If you’re reading this left column because you consider yourself liberal, the answer probably is “no.” 

If you’re reading this left column because you consider yourself conservative but want to avoid 'echo-chamber' news and politics, an explanation of Stephen Macaulay’s right-column might be in order. Macaulay is The Hustings’ pundit-at-large and as such he has written for both left and right columns. He’s written commentary for the right column, mostly, though as a never-Trumper, Macaulay has commented from this left column opposite pro-Trump and formerly pro-Trump contributors. 

The Hustings encourages you to comment on this issue so we can continue the conversation in these columns. When you comment to editors@thehustings.news, please let us know whether your political philosophy puts you to the left or to the right of the news items and issues of the center column. 

While you’re here, don’t forget to scroll down to read our flash debate on whether the January 6 Capitol insurrection was a “dress rehearsal” for what President Trump and his supporters might have planned for 2024. Note that while The Hustings strives for fair and equal political discourse, we are unabashedly pro-democracy.

--Todd Lassa

_____

FRI 11/12/21

The White House has confirmed that President Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold a virtual summit Monday.

The UN Climate Conference is scheduled to conclude today, although it could be extended if COP26 doesn’t produce a deal among participants (which do not include China and Russia) to end fossil fuel and coal use by a date certain (WaPo).

Was January 6 a ‘dress rehearsal’? Is ex-President Trump planning a coup for 2024? Read the issues by scrolling down to the next item, and join the conversation by emailing your comments to editors@thehustings.news.

Trump Wins Delay on 1/6 Documents – Donald J. Trump’s biggest success as a businessman, beside his 15 seasons as host of The Apprentice was perhaps his ability to file lawsuits and delay those for which he was being sued. That lawsuit success streak continued Thursday when a federal appeals court temporarily blocked the National Archives from turning over call logs, draft speeches and other documents related to the January 6 Capitol insurrection, to the House select committee investigating the riot (NPR’s Morning Edition).

The court has set a date of November 30 to hear arguments in former President Trump’s lawsuit to block their release, under the guise of “executive privilege.”

Note: This turned into the Washington image of a suspense novel yesterday, as the 1/6 committee seeking the documents were waiting out a Saturday deadline for the National Archives to turn them over. Most pundits say that while the case is likely to keep the documents out of the committee’s hands until the end of this year, it could extend into 2022, with the Supreme Court possibly being called upon to make the final rule. We’d say that a delay to next year, when primaries for the midterms begin, seems inevitable.

But don’t take any extra meaning beyond this: “The purpose of the administrative injunction is to protect the court’s jurisdiction to address [Trump’s] claims of executive privilege and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits,” the judges said in its brief, per The Hill.

•••

Putting the ‘Bi’ in ‘Bipartisan’ – Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was one of 19 Senate Republicans who voted for President Biden’s $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill – the BIF – way back in September, and now he’s defending the 13 Republicans who helped push it over the top in the House of Representatives’ 228-206 vote one week ago. In a Kentucky radio show interview McConnell called the BIF “good for the country,” Newsweek reports, even after House Republicans also in-favor have received death threats, apparently from those who don’t like to see the party hand Biden any legislative victories.

To the MAGA crowd, complete gridlock is good.

McConnell’s comity only goes so far. He has no plans to attend Monday’s Oval Office signing ceremony. “I’ve got other things I’ve got to do,” he said. Presumably, McConnell might have found the time for a Trump signing ceremony had any of the ex-president’s Infrastructure Weeks produced anything.

•••

Florida Men – Speaking of the de facto leader of the GOP, Donald J. Trump is complaining to guests and members of Mar-a-Lago that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hasn’t joined the club of 2024 Republican presidential hopefuls in saying he won’t run for president if the former president chooses to run again for a second term, according to scoopage from Politico. Trump also suggested DeSantis shouldn’t underestimate his 2022 Democratic challenger for Florida governor, Charlie Crist, the former independent, and former Republican before that. 

[No mention by Trump of “Little Marco” Rubio’s prospects for re-election to the U.S. Senate in Florida next year, where Democratic Rep. Val Demings outraised the incumbent in the third quarter, $8.3 million to $6 million.]

Meanwhile, in the House, Politico reports that Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s, R-CA, expected ascension to House Speaker after next November’s midterms will be tougher for having to deal with his caucus’ conservatives and “wild cards.” 

