Tech companies should face the sort of regulation that cars, food and other consumer products face, for the safety of democracy around the globe, former President Barack Obama said in a speech at Stanford University, one of the primary feeders of graduates to nearby Silicon Valley. Tech companies have “turbocharged” political divisions and requires government oversight, he said, according to The New York Times

“Tech companies need to be more transparent about how they operate,” he said. 

While The Hustings is a media company and not a tech company, as anyone who has tried to read us on a smartphone knows (TIP: Turn your phone to the horizontal position), we are committed to no-echo chamber, no trolling dialogue between liberals and conservatives. We encourage comments to editors@thehustings.com and will post them in the left and right columns so long as they are civil and do not attempt to spread conspiracy theories or misinformation.

[About the headline above: An internal combustion engine that is not turbocharged or supercharged is called “naturally aspirated.”]

_____

(FRI 4/22/22)

In the era of American politics before Donald J. Trump, the man who would be next year’s House speaker, Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) would now be toast. After he tweeted that the book, This Will Not Pass: Trump, Biden and the Battle for America's Future is “totally false and wrong” reporting he had “a plan” to remove then-lame duck President Trump from the White House after the January 6 Capitol insurrection and before President Biden’s inauguration January 20, authors of the book released an audio recording proving he had said just that in a phone call to other House GOP leaders.

Authors Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns are reporters for The New York Times. Read the newspaper’s story here: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/21/us/politics/trump-mitch-mcconnell-kevin-mccarthy.html

In a recording of the January 10, 2021 call, McCarthy asked the other Republican leaders about the mechanism for invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump, whom he faulted for “inciting people” to attack the Capitol. Rep. Liz Cheney, of Wyoming, asked McCarthy whether Trump might resign over it. 

McCarthy was doubtful, according to The New York Times, but he told the group of GOP leaders he had a plan to tell Trump of the impending impeachment resolution in the House of Representatives and that it was time to go.

“What he did is unacceptable. Nobody can defend that and nobody should defend it,” McCarthy said.

On January 11, according to the NYT, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told two longtime advisors he expected a sufficient number of Republicans to vote to convict Trump, which held the possibility the former president would not be allowed to run again. 

By the end of the month, McCarthy had kissed Trump’s ring on a surprise weekend visit to Mar-a-Lago. On February 13, eight Republican senators joined 50 Democrats and Independents to convict, nine short of the two-thirds vote necessary. That May, McCarthy stripped Cheney of her number-three position in the party’s caucus leadership (Cheney denies she leaked the January 8 call recording). 

Still the future speaker?: McCarthy yearns to replace Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as House speaker, of course, under the expectation that Republicans will obliterate Democrats in this November’s mid-term elections. Will he maintain sufficient support of both traditional Republicans and MAGA Republicans to win re-election for California’s 23rd District? Thanks to a new congressional district map, McCarthy has not just two Democratic challengers, but also Republican Jay Obernolte, incumbent for California’s 8th District, according to Ballotpedia. The state’s non-partisan primary is June 7. 

Meanwhile, a likely subpoena of McCarthy from the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection, on which Cheney is one of two Republicans, looms.

--Todd Lassa

_____

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson has endorsed Tesla CEO Amendment I absolutist Elon Musk’s plan to take over Twitter for $46.1 billion and open it to any and all free speech. Yell “fire” in a crowded theater all you like.

Carlson says any Democratic Party and “corporate media” opposition to Musk’s hostile takeover plan is simply a gambit to maintain control of their political message.

At The Hustings we welcome political opinions from the right and left, so long as they are fact-based and civil. No echo chambers, no trolling. Please email your comments on anything we post to editors@thehustings.news. Free and open and civil discussion from all points of view will keep us honest.

_____

The Biden administration’s Justice Department is ready to appeal a federal judge’s ruling that has overturned the public transportation and airline mask mandate only if the CDC determines that extending the mandate is needed, NPR reports. 

Beside further exacerbating the divide between conservatives and liberals over COVID-19 mask mandates and vaccinations, such an appeal could hamper future CDC mandates for potentially more dangerous health crises if the Supreme Court were to set a precedent by upholding the federal judge’s decision, Lindsay Wiley, professor of public health law at the University of California, Los Angeles told NPR’s Morning Edition. 

