President Biden announces today an additional $800 million to support Ukraine’s efforts to defend itself, The Washington Post reports.

Scroll down this column to read pundit Eric Blair’s commentary on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s pleas for a no-fly zone to stop Russian aggression. Our columnists on the left and the right are not very far apart on this issue. Whether you agree or have a different point of view, we want to hear from you. Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news and whether you consider yourself liberal or conservative in general.

_____

WED 3/16/22

Scroll down below today’s news to read our debate, No-Fly Zone = WWIII? with commentary in the left and right columns.

Zelenskyy Wants Polish MiGs and U-24 – Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pleaded for a no-fly zone – unlikely because of the implications of starting a “hot war” with Russia – Polish MiG fighter jets, and the formation of a new international organization he called “U-24” to fight Russian aggression in his live video address to the U.S. Congress Wednesday morning. Zelenskyy evoked the attack on Pearl Harbor and September 11, 2001, saying “Russia has turned the Ukrainian sky into death… . Is this a lot to ask for, to create a no-fly zone?”

Zelenskyy also asked for more aid and tougher sanctions against Russia, including the withdrawal of all U.S. businesses from the country.

“Ukraine is grateful to the U.S. for its overwhelming support,” Zelenskyy added, “I am grateful to President Biden for his faithful commitments.” 

Closing Quote: “I’m addressing President Biden. … You are the leader of the nation. I wish you to be the leader of the world. It means to be the leader of peace. Slava Ukrain!

What is ‘U-24’? – Zelenskyy did not go into detail, but it obviously would be a way to back Ukraine with some of the 30 European and North American (U.S. and Canada) nations in NATO, and likely to evoke a strong reaction from Russia’s dictator-president, Vladimir Putin. 

•••

Fall Back No More? – Who says an evenly split Senate can’t agree on anything? Republicans, Democrats, and whatever Manchinema are voted unanimously to make Daylight Savings Time permanent. You sprung forward last weekend? You won’t fall back this autumn in a sort of Groundhog Day for Americans’ internal body clock if the House forwards the bill to the White House and President Biden signs it.

•••

Meanwhile, in the Home of Starbucks -- After graduation, most college graduates would like to move to Seattle, according to a survey from the Axios-Generation Lab Next Cities Index. The other cities in the top five are New York, Los Angeles, Denver, and Boston.

However: Amazon has told some 1,800 of its employees who worked in an office in downtown Seattle they can work elsewhere, GeekWire reports, not because of COVID but because of crime occurring around the offices.

--Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Nic Woods

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news, and let us know whether you consider yourself “left” or “right.”

After Zelenskyy’s half-hour address -- Republicans, including Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska (pictured above) and House of Representatives Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, criticized Biden for failing to provide the Polish MiGs to Ukraine so the country could protect its own skies. The White House has rejected the transfer of MiGs as an action Putin would consider a NATO/U.S. declaration of war.

Scroll down this column to read pundit-at-large Stephen Macaulay’s commentary on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s pleas for a no-fly zone to stop Russian attacks. Our columnists on the right and left are not very far apart on this issue. Whether you agree or have a different point of view, we want to hear from you. Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news and whether you consider yourself conservative or liberal in general.

_____

By Eric Blair

Another war, another opportunity for the truly zealous to reach for their military Viagra. With the Ukraine crisis now past a fortnight, leave it yet again to those who delude themselves into believing that modern warfare is like the video game, Fortnite, with a similar lack of moral hazard involved. 

Claiming that “something” has to be done in the pursuit of protecting Ukraine from Vladimir Putin’s petulance, the interventionists are demanding NATO impose a no-fly zone over the beleaguered country, echoing an utterly unreasonable, albeit impassioned plea from Ukrainian President Zelensky. As heart-wrenching to watch, and ire-inducing as Russia’s unacceptable actions are, the solution is not for the United States -- and NATO member states more broadly -- to risk the inevitable escalation of this conflict by serving as the largely self-appointed air patrol over the skies of Kyiv, Khardiv and elsewhere. 

