain, but with a warning, according to Forbes

Wonder whether an Elon Musk-owned Twitter would remove that warning. 

Greitens is running for retiring Republican Sen. Roy Blunt’s seat. Missouri’s primary is August 2.

•••

Gun legislation … The bi-partisan group of senators led by Chris Murphy (D-CT) and John Cornyn (R-TX) working on gun legislation is expected to file legislative text today, already two days later than hoped for, according to Punchbowl News. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) hopes to begin the process by the end of the day so the full Senate can vote on the bill before leaving for recess next week.

Federal gas tax holiday? … President Biden says he will decide by the end of the week whether to temporarily lift the 18.4-cents per-gallon federal gas tax as the price-per-gallon hovers around $5 per gallon. But such relief would face a vote in Congress, where it already faces opposition. 

•••

Primaries today … A Senate runoff race in Alabama, Republican runoffs in Georgia and House primaries in Virginia.

--Todd Lassa

_____________________________________

(MON 6/20/22)

Oh, do tell … Ginni Thomas, who apparently does not discuss such matters with her husband and “close friend” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, “can’t wait to clear up misconceptions,” with the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection, which last Thursday announced it was planning to seek her testimony. “I look forward to talking to them,” the Murdoch-owned tabloid New York Post reports, quoting an interview Thomas gave with the considerably further-right Daily Caller

But first, up nextGeorgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who fended off then-President Trump’s efforts to get him to find 11,780 votes in order to overturn the state’s Electoral College votes from Joe Biden, is scheduled to appear in the fourth hearing of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection, CNN reports. Raffensperger’s deputy, Gabriel Sterling, also is scheduled to appear in the hearings, which begin 1 p.m. Eastern time Tuesday, June 21. 

A second hearing this week is scheduled for Thursday, June 23, again beginning at 1 p.m. Eastern time.

Meanwhile, in trade relations: Trump administration trade advisor Peter Navarro pleaded not guilty last Friday to two counts of contempt of Congress related to the January 6 insurrection (per Reuters). Navarro had “entirely ignored” a February subpoena by the House Select committee demanding he provide documents and appear for a deposition.

•••

Texas GOP pounds a nail into our democracy’s coffin … Holding its first in-person convention since 2018, Texas Republicans approved a measure that President Biden “was not legitimately elected,” The Texas Tribune reports. Its 5,100 delegates and alternatives also voted to rebuke Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) for taking part in bi-partisan gun regulation talks and voted on a platform that declares homosexuality “an abnormal lifestyle choice” and says Texas school children must “learn about the humanity of the unborn child.”

Meanwhile, in Colombia: Conversely, conservative presidential candidate Rodolfo Hernåndez had this to say when Gustavo Petro was declared the first left-wing candidate – ever – to win an election for leadership of the country: “Colombians, today the majority of citizens have chosen the other candidate. As I said during the campaign, I accept the results of the election.” That, Mr. Trump, is how it’s done in a free country. Petro, a former rebel and longtime senator, took more than 50% in Sunday’s election to Hernåndez’s 42%, The New York Times reports. 

--Todd Lassa

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

For our coverage and commentary on the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol’s hearings so far, including:

•”Eastman Sought Trump Pardon,” from Thursday, June 16’s hearing.

•Ken Zino, left column, “Humpty Dumpty Sat on a Wall: Conspirators Face Legal Consequences.

•Stephen Macaulay, right column, “Truth and Consequences.”

•“Trump Listened to ‘Team Crazy,’ Raised Cash” from Tuesday, June 14’s hearing.

•Stephen Macaulay, right column, “He Heard It, He Knew It.”

•Ken Zino, left column, “One Subpoena, Two Subpoena, This Stops at DOJ’s Door.”

Whether right or left, never-Trump or pro-MAGA, we seek your civil comments. Email editors@thehustings.news or hit the comment button this column, and let us know whether you belong in the left or the right column.

______

By Ken Zino

“What President Trump demanded that Mike Pence do wasn’t just wrong, it was illegal and it was unconstitutional,” committee co-chair, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) said in her opening statement last week. Given the testimony, videos and statements presented Thursday at the House Select Committee hearings, it seems that Donald Trump along with his legal advisor John Eastman and campaign advisors and supporters have stepped Through the Looking Glass into an insurrectionist wonderland that is completely baffling to those of us -- including Mike Pence, the White House Counsel, and a conservative federal judge -- who remain on the sane side. 

In the sequel to Alice in Wonderland, Alice has a debate with Humpty Dumpty that roughly goes like this: Alice notes that Humpty looks "exactly like an egg." Humpty objects. Alice explains she said he looks like an egg, not that he is one. A debate ensues with Humpty declaring "When I use a word…" Humpty Dumpty replies "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less." 

