By Stephen Macaulay

There are two ways that Liz Cheney seems to be perceived nowadays. One is that she is something of a Joan of Arc, an inspired individual taking on the Forces of Darkness.

The other is that she is the spawn of a Force of Darkness (i.e., her dad).

But I have another point of view on the evidently feisty representative from Wyoming: she is a Conversative Republican.

In her May 5th op-ed in The Washington Post Cheney wrote “The Republican Party is at a turning point, and Republicans must decide whether we are going to choose truth and fidelity to the Constitution.”

That “turning point” phrase got people on the Left a strong case of the vapors of delight. “Oh, my,” they said, “she realizes that the Party has to turn away from Trump.” The excitement on MSNBC was evident.

Then the final clause, “whether we are going to choose truth and fidelity to the Constitution” added a large measure of legitimacy: People don’t pull out the Constitution unless they really want to make a point. And the fact that she said “choose truth” is an absolute contrast to the man who spent the past several years complaining about it while creating “fake news,” the man who is responsible for the “Big Lie” that Cheney is forthrightly opposed to.

But there is another part of her essay that hasn’t gotten the amount of attention that it deserves: “There is much at stake now, including the ridiculous wokeness of our political rivals, the irrational policies at the border and runaway spending that threatens a return to the catastrophic inflation of the 1970s.”

Liz Cheney is not some sort of acolyte of Nancy Pelosi. She has a conservative Republican agenda and she will do her damnedest to pursue it.

The thing is, Cheney is a normal person. Normal to the extent that she knows right from wrong. You’d think that such a capability isn’t even table stakes, but given the fact that all but a handful of other people in the Republican party have a shown a bizarre resistance to acknowledging not just what they saw on a screen but actually were part of, the Storming of the Capitol by a Mob Whose Goal Was to Prevent the Certification of the 2020 Presidential Election — somehow by exhibiting what we would expect from elementary school children, the willingness to admit the truth -- she has been derided by some and seemingly sanctified by others.

Don’t get me wrong. I am glad she has and will continue to speak up about the travesty that is the continued lying by Donald Trump and his willing minions. (This brings to mind something that is really quite disturbing about some of them, especially the Republican politicians who had been in the 2016 primaries against him — yes, you, Ted Cruz and Lindsay Graham — who now not only carry his water but feed it to him in a golden teaspoon: They are shamelessly supporting him because they are afraid of losing their jobs. Pathetic.)

Liz Cheney is a conservative Republican. A proud one. Good for her. She stands for principles. There can be an argument about the validity of those principles, but she has them. She stands for truth. And no matter how many ways her detractors try to spin it, A is A: We saw what happened; we heard what Trump said.

So why is this in the Left column on this page? Because I think liberals are happy to engage with reasoned principled people. Those who willingly ignore reality and who spin fanciful conspiracy theories and lie one day and admit the next that what they said perhaps wasn’t true but it doesn’t matter — well that’s not someone whom you can actually compete with in any but a primitive way and we should be out of the gutter.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Todd Lassa

Liz Cheney, who just lost her post as the third most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives, has told allies that her ouster as conference chairman is a “turning point” for the GOP. 

Since the January 6 MAGA-hat attack on Capitol Hill, Democrats and those Republicans disaffected with their party since late 2016 have been holding their collective breath, wondering whether the GOP would move on as it has after every presidential election loss in the past. Even after a sufficient number of Senate Republicans failed to appear in convicting Trump for instigating that insurrection, rebukes from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and even House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy gave the ex-president’s detractors hope he would quickly fade away to wallow in his belief that his re-election was stolen, cloistered virtually alone in Mar-a-Lago much like the title character at Xanadu in the opening scene of Citizen Kane

For a short time, Trump’s grip on the GOP appeared to be loosening, but then party stalwarts like McCarthy and Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina started showing up at Mar-a-Lago, while Trump showed up at CPAC in Orlando to effectively claim the party’s leadership. Trump’s ability to convince his followers to believe, and his party’s leaders to repeat, the lie that last November’s election had been stolen recalled a flashback scene later in Citizen Kane when Welles’ character loses a gubernatorial election, and editors at his newspaper are forced to run the headline “Kane Defeated – Fraud at Polls.” 

Cheney’s removal from the House Republican Committee chairmanship will not push her gently into the night, but it may have freed her up to work, as she promised after the vote against her Wednesday, to do everything she can to assure that Donald Trump doesn’t get anywhere near the Oval Office again.

“We have seen the damage that he continues to provoke with his language, we have seen his lack of commitment and dedication to the Constitution, and I think it’s very important that we make sure whomever we elect is someone who will be faithful to the Constitution.”

Whether intended or not, Cheney is now a RINO – “Republican in name only” – in the eyes of Trump’s supporters, but unlike other conservatives who broke off from the GOP in the last five years, she will fight from the inside. Those RINOs, in turn, believe that Trump is not a true conservative – not only in many of his policies, but also in terms of what they see as his disregard for the rule of law.

Until House Republicans removed her from her committee leadership position, she was considered a leading prospect for House  speaker if, as expected, the GOP retakes its majority in November 2022. Now the expectation for a Republican House majority remains, and GOP-led state legislatures quickly rewriting voting laws, first in key battleground states as Georgia, Texas, Iowa, and Arizona has the Cheney wing of the party, as well as Democrats, worried the mechanism soon will be in place for a successful coup through a Constitutional overturn of Electoral College results in 2024, should that become necessary for Trump’s return to the White House. 