Putin has proven that, whether driven by vendetta or frustration, he seems unwilling to employ a reverse gear to his onslaught machine. Every NATO jet over Ukraine increases exponentially the possibility of direct engagement between a Russian fighter jet and a corresponding F-16 or F-22. The downing of any air force plane will undoubtedly be deemed an act of war; for two nuclear heavy countries both currently at the equivalent of DEF-CON 3, those with a Top Gun fetish or fantasy would be wise to stay clear of trying to create a new MIG Alley in Eastern Europe.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Todd Lassa

Since Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy begged U.S. Congress and the United Kingdom’s parliament last week for a no-fly zone over his country, Russia’s army has shelled a maternity hospital and conducted an air strike on a military facility in Western Ukraine less than 15 miles from the Polish – and thus NATO – border, killing 35 and injuring 134 according to The Washington Post. Even as Vladimir Putin’s Russia suffers severe economic and trade sanctions, Ukraine is shedding blood, of civilians as well as its military.

Despite the obvious perils of a no-fly zone, proponents of NATO fighter jets closing Ukrainian airspace to Russia argue that the consequences of not doing so will be far deadlier. The proponents note that Ukraine agreed to give up its considerable nuclear arms stockpile in the 1994 Budapest Memorandum in exchange for a guarantee of its security by the U.S., U.K. and Russia. Supporters of Zelenskyy’s pleas for a no-fly zone include retired Gen. Philip Breedlove, former commander of the U.S. European Command, who told MSNBC that Putin already considers the sanctions and weapons supplied by the U.S. and NATO to Ukraine to be acts of war. 

But the prevailing viewpoint by the Biden White House and among Western European leaders is that we can’t afford to turn this new cold war into a “hot war” with Putin, who has hinted about his nuclear might. The U.S., U.K and France combined have slightly fewer nuclear warheads compared with Russia. The violent use of but one of them, however, would be devastating. 

What to do about Zelenskyy’s pleas for help? 

Two of our pundits react to this grave issue, with Stephen Macaulay in the right and Eric Blair in the left. 

Tell us what you think with an email to editors@thehustings.news, and no matter what your position on a no fly zone, please indicate whether you consider yourself “left” or “right” in order that we place your comments in the correct column.

(MON-TUE 3/14-15/22)

_____

By Stephen Macaulay

“So we have made it clear that we are not going to move into Ukraine, neither on the ground, or in Ukrainian airspace. And of course, the only way to implement a no-fly zone is to send NATO planes, fighter planes into Ukrainian airspace, and then impose that no-fly zone by shooting down Russian planes. . . . But we also believe that if we did that, we'll end up with something that could end in a full-fledged war in Europe, involving many more countries, and causing much more human suffering. So that's the reason why we make this painful decision to impose heavy sanctions, provide significant support, stepping up support. But at the same time not involving NATO forces directly in the conflict in Ukraine, neither on the ground, or in their airspace.” - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, 4 March 2022

As we watch the horrible situation in Ukraine, as we hear President Zelenskyy ask for a no-fly zone to be established, it is almost simply humane to think that this would be the right thing to do.

But to do so, to have a Russian plane shot down as Stolenberg notes, would result in the 30 nations of NATO joining the battle. As President Biden told the House Democratic Caucus Issues Conference last week, “But, look, the idea — the idea that we’re going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains going in with American pilots and American crews, just understand — and don’t kid yourself, no matter what you all say — that’s called ‘World War Three.’  Okay?  Let’s get it straight here, guys. That old expression — ‘Don’t kid a kidder.’”

No one is kidding about any of this.

There is an array of anti-aircraft systems that the NATO countries can send to Ukraine to mitigate the consequences of Russian bombers. Like the British STARStreak high-velocity, man-portable, anti-air missiles.

Here’s the thing: the NATO countries are playing by the rules. The STARStreak is a defensive weapon, not an offensive weapon. The NATO leaders do not want to poke the proverbial bear.

Still, one wonders whether Putin, with his economy in shambles, isn’t going to feel sufficiently provoked to launch attacks on NATO countries.

At which point the notion of a “no-fly zone” over the Ukraine is going to seem quaint.

A question that must be asked a lot in Brussels, Washington, Berlin, London, Paris and other capitols is: Do we maintain a reactive mode or do we make Putin regret that he ever left his dacha?