What do you think? Should the Justice Department appeal, or let it go? Comments:

editors@thehustings.news

_____

(THU 4/21/22)

Scroll down to below this post to read "(Ketanji Brown) Jackson Deserves Better."

More arms for Ukraine … President Biden Thursday announced an additional $800 million in military aid for Ukraine (AP) but warned that Congress will need to approve additional funds to maintain U.S. support. This is on top of $2.6 billion already contributed to Ukraine’s war effort against Russia. The latest tranche goes for heavy artillery, 144,000 rounds of ammunition and drones for an escalated battle over the Donbas region in Eastern Ukraine. …

Tweet this … Tesla CEO Elon Musk says he’s secured the $46.5 billion necessary to buy Twitter outright, at $54.20 per share, NPR reports. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the world’s richest person says he has lined up $25.5 billion in loans from Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and other banks, and will shell out the remaining $21 billion from his personal fortune. ...

Mask mandate appeal coming … The Justice Department says it will appeal a federal judge’s ruling that struck down the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s mask mandate on public mass transit including commercial airplanes, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. The CDC asked the DOJ to appeal the ruling by a federal judge in Tampa, Florida, that lifted the mandate earlier this week.

The CDC did not follow proper rule-making procedures, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle said in a 59-page opinion Monday. The CDC says that wearing a mask on buses, subways, airplanes and other public transit “remains necessary to protect the public health.”

_____________________________________

WED 4/20/22

Masks Off

Some airline passengers removed masks mid-flight Monday after a federal judge overturned the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s national public transportation mask mandate to fight the COVID-19 virus. U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, in Tampa, Florida, said in a 59-page opinion that the CDC did not follow proper rule-making procedures in issuing the mandate.

Mizelle’s ruling does not preclude local authorities and private companies from mandating their own masking requirements, The Washington Post reports, though United, Delta, Southwest and American immediately lifted their requirements –- even triggering removal celebrations on some in-air flights –- and the Raleigh-Durham (North Carolina), Miami and Portland (Oregon) airports are among those announcing they will no longer require masks, per local TSA directives, according to the New York Post. Lyft and Uber also have lifted the mask mandate for drivers and passengers.

New York’s subway system and LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy airports, and San Francisco International are reportedly maintaining mask mandates. There has been a surge in new East Coast cases of the BA.2 omicron variant in recent weeks.

This left the Biden administration and the CDC scrambling Wednesday to determine how to respond. See left and right columns for more.

What do you think?: Should the Justice Department appeal Judge Mizelle’s ruling to the Supreme Court, or is it time to take off masks while on airplanes and public transportation? Email your comments to editors@thehustings.news and tell us in the subject line whether you’re “left” or “right” no matter whether it matches your opinion on this question. We will post civil comments … no echo chambers and no trolling … in these columns.

--Todd Lassa

_____

U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle is being hailed by the prevailing Trump wing of the Republican Party for her wisdom in striking down the CDC’s COVID-19 mask mandate on public transportation. Mizelle was 33 when then-President Trump nominated her to the federal bench in Tampa, Florida, in September 2020, and became the youngest federal judge ever. Her husband is Chad Mizelle, who was acting general counsel for the Trump administration’s homeland security council.

Responding to her nomination, the American Bar Association rated her “not qualified.”

The ABA “prefers a dozen years of practice experience and she had merely eight,” Carl Tobias, law professor at the University of Richmond (Virginia) told The Guardian. Mizelle also lacks experience in litigation and trying cases.

But Matt Schlapp, chairman of the American Conservative Union, best-known for its annual CPAC conventions, tweeted: “God Bless Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle.”

Your opinion of Judge Mizelle and her ruling? Comments: 

editors@thehustings.news.

_____

The Senate Judiciary Committee has a long, enduring tradition of mishandling Supreme Court justice nominees for political purposes. You are invited to join this conversation on the most recent example, the hearings of Judge Kitanji Brown Jackson. 

Comments from the left on Nic Woods’ center column assessment will appear in this column. Whether you are on the left or right of American politics, we’d like to hear from you. Email your comments to editors@thehustings.news and indicate in the subject line whether you are liberal or conservative.

NOTE: If you are trying to read The Hustings on a smartphone, this column will appear first. It is not the center column. Place your phone horizontally to get the proper three-column perspective.