Donald Trump remains acting like he is Dumpty, rather than legally dumped by voters. Words mean what he chooses them to mean, and the constitutional crisis is still happening.

“Today, the Select Committee is going to reveal the details of that pressure campaign,” the panel’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) said in his opening statement.  “But what does the vice president of the United States even have to do with a presidential election? The Constitution says that the vice president of the United States oversees the process of counting the Electoral College votes -- a process that took place on January 6th, 2021” [and was extended to 3:42 a.m. on the 7th due to the insurrectionist breach]. Pence refused to leave until the electoral count was complete. Donald Trump wanted Mike Pence to do something no other vice president has ever done. “The former president wanted Pence to reject the votes and either declare Trump the winner or send the votes back to the states to be counted again. Mike Pence said no. He resisted the pressure. He knew it was illegal. He knew it was wrong,”  

All the king's horses and all the king's men

Couldn't put Humpty Dumpty together again.

Note these words from a pragmatic – versus semantic -- viewpoint in a statement released just before the hearing, by respected conservative retired federal judge Michael Luttig: “A stake was driven through the heart of American democracy on January 6, 2021, and our democracy today is on a knife’s edge. America was at war on that fateful day, but not against a foreign power. She was at war against herself. We Americans were at war with each other -- over our democracy. January 6 was but the next, foreseeable battle in a war that had been raging in America for years, though that day was the most consequential battle of that war even to date…

“Though disinclined for the moment, as a political matter of fact only the party that instigated this war over our democracy can bring an end to that war. Like our war from a distant time, these twin wars are testing whether this nation or any nation . . . so conceived in liberty . . . can long endure.” We must hope that January 6 was the final battle of at least the deadly war for America’s democracy. 

Oh, another problem the Committee has with these Looking Glass wars; It cannot indite Trump and fellow insurrectionists no matter what their actions and words mean in the real world. 

For more information I recommend a new Brookings report “Trump on Trial: A Guide to the January 6 Committee Hearings and the Question of Criminality.” 

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Todd Lassa

Attorney John Eastman (at left, in photo above), purveyor of the debunked theory then-Vice President Mike Pence had the power to reject, or at least delay, certification of Electoral College ballots on January 6, after the coup attempt sought a presidential pardon from Donald J. Trump through his then-personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Trump did not grant one to Eastman, who after all was no longer useful to him.

As late as 11:44 p.m. Eastern time January 6, 2021, after the vice president had survived four hours in a secured room with rioters just 40 feet away outside, Eastman emailed the vice president’s counsel, Greg Jacob, arguing now that “precedent has been set … I implore you to consider one more minor violation” and suspend the vote count by 10 days in order for five to seven of the states to reconsider their electors. Pence by now already was proceeding with the count. 

The vice president earlier in the day had declined a Secret Service plan to drive himself and his staff out of the Capitol grounds to safety, despite the chants of “hang Mike Pence.” Member of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection, Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) referred to testimony from an informant of the extremist group that the “Proud Boys would have killed Mike Pence given a chance” and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) along with him.

Let’s start at the beginning of the 1/6 panel’s third public hearing, Thursday afternoon. Jacob testified that the first time he spoke with Pence about the 12th Amendment governing the Electoral College was “around December 7” 2020. In that conversation, Pence recalled that one of his first memories as a Congress member was in 2001, when Vice President Al Gore rejected calls from fellow Democrats to challenge the Electoral College vote to certify George W. Bush as winner – over himself -- of the 2000 election. 

“We concluded that what you have is a sentence in the Constitution that is inartfully drafted,” Jacob told the panel, referring to the basis for Eastman’s scheme. 

But the panel’s other in-person witness, retired federal judge Michael Luttig told the House Select committee that had Pence obeyed Trump’s order to reject or stop the electoral vote it "would have plunged America into what I believe would have been tantamount to a revolution … which in my view would have been the first Constitutional crisis since the founding of the republic.”

Eastman had drafted a letter to President Trump before the election in October that Trump could use wording in the 12thAmendment to overturn the results, but on January 5, in a meeting with Jacob, Eastman agreed that such an attempt would be overturned, 9-0 by the Supreme Court. 

On the following January 4, Trump, Eastman, Pence, Jacob and the vice president’s chief of staff, Marc Short, met in the Oval Office where Eastman outlined two paths he saw to overturning the November election:

•Reject the electoral votes outright, or ...

•Suspend the January 6 electoral vote count for 10 days during which five to seven state legislatures re-examine their election results. 

“The vice president never budged in his initial position” that he did not have any such authority, Jacob said. 