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Pundit-at-large Stephen Macaulay explains gas prices, right over there, two columns over. Become a citizen pundit and join the discussion on who is to blame, whether the White House is acting forcefully enough on this and inflation in general, by submitting your civil comments to editors@thehustings.news and please tell us whether you consider yourself left or right, so we know which column should post your opinions.

Read “Taking Sides? The Art of Controlling History” in The Gray Area.

Also in these three columns:

Analysis and coverage of President Biden’s State of the Union address in the center, with GOP (and progressive Democratic) responses in the right, “Why I Didn’t Watch the State of the Union Address” in the left.

•”Too Woke or Anti-Woke” in the center, with “Erasure to Oblivion” in the left and “Where Woke and MAGA Meet” in the right.

_____

FRI 3/11/22

Gas Tax Holidays are up for consideration in several states, including Tennessee, Georgia, Michigan, Maryland and highest-gas-tax-rate-in-the-U.S., California.

Beat the Midterms – The House Democratic Issues Conference meeting in Philadelphia through the weekend are split over how to stem their much-expected loss of the majority to Republicans in this November’s midterms, Roll Call reports. But the party’s progressives, who spent much of 2021 pushing to make the White House’s sweeping infrastructure program contingent on its even more sweeping Build Back Better plan, appears to have a solution.

Progressive House Democrats are pressing President Biden to enact those “big chunks” of BBB as outlined in his State of the Union address buy signing a pile of executive orders (EOs), Punchbowl News reports. 

“We’re going to make sure that we do everything we can to cut costs for the American consumer,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), chair of the House Progressive Caucus, who will release a slate of proposed EOs next week. 

Known Knowns: While this sounds like 2022 is 2021 all over again for the Progs, who appear to be acting like they have a commanding majority in the House, it should be noted that Jim Clyburn, the moderate Democrat from South Carolina largely credited with reviving Joe Biden’s bid for the party’s presidential nomination in 2020, “threw his considerable might behind the idea,” Punchbowl News says.

If the House Progs can convince the White House to stock up on ink for Biden’s Resolute desk, chunks of the nearly $2 trillion Build Back Better program to be given EO priority will certainly include the child tax credit, portions of the Green agenda and an increase in the refugee cap.

Known Unknowns: As a war-time president who got a bump in the polls after his SOTU from Trump-level low numbers, Biden may be in a better position than he was a few weeks ago to sign a pile of EOs, as House Dems – both progressive and moderate – attack their Republican midterm opponents as coming from a party of do-nothings and including even some pro-Putin candidates from the MAGA wing of the GOP.

•••

Meanwhile, in Constitutional News -- When someone pleads “the Fifth,” it generally goes to this clause in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution…

“nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

The Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, which undoubtedly knows more than a little bit about the law, explains it like this:

“To be self-incriminating, the compelled answers must pose a “substantial and ‘real,’ and not merely a “trifling or imaginary hazard” of criminal prosecution.”

Which sounds rather serious.

Michael Flynn appeared before the January 6 Committee Thursday. Politico quotes his attorney: “General Michael Flynn appeared before the January 6th Committee today in compliance with their subpoena and, on advice of counsel, exercised his Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer the Committee’s questions.”

This is the same Michael Flynn who once had a brief stint as the national security advisor and got a pre-emptive free pass from then-president Trump for charges that he lied to the FBI during an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. (Why would you need to lie if you’d done nothing wrong?)

About that brief stint: January 22 to February 13, 2017. He barely had enough time to find out where the washroom is.

Why so short? Due to it being revealed that he’d reportedly lied to then Vice President Pence about conversations with Sergey Kislyak, who was the Russian ambassador at the time.

All of this goes without comment.

•••

Kick the Can No More – The Senate appears to have become as tired as we are with the age-old cliché about “kicking the can” -- that is, federal budget continuing resolutions, a few weeks or months down the fiscal year road in order to avoid government shutdowns. The chamber voted, 68-31 yesterday to pass a $1.5-trillion government funding bill that takes us through the end of the fiscal year, September 30, The Hill reports. That’s just two days after the House of Representatives passed the bill along with a provision to allow the Senate a CR that would have extended the deadline beyond Friday, the date set by the previous CR, to next Tuesday, to allow the upper chamber more time.