_____

By Nic Woods

The Senate vote to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson April 7 to the Supreme Court of the United States should have been 70-30, or at least matched Neil Gorsuch’s 54-45, but because we seem to live in one of the most blindly partisan and disingenuous political timelines ever, it was 53-47.

While that’s one more than Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas (both 52-48) and three more than Brett Kavanaugh (50-48), Brown Jackson was far less controversial than any of them. Could anyone in the Senate say with a straight face that she lacked qualifications? Unlike Barrett, Jackson knew that what was legal and what wasn’t and what was under her purview as a judge and what sounded like it should be a senator’s problem. 

And unlike Thomas and Kavanaugh, she didn’t have to worry about past, er, discrepancies potentially derailing her nomination.

The 53-47 vote was the same number that supported her rise to her current judgeship on the U.S. Court of Appeals to the District of Columbia Circuit but, instead of Mitt Romney (R-UT) casting a vote her way that time, it was … Lindsay Graham, the same South Carolina Republican who suddenly had a bit of a temper tantrum because President Joe Biden picked her over his choice, J. Michelle Childs, who sits on the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

He should have known this was going to happen — while Childs is highly qualified, if she had been chosen, she would have been equally impressive and likely more qualified that those who made it to the court before her — Jackson was just a smidge more qualified and Biden was taking no chances. 

Better luck next time, Lindsey. If you allow a next time.

This brings me to what was irritating about her confirmation process. It was a dog and pony show that was beneath her. 

Since Robert H. Bork was rejected in 1987 — the last rejection of a SCOTUS nominee, for better or worse — his ghost has been haunting the proceedings for everyone who has been luckier than he and didn’t have a role to play in one of the most memorable fiascos of the Nixon administration, the Saturday Night Massacre. He also had a candid streak that revealed too much of his judicial philosophy for those senators who were willing to otherwise forgive him for following sketchy presidential orders. 

None of this was Jackson’s fault. It isn’t her fault that her credentials were impeccable and unassailable and so she had to answer to nonsense from Republicans Ted Cruz of Texas and Josh Hawley of Missouri. It also isn’t her fault that they don’t seem to know that, if they aren’t satisfied with the minimum sentences of child predators as they currently stand, it’s their job to pass a tougher law. These two, like most Republicans, have been on record for disliking “activist judges,” so why were they asking a judge to be tougher than the law Congress passed?

Which brings us to a serious question and probably the biggest one from the hearings: Why do voters continue to find lawmakers who don’t seem to know what their jobs are? 

John Kennedy of Louisiana’s obligatory impression that a Harvard-educated Black woman is “articulate” and Ted Cruz’s performance are not really worthy of mention.

Someone, I guess, had to say that a Black person was articulate and it might as well be the junior senator of a Southern state. Lindsay Graham was mid-temper tantrum so he was otherwise occupied. 

And, perhaps, if Ted Cruz wants to ask serious questions about Antiracist Baby, he should ask the author, Ibram X. Kendi.  I have had several conversations with Kendi and can say such a meeting of the minds would be a technical knockout if Cruz were to allow Kendi to get a word in edgewise.

The pinnacle of disingenuousness was Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who said the right things but acted as if none of that mattered because he couldn’t get a feel if Judge Jackson was, or was not, an originalist. 

Originalism, in short, is interpreting the Constitution based on the original understanding at the time it was adopted and, if there are any changes, it would be done through the process laid out in Article V. Now, the original understanding of “people” when the Constitution was adopted did not apply to six people who have sat on the Supreme Court, in addition to incoming Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. 

What do you think, Ben Sasse – is she an originalist? And what really was your point in trying to come off as the rational Republican on the Judiciary committee for the length of your speech, then not voting for her because you knew she couldn’t possibly be an originalist? https://wapo.st/3EkNUu4

_____
Woods is deputy editor.

Is there justification for the way Ted Cruz (TX), Ben Sasse (NE), John Kennedy (LA) and other Republicans treated Supreme Court Justice-elect Ketanji Brown Jackson in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s nomination hearings? Were Democratic committee members’ grillings of Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavenaugh and Amy Coney Barrett as egregious? Did their hearings make turnabout fair play?

Comments from the right on Nic Woods’ center column assessment will appear in this column. Whether you are on the right or left of American politics, we’d like to hear from you. Email your comments to editors@thehustings.news and indicate in the subject line whether you are conservative or liberal.