Far-fetched as that may seem, Capitol Hill Republicans who want to move on from Trump (including those too scared to say so out loud) now are pinning their hopes on a Cheney-led coup from within. More than 100 former Republican officials and politicians, led by an Department of Homeland Security ex-official from the Trump administration, Miles Taylor, have formed an organization, Repair, to launch a third party for conservatives. It would almost certainly sacrifice itself by splitting the conservative vote and handing the win to the Democratic Party, while ultimately exorcizing the GOP of Trump.

_____
Subscribe to The Hustings newsletter, at thehustings.substack.com

By Bryan Williams

Much ink has been spilled over the decades about how Democrats always circle the wagons whenever one of their own members encounters scandal, controversy, etc., and Republicans do the exact opposite. This leads the GOP to being viewed as less cohesive a party and the party that flounders in elections and in the hearts and minds of a growing number of American voters. I would point to the 2010 midterms and even the 2020 election as proof that this conventional wisdom is not so wise after all.

The latest example of the Republican Party not protecting its own is Rep. Liz Cheney, of Wyoming, who was just ousted from the GOP’s number-three leadership position in the House. Whether or not you agree with her stand against President Trump (for the record, I do), you have to wonder how the “Party of the Big Tent” as Reagan put it ousted someone with the bona fides of conservative Republicanism as Liz Cheney. Donald Trump still holds a peculiar hold on the GOP. Republican Leader (and my congressman) Kevin McCarthy publicly say they need to stop relitigating the past election and move on, all while giving a wink that Trump is the one who will usher in a new majority in 2022, and McCarthy’s ascendency to the House speakership.

Now there are 100 former Republicans who are “threatening” to form a third party over their distaste of Trump, Trumpism, and Trumpistas like McCarthy. Ho-hum. I again say forming a new party is not necessary. I believe a bigger message the voters could send to the Republicans is simply to not vote. I am not suggesting Republicans should vote for a Democrat to send a message – just do not vote. I have not voted for several local Republican representatives because I do not believe in them, but I certainly do not believe in their Democratic opponents either. Believe me, the political leadership pays attention to the numbers. If the pro-Trump Republicans still win, but with only 53% of the vote instead of 71% in a heavily Republican district, they’ll wonder, “Why don’t they really like me anymore?”  Being less popular is killer to these politicians. A little natural selection never hurt anyone, and this is what our current crop of Republicans need more than a “Third Way” party. I know who I will leave blank in 2022. 

_______
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Jim McCraw

The Villages, the largest retirement community in Florida, the United States, and on Earth, is home to a huge number of Republican retirees -- retirees from all 50 states, many of whom have served in the military and/or law enforcement.  They voted overwhelmingly for Trump two elections in a row and were mighty pissed off when the second one didn’t go as they planned.

The other night, there was a raucous “America First Tour" rally near The Villages, fronted by Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida, reported to be under federal investigation (begun by Donald Trump’s last attorney general, Bill Barr, no less) for allegations of sex trafficking, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, of Georgia, who was stripped of her committee positions shortly after the 117th Congress commenced, because of her controversial social media postings.

These two people purportedly speak for the Republican party, and it’s a shame, really. Matt Gaetz, whether he turns out to be charged with sex trafficking offenses or not, is as slick as snot on a doorknob.  The hair, the smile, the oily presence, all hold a mysterious attraction for these retired Floridians.  

If anything comes of the investigation of sex trafficking or not, that will be the end of him, because even Republicans are not fond of sex criminals.  If he isn’t convicted, he will carry on following the same path as the departed Donald J. Trump, ego first, mouth open, principles not easily visible, ready to flatly deny any accusations sent his way, true or not.

The other congress member, Marjorie Taylor Greene, is not a Floridian, but a Georgian with a big mouth and a big set of pistols, who came all the way down here to support Gaetz in his bid to stay alive politically. Wonder how much that cost him.

We sit here in bewildered awe, wondering how the Republican party has come down through history after Ike, Nixon, Reagan and the Bushes, to not only allow, but foster, liars and fantasists like these two.  I would have zapped both of them, but my Jewish Space Laser is in the shop for repairs.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 2021

Former acting Defense Sec. Christopher Miller and former acting Attorney Gen. Jeffrey Rosen testify today before the House Oversight Committee about federal response to the January 6 Capitol Hill insurrection. Miller will tell the committee he was concerned that  sending troops to the Capitol could “fan the flames” of a military coup and repeat the National Guard response to student protests at Kent State University in 1970.

Used Cars and Trucks Lead Biggest Inflation Since 2008 – The Consumer Price Index rose 4.2% for the 12-month period ending in April, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday morning. This marked the largest 12-month CPI increase since a 4.9% hike for the 12-month period ending September 2008, the BLS says. The CPI-U, for all urban consumers, was up 0.8% in April on a seasonally adjusted basis, compared with an 0.6% increase in March. 

Used cars and trucks led price increases. That index was up 10.0% in April, the largest one-month increase since the series began in 1953, the BLS says, and accounts for more than one-third the seasonally adjusted all-items increase. The Food Index was up 0.4% in April, and the energy decreased slightly. All consumer items less food and energy rose 4.2% for the 12 months ending in April, the BLS says.

Note: Republicans will use this jump in inflation as a cudgel against President Biden’s $2.3-trillion infrastructure package, as negotiations with leaders of both parties in the House and Senate meet with the president at the White House today. You may have noticed that the April 12-month inflation rate was highest since September 2008, when the country was on the precipice of The Great Recession. The year after that, the Obama administration responded with its $800-billion stimulus package, which coincidentally is about equal to the Republicans’ current infrastructure counter-offer, not adjusted for inflation. Biden’s bigger-than-life package is in part a response to criticism that the Obama stimulus bill was not big enough and resulted in slow but steady growth leading up to the Trump administration. It’s the economic cycle of life.