Note: Bottom line is that if Trump’s support is indeed crumbling among Republican senators, he still has the House. Question is whether that support will hold as Republican Senators attempt to move on.

This Just In: Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-AK, a moderate, announced Friday morning she will run for re-election. She faces Trump’s primary challenger, Kelly Tshibaka, the former commissioner for the state’s Department of Administration. Murkowski, who has served in the Senate since 2002, when her father appointed her to finish his term, was one of seven Republicans to vote to convict Trump in the trial of his second impeachment, earlier this year.

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Nic Woods

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

Joe Biden “is the first President to make no effort whatsoever to protect presidential communications from being the subject of compelled testimony. Mr. Meadows remains under the instructions of former President Trump to respect longstanding principles of executive privilege. It now appears the courts will have to resolve this conflict.”

That from former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows’ attorney George Terwilliger III, according to The Washington Post.

The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 mayhem at the Capitol has requested documents from Meadows (as well as his appearance in front of the committee).

It would be a cheap shot based on the attorney’s name that there seems to be a difference between the rich and powerful and the rest of us. I’ll take it.

If you were served a subpoena by the United States House of Representatives, I’m guessing that following a reaction of “oh shit,” you’d clear your calendar.

But Meadows, as well as several other Trump acolytes, seem to think that they must listen to their liege and they are above doing what the rest of us would be obligated to do.

Let’s think about Terwillger’s quote. “[T]he first President to make no effort whatsoever to protect presidential communication from being the subject of compelled testimony.” First, that seems to be a rather extensive claim. Second, when else did we have a president who reportedly sat watching TV while the U.S. Capitol was under attack and chose not to do anything about it until he was good and ready, and at that point made what is arguably a mealy-mouthed recommendation that the anarchists go home. (No, those people who attacked the Capitol are not anarchists in the true sense of the word, as anarchists would not storm against the government on behalf of a politician, but seeing as how the Republicans imprecisely bandy about the term “socialist,” fair is fair, unless you are Trump, and fairness is what he says it is.)

Then there’s “under the instructions of former President Trump.” That adjective means “previous.” Trump is no longer president. He is, which may come as a surprise to some people, a regular citizen. Meadows might as well be under the instructions of Ryan Seacrest.

The “longstanding principles of executive privilege” is also rich.

The Presidential Oath of Office includes the phrase, “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

On January 6, the U.S. Congress was fulfilling its duties under the Constitution. So to protect Congress would be to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.”

Somehow one could argue that (1) not only does executive privilege end when someone is no longer in charge of the Executive Branch, but (2) the abrogation of his responsibilities on January 6 — and does any doubt that his inaction that afternoon contributed to things like, oh, the vice president’s life being put in danger — makes that privilege, under these circumstances, laughable.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Use the scrollbar to scroll past today’s News & Notes to read The Hustings debate, “Was January 6 a ‘Dress Rehearsal’?” with news and analysis on the issue in the middle column, and commentary in the left and right columns.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

THU 11/11/21

The Tomb of the Unknowns marks its 100th anniversary at Arlington National Cemetery and is open to the public for the first time in 96 years, for just two days, NPR says.

President Biden will sign the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill Monday, The Hill reports.

A federal judge has approved a $626 million settlement of civil claims regarding the Flint, Michigan, water crisis. Nearly 80% of the settlement is for children, but it does not settle all lawsuits over lead contamination in the city’s water, Michigan Public Radio reports.

Scroll down to read a new comment in the right column regarding our ongoing debate, ‘Was January 6 a ‘Dress Rehearsal’?” It’s not too late to add your own comments to the left or right columns – email us at editors@thehustings.news.

Insurrection vs. Inflation – District Judge Tanya Chutkan refused to delay the Friday deadline for the National Archives to turn over Trump White House documents to the January 6 House select committee, while the former president appeals the judge’s decision of earlier in the week (The Hill). Meanwhile, President Biden spoke of easing up supply shipping bottlenecks with the passage of his $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, after the Labor Department yesterday released news of the highest annual Consumer Price Index in 30 years.

What do these two issues have to do with each other?

If Donald J. Trump’s attorneys can’t get the Supreme Court to stay the district judge’s decision before the White House documents are turned over to Rep. Bennie Thompson’s, D-MS, committee tomorrow, much will be revealed about the president and his advisers’ involvement in the Capitol insurrection. 