_____

We are celebrating the Allegany County (Maryland) Library System’s recent Day of Civility with an audio podcast on YouTube, available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyb4xVPfB1M … Scroll down to read our story on the discussion between speakers on the left and right. 

Also up for your discussion …

 “On Regime Change,” page 2.

• The importance of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s experience as a public defender, page 2.

• Debate: “No Fly Zone = World War III?” page 3.

Comments? Email editors@thehustings.news.

_____

Congress is on Easter/Passover recess until Monday, April 25, and week-daily …meanwhile… is also taking the time off. Until then ...

The Fox News headline … Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is “mocked for voicing outrage” over a video she reportedly shared Saturday evening, which depicts a worship leader on a commercial airliner, leading passengers in singing Christian music for Easter. 

The ‘outrage’: “I think my family and I should have a prayer session next time I’m on a plane,” she wrote with the video (not identified as being posted on any social media). “How do you think it will end?”

Republican candidates’ reaction: Fox News quoted several Republican candidates criticizing Omar, who is Muslim.

“Why do you hate Christians, Ilhan?” says Vernon Jones, a “Black pro-Trump former Democrat” running to represent Georgia’s 10th District in the U.S. House of Representatives. 

“Qatar – a country you’re very familiar with – plays Islamic prayers on the intercom before takeoff on their planes,” commented Cicely Davis, who is running for the GOP nomination for Omar’s House seat, Minnesota’s 5th District.

Was it ‘outrage’?: Did Omar express “hatred” for Christians? Email your comments to editors@thehustings.news.

•••

On Musk’s Twitter gambit … Last week, the world’s richest man, Tesla and SpaceX chief Elon Musk launched a $43 billion hostile takeover bid of Twitter, prompting a “poison pill” response from the social media giant. Some conservatives are buoyed by the prospect of un-censored free speech that would allow room for Donald J. Trump and followers to spread whatever views of the 2020 presidential election and right-wing conspiracy theories they may have. 

Our meta response: So The Hustings took to Twitter (@NewsHustings) in a 72-hour reader poll to ask: “If Elon Musk buys Twitter in order to open up unfettered free speech, will he allow criticism of Tesla, SpaceX, The Boring Company and Elon Musk’s Twitter?"

Results: Of 595 votes, 52.6% responded “yes,” and 47.4% said “no.”

Context: Like a certain former president, Elon Musk has proven thin-skinned toward public criticism of him and his company, though much of the backlash to such criticism comes from loyal followers of Musk and his businesses.

•••

Headlines aggregated … Russian missiles hit Lviv, Ukraine, early Monday, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. At least seven are dead, the first fatalities in the western city near the Polish border. [https://www.npr.org/live-updates/ukraine-russia-lviv-mariupol-04-18-2022] …

Alex Jones’ Infowars has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Southern District of Texas, sources tell The Hill, [https://thehill.com/news/media/3271477-alex-joness-inforwars-files-for-bankruptcy/] as the website faces numerous lawsuits over comments made about the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in which 20 first-graders and six teachers were killed …

Tesla stockholders have asked a judge to silence the EV automaker’s CEO, Elon Musk, in a fraud case, according to Politico. The shareholders are suing Musk over some 2018 tweets in which he said he was lining up investors to take the company private. [https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/17/tesla-elon-musk-lawsuit-00025741] …

President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden paid 24.6% tax on $610,000 income, Roll Call reports. [ https://rollcall.com/2022/04/15/bidens-paid-24-6-percent-tax-on-610k-income-return-shows/]. Today is deadline for filing income taxes.

_____________________________________

FRI 4/15/22

The Slava goes to Ukraine's military... A senior Pentagon officials has confirmed to NPR that Russia's premier missile cruiser, Moskva, was hit by two Ukrainian missiles before it sank in the Black Sea, off the coast of the Eastern Donbas region of Ukraine. The Kremlin had claimed the explosion was the result of an onboard ammunition explosion, which forced Moskva's crew of 500 to evacuate.

•••

Republicans v. Democrats … 

Donald J. Trump may not have been able to reverse the results of his November 2020 re-election loss, but he has influenced the Republican National Committee to withdraw from the Commission on Presidential Debates, which was formed in 1987 and has organized the televised combats between major party candidates since George H.W. Bush v. Michael Dukakis.