•••

Truth & Consequences – Rep. Liz Cheney, of Wyoming, was ousted as the Republican House Committee chairwoman Wednesday morning, by voice vote The Hill reports, meaning there will be no tally of the colleagues who supported her, versus former President Trump. 

In her remarks following the ouster vote, Cheney said she would do everything she can to assure that Donald Trump doesn’t get anywhere near the Oval Office again, the BBC reports. Tuesday night, Cheney said on a near-empty House floor: “Remaining silent and ignoring the lie emboldens the liar. I will not participate in that. I will not sit back and watch in silence, while others lead our party down a path that abandons the rule of law and joins the former president’s crusade to undermine our democracy.”

It is unclear whether the GOP caucus will also vote by this week on Cheney’s replacement as chair of the Republican House Committee. The lead candidate is Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, who is considered far less traditionally conservative than Cheney, though she has the endorsement from the Office of the Former President in Mar-a-Lago.

•••

Don McGahn to Testify? — The hearing for COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, APPELLEE v. DONALD F. MCGAHN, II is likely not to be heard next week, as lawyers for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, and the Justice Department have reached an agreement with McGahn about how the subpoena provided the former White House counsel during the Trump Administration, in 2019, will be handled, The Washington Postreports. Or more to the point, McGahn will testify on the Hill regarding issues related to the Mueller probe and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Note — There are several things to unpack here. Certainly, there must be some concern about the separation of powers: No one wants Congress to be able to subpoena those in the executive branch willy-nilly. That said, there was certainly a pattern among many in the Trump Administration to treat subpoenas like the fliers you might find under a windshield wiper blade announcing a chimney repair service or a new coney dog restaurant when you’re parked at a Walmart. Funny thing: While there was substantiated interference with the 2016 election, there was little in the way of apoplectic Republicans responding to that.

•••

NRA Denied Bankruptcy, Faces Potential Dissolution – A federal court judge has denied the National Rifle Association a bankruptcy filing that would move the organization from New York to Texas, saying the gun rights advocacy group did not file in “good faith,” NPR reports. The ruling means the New York Attorney General’s office will continue its investigation into the non-profit NRA’s misuse of resources under President Wayne LaPierre, who remains the group’s chief after nearly 30 years, and that it may face dissolution.

•••

Arizona Governor Signs Bill Cutting Early Voting Lists – Republican Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey has signed SB 1485, a bill that converts the state’s “permanent early voting list” to an “active early voting list.” The new law removes voters from the early voting list if they do not vote early at least once in a primary, general or municipal election during two consecutive cycles. Election officials must send such voters a notice they are going to be removed from the early rolls, and those voters have 90 days to respond to remain on the list. Registered voters remain on the rolls however, and the bill does not prevent voting in person.

Note: SB 1485 would seem to potentially affect as many Republican voters in the state as Democratic voters. –Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

__________________________

Please email comments to editors@thehustings.news

_________________________

TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2021

The Hustings is now on Substack. Go to thehustings.substack.com … and if you’re reading this on Substack, please go to https:/thehustings.news to read our latest debate, on everything you need to know about the return of Congressional earmarks.

Pelosi Pushes on January 6 Commission – House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi has “deputized” Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-MS, to lead negotiations with Republicans in establishing a January 6 commission to study the MAGA-backed insurgency on Capitol Hill, Punchbowl News reports. Thompson will work with the GOP’s designated point person, Rep. John Katko of New York, as House Republicans are otherwise distracted by their own efforts to replace Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming with Elise Stefanik of New York as conference chairman over their reactions to the very same insurgency. 

Katko and Cheney are two of 10 House Republicans who voted with Democrats in late January to impeach former President Trump over inspiring insurgents with the “Big Lie” to attack Capitol Hill. 

Note: For what was supposed to be an obvious agreement among the two parties to hold a “September 11 attack-style” investigation, Republicans, led by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, have turned it into one of those “whatabout?” pivots, equating last summer’s Black Lives Matter protests across the country with the MAGA-hatted attempt to overturn the election of President Biden.

Whatabout  GOP Cancel Culture? – Turning on its ear a charge that conservatives usually aim at Democrats, Republican Joni Ernst of Iowa, the only woman on the Senate leadership team for her party, compared the House GOP’s impending ouster of Cheney expected Wednesday to “cancel culture” and argued the party should be unifying ahead of 2022, The Hill reports.

•••

DarkSide Pipeline Attack Was Extortion – Federal investigators say all indications so far are that Eastern Europe-based DarkSide’s cyberattack was a “simple act of extortion,” The New York Times reports. President Biden said Monday that the U.S. will “disrupt and prosecute” the group for its attack last weekend on the pipeline that Alpharetta, Georgia-based Colonial Pipeline operates, which provides some 45% of petroleum and jet fuel to the East Coast. The FBI has formally blamed DarkSide for the attack, while suspecting no connection between the criminal group and the Kremlin. A portion of the pipeline already is up and running, NPR says.

Note: Already, criticism has emerged that so much of the East Coast’s fuel supply relies on one pipeline, although AAA told NPR that gas prices could rise 3-6 cents per gallon this week, a fairly modest increase considering the pipeline’s importance. The disruption also bolsters Biden’s infrastructure proposal, although to Republican opposition,  only adds the need for more robust, secure broadband Internet connectivity to roads and bridges.

•••

Biden Administration Touts ACA Sign-Ups – One million Americans have signed up for health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act during special 2021 enrollment that commenced in February and extends to August 15, the Biden administration has announced. Enrollment is available at healthcare.gov. 

The White House also has opened the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to adolescents aged 12 to 15. The vaccine already was available to those 16 and older.