If, on the other hand, Trump manages more delay, the select committee will get stalled probably well into 2022. Next year, coincidentally, is when Treasury Secretary Janet Yellin expects inflation to come down to normal levels while the White House holds out high hopes that bipartisan infrastructure will help fix the supply chain bottleneck and all those container ships stacked up off U.S. coasts. 

Known knowns: Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-WV, is highly unlikely to let the $1.8 trillion Build Back Better social safety net plan go anywhere, especially after the dire CPI numbers. 

Known unknowns: The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on the safety net bill next week. But it’s unlikely to advance, at least in the Senate, until next year if at all, depending on how the inflation rate plays out in coming months. By the time that happens, the House select committee either will, or will not, have scrutinized Trump’s White House papers.

Unknown unknowns: House Republicans who support Trump want to strip the 13 moderate House Republicans who voted for the bipartisan infrastructure bill of their committee assignments, even though the bill has widespread support across the country, as it fixes roads and bridges – and ports – while boosting employment levels. The Trumpists do not want to hand Biden any victories, especially as his poll numbers plummet -- a USA Today/Morning Consult poll released yesterday says Biden’s approval rating has dropped to a Trump-like low of 38%. 

They also want to root out moderate House Republicans (many of whom, including Illinois’ Adam Kinzinger, one of only two GOP members on the 1/6 committee, have already announced they will not run for re-election) on their way to a much-expected route of Democrats in next November’s mid-terms.

Known known II: If the 1/6 select committee struggles next year with Trump’s stall tactics, and the inflation rate and struggling economy hands the GOP a turnover of the House, its new speaker, Kevin McCarthy, R-CA, will dismantle the committee.

•••

House Dems Hope to Censure Gosar — A group of House Democrats will offer a resolution to censure Paul Gosar, R-AZ, which, if accepted, would have the consequence of Gosar having to stand in the well of the House as the censure is read out by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Gosar posted “an edited video on social media depicting himself as murdering Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and attacking President Joe Biden,” according to Punchbowl News.

Note: Gosar is 62 and generally considered to be a grown-up. An edited anime with one of his colleagues being killed and the president of the United States being attacked is something that one might imagine a pimply-faced teen to post. Yes, this is what it comes to in the political entity formerly known as the “Grand Old Party.” There is nothing grand about it. Stupid, perhaps. Incidentally: Gosar’s former career was as a dentist. The mind boggles.

•••

There’s Always Chris – Former New Jersey governor, “friend” of Donald J. Trump, and likely 2024 presidential candidate Chris Christie told the Republican Jewish Coalition in Las Vegas last weekend that it’s time for the GOP to focus on future fights rather than rehash the 2020 election, Axios reports in a preview of an exclusive interview for an upcoming HBO show. 

Predictably, Trump put out a statement that Christie “was just absolutely massacred by his statements that Republicans have to move on from the past.” Christie left New Jersey with a record-low approval rating of just 9%, Trump continued, without explaining why he would have relied on such a disliked politician for his 2016 campaign. 

Note: Good news for never-Trump Republicans, Democrats and other defenders of democracy is that Christie’s almost inevitable ’24 run will make it hard for Trump to hold on to all but his most loyal acolytes over the next three years.

•••

Obituary: F.W. de Klerk, South Africa’s Last Apartheid President – The last president of South Africa’s Apartheid regime, F.W. de Klerk, has died after battling cancer at his home near Cape Town Thursday, age 85. De Klerk served as South Africa’s president from 1989 to 1994, when he lost re-election to the formerly imprisoned African National Congress leader, Nelson Mandela. The two men shared the 1993 Nobel Peace Prize. While de Klerk apologized for Apartheid, the question remains of whether he sufficiently rejected its moral injustice.

--Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Nic Woods

____________________________________

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2021

Scroll down for our debate on whether the January 6 Capitol insurrection was a ‘dress rehearsal’ for Donald J. Trump’s return in 2024. Submit your comments to editors@thehustings.news.

Inflation Rate Hits 30-year High – Consumer Price Index was up 6.2% for the last 12 months, the highest annual inflation rate since 1991, the U.S. Labor Department reported Wednesday. The CPI rose 0.9% in October, versus 0.4% in September. The Labor Department cited price increases in a wide array of consumer goods, though energy, shelter, food, used and new cars and trucks “were among the larger contributors.”