But the next day, Eastman took a meeting with Jacob “to request that you reject the electors in the disputed states.” Eastman was pushing the second scenario, the 10-day delay, Jacob said. 

Trump began his pressure campaign on Pence with an early morning January 6 tweet; “Come through for us and send it back to the states,” and another at 8:17 a.m. that the vice president “could send it back to the states and we win…” Early drafts of Trump’s speech at his Elipse rally that morning made no mention of Pence, Aguilar said, but before the crowd that was about to head to the Capitol he reiterated his demand Pence reject the electoral count.  

A 2:24 p.m. Trump tweeted: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what needed to be done to preserve our Country (sic)or Constitution.” 

“Immediately after” that tweet, Aguilar said, “crowds outside and inside the Capitol surged.” At 4:19 p.m., with rioters within 40 feet of the office where Pence was being protected, Trump asked the rioters in a tweet to leave the Capitol.

Today’s Twitterverse is split between admiration for Pence and criticism that he has not appeared before the 1/6 panel in person. 

At the conclusion of Thursday’s hearing, Luttig, the highly regarded conservative retired judge again warned that “if the former president or his anointed successor” were to lose the 2024 election, “they would attempt to overturn that 2024 election in the same way they attempted to overturn the 2020 election but would succeed. I don’t speak these words lightly.”

Aguilar concluded saying that Trump put party “ahead of the country.”

But the ranking Republican on the 1/6 panel, Liz Cheney of Wyoming more accurately identified Trump’s priorities: “An honorable man, a man who loved his country more than himself, would have conceded.”

(FRI 6/17/22)

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

“We are living through what feels like the end of America.” -- Virginia Thomas text to Mark Meadows, January 10, 2021

“The law is not a plaything for Presidents or judges to use to remake the world in their preferred image. . . . When our elected and appointed leaders break, twist and fail to enforce our laws in order to achieve their partisan ends, or to accomplish frustrated policy objectives they consider existentially important, they are breaking America.” --Greg Jacob, former Pence lead counsel, to the January 6 Committee

And there you have it in a nutshell.

Anyone who has read Thomas’ unhinged texts to Trump’s then-chief of staff Mark Meadows knows that she was doing her utmost to break and twist the laws by ignoring the will of a majority (popular vote and Electoral College) American people.

The concern isn’t just that she happens to be the spouse of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (and let’s not accept the undoubted fiction that Mrs. and Mr. Thomas keep their interest wholly separate like some domestic Iron Curtain: it doesn’t take an Originalist interpretation of the texts to Meadows — oh, and the emails to John Eastman, too — to know that this support of her Dear Leader wasn’t a passing fancy of Mrs. Thomas, that this was bordering on obsession: anyone who is married knows that exchanges of ideas and about activities are simply a way of life and for her not to discuss it shatters credulity). 

Rather, the concern is that she is at a societal strata that most of us will never reach and consequently has influence among others who are at that level with potential untoward consequences for the rest of us. (It also ought to be concerning for the faculty of the Creighton University School of Law, from which she obtained a J.D. in 1983: She is representative of the legal thinking that comes out of that place? Ignoring the Constitution?)

This discussion of Mrs. Thomas is not related to the committee’s decision to call on her to testify regarding the emails with Eastman.

It is to make the point that there were some people associated with the Trump White House who, like Jacob, understood what was going on, particularly after the loss was falsely claimed to be victory by people like Mrs. Thomas.

Jacob also noted, “We should not feign surprise when our citizens treat the law and the Constitution with the same level of respect that our leaders do.”

Consideration and thoughtfulness — characteristics of respect — are, like shame, something that is obviously absent among those who pulled a massive con on the American people.

We’re it just a grift that would have been one thing. But when those who are in what one would imagine are sophisticated salons talking in shrill tones about releasing the “Kraken,” who are coming up with conspiracy theories the likes of which not even a B-hack writer could get away with peddling, then that rips the fabric of the country.

Yes, Mrs. Thomas, it does feel like the end of America.

Thanks to you and your ilk.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Read our coverage of the House of Representatives’ Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol, including …

•The Monday, June 13 hearing (center column) with “One Subpoena, Two Subpoenas, This Stops at the DOJ,” by Ken Zino, in the left column and “He Heard It. He Knew It.” by Stephen Macaulay, in the right column. 

•Results of our weekend Twitter poll on whether the first public hearing, on June 9, made the case against Donald J. Trump or were a waste of time. Tweeted comments are in the left (“Trump is Culpable”) and right (“Waste of Time”) columns.

•Coverage of the Thursday, June 9, opening public hearing, with Ken Zino and Eric Blair commentary in the left column, “Opening Arguments are In,” and Stephen Macaulay commentary in the right column “We Didn’t Start the Fire.”