•••

California Racks Up Budget Surplus – The State of California is emerging from the coronavirus pandemic with an eye-popping $75.7 billion budget surplus, Politico says, which Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to return to taxpayers as a rebate ahead of a recall election this year. The surplus, coming as other states face deficits after a year of economic shutdowns, is a key argument against President Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan, says Sen. Mitt Romney, R-UT. The most high-profile Republican candidates looking to unseat Newsom in the recall include Caitlyn Jenner, the Olympic athlete-turned-reality TV star, Kevin Faulconer, former mayor of San Diego, and John Cox, who lost the state’s 2018 gubernatorial election to Newsom. 

•••

China Influencing U.S. — In 2016, Chinese foreign agent spending as part of “its efforts to sow discord and disinformation in the U.S.” totaled $10 million. In 2020, that number had surged to reach nearly $64 million, according to Axios. Last week, the site reports, Xinhua, the Chinese news service, filed under the Foreign Agents Registration Act — a good thing — but as “an independent legal entity” when, as Axios reports, it is “owned by the Chinese government, run by senior Communist Party officials and widely seen as a Beijing mouthpiece.” Not a good thing.

Note — After the evident success that the Russians have had vis-à-vis sowing disinformation at the previously highest levels of government in the U.S., to say nothing of the trolls that managed, in part, to convince MAGA zealots of things like “the election was stolen,” why wouldn’t the Chinese do their bit? 

Vatican Warns American Bishops on Biden Rebuke – The Vatican has warned the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to “deliberate carefully and minimize divisions” when they meet to discuss a rebuke of American Roman Catholic politicians who favor abortion rights, Politico reports. Cardinal Luis Ladaria, prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, told Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles, president of the U.S. Conference, they should seek unanimous support for any censure of American politicians, potentially including President Biden, and should extend any such rebuke to all churchgoing Catholics.  – Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Nic Woods


MONDAY, MAY 10, 2021

Our pundit from The Villages in Florida, Jim McCraw, comments on the “America First” rally held in his community, in the left column, while a reader comments on our home page debate on Congressional earmarks, in the right column.

McConnell: Up to $800-billion in Infrastructure Paid by Gas Tax Increase – Republican wiggle-room on President Biden’s $2.3-billion American Jobs Act is between $600 billion and $800 billion total, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY, told Kentucky public television in an interview broadcast last weekend. He cited Shelley Moore Caputo’s, R-WV, proposed $800-billion infrastructure bill. Caputo will discuss her counter-proposal with Biden in a White House meeting Thursday, Punchbowl News reports – the day after the president meets with the Senate and House leaders of both parties. Caputo’s Republican infrastructure plan strips away all of what McConnell calls “liberal daydream” proposals of the American Jobs Act. 

The biggest gulf between the two parties is how to pay for infrastructure programs, whether limited to $800 billion, or not. Republicans will not support Biden’s proposed rollback of the Trump administration’s 2017 tax bill, which among other business-friendly provisions, reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% (Biden wants to restore the 28% rate established during the Bush 43 administration). 

“That’s not going to get any support in my caucus, from Susan Collins to Ted Cruz,” McConnell told KET TV’s Connections.“And they don’t have a huge margin to play with,” he added, referring to Sen. Joseph Manchin III’s, D-WV, reluctance to consider the Biden package. The best way to pay for infrastructure, McConnell says, is to use a tax provision the federal government already has; the gas tax. That is a big change for Republicans, who for decades have resisted any consideration of a federal gas tax hike. It has been stuck at 18.4-cents per gallon since 1993.

Note: It appears that to attempt “unity,” the Biden White House will have to accept a bridges-and-roads-only infrastructure package close to Republicans’ limit of roughly a third of the American Jobs Act. The remaining $1.5-trillion or so of Biden’s proposal may be reconstructed into a separate package passed via filibuster-proof reconciliation, whose fate once again will rest with Sen. Manchin.

•••

Speaking of Gas Taxes – The nationwide average price of regular unleaded gasoline has gone up by 6 cents per gallon, to $3.02 according to the Lundberg report, a small increase so far, after a cyberattack Saturday struck a pipeline that supplies 45% of the Eastern U.S.’s petroleum supply. Georgia-based Colonial Pipeline is in the process of restoring some of its IT systems, as the Department of Energy coordinates the federal response to the attack, according to the AP, which cited sources as saying it appears a criminal gang known as DarkSide is responsible. Colonial Pipeline has not revealed whether a ransom was demanded or paid. DarkSide thrives on a “Robin Hood” image of holding big business hostage and distributing a share of its ransom to charity.

•••

McCarthy Makes it Official – Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California replied with an anti-climactic “Yes, I do,” when Fox News host Maria Bartiromo asked whether he officially backs New York Rep. Elise Stefanik’s bid to replace Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney as chair of the House Republican Conference Committee. The House Republican caucus is expected to vote on whether to remove Cheney from the post this week.

Note: This leaves Cheney about 17 months to organize what’s left of never-Trumpers in the GOP to fight off the former president’s choices to defeat them in the primaries. It will be a bumpy, so far unpredictable year-and-a-half.

•••

Putin Shows Off Military — On May 9, 1945, the Soviet government announced victory against the Nazis. “Victory Day” was celebrated once again yesterday in Moscow as it is annually, with more than 12,000 troops, 76 fighter jets and helicopters, and 190 weapons including the MSTA-S self-propelled howitzer, the RS-24 Yars ballistic missile and the T-34 tank, according to The Washington Post.