Some conservative Republicans had objected to voting on the 2,741-page bill without time to read it, but the $13.6 billion in aid tied to Ukraine helped speed the process.

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

_____________________________________

THU 3/10/22

Inflation Rate Hits 7.9% in February – The Consumer Price Index rose 0.8% in February, the Labor Department announced Thursday morning, as measured even before the effect of Russia’s attack on Ukraine on already skyrocketing oil prices, for an annual rate of 7.9%, highest since January 1982. Gasoline prices were up 6.6%, accounting for nearly one-third of the February inflation rate, with food and shelter also leading the index, the Labor Department says. The annual inflation rate for 2021 was 7.5%.

•••

(Almost the) Final Kick of the Can – In the end, the House of Representatives passage of a $1.5-trillion omnibus appropriations bill for Fiscal 2022 seems anticlimactic next to all the news coming out of the war in Ukraine. But it’s not quite the end, as the Senate needs to take up passage and send the bill to President Biden’s desk, so the House added a four-day stopgap extending the deadline for federal funding to next Tuesday, Roll Call reports. The House passed the omnibus bill 361-169. Figure a dozen or so Republicans will join Democrats in the Senate.

Speaking of Ukraine, the House bill includes $13.6-billion in funding for the crisis there. 

Democrats stripped out $15.6 billion in emergency COVID-19 funding and determined that coronavirus relief needs a standalone funding bill, which is due to happen next week.

Known Knowns: Separation of the COVID-19 funding began when House Republicans demanded budget cuts elsewhere to accommodate the White House’s $22.5 billion appropriation request for coronavirus relief. That led to infighting among Democrats over concentrated power of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, according to Punchbowl News – so taking up the separate appropriations bill next week looks to be far from a slam-dunk. Expect House Republicans to take advantage of the infighting.

•••

Facing Threats, 1/5 of Election Officials Plan to Quit – One in six election officials have experienced threats because of their jobs, with 77% saying the threats have increased in recent years, and fully 20% plan to leave before the 2024 election, says a new report for the Brennan Center for Justice.

“As American democracy finds itself under assault from lies about the 2020 presidential race ‘being stolen,’ election officials are a prime target in the attempt to undermine future elections,” the report begins. “In 2020, in the face of a pandemic, record-high turnout, and a flood of disinformation about the election process and its integrity, these officials managed to run ‘the most secure election in American history.’” < https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/poll-local-election-officials-finds-safety-fears-colleagues-and>.

More than half of poll respondents are concerned about the safety of their colleagues, and more than a quarter are concerned about being assaulted on the job. The Brennan Center reports that safety concerns range from death threats that name officials’ young children to racist and gendered harassment. The report says 90% of election officials either are not aware of, or know little about, the Justice Department’s Election Threats Task Force, which investigates and prosecutes threats against election officials. (Hat tip to NPR’s Morning Edition.)

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Nic Woods

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

It is a reflection more of the love of alliteration among headline writers, particularly for broadcast outlets, than this is a telling bit of information:

PAIN AT THE PUMP!

Yes, gasoline costs more. It will continue to cost more. But let’s look, for a moment, at that cost.

The average driver, now that we’re coming out of COVID is driving more. This means that compared with the last two years, the demand for gasoline has increased. And what happens to the price of the supply when there is increased demand?

There is another factor. You may have noticed that it is getting warmer. Yes, summer is on the way. Every year the price of gasoline increases as winter goes out and summer comes in because the refineries must change the formulation of gasoline. There is an additive put in the mix so as to keep gasoline from evaporating quite so quickly. That additive costs more.

In addition to which, refineries tend to do equipment maintenance around this time of year, and in order to do that, some of their capacity is taken off line. Yes, that means reduced supply. And another reason why there is an increase in price this time of year. Every year.

Let’s get back to the PAIN AT THE PUMP!

An average driver drives 15,000 miles per year. The average fuel efficiency in 2021 for vehicles, according to the EPA, was 25.4 mpg. So this means that the average driver buys about 590 gallons of gasoline per year.