•Also read Macaulay’s pre-hearings suggestions, “When the Cameras Go Live: A Suggestion for the 1/6 Committee.”

Submit your own comments on these and/or the hearings in general on the comments section of this page, or email us at editors@thehustings.news.

_____

(THU 6/16/22)

Hearing III begins 1 p.m. Thursday … The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection holds its third public hearing at 1 p.m., featuring a look at emails between Donald J. Trump attorney John Eastman and Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and of a documentary video showing Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) giving a January 5 tour of the Capitol. One man in that January 5 tour (picture, above) was caught on video participating in the Capitol siege January 6. 

The 1/6 panel will center on former Vice President Mike Pence’s pushback on Trump’s demands he certify the Electoral College votes for the former president instead of Joe Biden. Thursday’s witnesses are Pence attorney Greg Jacob, and attorney and former federal judge Michael Luttig, whom Eastman once clerked for, and who tweeted numerous times January 5, 2021, that the Constitution does not give the vice president authority to alter or change the vote. 

Fun fact: It’s the eve of the 50th anniversary of the Watergate break-in.

•••

Palin’s return to politics … Sarah Palin, who stepped down as Alaska’s governor in 2009, about half a year after she and Republican presidential candidate John McCain lost to Obama-Biden, leads the top-four primary in a special election for her state’s single House seat, the AP reports. Donald J. Trump-backed Palin is ahead of moderate GOP businessman Nick Begich, scion of a prominent Alaska Democratic political family. Begich was challenging Republican Rep. Don Young before he died in March. Young had been in office since 1973.

Palin got 28.3% of the vote to Begich’s 19.3%. Independent Al Gross takes third with 12.8%. The fourth position hasn’t been determined, with Democrat Mary Peltola at 8.7% leading Republican Tara Sweeney at 5.5%. More than four dozen candidates were running for the four runoff positions, and Palin’s lead does not necessarily give her an advantage over the other three candidates in the ranked-choice special election August 16, according to Axios.

•••

Fed hikes interest rates by 0.75 point … The Federal Reserve hiked interest rates by 0.75 point Wednesday, the largest increase since 1994, The Wall Street Journal reports. Analysts were bracing for an 0.5-point increase to tamp down the heated economy and an 8.6% inflation rate that defied expectations by failing to decrease in May. The Fed signaled it would continue lifting rates at such a pace this year until inflation begins to decline.

Upshot: While economists worry the Fed’s aggressive anti-inflation measures will force a recession, PRI’s Marketplace notes the increase to 1.75% from 1.5% puts it where it was just before the pandemic.

•••

Biden sends $1 billion more to Ukraine … President Biden announced the U.S. will send an additional $1 billion “security assistance package” of artillery, coastal defense weapons and ammunitions to Ukraine to help fight off Russian forces, which are making gains in the invaded country’s eastern region. The U.S. also will send $225 million worth of drinking water, medical supplies, food and shelter (per The Hill).

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Nic Woods

_____________________________________

(WED 6/15/22) Loudermilk Video Released

Photo: “During the tour, the man took photos of hallways, tunnels, and staircases within the Capitol complex.” – Caption in video of Rep. Barry Loudermilk’s January 5 Capitol tour.

Let’s go to the tapes … The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol has released documentary footage showing a man who took part in a tour of the Capitol with Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) on January 5, 2021, and then on January 6 was filmed yelling threats at Congress members, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), The Hill reports.

View the entire 2-minute, 47-second video on Twitter @January6thCmte. 

The man in question has been interviewed by the committee, Punchbowl News reported earlier in a scoop about the footage, and it doesn’t appear he has been charged with any wrongdoing. 

Our take: As with everything else the 1/6 panel has made public so far, it’s not likely to move Loudermilk or Trump’s still-loyal supporters.

•••

Tuesday’s primaries … Rep. Tom Rice (R-SC), one of 10 Republican congressmembers who voted in favor of Donald J. Trump’s second impeachment has said “it would be a badge of honor” to lose the GOP primary to a Trump-backed candidate, NPR’s Morning Edition notes. And so, Rice gets his badge, having lost to South Carolina state legislator and Trump endorsee Russell Fry, 51.1% to 24.6% (all figures per Ballotpedia).

As if the Democratic primary in South Carolina’s Senate race matters, three candidates were in a close race as of Wednesday morning, with Krystle Matthews leading at 34.4%, Catherine Fleming Bruce at 34.2% and Angela Geter at 31.5%.

ConverselyFreshman Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who has openly criticized Trump, though she did not vote for his second impeachment, beat Trump-backed challenger Katie Arrington, 53.3% to 45%. 