Note: Although Donald Trump seemed to have thought that Russian leader Vladimir Putin was his pal — someone more forthright than, say, the U.S. intelligence community — this annual event in Red Square should be a cautionary reminder. You may recall that in July 2017 Trump saw a similar Bastille Day celebration in Paris and wanted to have one in Washington. As presidential historian Douglas Brinkley told The Washington Post in January 2018 about the proposed Trumpian parade, “It smacks of something you see in a totalitarian country — unless there is a genuine, earnest reason to be doing it.” Which put the ball in the then-administration’s court. 

•••

Obit: Pierre DuPont IV – Pierre “Pete” DuPont IV, who briefly ran for the GOP presidential nomination in 1988, died Saturday in Wilmington, Delaware, at age 86. A scion of the chemical giant DuPont’s founder, he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from Delaware in 1970 and served three terms, until he was elected governor of the state in 1976. In 1980, DuPont became the first incumbent governor in 20 years to be re-elected to a second term. Term-limited, DuPont briefly ran for the GOP presidential nomination in 1988, which was clinched by George H.W. Bush.        –Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Herewith, a reader’s comments on our most recent home page debate, “With its New Policy on Earmarks, Congress Goes Back to the Future,” posted Friday, May 7. To read the three columns on the subject, scroll down using the vertical track bar on the far right.

Loved the added lesson. (“With Its New Policy on Earmarks, Congress Goes Back to the Future,” by Charles Dervarics, with left column by Keith Tipton and right column by Stephen Macaulay, home page debate.)

I enjoyed and saw all three columns as logical and fair (which is unusual for me), but as a citizen who prefers a smaller federal government and theorizes that taxing and spending is better when it is managed closer to the people on the state and city or local levels. 

The practice of earmarking has never been popular with most voters and I applaud any attempt to make them transparent, even if I’m skeptical that politicians want to give up bringing home pork. I’m also sympathetic to smaller states by population, with lower incomes and far more square miles to manage; they do need additional resources to maintain, develop and expand their infrastructure, hence earmarking provides a way for them to trade votes for funding. On the other hand, it is not all that difficult for all but the naïve to see why politicians want more money and include earmarks for their constituents in every bill.

Personally, I see the only way to correct the abuse and waste associated with earmarks is to reduce the size of the federal government and amount of money it controls. Just as with our own budgets, when we have less, it will be spent on the most essential needs before our wants … and in the case of our federal government, a smaller take from citizens might be used more efficiently (I’ve yet to see government spend efficiently). As the federal government has grown, it has expanded and often supplanted personal responsibility and very efficient volunteer efforts (I grew up in a small town and miss how my mom’s generation ran local charities).

Political idealogues have forever debated “how big” the role of the federal government should be, but I personally prefer we move closer to James Madison and how he defined the concept of federalism – “The powers delegated … to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite” … a return to that would curtail wasteful earmarking. 

-- Rich Corbett, Cincinnati

_____
Please email comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Keith Tipton

For about 10 years, earmarks -- line items slipped into large, discretionary Congressional appropriations bills -- have chiefly been absent from headlines. Why? In the mid-2000s, the practice reached a peak of 14,000 earmarks in one year, and some of them turned out to be a tiny bit criminal (kickbacks), while others just brought shame on Congress for being wasteful and laughable. Congress has had earmarks since the very first session in 1789 (a pier in Pennsylvania). It's not a new phenomenon, but it got out of control to the point of pushback from Congressional leaders about the practice.

Now, why are these like cockroaches and ants? You can do your best, but you can't completely get them out of your house. "Hard" earmarks giving explicit funding for various projects were mostly stopped for the last 10 years, but "soft" earmarks took up the slack. These are suggestions or hints that the government agencies spending the money should consider a specific program or project for funding, and they are often treated as hard earmarks. Who is responsible for soft earmarks is more challenging to determine than who is responsible for hard earmarks.

The reason earmarks are in the news is that they were obviously popular in the past, and some want them allowed again. It is one of the powers of being a lawmaker to be able to slip into a money-related bill a little something for the folks back home, whether it be a tax break, new construction, or perhaps a research project at the local university. Some House and Senate members with long careers became famous for this. Incumbents can use funded projects to say, "See what I did for our district?" In a close race, an earmarking candidate will likely point to the money in hopes of gaining votes. While not a bad thing if the projects aren't wasteful or unethical, the problem is that they nearly always get funded without oversight or outside review of the merits of the proposals.

The current atmosphere of allowing earmarks is to create more "bipartisan support" for bills, such as President Biden’s $2.3-trillion American Jobs Act proposal. The idea is that if earmarks are allowed, certain "no" votes might turn to "yes" votes if they can slip in something specific to get projects done back in home districts.

Donald Trump was interested in earmarks in 2018, probably because he wanted to overturn the Affordable Care Act and wished to entice reluctant Congress members to support his efforts. Senators and representatives designating money for their districts are not breaking the law, but the history of such is that it gets out of control and becomes embarrassing, or worse.  

For the leaders of the House and Senate to tell their caucus members that, "Hey, we'll let you spend taxpayer money if you vote for certain bills" is bad form. Biden was elected to run the government far differently than Trump. The leaders of the House and Senate must do the same. Declaring earmarks as "okay" for the sake of getting bills passed is a soul-killing move. Democrats have to take the high road as much as possible to change the culture of Washington, and they have to reject the endorsement of earmarks as a result.

_____
Keith Tipton is an educator, dog person and proud Rice University grad who lives in Lubbock,Texas, with his wife and two kids.

By Charles Dervarics

After 10 years of hibernation in politically charged Washington, the much-derided earmark is making a comeback on Capitol Hill. Democratic leaders are promising a better, cleaner and more transparent version of this old chestnut through which lawmakers steer federal funding to favored (or important?) projects in their states without merit-based reviews.