•••

Judge Rejects Trump’s Lawsuit to Block 1/6 Papers – Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan has denied former President Trump’s lawsuit seeking to block the National Archives’ release of documents related to the January 6 Capitol insurrection to the House Select Committee investigating the riot. In her 39-page ruling, the judge said there is a public interest in releasing the documents (The Hill).

“Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not president,” Chutkan said.

Note: While the House Select Committee hopes to procure the documents as early as this Friday, Trump’s attorneys have promised to appeal, and the case is likely headed to the Supreme Court. If Trump’s lawyers can draw out the case well into 2022, a long delay could come after the midterm elections, when Republicans expect to retake the House majority and a new speaker, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-CA, would likely dissolve the 1/6 investigation.

•••

Meanwhile, 1/6 Committee Subpoenas 10 More Trump Associates – The House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection has issued 10 more subpoenas, to former Trump administration officials. They are, per The Wall Street Journal:

•Kayleigh McEnany: Trump White House press secretary.

•Stephen Miller: Senior advisor, and key advocate for administration’s immigration policy.

•Chris Liddell: Former White House deputy chief of staff.

•Nicholas Luna: Trump personal assistant (“luggage carrier”).

•John McEntee: Former White House personnel director.

•Ben Williamson: Trump assistant and senior advisor to ex-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

•Keith Kellogg: Ex-Vice President Pence’s security advisor.

•Cassidy Hutchinson: Special assistant to ex-President Trump for legislative affairs.

•Molly Michael: Special assistant to the ex-president, and former Oval Office operations co-ordinator.

•Kenneth Klukowski: Former senior council to ex-Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark.

•••

Sununu Rejects Senate Run – Republican New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu has rejected pleas by GOP Senate leadership to run against Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-NH, in next year’s midterms. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY, and Sen. Rick Scott, R-FL, considered Sununu their best chance for retaking the chamber’s majority after November 2022, Politico notes. 

Sununu is the younger brother of former Sen. John Sununu, who lost re-election to Democrat Jeanne Shaheen in 2008. Shaheen, a former governor who lost her first run against John Sununu in 2002, became the first Democratic U.S. senator from New Hampshire since 1981 when she took the seat in 2009.

Note: The pols have it that Sununu finds it easier to be a Republican governor with a distant relationship to Donald J. Trump, like Virginia Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin, than to potentially run against a hand-picked Trump candidate for the Republican Senate primary next year.

•••

Obituary: Max Cleland – Former U.S. Sen. Max Cleland, D-GA, died Tuesday at the age of 79. As a U.S. Army captain who served during the Vietnam War, he lost both legs and an arm in a grenade accident in 1968. He served as administrator of the Veterans Administration under President Carter from 1977 to 1981, and ran for the Senate in 1996, where he served until January 2003. During his failed bid for a second term, Saxby Chambliss, his Republican opponent ran commercials claiming Cleland was “soft” on terrorism, picturing him side-by-side with a photo of Osama bin Laden. Republican Sens. John McCain, of Arizona and Chuck Hagel, of Nebraska expressed their outrage at their party’s smear campaign at the time.

“I publicly stated that I wanted it stopped,” Hagel later said. “To question Max Cleland’s patriotism was just astounding to me. And these are from people who had never served our country in uniform.” 

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

_____

Use the scrollbar to scroll past today’s News & Notes to read The Hustings debate, “Was January 6 a ‘Dress Rehearsal’?” with news and analysis on the issue in the middle column, and commentary in the left and right columns.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

You are invited to add your comments to the left or right column of this page on the question posed in the center column. Please submit your comments to editors@thehustings.news and let us know whether you consider yourself “left” or “right.”

Contributor comments:

America's muted reaction to the January 6th insurrection continues to baffle. Gonzalez's wise warnings should be heeded, unfortunately, we know that they are likely to fall on deaf ears. Congress needs to pass a bill to repair the 1964 Voting Rights Act immediately. 

-Jessica Gottlieb

•••

_____

By Todd Lassa

There is a pervasive notion that the January 6 pro-Trump Capitol insurrection was not a one-off. Given the ongoing commitment among some in the Republican Party to what is now known -- but not by them -- as "The Big Lie," that the 2020 presidential election was "stolen," there is concern that coups tend to fail before they succeed and in 2024 if the election results do not have a Republican presidential victory, there may be another insurrection.