The price of a gallon of gas this past January, was $2.81 per gallon. So were it to stay at that for a year it would cost the average driver $1,657.90.

Let’s say that gasoline goes to $5.00 per gallon. (Yes, it has already eclipsed that in many places, but we’re talking average across the country.) This means that over a year that average driver would spend $2,950.

That is a difference of $1,292.10 over a year’s time. That’s $107.68 per month. Not trivial, but let’s put that in context.

A tall Starbucks Frappuccino (a.k.a., small beverage) costs on average $3.25. Or 65% of the price of a $5.00 gallon of gas.

There is another factor in all of this.

There is a war going on. A major war. This is causing additional disruptions to the supply chain, specifically the supply of oil.

One thing that tends not to be taken into account when people proclaim PAIN AT THE PUMP! is that the price of petroleum is predicated on the world market.

So if there is a barrel of oil pumped in Texas and a company in Japan says they’ll pay X and X is higher than what people are willing to pay elsewhere, guess where that oil will be sold? Voila! Price increase.

It is completely mystifying what Joe Biden can do about this. Very little, I’d submit.

It all comes down to supply and demand.

SUPPLY AND DEMAND!

Certainly not as exciting as

PAIN AT THE PUMP!

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Scroll down with the far-right trackbar for …

•”Why I Didn’t Watch the State of the Union Address,” pundit-at-large Stephen Macaulay’s column on President Biden’s speech, covered in the center column.

•”Erasure to Oblivion”, Eric Blair’s commentary on the center column, “Too Woke or Too Anti-Woke.”

Feeling left out? Email your comments on these opinion columns and/or any “meanwhile” daily news note to editors@thehustings.news. Subscribe to our newsletter at https://thehustings.substack.com.

_____

WED 3/9/22

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (at right, above) last night thanked the U.S. for banning Russian oil imports.

Biden Bans Russian Oil, Natural Gas Imports – No American relishes the added hike to prices -- currently more than $120 per barrel according to NPR -- that will be caused by President Biden’s ban on oil imports from Russia, the world’s largest exporter, in an executive order announced Tuesday. Biden also banned natural gas and coal imports. Republicans looking to boost gains expected in this year’s midterms already have attempted to paint the White House’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as weak, even as former President Trump and a faction on Fox News continue to fawn over Vladimir Putin. 

Pump Gas: Average price for a gallon of regular unleaded nationwide has reached $4.25 per gallon according to AAA, NPR’s Morning Edition reports Wednesday, with prices averaging over $5.50 per gallon in car-happy California. 

GOP Arguments: This is no time to subsidize electrification and renewable energy sources (as found in the “green” provisions of Biden’s stalled Build Back Better plan), but instead we should drill our way back to energy independence.

“Democrats want to blame surging prices on Russia,” The New York Times quotes House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). “But the truth is, their out-of-touch policies are why we’re here in the first place.”

Biden’s Counterpoints: Oil companies operating in the U.S. “have 9,000 permits to drill now. They could be drilling right now, yesterday, last week, last year,” Biden said in announcing his ban Tuesday, (NYT). “They have 9,000 to drill offshore that are already approved. So let me be clear. They are not using them for production now. These are the facts.”

Other Support: Great Britain has pledged to phase out imports by the end of the year, and the executive arm of the European Commission intends to make itself independent of Russian oil in the coming years – even if that’s too little, too late. Moderate conservatives are lining up behind Biden, including the group Republicans Against Trumpism, which tweeted a copy of the ex-president’s “Save America” message from yesterday calling out the “highest gas prices in history,” which asks, “Do you miss me yet?” To which Republicans Against Trumpism tweeted, “NO.”

Also: The U.S. has been an oil exporter for most of the century, with oil supplies playing on the price-setting global market. American refineries built in the ‘00s mostly treat Brent Crude from other oil-producing countries so much of low-sulfur sweet crude from the U.S. is exported. 

A Mess for Texas?: A potential bright spot for Democrats this year is that the high oil prices likely will benefit states like Texas, Oklahoma and North Dakota that were hit by historically low oil prices over the past few years, especially when prices turned negative briefly early in the pandemic. 