For some in D.C., it’s time to cue the familiar refrain about the evils of political “pork barrel spending.”  In fact, earmark comes from an agricultural term in which farmers would mark the ear of pigs or cattle to note an animal’s ownership, age or gender. (As my father was a butcher, I always enjoy any side reference to the old family business). 

But earmarks have a long and controversial history in Congress. While some addressed key priorities in traditionally underserved communities, high-profile boondoggles such as Alaska’s ‘bridge to nowhere’ became an easy target for critics and the press. Back in 2010, earmarks for special projects totaled $16.5 billion, according to Citizens Against Government Waste. Though significant, however, that figure was just a drop in the bucket for all government spending, representing only half of one percent of the federal budget. 

Until the ban a decade ago, lawmakers typically added projects via specific language in appropriations bills or reports that accompanied such legislation. But the insular process meant some details didn’t emerge publicly until after a congressional vote.

What’s notable this year is that Democrats are pledging a more open and need-based process. Given President Biden’s emphasis on infrastructure, highway and transit projects are likely to be a significant focus of new earmarks. The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure recently issued detailed criteria for projects, noting that all requests should appear on state/local priority lists and have letters of support from local leaders. Among other requirements, lawmakers also must certify that neither they nor any family members have a financial stake in the project.

"We have surrounded our new process with the transparency to assure projects meet federal and local standards,” said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., a senior Democrat on the panel. Other proponents argue it will give lawmakers, rather than government bureaucrats, more input in steering funds toward the local level. 

In the House Appropriations Committee, which sets spending for hundreds of government programs, leaders say that a lawmaker can request up to 10 earmarks – called community project funding – but must make all requests fully public.

Republicans appear divided, however. In a secret tally, the House GOP recently voted to participate in the earmark process. But the Senate Republican Conference upheld its previous ban on the practice, though individual members are not bound by that policy.

Proponents of the new approach say both Democrats and Republicans can share equally in the new earmarks, with some even suggesting that it may help diffuse tensions between the parties. Most also welcome increased transparency. At the very least, in butcher parlance, it should provide the public with more information about political sausage-making on Capitol Hill.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

You can find this in the White House archival material related to the George W. Bush administrations:

OMB (Office of Management and Budget) defines earmarks as funds provided by the Congress for projects or programs where the congressional direction (in bill or report language) circumvents the merit-based or competitive allocation process, or specifies the location or recipient, or otherwise curtails the ability of the Administration to control critical aspects of the funds allocation process.

And there you have the long and short of it. Elected Official A wants to fill potholes in her district and so adds some money to a bill (an “add-on”) or manages to take part of the defined spending for her purposes (a “carve-out”). And if you drive on the road that resembles the surface of the Moon, you are very happy that Elected Official A has managed to get some asphalt for your area.

However, there is that little bit of language that is concerning “circumvents the merit-based or competitive allocation process.” Meaning that there is the very real possibility that Elected Official B might decide that Giant Corporation Inc. headquartered in his district would be very happy were there to be a new road built that would be essentially of benefit to Giant Corporation Inc. and only Giant Corporation Inc. — oh, and GCI has donated to the Elected Official B campaign or PAC or both — so monies are earmarked for the Giant Corporation Parkway.

That is probably not a good thing for the taxpayers. But hey, money is there for the earmarking!

There is another way of looking at this, but this way works only in the event that people actually pay attention.

Say that you live in a district that is adjacent to those of Elected Officials A and B. Your representative, Elected Official C, who you are sure doesn’t do much outside of make nonsensical speeches about nonexistent things or events, but does so in a way that you can see the vein throbbing in his forehead so clearly that it results in TV coverage.

The roads in your area cause bent tire rims galore. Giant Amalgamated Widgets has closed its operations because it didn’t think that it was getting sufficient infrastructure contracts, which means that there is a reduction in the tax receipts (assuming there wasn’t some sweetheart deal to attract GAW to your town).

What is the likelihood that if you are aware of what Elected Officials A and B did in terms of getting some funds you’re going to want to reelect C, who seems to be more interested in getting spittle on the surfaces of local TV crew microphones than anything else?

Let’s not be naïve: the gears of politics need grease, and the grease is money. That can work to your favor or to their favor.

An engaged electorate deserves things like smooth roads. Earmarks could be a way to get them.

And it is up to an engaged electorate to make sure that the grease works in their favor, not that of people like Elected Official B.

_____
Stephen Macaulay is pundit-at-large.

Go to the comments tab or email your thoughts to editors@thehustings.news on today’s News & Notes or any of the home page debates, including these recent posts:

•Nic Woods’ news analysis, including implications of the nation’s falling birth rate, on the preliminary 2020 U.S. Census results.

•President Biden’s attempt to reverse Supply Side Economics with FDR-style Keynesian economics.

•Debate of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Bill by Michelle Naranjo in the left column and Bryan Williams in the right column.

•Afghanistan: Is Now the Time to Leave? By David Amaya in the left column and Stephen Macaulay in the right column. 

•Braver Angels debate, Resolved: Deficit Spending is a Major Risk to the U.S. Economy.

•We debate Biden’s SCOTUS commission, with Chase Wheaton in the left column and Stephen Macaulay in the right column.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

THURSDAY, MAY 6, 2021

President Biden continues his campaign to sell his $2.3 trillion American Jobs Plan infrastructure package to the public, as well as resistant Republican senators. He visits GOP stronghold Lake Charles, Louisiana, today, speaking in front of a 70-year-old bridge that is 20 years past its designed lifespan, AP reports.

DeSantis Signs Restrictive Florida Election Law – Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, R, has signed a state law with new voting rules and penalties that constrain voting by mail, drop box use and handing out food and water to voters standing in long lines, The Washington Post reports. DeSantis says the legislation will ensure “the most transparent and efficient election anywhere in the country.” 