While Trump has “repeatedly leveled accusations of anti-Republican bias” against the CPD, The Hill notes, GOP acrimony toward the group goes back to 2012, at least, when CNN’s Candy Crowley “fact-checked” candidate Mitt Romney live in a debate against President Barrack Obama – and Crowley was wrong, says uspresidentialelectionnews.com. 

This comes as the Democratic National Committee looks ready to brush Iowa’s caucuses from its 2024 presidential nominating process, CNN reports. Per a statement by the DNC as quoted by CNN’s Chris Cilizza in his daily newsletter, The Point!: “The new plan jettisons the current early states of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina and implements a process that would prioritize diverse battleground states that choose to hold primaries, not caucuses. Under the new structure, states will apply to hold early nomination contests and the rules committee will select up to five that will be allowed to go before Super Tuesday, the first Tuesday in March.”

Iowa is not diverse and does hold caucuses, Cilizza notes, and pounded the final nail in its first-in-the-U.S. contest’s coffin when it botched its 2020 caucuses, and was not able to name a winner for days.

•••

Musk and Twitter … Everybody’s talking about Tesla CEO and SpaceX founder Elon Musk’s launch of a hostile $43 billion takeover of Twitter. Musk, whose persona and apparently libertarian, anti-union politics have invited comparisons with former President Trump, has 81 million Twitter followers. He told a TED conference Thursday he “sees the platform as a way to foster conversation and potentially even prevent international conflicts,” according to The Washington Post

Conservatives consider Musk their “Twitter savior” who would “allow for few, if any restrictions on free speech,” Politico reports. 

That got us to wondering whether the soft-skinned Musk would allow any criticism of Tesla, SpaceX or of the world’s richest man himself, on Twitter if he owned it. Go to our Twitter account, @NewsHustings and take our poll on the question.

--Edited by Todd Lassa

_____________________________________

Younger voters are losing confidence in Uncle Joe . . . Joe Biden’s popularity number among Gen Z (born 1997-2004) was 60% in January to June 2021, according to Gallup.

Biden is now — between September 2021 and March 22 — down 21 points, to 39% approval.

For Millennials (1981-1996) he is down 19 points over the same period, to 41%.

And for Gen X (1964-1980) the decline is 15 points, to 40%.

While the Gallup analysis focuses on the nature of the people within those generational cohorts (e.g., there are more political independents among these groups and therefore there isn’t the same sense of political party straight-line support), we would like to suggest a simpler explanation, albeit one that is perhaps somewhat insensitive.

Joe Biden is 79 years old.

Anyone who sees him walking from a podium in the White House or on his way to Marine One can see that the man appears frail. Each step seems lightly placed as though there is a bit of trepidation that he might fall.

Isn’t it possible that younger people get the sense that the man is simply too old to be the president and consequently that any problems — whether pandemic or economic — are a consequence of that?

•••

Fraud at polls; Trump still defeated … All evidence to date there was voter fraud in the November 2020 presidential election points to the MAGA wing of the GOP allegedly committing voter fraud. Latest is that Mark Meadows has been removed from the rolls in Macon County, North Carolina as the state continues to investigate whether Donald J. Trump’s last White House chief of staff registered to vote at a motor home he never owned or resided in. 

“What I found was that he was also registered in the state of Virginia,” said Macon County Board of Elections Director Melanie Thibault, according to Asheville, North Carolina’s Citizen Times. “And he voted in a 2021 election. The last election he voted in Macon County was in 2020.”

Meadows was removed from the Macon County voter rolls under General Statute 163-57. A spokesperson for the former Trump chief of staff did not return calls for comment to the Citizen Times.

--Edited by Gary S. Vasilash and Todd Lassa

_____________________________________

TUE 4/12/22

Highest inflation rate since 1981 … The Consumer Price Index hit another high with an annual rate of 8.5% in March, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Tuesday. The month-over-month rate was +1.2% for March, after a +0.8% in February. Energy prices rose an especially brutal 11% in March, for an annual rate of +32%, with gasoline up 18.3% in March. Food prices rose at an annual rate of 8.8%.