Last Friday, one of the current congress members who has chosen not to run for re-election and face one of Donald J. Trump’s hand-picked primary challengers, Rep. Tony Gonzalez, R-OH, spoke on CNN to warn that January 6 was a “dress rehersal” and that a much better-organized Trump campaign will try again when he runs in 2024.

“January 6 was an unconstitutional attempt led by the President of the United States to overturn an American election and reinstall himself in power illegitimately,” Gonzalez said. “That’s fallen nation territory. That’s third world country territory. My family left Cuba to avoid that fate.

“I will not let it happen here,” Gonzalez continued. “I think it’s all pushing towards one of two outcomes: He either wins legitimately, which he may do, or he loses again, you just try to steal it.”

Gonzalez, a sophomore representative serving for Ohio’s 16th Congressional District was one of 10 Republicans in the House of Representatives to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, over the January 6 insurrection. He announced in September he would not run for a third term.

In a statement released by Trump’s Save America PAC, Gonzalez’s September retirement announcement prompted the ex-president to say, “1 down, 9 to go!” (per Mediaite.)

President Biden and other Democratic leaders have tried to push federal legislation that would restore portions of the 1964 Voting Rights Act that would prevent such state legislation from taking effect, though there is no chance any of the proposed bills would pass the Senate without suspension of the legislative filibuster. 

The question on the table is this: Should Rep. Gonzalez’s warnings be taken seriously? If so, what steps should Congress take – if any – to assure a fair 2024 presidential election?

_____

You are invited to add your comments to the left or right column of this page on the question posed in the center column. Please submit your comments to editors@thehustings.news and let us know whether you consider yourself “left” or “right.”

Contributor comments:

Remember Jacob Chansley, the January 6 rioter, face painted, shirtless, and with a horned hat?  It is not a good look. “Evil clown” comes to mind, especially because of the spear. (Do you think he’d be admitted to Mar-a-Lago?) If 1/6 was a dress rehearsal, here’s hoping for better costumes.

--Stephen Macaulay

•••

Gonzalez is a fool doing nothing more than getting the anger to rise in his base. That is an outrageous and completely false claim and he has not the slightest evidence for it. It is merely one more step in the on-going demonization of Trump voters on the theory that we will be denied in the future and that they will somehow make Biden/Harris look like they have competence.

--David Iwinski

•••

_____

Stephen Macaulay discusses Virginia Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin’s, R, upset victory of Democrat Terry McAuliffe. Scroll down to our three-column debate.

Also in this column…

• Jim McCraw comments on whether the Build Back Better plan compromises will leave anyone satisfied by $1.75 trillion worth of social programs. 

•David Amaya on the future of nation building by the U.S. government.

Help us build a better social news media site. Send your civil comments on these and News & Notes issues to editors@thehustings.news

_____

11/9/21

According to WaPo political reporter and Peril co-author Robert Costa; “Political reporters are on the democracy beat.” Coming later today in this space, we begin a three-column debate on whether January 6 was a ‘dress rehearsal’ for a potential pro-Trump coup in 2024. Join the conversation and send comments to editors@thehustings.newsPlease be civil.

And the Latest 1/6 Select Committee Subpoenas Go To – The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection issued six more subpoenas Monday, as it awaits Attorney Gen. Merrick Garland’s next move on how to handle a contempt of Congress charge against Stephen K. Bannon. As with Bannon, this list of five men and one woman includes no one who was a federal employee, working for the Trump administration – and thus with no basic claim to executive privilege -- when allegedly planning on January 5-6 to overturn the November election in favor of Donald J. Trump. The list, per The New York Times:

Michael Flynn: Former national security advisor to President Trump.

John Eastman: Attorney who drafted the memo on how Trump could use Vice President Pence and Congress to try to invalidate election results.

Bernard Kerik: Former New York City police commissioner who participated in a planning meeting at the Willard Hotel January 5. Then-President Trump in 2020 pardoned Kerik for ethics violation convictions.

Bill Stepien: Trump campaign manager who supervised its conversion into the “stop the steal” campaign.

Jason Miller: Senior advisor to the campaign who participated in the January 5 Willard Hotel meeting.