Restrictions include prohibition of mobile drop boxes and a requirement that local election officials staff all drop boxes and allow ballots to be dropped only in early-voting hours, subject to a civil penalty to the officials of $25,000.

Note: DeSantis has scheduled a signing ceremony at the West Palm Beach Airport Hilton near Mar-a-Lago, in a rally “for the best governor in the U.S.A.” DeSantis, who polled second in popularity after the ex-president at the CPAC convention in Orlando last February, is considered the lead prospect for running mate if Donald Trump chooses to enter the GOP nomination race in 2024. The Florida voter bill seems designed to lock the state in favor of such a Trump/DeSantis ticket.

•••

Arizona Secretary of State Complains of ‘Inadequate Ballot Security’ – Workers in a Republican-led audit of the November 2020 Maricopa County vote have left ballots and computers unattended, Arizona’s Democratic Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs, says in a six-page letter to her Republican predecessor, according to a report by The Hill. The Arizona GOP has hired Florida-based Internet security firm Ninja Warriors to conduct the second audit of last year’s presidential election ballots in the state’s largest county, which includes Phoenix. 

In her letter to former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, R, who is spokesman for the election audit, Hobbs says that auditors have been instructed not to speak with her office’s observers, and to not speak when the office’s observers are near their tables. The Hill quotes a Twitter account by the Maricopa Arizona Audit that says Hobbs was promoting “baseless claimes (sic) about this forensic audit.” 

Also on Twitter – Dennis Welch, political editor for CBS5 News/3TV in Phoenix posted video of an official overseeing the audit, John Brakey, saying auditors “are looking for bamboo fibers because of a baseless accusation that 40,000 ballots from Asia were smuggled here.”

Note: U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming is about to lose her post as Republican Conference Chairman for opposing this sort of reaction to Donald Trump’s re-election defeat.

•••

France Joins Vaccine Waiver while EU Balks – France has joined the U.S. in supporting an intellectual property waiver on COVID-19 vaccines regarding patents and other protections under World Trade Organization rules, but others, including the European Union, have not yet joined in, according to the AP. Pharmaceutical manufacturers are also resistant, arguing that the patents protect against poor-quality knockoffs, and that the secondary drugmakers may not have the necessary manufacturing knowhow. However, the country now suffering a severe crisis over its surge of coronavirus cases, India, also is the world’s largest manufacturer of pharmaceuticals.

•••

Biden’s $1.8 trillion package polls positive — Fifty-eight percent of all U.S. voters support President Biden’s $1.8 trillion “American Families Plan” according to a Morning Consult-Politico survey. That number is based on 29% who “strongly support” and 29% who “somewhat support” the proposal. There are 13% who had no opinion, which leaves 30% in the “somewhat oppose” (12%) and “strongly oppose” (18%) categories.

Note: No surprise that 52% of Democrats are in the “strongly support” category, but what is a bit telling that things are not necessarily good in Mitch McConnell’s World of Zero Support is that 40% “strongly oppose” the proposal. So there is greater positive support from Democrats than there is negative support (assuming there can be such a thing) from Republicans.

The all-important Independents’ 20% “strongly support” and 34% “somewhat support,” goes beyond the majority mark, to 54%. Given there are 19% with no opinion, this leaves just 27% against it.

•••

Senior Hill Aides Predict Republicans Win House, Not Senate – Two-thirds of senior Capitol Hill aides polled by Punchbowl News say the GOP will win a majority of the House of Representatives in the 2022 midterms, while Democrats will hold the Senate. The new regularly published poll of anonymous aides, which PN calls The Canvass[VJ1] , conducted by independent polling firm Locust Street Group, says 66% of all polled, including 36% of Democrats, agree Republicans will flip the House. The poll says 66% of all polled agree Democrats will retain the Senate majority, with a 50-50 split among the Republicans polled and 82% to 18% among Democrats.

•••

Trump Ban Follow-Up – Yesterday’s News & Notes reported that a 20-member Facebook Oversight Board voted to retain the social media site’s ban on former President Trump. The board criticized Facebook for vacillating on the ban, however, as Wednesday’s decision keeps Trump off the site for only six months, after which the site may again reconsider. Trump is permanently banned from social media activity on Twitter and YouTube. –Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Nic Woods

_____
Please email comments to editors@thehustings.news

Go to the comments tab or email your thoughts to editors@thehustings.news on today’s News & Notes or any of the home page debates, including these recent posts:

•Nic Woods’ news analysis, including implications of the nation’s falling birth rate, on the preliminary 2020 U.S. Census results.

•President Biden’s attempt to reverse Supply Side Economics with FDR-style Keynesian economics.

•Debate of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Bill by Bryan Williams in the right column and Michelle Naranjo in the left column.

•Afghanistan: Is Now the Time to Leave? By Stephen Macaulay in the right column and David Amaya in the left column. 

•Braver Angels debate, Resolved: Deficit Spending is a Major Risk to the U.S. Economy.

•We debate Biden’s SCOTUS commission, with Stephen Macaulay in the right column and Chase Wheaton in the left column.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Enter your opinions on today’s News & Notes, or any of the news topics below, or email editors@thehustings.news, and we will post them in this space. 

Scroll down one post to read Nic Woods’ news analysis on preliminary 2020 U.S. Census statitics.

Scroll down further to read these debate posts …

•Keynesian vs. ‘Trickle-Down’ economics.

•The George Floyd Justice in Policing bill.

•Afghanistan: Is now the time to leave?

•Braver Angels debate, Resolved: Deficit spending is a major risk to the U.S. economy.