Nevada“President Trump Endorses Adam Laxalt for U.S. Senate!” Yes, that’s the one-term president who insists he’s still president endorsing the son of the former U.S. senator from New Mexico, and a moderate Republican, Pete Domenici – complete with requisite superfluous exclamation mark. Laxalt beat Sam Brown for the GOP nomination, 57.5% to 34.1% and will take on the incumbent Democratic senator, Catherine Cortez Masto, in November. 

Republicans believe this is one of the key races they can win in the midterms to retake control of the Senate. 

North Dakota: Incumbent John Hoeven easily defeated Riley Kuntz, 78.5% to 20.8%, for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. In the Democratic primary, Katrina Christianson took 76.2% of the vote to Michael Steele’s (no, not the former GOP chairman/current MSNBC pundit) 23.8%.

Texas: It’s lobbying firm 1, Democrats -1. On April 1, four-term Democratic Rep. Filemon Vela resigned from Congress to become a lobbyist for a top Washington firm, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, weeks after he announced he would not run again this November. Republican Mayra Flores, 51.0%, beat Democrat Dan Sanchez, 43.3%, for the seat in a special election. The House count is now 220 Democrats to 210 Republicans.

Note: “Trump” appears nowhere on Flores’ website homepage, but a tweet there from Elon Musk says she is the first Republican he has ever voted for. Flores’ victory is the latest sign of a shift by Hispanic and Latino voters to the GOP.

•••

Pro-authoritarian candidates … account for an overwhelming portion of GOP midterm candidates who have won primaries held through the end of May, The Washington Post reported in exclusive analysis Tuesday. The newspaper’s report says “at least 108 candidates” for Congress or statewide office nominated or chosen in conventions have repeated former President Trump’s Big Lie that but not for voter fraud he won re-election in 2020. On top of that, at least 149 candidates out of more than 170 races campaigned on a platform of tightening voting rules or more strictly enforcing existing laws, WaPo continues. 

The Republican candidates, nominees plus those facing runoffs, are running for the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives, governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general and secretary of state. WaPo singles out Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano, who was on Capitol Hill January 6, 2021, and “has asserted that the Republican-controlled legislature should have the right to take control of the all-important choice over which presidential electors to send to Washington.”

Note: This essentially affirms the Trump wing of the GOP, which still appears to be the majority of the Republican Party, as pro-authoritarian, willing to overturn popular vote in a state to assure its candidates win. Primaries that The Washington Posthas surveyed so far all occurred before the House Select committee on January 6 began its public hearings, and it promises to survey subsequent primaries through the season, but we don’t expect much of a change in this attitude.

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Nic Woods

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

The Wall Street Journal editorial board somehow imagines that the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol is tricking the average American:

“Do Democrats want to unfairly besmirch the entire GOP with the January 6 disgrace, while distracting voters from 8.6% inflation and $5-a-gallon gasoline? Yes.”

Does anyone really think that someone who buys gasoline or food or damn near anything else will not notice the prices because they are so distracted by the hearings? Isn’t this a smear on the cognitive abilities of the average American by the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal?

Or maybe the Journal is concerned that the members of the committee are in some way abrogating their responsibilities in terms of getting things done to address the high gas and grocery prices.

Yes, that 2% of the House of Representatives is undoubtedly hobbling important work.

(Oh, and given that two of the members were elected as Republicans, one of whom has shown herself to be unstinting in her pursuit of the truth, how is it that Democrats are doing the unfair besmirching? And what would be fair besmirching? And were it not for the people who are being besmirched — not “the entire GOP,” unless everyone in the GOP stands with those who are lying or prevaricating about what led to January 6 and even now don’t want to admit the truth (e.g., why won’t Kevin McCarthy admit that the election was fairly contested and lost by Trump?) — there would be no need for the committee.

If the Journal was really concerned about the average American’s pocketbook, then it should be more supportive of the committee’s work.

House senior investigative counsel Amanda Wick has estimated that solicitations from the Trump campaign for things like the “Election Defense Fund” has taken in $250 million dollars, money that might have otherwise been spent by average Americans on things of a legitimate nature, such as the aforementioned gas and groceries.

Instead, it went to things like the Trump Hotel Collection. In that instance, the sum paid was comparatively small -- $204,857 vs. the $1 million that went to something called the Conservative Partnership Institute — but if we go back to the Journal’s concern, know that the $204,857 represents 40,971 gallons of gas at $5 a gallon. Somehow the fuel is far more legitimate rather than raising money to pursue a fantasy. Those F-150s aren’t going to fill themselves up.

The Journal Editorial Board went on to say, “One irony is that the largely Democratic committee’s evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump’s designs on overturning the election were foiled mainly by Republicans, including many in his Administration.”