•Angela McCallum: Trump campaign national executive assistant, she reportedly left a voice mail message for an unknown Michigan state representative asking whether she could “count on” the rep to help appoint an alternative slate of electors.

•••

House GOP Blowback on Infrastructure Vote – Punchbowl News says rank-and-file Republican members of the House of Representatives are pushing leadership to strip of their committee posts 13 GOP colleagues who voted for President Biden’s $1.2-trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill last Friday. The acrimony is reportedly roiling House GOP leadership, all the way up to Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California.

Much of the anger is directed at Rep. John Katko, R-NY, who joined 12 other Republicans in the 228-206 passage of the bill and is ranking member on the Homeland Security Committee. Katko also was one of 10 House Republicans to vote for Donald J. Trump’s second impeachment.

Several other Republicans who voted for the bipartisan bill hold ranking committee posts, according to Punchbowl News, and three of the 13 have already announced they will not run for re-election next year.

Note: This is all political, of course. Republican House members are angry that members of their party handed Biden his first major legislative victory, even on a bill that has widespread support across the country. The 13 Republicans gave House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, who lost six progressives on infrastructure, a cushion on the vote. 

•••

Two for SCOTUS Today – In Ramirez v. Collier, the U.S. Supreme Court will rule definitively on the rights of a convict on death row to receive spiritual comfort and advice prior to execution, per SCOTUSblog. The case involves a Texas policy that has excluded all spiritual advisors from the state’s execution chambers.

Also today, in United States v. Vaello-Madero, the court will consider equal protection challenging Puerto Rico’s exclusion from federal safety net programs (SCOTUSblog). The case involves Jose Luis Vaello-Madero, a Puerto Rican-born U.S. citizen who was living in New York City in 2012 when he became seriously ill and began receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI). When he returned to Puerto Rico to be closer to family, the SSI stopped. While Puerto Rico is U.S. territory, its citizens are excluded from such safety net programs.

•••

Going in the Wrong Direction? — Sixty-two percent of Americans polled by Morning Consult say that the U.S. is headed in the wrong direction. Since early May, when the number was 50%, those thinking that things aren’t going where they are supposed to be has been heading upward. If there is any satisfaction in the numbers, which are compiled each week, it is that on January 15, 2021, those who said “wrong track” was at 79%, a peak.

Note: One of the primary problems of the Biden Administration is a remarkable inability to message. Until that gets fixed the wrong-way perception will not change. It isn’t going to happen by having Biden stand in front of a White House podium intoning a script, but by having enthusiastic people out there talking about things that are going right, whether on Wall Street (how often did Trump take credit for a rising stock market?) or Main Street (the jobs numbers improved, but no Democrats are beating a drum about it).

--Edited by Todd Lassa, Gary S. Vasilash and Charles Dervarics


MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen testifies before the European Parliament in Brussels today, and before French lawmakers in Paris Wednesday; both groups are expected to air their own proposals for changes to the EU’s content moderation rules, called the Digital Services Act (Politico).

The U.S. reopens international borders today to travelers from 33 countries, mostly in Europe, plus Canada and Mexico, who have been vaccinated for COVID-19, and have proof of a recent coronavirus test (WaPo).

Court Blocks Vax Mandate -- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in response to a lawsuit filed by a group including Louisiana’s attorney general, ruled that the Biden administration’s vaccine requirement that companies with 100 or more employees (who must be vaccinated or show regular negative COVID tests), which is to go into effect January 4, 2022, is suspended.

Note: The Biden rule is to be implemented through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which was put into existence in 1970 under Richard M. Nixon, who, as you may recall was a Republican. And it is worth noting that the 91stCongress (1969-1971) included 243 Democrats and 192 Republicans. Who knew that there could be things done on a bipartisan basis?

While there seems to be glee in Baton Rouge — The Washington Post quotes Jeff Landry, the Republican attorney general of Louisiana saying the court’s action is “a major win for the liberty of job creators and their employees” — there is something to keep in mind.

Presently there are 754,000 deaths in the U.S. attributed to COVID-19. The Biden plan is meant to help mitigate the addition of more people to that role.

And there is something that is Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, known as the “General Duty Clause.”

According to the General Duty Clause employers are required to provide employees:

"employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees...."

Presumably COVID-19 is recognized. The 754,000 deaths were certainly not all workplace related, but it is a known cause of death and physical harm to those who don’t die.