•••

American Authoritarian In-Waiting? – Former press secretary for the Trump White House Stephanie Grisham on ABC TV’s The View Tuesday, (per The Hill): “I think (Trump) feared (Putin). I think the man intimidated him. I also think he admired him greatly. I think he wanted to kill whoever spoke out against him.”

•••

Would the Wall Have Helped? — A 30-year-old U.S. citizen was arrested at the San Ysidro border with Mexico trying to smuggle 52 live reptiles into the U.S. that he had placed in bags and secreted on his body, the AP reports. Included were nine snakes and 43 horned lizards.

Note: “I would build a great wall – and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me – and I’ll build them very inexpensively,” said you-know-who. Would that have stopped this creepy-crawly case? Probably not.

•••

Insurrectionist Convicted – Guy Reffitt, a recruiter for the extremist group Texas Three Percenters, was found guilty on all counts for his actions in the January 6 Capitol insurrection. He is the first insurrectionist to go to trial for the riot. Jurors deliberated for two hours before finding Reffitt guilty of five felonies in the federal case, The Washington Post reports:obstruction of an official proceeding, interfering with police in a riot, transporting a firearm for that purpose, armed trespassing and witness tampering. Reffitt faces a maximum sentence of up to 20 years. 

Also: Longtime Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio was charged with conspiracy in the Capitol insurrection Tuesday.

Plea Deal Warning: While Reffitt’s son testified against him during the three-day trial, Reffitt’s wife stands by him, saying “This fight has just begun,” according to NPR’s Morning Edition. “Do not take a plea,” Nicole Reffitt said. “They are making a point out of Guy.”

--Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Nic Woods

_____________________________________

TUE 3/8/22

‘I’m not leaving Kyiv…I’m not hiding and I’m not afraid of anything.’ –Volodymyr Zelenskyy (at right, above). President Biden today announces a ban on Russian oil, natural gas and coal imports.

Welcome to the 20th Century – The Senate passed by unanimous voice vote the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act late Monday to send it to President Biden’s desk for a certainly quick signature (per UPI). The bill makes lynching a federal hate crime.

“After more than 200 failed attempts to outlaw lynching Congress is finally succeeding in taking a long overdue action” by passing the act, says Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). “Hallelujah, it’s long overdue.”

•••

Meanwhile, back in the late 18th Century -- Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and consequently important to confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson as justice to the Supreme Court, put out a statement yesterday regarding the vetting procedure (which, from the outside, looks more like a meet-and-greet that an elementary school teacher might conduct with parents before a full-blown conference, wherein Mrs. Wilbur explains why Johnny’s behavior is too disruptive. . .) that is underway:  

“Vetting a nominee for a lifetime appointment to the high court is serious business. The American people rightly expect a full and thorough vetting process. We should not sacrifice the integrity of our constitutional advice and consent responsibility to meet an arbitrary timeline.” 

The Court’s next term doesn’t begin until October, so there’s absolutely no need to rush.” (Hat-tip, Punchbowl PM.)

That the Republicans put Amy Coney Barrett in the big chair in 30 days doesn’t seem to be precedent.

But here’s something to think about vis-à-vis the Iowa senator’s position. Grassley said, when opposing Jackson’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, he wasn’t “satisfied” that she “will adhere to the Constitution as originally understood.”

Yes, there is a school of thought of Constitutional originalism. But look at that: “as originally understood.”

How can anyone in the 21st century claim that he can get into the mindset of someone from the 18th century?

Did Grassley ride a horse from Des Moines to Washington? Does he work a pump in order to get water? Does he light his house with whale oil? Does he own more than one pair of breeches?

To claim that one can understand how someone thought in 1788 is, well, disturbing.

•••

No More Can-Kicking? – The House of Representatives expects to pass the fiscal year 2022 appropriations budget Wednesday, with the Senate following shortly after, Roll Call reports. House and Senate appropriations committees were making progress Monday on the 12 annual appropriations that compile the bulk of the budget. The third continuing resolution since the fiscal year began last October 1 is set to expire this Friday.

According to Roll Call, COVID-19 aid is one of the few major items still being negotiated Tuesday. If the House and Senate can resolve that, we’re good until this coming October 1, just a month ahead of the mid-term elections. 