Nice to see a bit of fact-checking kicked in and there is a glancing acknowledgement of the Republicans on the committee.

But what seems to be somehow overlooked is the fact that Trump, a Republican, had “designs on overturning the election.” That the subverting the will of the people didn’t happen wasn’t because he and his supporters didn’t want it to happen. Yes, there were many Republicans, “including many in his administration” (as though there would be Democrats in his administration), who helped stop him. But Republicans, many brought into his administration, though not necessarily in an official capacity, were fundamental in promulgating what led to January 6. (Eastman, Giuliani, etc.)

“White House lawyers threatened to resign if he fired Justice Department officials who didn’t indulge his fraud theories,” the Journal writes.

It is worth noting that according to The Washington Post the warning about the potential of mass resignations occurred three days before January 6th. What happened between November 4, 2020 and January 3, 2021?

Why there weren’t wholesale resignations among the Republicans that the Journal seems to think are like Caesar’s wife is the real question here.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Ken Zino

Trump’s losing campaign manager William Stepien suddenly skipped the hearing this morning despite being subpoenaed. At the last moment he backed out because his wife went into labor, an excuse the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection accepted. In another twist of the sedition plot, Stepien is now a campaign adviser to the Trump-endorsed House candidate, Harriet Hageman, who is challenging Liz Cheney in the Wyoming Republican primary election. 

The committee’s assertions the former president should face a landmark criminal indictment have also been supported by Monday’s live and videotaped testimony. 

What I said after the opening hearing, that Trump had Motive, Means and Opportunity, might now give way to another journalistic truism -- Follow the Money. Trump was making money by promoting the Big Lie. As Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) said: “We’ll also show that the Trump campaign used these false claims of election fraud to raise hundreds of millions of dollars from supporters who were told their donations were for the legal fight in the courts. But the Trump campaign didn’t use the money for that. The Big Lie was also a big rip off.” 

This hot potato toss reminds me of the kids’ rhyme -- One subpoena, two subpoena, Or… Well, in my view this now stops at the Justice Department’s door. The evidence continues to build unchallenged.

Once again Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS) put it plainly in his opening. “… as someone who’s run for office a few times, I can tell you: At the end of a campaign, it all comes down to the numbers ... For the most part, the numbers don’t lie.

“But if something doesn’t add up with the numbers, you go to court to get resolution. And that’s the end of the line. Because those numbers aren’t just numbers. They are votes. They are your votes. And the very least we should expect from any person seeking a position of public trust is the acceptance of the will of the people — win or lose.

Donald J. Trump didn’t accept the will of the people. He didn’t have the numbers. Trump went to court, and he still didn’t have the numbers – he lost.

Trump’s nemesis, the honorable Rep. Cheney noted, “A federal court has already reviewed elements of the committee’s evidence on this point and said this: ‘In the months following the election, numerous credible sources – from the president’s inner circle to agency leadership and statisticians – informed President Trump and Dr. [John] Eastman that there was no evidence of election fraud sufficient to overturn the 2020 Presidential election.’” The court threw out the case. 

“Today, you will hear much more from former Attorney General Bill Barr’s recorded testimony, and you will hear in greater detail what others in the department told President Trump – that his claims of election fraud were nonsense,” said Cheney.

Cheney’s summation to the jury of American voters:

“First, you will hear firsthand testimony that the president’s campaign advisors urged him to await the counting of votes and not to declare victory on election night. The president understood even before the election that many more Biden voters had voted by mail – because President Trump ignored the advice of his campaign experts and told his supporters only to vote in person... He falsely told the American people that the election was not legitimate…

“Second, pay attention to what Donald Trump and his legal team said repeatedly about Dominion voting machines – far flung conspiracies with a deceased Venezuelan communist allegedly pulling the strings. 

“This was ‘complete nonsense,’ as Bill Barr said. Trump’s own campaign advisors, his Department of Justice, and his cybersecurity experts all told him the same thing... 

“And third, as Mike Pence’s staff started to get a sense for what Donald Trump had planned for January 6, they called the campaign experts to give them a briefing on election fraud and all the other election claims. 

“On January 2, the general counsel of the Trump campaign, Matthew Morgan – this is the campaign’s chief lawyer -- summarized what the campaign had concluded weeks earlier – that none of the arguments about fraud or anything else could actually change the outcome of the election.” 

______________________________________

Also on this page ...

Reaction from our Twitter poll on whether the first public hearing of The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol was effective or not worth watching, in the left and right columns, respectively. Read the center column for results of the poll.