Meanwhile, President Biden visited Iowa Tuesday to announce the federal government will allow sales of a 15% ethanol summer fuel blend in order to ease gas prices, Roll Call reports. The biofuel causes more greenhouse gas but can also cut the cost of fuel at the pump.

•••

We’ve been warned, again … Fiona Hill, the national intelligence officer on Russia and Eurasia for the George W. Bush administration, the Obama administration for nearly a year, and for the Trump administration up to Donald J. Trump’s 2019 “perfect” phone call with newly elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy demanding he have Hunter Biden investigated in exchange for military aid, tells journalist Robert Draper for The New York Times Magazine she was at home writing her memoir, January 6, 2021, when a friend called to tell her to turn on her television.

“I saw the thread, the thread connecting the Zelinskyy phone call to January 6,” she tells Draper. “And I remember how, in 2020, Putin had changed Russia’s Constitution to allow him to stay in power longer. This was Trump pulling a Putin.”

Hill’s memoir is titled, There Is Nothing for You Here: Finding Opportunity in the 21st Century.

Draper’s in-depth piece on Hill may be found here (subscription required): https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/11/magazine/trump-putin-ukraine-fiona-hill.html

It’s worth a close read, especially if you remain a fan of the former president’s policies. While The Hustings remains committed to an open, civil discussion between left and right, we are trying to understand the enduring loyalty toward ex-President Trump nearly 15 months after the Capitol insurrection. We welcome civil comments from either side of the political divide, including comments from anti- and pro-Trump conservatives, as well as liberals. email: editors@thehustings.news

•••

Meanwhile, in weather news . . . One in three U.S. adults say they have been affected by an extreme weather event — extreme cold, hurricanes, ice storms — during the past two years, according to a recent Gallup poll. Those living in the South and West have been most affected, 39% and 35%, respectively.

Considered overall, 63% of those who have been affected by extreme weather worry “a great deal” about global warming/climate change and 78% of them believe those environmental changes are underway. Presumably, if a cow goes flying past your window, your level of concern is a bit elevated.

Considered through a partisan lens, there is no surprise: 79% of Democrats who have been affected worry “a great deal” while only 28% of Republicans who have been affected do. Perhaps Republicans are just more calm and collected than Democrats.

But one thing is curious about the results: 35% of Democrats and 31% of Republicans who have been affected by an extreme weather event say they understand global warming “very well.”

Evidently there is a lack of information that cuts across all individuals.

The weather, of course, doesn’t consider one’s political affiliation.

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

_____

Did the left start acrimony with political correctness? Or was it former Rep. Newt Gingrich’s (R-GA) fault? How do we discuss this sort of things with civilty toward all? Listen to the Allegany County Chapter of Choose Civility’s new podcast featuring discussion from conservatives and liberals here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyb4xVPfB1M and read our coverage below. 

Also up for your discussion …

 “On Regime Change,” page 2.

• The importance of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s experience as a public defender, page 2.

• Debate: “No Fly Zone = World War III?” page 3.

Comments? Email editors@thehustings.news.

_____

The three speakers in the Choose Civility podcast who identify as liberal are …

Tim Magrath, associate professor of political science and director of the Beall Institute for Public Affairs at Frostburg State University. He worked on Capitol Hill for 25 years, including for the office of Sen. Paul Sarbannes (D-MD).

Patrick O’Brien, director of FSU’s office of civic engagement, and an alumnus of the university.

•Colin Creagan, a junior in mass communications at FSU.

Your comments on the podcast and/or the center column are welcome. Email editors@thehustings.news and tell us in the subject line whether you identify as “left” or “right”, and please be civil.

_____

By Todd Lassa

Listen to the podcast on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyb4xVPfB1M

What happened to civil political discourse? How did our red-state, blue-state, rural red-urban blue dichotomy get to the point where Democrats refuse to talk to Republicans and Republicans don’t want their kids to marry Democrats? How did the simple act of wearing a mask and taking a vaccine become volatile fuel for left-right firestorms?

It's a complicated problem that seems to be escalating, even in the time since the pro-Trump insurrection on the Capitol more than a year ago. Liberals and Democrats have long blamed what they see as Republican intransigence on Constitutional Originalism and all its offshoots, from the Second Amendment to efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade, while conservatives and Republicans argue the current high level of political acrimony goes back to “political correctness” and culminates in “cancel culture.” 