•••  

Republicans Can’t Redraw Maps in NC, PA -- …for now. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to block state courts in North Carolina and Pennsylvania from throwing out their Republican legislatures’ congressional maps gerrymandered toward their party in favor of redrawn maps of the state courts’ own, according to SCOTUSblog.

Republican legislators in both states took their cases to the Supreme Court arguing their state courts do not have the authority to redraw their maps. SCOTUS declined to intervene without explanation in the North Carolina case and turned down Pennsylvania Republican legislators’ request in a two-sentence order, the website says, though four conservative justices on the Supreme Court signaled intent to return to the issue on a later date. It’s a Democratic Party victory in both states that may stanch, at best, their losses in the midterms. 

--Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Charles Dervarics

_____________________________________

MON 3/7/22

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (right) and fellow soldiers fight to hold off Russia’s invasion. Russia has set another "cease-fire," but keeps hitting civilians.

Trump’s Harvey -- According to WebMD, about 65% of children have imaginary friends at some point prior to age seven. The site notes, “Many children know that these friends don’t actually exist, but they experience real feelings of comfort thanks to the friendship.”

Although it probably doesn’t take the form of an imaginary person or animal per se, it is almost as though Donald Trump’s continued fixation on how the 2020 election was “stolen” from him is predicated on him having an imaginary pal who is continuing to tell him that lie.

A reasonable person would think that after having lost more than a year ago, after failed lawsuits and recounts that showed his opponent actually gaining more votes Trump would have given up on this. How else to explain this other than his imaginary friend consistently telling him he is a winner making the only explanation for his not having won is because he was cheated out of his imaginary victory?

While it might seem to be a bit excessive to suggest that the former president of the United States has the cognitive capabilities of a pre-K student, a comment that he made at a Republican donors’ event in New Orleans on Saturday seems to belie that.

The Washington Post, which obtained a tape of the speech, quotes Trump as describing Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-CA) as a “watermelon head. . .because his head is shaped like a watermelon.”*

This is how a grown-up describes someone? The Wharton School ought to consider revoking his diploma.

One more thing from WebMD: it describes “Having an imaginary friend beyond age 12” as a “concerning” sign.

Indeed.

*It is perplexing to imagine that these wealthy Republican donors, women and men who have become successful in their given fields, serious people, could listen to a childish remark like this with anything but horror. Those among them who have children would undoubtedly tell Suzy or Johnny that such name-calling is completely unacceptable. Yet the line undoubtedly received laughs and applause, further goading the lengths to which Trump’s imaginary friend will take him.

•••

Ex-Prez: Don’t Buy This Book -- Donald J. Trump sent Lester Holt a letter because the NBC newsman interviewed former Trump Administration attorney general Bill Barr. The interview, broadcast last night on NBC and excerpted everywhere, was predicated on Barr’s book, One Damn Thing After Another, which will be released tomorrow.

Trump, who seems not to have done too well vis-à-vis leaders in the Department of Justice, calls Bill Barr “a big disappointment to me as Attorney General [sic], he was afraid to act, and usually didn’t,” in a letter filled with his typical superfluous capitalization. The letter was obtained by Axios.

Conservative and liberal pundits alike say no one should buy it, because Barr raises serious issues about Trump’s competence that he should have voiced while the ex-president was still in the White House. Perhaps there is some concern that sales of Barr’s book might take away from the demand for Our Journey Together, Trump’s word-un-intensive picture book, which the Republican National Committee purchased to hand out at last weekend’s fundraiser in New Orleans.

Trump did not feel it necessary to read the book before reviewing it for Holt: “I would imagine that if the book is anything like him, it will be lazy, slow and very boring.”

No word on whether Jeff Sessions has read the tome.

•••

Meanwhile … Up on the Hill – GOP lawmakers are attempting to pre-emptively stop the current attorney general, Merrick Garland, from carrying out prosecution of Donald J. Trump based on an expected referral by the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection, The Hill reports. 

Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) said such a referral “would probably have as much political taint on it as you can get. … To me, it’s politically driven.”