And that is a “major win for the liberty of job creators and their employees”?

•••

Granholm: “All Options on Table,” Including Strategic Energy Reserve – President Biden has not ruled out tapping the Strategic Energy Reserve as petroleum prices spike under pressure from demand and of supply bottlenecks, according to Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm. “All options are on the table,” Granholm told CNN’s Dana Bash on State of the Union Sunday.

Note: More critical to the Biden administration’s first-year success as bipartisan infrastructure bill spending begins is the price of gasoline, which sits at an average of $3.422 per gallon according to AAA, and of home heating oil, which also is spiking. The problem is related to fears of continued high inflation even as Treasury Secretary Janet Yellin tries to reassure Americans that this is not likely to be the case  next year as employment returns to normal levels and supply chains open up. For now, high energy cost concerns will create more fodder by moderate Democrats and Republicans against the White House’s $2 trillion Build Back Better social safety net package.

•••

And So Infrastructure Has Come to Pass – It seems to have taken the Democratic loss in last week’s Virginia gubernatorial election and a much closer call than polls predicted in the New Jersey governor’s race to finally get the bipartisan infrastructure (BIP) bill passed in the House of Representatives, 228-206, and sent to President Biden’s desk for signing into law. Biden cancelled his usual, short, weekend trip home to Wilmington, Delaware, in order to sign it. 

The House vote included 13 Republicans in favor and six progressive Democrats who voted “nay.” (See The List.)

To keep things straight, this infrastructure bill is the one for which Congress members can go home and tell constituents that roads will be built and bridges fixed; lead water pipes replaced; Amtrak enhanced; and wi-fi installed in rural America. It’s $1.2 trillion, of which $550 billion is new spending and the rest reauthorizes surface transportation and water programs for five years, according to Roll Call.

Note: For months moderate Democrats and some Republicans have urged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, to allow separate votes on BIP and on Biden’s approximately $2-trillion social safety net Build Back Better (BBB) program set to pass via the reconciliation process. Blockage came from Sens. Joe Manchin III, D-WV, who has already negotiated the package down from $3.5 trillion, and Krysten Sinema, D-AZ. 

But on Friday, when Pelosi had scheduled a vote on both bills, six moderate House Democrats blocked it, Roll Call reports, saying they couldn’t vote for it without a Congressional Budget Office score detailing its costs. Five of the Democrats, Ed Case of Hawaii, Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Stephanie Murphy of Florida, Kathleen Rice of New York and Kurt Schrader of Oregon, said if the package remains un-modded “other than technical changes,” they will help forward the package the week of November 15.

But there remain several moving parts, and we’d bet this will get punted into early next year. At least Biden has infrastructure.

The List: (Per The New York Times.)

The “Squad” of progressive Democrats who voted against the BIP Friday:

Jamaal Bowman, New York.

Cori Bush, Missouri.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York.

Ilhan Omar, Minnesota.

Ayanna S. Pressley, Massachusetts.

Rashida Tlaib, Michigan.

Eight Republicans in the Problem Solvers Caucus who voted for the BIP Friday:

Don Bacon, Nebraska.

Brian Fitzpatrick, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Garbarino, New York.

Anthony Gonzalez, Ohio.

John Katko, New York.

Tom Reed, New York.

Christopher H. Smith, New Jersey.

 Fred Upton, Michigan.

Five additional Republicans who voted for the bill:

Adam Kinzinger, Illinois.

Don Young, Alaska.

Nicole Malliotakis, New York.

David B. McKinley, West Virginia.

Jeff Van Drew, New Jersey.

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

_____________________________________

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2021

Pfizer says its experimental antiviral pill for COVID-19 treatment has cut hospitalization and death rates in trials of high-risk adults by nearly 90%. 

The trial in the death of Ahmaud Arbery begins today in a Georgia court.

Funeral for former Secretary of State Colin Powell is held today at Washington National Cathedral.

Scroll down for our debate on the meaning of Republican Glenn Youngkin’s victory in Tuesday’s Virginia gubernatorial race.

Good October Jobs Numbers – Nonfarm payroll in the U.S. increased by 531,000 jobs in October, a return to an employment boom from about 1 million per month in June and July, before stumbling in August and September. The unemployment rate dropped by 0.1 points to 4.6%, according to the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Leisure and hospitality employment continues its recovery, and the BLS also cites gains in professional and business services, manufacturing and transportation and warehousing, while public education lost jobs.