“Another View to the Coup,” our center-column analysis of that first 1/6 panel public hearing from last Thursday evening, with commentary by Eric Blair and Ken Zino in the left column and Stephen Macaulay in the right column. 

_____
COMMENT: editors@thehustings.news

By Todd Lassa

UPDATE -- The U.S. House Select Committee Investigation of the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol has postponed Wednesday's public hearing without giving a reason, NPR reports. The panel will reconvene as scheduled at 10 a.m. Thursday.

The lesson from Day Two of the House Select Committee’s public hearings of its investigation of the January 6 Capitol insurrection is that if you can convince enough followers about something like the Big Lie, you can make money off it. Or as committee member Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) put it; “Not only was there the Big Lie, there was the big ripoff.”

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), the panel’s vice-chair, quoted “one conservative editorial board” as writing, “Mr. Trump betrayed his supporters on January 6 and he is still doing it.”

In his live testimony, Chris Stirewalt, former politics editor for Fox News described how an exclusive formula for calling each state’s election results gave his cable network an edge in calling Arizona for Biden ahead of other networks – which led to his being fired for it. 

Bill Stepien, Trump’s chief political advisor for the 2020 election, was excused from live testimony because his pregnant wife was in labor Monday morning. As part of a large inner-circle of the 45th president who tried to tell him there was no credible evidence of results-changing voter fraud, Stepien described in videotaped testimony how “there was a surprise in the call” for Arizona by Fox News by “most everybody” in the room watching the returns from the White House that night. 

Stepien tried to get Donald J. Trump and the rest of the group to agree not to call the election for either candidate that Tuesday night, as results would be counted for days. But Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, arrived at the White House later election night, “apparently inebriated,” and tried to talk the president and his advisors to reject that idea as “being weak.” 

Stepien’s group became known as “Team Normal” while Giuliani and his circle were known as “Team Crazy,” according to Lofgren. (Much of Team Crazy’s early tactics focused on falsely accusing Dominion Voting Systems of fraud.)

The next day, Trump told a group of supporters in a nationally televised meeting “We were getting ready to win this election. Frankly, we did win this election.”

“Mr. Stepien, after the votes were counted, who won the election?” Lofgren asked in a video clip.

“Uh, Joseph Robinet Biden Jr., of the great state of Delaware.”

Asked by Lofgren to explain “Red Mirage,” ex-Fox News’ Stirewalt said it is the foundation of the Big Lie in that it is predicated on statistics that show Democrats use mail-in and absentee ballots far more than Republicans, and those ballots are only counted after election-day ballots. 

“You expect to see Republicans with a lead (early on) but it’s not really a lead,” Stirewalt explained. “When you put a jigsaw puzzle together you see the same image – it doesn’t matter which pieces you put together first.”

The panel relied heavily once again on former Attorney General William Barr. (It doesn’t hurt he was seen as a fierce Trump loyalist after his “handling” of the Mueller Report.) 

“Right out of the box on election night Trump claimed that there was major fraud,” he said, and it “seemed to be based” on a lot of Democratic votes coming in late, particularly from big cities in the states that mattered. 

Lofgren launched into more video, including recordings of former Trump attorney Sidney Powell, and of Giuliani on Fox News describing hundreds of thousands of ballots in garbage trucks being dumped into vote counts. 

Barr said of Trump; “He’s become detached from reality if he really believes this stuff. (There) wasn’t any interest in what the actual facts were.” Challenging states’ results was not the pervue of the Justice Department, Barr noted, but rather up to his campaign’s attorneys. And the 1/6 panel reiterated the results of 62 such cases the Trump campaign brought in nine states plus the District of Columbia, with 22 Republican-appointed judges, 10 by Trump, plus all three of his Supreme Court nominees, who rejected fraud claims. Of those, Trump scored 61 losses and one win.

And yet, Trump established the Official Election Defense Fund, which the 1/6 panel, questioning numerous ex-Trump officials and advisors concludes does not exist, according to Lofgren, though it has raised $250 million, nearly $100 million of it in the first week after the election. Trump’s Save America PAC created November 9, 2020, has paid $1 million of its donations to Mark Meadows’ Conservative Partnership Institute, $1 million to the America First Policy Institute, $204,857 to the Trump Hotel Collection and $5 million to Event Strategies Inc. according to the 1/6 panel.

(TUE 6/14/22)

_____
COMMENT: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

Let’s not get too fancy here.

The adult tells the 4-year-old to eat the broccoli and the child sticks his fingers in his ears and goes “la-la-la-la-la-la. . .” to block out what will have to happen.

In the second public hearing of The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (the name of the committee cannot be stated too often lest people overlook the fact that it was an attack) the child in question was Donald Trump.

Aides told him that he lost. He didn’t want to listen. They repeated it. “La-la-la-la-la-la-la.”