No wonder the culture wars obliterate any semblance of civility in our political discussion.

The Allegany Chapter of Choose Civility, an organization rooted in Maryland library systems, tackle civility in political discussion in an audio podcast to commemorate its fifth annual Day of Civility, Thursday, April 7. The podcast on YouTube asks, “How can we model and hold others accountable to engage in civil political discourse that helps us to address our shared local and national challenges?” says Elesha Ruminski, professor of communication and leadership studies at Frostburg State University. Ruminski, who is coordinator of the Communication Leadership Lab and member of the Allegany County Choose Civility chapter, moderated the discussion.

Delanie Blubaugh, editor of FSU’s The Bottom Line <thebottomline.news.com> and this editor presented pre-written questions (this is a discussion, not a debate, though you are encouraged to comment for the left or right columns). 

Speakers

See the left column for the background and affiliations of Tim McGrath, Patrick O’Brien and Colin Creagan.

See the right column for the background and affiliations of Tanya Gomer, R.J. Caster and Justin Brick.

Origins of the Acrimony

Tim Magrath: “Caustic political discourse is a relatively recent innovation. I hate to put it on any one person, but I would suggest it’s Newt Gingrich. He succeeded at that.” In 1994, “he told people he was counseling to attack Democrats at that time in very caustic language and he succeeded.” …Gingrich (R-GA) gained 60 House seats in the ’94 midterms and took over the House of Representatives.

“When I started working for Congress there was civility, there were conservative Democrats and liberal Republicans. And they … worked together.” McGrath quotes three-time House Speaker Sam Rayburn (D-TX): “Disagree without being disagreeable. And never make politics personal.”

RJ Caster points to centuries of political violence in America: “Are we more violent now than in the past?” he asked, citing the Alexander Hamilton-Aaron Burr duel, South Carolina Rep. Preston Brooks beating Sen. Charles Sumner of Massachusetts nearly to death with a cane in the Capitol over an argument leading up to the Civil War, and shots fired by Puerto Rican nationalists in the House Gallery in the 1950s. 

On Facts and alternative facts

Tanya Gomer notes that every individual’s reality is colored by background and experience. Hers is informed by 10 years in the military, time spent overseas, her education and law enforcement background. Seemingly counter to this background she recently wrote a grant application for tackling the opioid epidemic that favors funding community services over law enforcement – which many on her side might denounce this as “defunding the police.”

Patrick O’Brien: “We truly have reached a point where we don’t even agree on what reality is. … We don’t even agree the world is not flat.”

How do we fix it?

TG: “We need to take emotion out of politics.”

TM: “The vast majority of people are in the middle. They’re moderates.” Gerrymandering states’ congressional districts for protection of Congress members’ seats, whether Democrats in Maryland this year, or Republicans in Ohio and Pennsylvania protects the hard-left and hard-right instead of moderates who would best represent most American voters. “In competitive congressional districts, it’s the middle that matters, not the fringes. … without competitive congressional districts, I think we’re in trouble.”

RJC: Quoting the late political philosopher, Leo Strauss, “Liberal democracy is built on low, but solid ground. Our unifying factor is based on a set of ideals, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. … We don’t have a unifying element anymore. We don’t agree on shared values or what’s true and what’s not true.”

American political discourse should take a page from marriage counseling, Caster says. “Get both sides to agree on something bigger than the argument.”

More

There’s much more on the Allegany County Choose Civility podcast. While the discussion won’t fix our political discourse overnight, it’s a start. Join the conversation by emailing your opinions to editors@thehustings.news. Keep your comments civil and tell us in the subject line whether you identify as “left” or “right.”

_____

The three speakers in the Choose Civility podcast who identify as conservative are …

Tanya Gomer, grants manager and pretrial risk assessment coordinator at the Allegany County Sheriff’s Office and Detention Center, a Frostburg State University alumni and president of the Allegany County Republican Women’s Club.

RJ Caster, chief executive officer of Jacksonville, Florida-based Techne Media, specializing in data and psychographic research. He is an alum of FSU who served as an intern in the office of former Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD).

•Justin Brick, senior studying communication studies, and a Communication Leadership Lab assistant at FSU.

Your comments on the podcast and/or the center column are welcome. Email editors@thehustings.news and tell us in the subject line whether you identify as “right” or “left”, and please be civil.

_____