•We debate Biden’s SCOTUS commission.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 2021 

The birth rate in the United States fell to its lowest level since 1979, at slightly more than 3.6 million in 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says in its Vital Statistics Surveillance Report released Wednesday. Last year marks the sixth straight year that the birth rate declined. Read Nic Woods’ news analysis on how that birth rate affects the U.S. Census on this page by scrolling down with the trackbar on the far right. 

Facebook Board Upholds Ban on Trump – The quasi-independent Oversight Board has voted to uphold Facebook’s ban on former President Donald J. Trump, the AP reports. Facebook was the first social media platform to ban Trump for inciting “violent insurrection” in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. The board of 20 “international experts” ruled whether Trump may post to Facebook, normally a pretty libertarian platform for speech. The Oversight Board also faulted Facebook for the way it handled its initial decision, AP says. …

Meanwhile, Back at the Republican House Conference – Reps. Kevin McCarthy, R-CA, and Steve Scalise, R-LA, have fully turned on House of Representatives Republican Conference Chairman Liz Cheney, of Wyoming, and are working to remove her from the post and replace her with Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, Punchbowl News reports. Two other GOP House members, Reps. Jackie Walorski and Jim Banks, both from Indiana, have dropped out. We mentioned Banks as a lead candidate for chairman in this space yesterday.

Note: Never-Trumper Republicans are wringing their hands over how the MAGA wing of the party has retained and even strengthened control since the January 6 Capitol Hill riots, and how members of the party on Capitol Hill are enabling the ex-president to pull strings from Mar-a-Lago. The answer that keeps coming up is that, for GOP House and Senate leadership, bolstering its mostly white base with a candidate like Trump is the easy way out. After Mitt Romney’s defeat in his 2012 bid to unseat President Barack Obama, the GOP’s “autopsy” found that the party must expand its tent to attract ethnic and racial minority voters to survive. … 

The GOP clearly is ready to take the easy way again for 2022 and 2024, as state legislatures pass bills to constrict voting. 

•••

Yellen Shakes Wall Street -- Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s remarks in an Atlantic magazine interview, released yesterday, “caused a brief panic on Wall Street,” The Washington Post reports. Yellen is quoted as saying, “It may be that interest rates will have to rise somewhat to make sure our economy does not overheat, even though the additional spending is relatively small relative to the size of the economy. It could cause some very modest increases in interest rates to get that reallocation.” The current rate ranges from 0% to 0.25%.

Note: The concern is inflation – rising prices of goods and services. There are various causes of inflation, including increases in production costs and surges in demand. Both of which seem to be the case right now, with supply chains being stretched by the pandemic and people relieving their pent-up demand by buying more goods. While Wall Street may be concerned that the cost of money is going to rise (an increase in interest rates would make it more expensive to borrow and, consequently, there might be a decrease in demand), it is clear that the economy is still in the midst of COVID recovery, so it may need a shot in the arm, which could mean that measures like increasing the interest rates to, say, a whole number might need to be taken.

•••

Will Democrats Go It Alone with Reconciliation? – As of today, the prospects for Senate passage of President Biden’s $2.3 trillion American Jobs Plan will likely depend on Democrats using the reconciliation process it employed for the $1.9 trillion American Rescue (from COVID-19) Plan Act – or kill the legislative filibuster. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY, has said that “zero” of his Republican colleagues support the infrastructure (American Jobs) plan and has set a top bid of just $600 billion for roads and bridges, according to the National Review.

So former Democratic U.S. representative and House Speaker Harry Reid, of Nevada, recommends ignoring Republicans, in a Tuesday opinion piece in the Las Vegas Sun :

The lesson Democrats should take away from 2020 is that ignoring the naysayers, plowing ahead with popular proposals and delivering the results voters want is not only good policy, but also good politics.

The White House plan is to give negotiations with the Republican Senate Caucus a chance up to Memorial Day weekend, and then – apparently – damn the filibusters, full $2.3 trillion ahead! But can Biden prevent the McConnell from getting Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-WV, to defect?

Note: The calculation seems to be this – Democratic Senate leadership must sacrifice the legislative filibuster (which will be an issue for them when Republicans gain the majority) to push through the infrastructure plan, which according to most national polls has solid public support, even among Republican voters. As the clock continues to tick, the Biden White House now has less than 18 months before the mid-term elections to get this done, and to show some positive economic results in the interim. The “unity” alternative is to continue to negotiate with Republicans and work to prevent a mid-term flip in the Senate, as well as the House. The ongoing drama with House Republican leadership (see above) only adds to the urgency. The GOP isn’t getting weaker from the Cheney vs. Trumpers struggle; It’s coalescing behind a vanquished president who may very well run in 2024 on a platform of dismantling everything Biden gets passed in the next three-and-a-half years.

•••

Chauvin Seeks Retrial – Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin has called for retrial weeks after his conviction on two counts of murder, and second-degree manslaughter in the death of George Floyd a year ago this month. Chauvin’s attorneys have cited jury and prosecutorial “misconduct,” without detailing any examples. However, a photo has surfaced of one juror attending a march in Washington last August, wearing a t-shirt that reads, “Get Your Knees Off Our Necks.” The photo has quickly become Fox News fodder.

–Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Nic Woods

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Enter your opinions on today’s News & Notes, or any of the news topics below, or email editors@thehustings.news, and we will post them in this space. 

Scroll down one post to read Nic Woods’ news analysis on preliminary 2020 U.S. Census statitics.

Scroll down further to read these debate posts …

•Keynesian vs. ‘Trickle-Down’ economics.

•The George Floyd Justice in Policing bill.

•Afghanistan: Is now the time to leave?

•Braver Angels debate, Resolved: Deficit spending is a major risk to the U.S. economy.

•We debate Biden’s SCOTUS commission.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news