--Edited by Gary S. Vasilash and Todd Lassa

_____

Scroll down with the far-right trackbar for …

•Both GOP and progressive Democratic responses to President Biden’s State of the Union address, covered in the center column.

•“Where Woke and MAGA meet,” pundit-at-large Stephen Macaulay’s response to the center column, “Too Woke or Too Anti-Woke.”

Whether you are an anti- or pro-Trump conservative, we want to hear from you on these debates and our “meanwhile” daily news notes. Email your civil comments on these opinion columns and/or any “meanwhile” item to editors@thehustings.news. Subscribe to our newsletter at https://thehustings.substack.com.

_____

•Scroll down to read Stephen Macaulay’s commentary, “Why I Didn’t Watch the State of the Union Address” below. 

•Become a citizen pundit. Comment on the above, any of our other SOTU stories, or any other recent stories and commentary with an email to editors@thehustings.news.

_____

THU-FRI 3/3-4/22

Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky: “We are a nation that broke the enemy’s plans in one week.” (Axios

Words of the Day: Conspiracy to Defraud – …This is a key potential charge against then-President Donald J. Trump over an alleged attempt to overturn the presidential election listed in a brief that the attorney for the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection has filed in a California federal court.

The brief challenges lawyer John Eastman’s refusal to turn over thousands of emails the House committee had requested that the panel believes reveals his role in trying to persuade Vice President Mike Pence to reject electors from states now-President Joe Biden won. (The Washington Post and NPR)

Eastman cited attorney-client privileges as a shield against releasing the emails. The House panel has questioned whether Trump was in fact an Eastman client, and the panel’s attorney also argues that Eastman’s claim is a potential violation of the “crime/fraud” exception.

A statement released by House panel Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) says in part; “The facts we’ve gathered strongly suggest that Dr. Eastman’s emails may show that he helped Donald Trump advance a corrupt scheme to obstruct the counting of electoral college ballots and a conspiracy to impede the transfer of power.”

Known Knowns: It has been nearly 13 months since most of us witnessed the obvious in coverage of the attack that disrupted Congress’ certification of the electors from the November 2020 presidential election, and it will likely take additional time for Attorney General Merrick Garland to decide whether and of what, exactly, to charge Donald J. Trump. As long as we still have a democracy, the ex-president can thank our judicial system for that much.

•••

More Words: Seditious Conspiracy – That’s what Oath Keeper Joshua James pleaded guilty to in a Washington, D.C., federal district court for his participation in the January 6 Capitol insurrection (per Newsweek). To be exact, it contains one count of seditious conspiracy and one count of obstructing an official proceeding (the electoral count certification). James’ attorney filed a separate statement of offense in the plea in return for dropping all other charges, according to the Newsweek report. 

James is expected to “fully co-operate” with the Justice Department during its investigation of Oath Keepers’ role in the riot. Sentencing, at a later date, is expected to be 87 to 108 months.

Known Knowns: The big Oath Keeper catch in this investigation is organization founder Stewart Rhodes. When District Judge Amit Mehta asked whether he entered the Capitol to prevent certification of Biden as president, James replied, “Yes sir.”


Masks are a violation of liberties, but not government interference with one’s self? — Governor Greg Abbott directed the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services to investigate parents who allow their children to medically transition genders for possible crimes. According to The Washington Post, a Texas judge has granted a temporary restraining order against those covered by the plaintiffs who brought the suit, not others.

Note: Abbott initiated bans on mask mandates. According to the Centers for Disease Control “Masking is a critical public health tool and is important to remember that any mask is better than no mask.”

Yet Abbott said no!

And now here is Abbott, going after parents as criminals with regard to their children who may undergo medical procedures. 

Last year it was an abortion law that bars the procedure after six weeks.

This is really quite remarkable.

Somehow the man believes that when it comes to personal medical decisions, if it is politically popular it is good. Otherwise, no one is going to mess with the political freedom of Texans.

--Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Charles Dervarics

_____

•Scroll down to read our reports on Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds Republican response and Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-MI) progressive Democratic response to President Biden’s State of the Union address.  

•Become a citizen pundit. Comment on the above, any of our other SOTU stories, or any other recent stories and commentary with an email to editors@thehustings.news.

_____