(Trump may have wanted to believe an “apparently inebriated” Rudy Giuliani, but I suspect that a teetotaler knows full well when someone is drunk and talking bullshit.) 

But the kid at the dinner table and Trump were told, unambiguously, the truth of the matter and pretending not to hear it doesn’t change a thing.

Of course, the difference between the kid and Trump is that the broc doesn’t have the ramifications of an attack, an attack that led to the deaths of people in law enforcement. Many Republicans were in high dudgeon when the phrase “Defund the Police” was put out there.

How any of them can watch the Nick Quested footage as the mob attacked the police with fury and vengeance and not see their hypocrisy is startling. Or maybe it isn’t. Maybe they, too, have their eyes shut and ears blocked so that they don’t have to witness the bloody reality of that situation.

Trump knew full well that he lost. If he didn’t, if he didn’t believe the people who he put into their positions of authority who told him he lost, then arguably the implementation of the 25th Amendment should have occurred because clearly the man’s faculties were not what we’d expect of someone beyond age 4.

So because he knew, because he kept telling people how the election was rigged, stolen or otherwise not in his favor, he worked to instigate what occurred on January 6.

The kid who doesn’t eat his broccoli might get sent to his room with his devices taken away.

What’s going to happen to Trump?

The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol can’t answer that question.

The Justice Department can. And should.

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Left-Column Tweets on the 1/6 Hearings

Eight-hundred and sixty-two people have been charged in the Capitol insurrection so far. Three-hundred and six federally charged rioters have entered guilty (pleas). At least 73 rioters have pled guilty; 32 have received jail time.

--Dr. Judith A. Miller

Trump encouraged these terrorists to be violent! Trump must be charged, jailed and never be allowed to run for president as he … has never been worthy in the first place.

--lisadesanti

The truth is never a waste of time.

--debbie does moderna

They don’t need public hearings to charge Trump. They charged 600 people with no hearings. This is a waste of time regardless of whether they make a case.

--Daniel Garrix

Trump was kind enough to confess on tapes, tweets and interviews. Aren’t we lucky!!

--Mary Wooster

_____

Pictured: House Select Committee vice-chair Liz Cheney (R-WY)

1/6 hearings continue in earnest … Twenty million television viewers watched last Thursday’s House Select Committee public hearings on the January 6 Capitol insurrection, according to the Nielsen ratings organization. No doubt fewer people will watch when the hearings resume Monday at 10 a.m. Eastern (and again on Wednesday and Thursday). But most of those viewers will be watching replays of highlights along with analysis prime time Monday on all the major cable news networks and ABC, CBS and NBC and not on Fox News. 

That’s a substantial number (The New York Times notes that “nearly” 13 million people watched the peak of Game 1 of the NBA championship series between the Golden State Warriors and the Boston Celtics, again per Nielsen). 

It would be smart money to bet that much of that small but vocal minority who don’t see a violent attack on the Capitol in the videos presented Thursday and who don’t think former President Trump was so determined to hold onto power that he incited said attack will be part of the follow-up audience. 

After Thursday’s hearings, The Hustings posted a poll on Twitter, asking followers whether they were a.) Making a case against Trump; or b.) Waste of time. We got just 254 votes, but admit we suffered a glitch in the timing between the poll and its paid (to Twitter) promotion. Select tweets in response to the poll are here, in the left and right columns. 

The results?

74.4% said the House Select Committee is making a case against Trump.

25.6% said the public hearings were a waste of time.

•••

Gun legislation ‘progress’… Gun control advocates who emerged after Sandy Hook and the Stoneman Douglas High School shootings will not see much in the “compromise” legislation being negotiated by 10 Republican and 10 Democratic senators. As-yet unwritten legislation “increases needed mental health resources, improves school safety and support for students, and helps ensure dangerous criminals and those who are adjudicated as mentally ill can’t purchase weapons,” according to a statement by the 20 senators (per Roll Call). 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is enthusiastic. The deal “could get a quick vote,” he said. Well in time for the midterms.

--Todd Lassa

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Right-Column Tweets on the 1/6 Hearings

Nope … not interested in “show trials” that are clearly orchestrated by Dems and televised on propaganda in prime time for political theater.

--Rich Corbett

When a case is one sided … well you start thinking of North Korea.

--Meredith

I didn’t watch one second. I do not watch career liars. 

--Ultra Beautiful MAGA Queen AnneTony

Democrats have got nothing, but Trump & Patriots have got it all.

--Ellen

Do you even realize that the reason people went to D.C. was because they believed there was fraud. And politicians refused to investigate.

--Britnee

Waste of time.

--Walter L. Jones

_____