•••

Is Today Really the Day? – Democrats in the House of Representatives are planning to vote today on the $1.75-trillion budget reconciliation bill and, oh yeah, pass the $1.2-trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill ($550 billion in new spending) the latter of which would head straight for President Biden’s desk.

Questions remained Thursday over process and policy, including how the social spending bill would provide relief to undocumented immigrants, and how to raise the cap on state and local tax deductions without additional benefit to the wealthiest homeowners, Roll Call says. Prescription drug price provisions were also being negotiated so that bill matches an agreement that House and Senate Democrats reached earlier this week. 

New Jersey Democrats also negotiated a deal late Thursday to raise the limit on state and local tax deductions (SALT) to $80,000, according to Roll Call. It was lowered to $10,000 in 2017.

Note: Would this have saved Terry McAuliffe’s failed Virginia gubernatorial candidacy if it happened last week? Probably not. The bipartisan infrastructure bill should give Democrats some hope for their prospects in Senate and House races in next year’s midterm elections, though.

•••

Meanwhile, the Republican Message – Progressive Democrats are hopeful that Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-WV, will come through and support the $1.75-trillion social infrastructure budget reconciliation bill after the House (probably) passes it today along party lines. Sen. Krysten Sinema, D-AZ, the other swing-voter, appears MIA on the issue the last couple of days. 

But Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-SC, put out this warning on Fox News Thursday: “Any Democrat who claims to be a moderate if you vote for the socialist spending package, you will get your ass beat and you deserve it.”

Note:  Graham’s warning isn’t for Manchin nor Sinema, both of whom are not up for re-election to the Senate until 2024, but to moderate House Democrats who must support the social infrastructure bill for it to pass today. 

•••

From the Newspaper that Gave Us ‘Headless Body in Topless Bar’ – The New York Post reports climate change activists “Swarm Joe Manchin’s Maserati as he Tries to Leave Parking Garage.” 

“A gaggle of far-left environmentalists” chased Manchin from his Washington houseboat on the Potomac as he tried to leave a parking garage Thursday. 

Note: The Murdoch-owned New York tabloid says both Manchin and Sinema have been the target of radical environmentalists angry about their balking at the budget reconciliation bill, which contains $550 billion worth of climate change mitigation policy. 

•••

U.S. Justice Dept. Files Suit Against Texas S1 — The U.S. Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against both the State of Texas and the Texas Secretary of State (John B. Scott) “over certain restrictive voting procedures” in Texas Senate Bill 1, claiming that they violate part of Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act [i.e., restricting assistance to voters in the polling booth who are disabled or illiterate] and Section 101 of the Civil Right Act of 1964 [i.e., rejecting mail-in ballots and request forms because of form-filling errors or omissions “that are not material to establishing a voter’s eligibility to cast a ballot].” This essentially means, in the words of Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke for the Justice Dept.’s Civil Rights Division: “Laws that impair eligible citizens’ access to the ballot box have no place in our democracy. Texas Senate Bill 1’s restrictions on voter assistance at the polls and on which absentee ballots cast by eligible voters can be accepted by election officials are unlawful and indefensible.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton tweeted, in part, “It’s a great and much-needed bill. Ensuring Texas has safe, secure, and transparent elections is a top priority of mine. I will see you in court, Biden!”, according to Politico.

Note: Arguably, there are “safe, secure, and transparent elections” in Texas. As KVUE (Austin, Texas ABC affiliate) reports, “According to records from the Texas Attorney General's Office, there were a total of 534 offenses charged to 154 people (some had multiple offenses)for either mail ballot fraud, assistance fraud or illegal voting since 2004. Among those 534 offenses, 310 were for mail-in ballot fraud, 159 were for assistance fraud and 189 were for illegal voting. A total of 272 charges of the 534 offenses resolved were from 2015 to March 2021. There are also 510 total counts pending prosecution, according to the report.”

According to the most recent figure from the Texas Secretary of State, there are 16,676,353, registered voters, which puts those numbers into context.

--Edited by Todd Lassa and Gary S. Vasilash

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

Bryan Williams discusses Virginia Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin’s, R, upset victory of Democrat Terry McAuliffe. Scroll down to our three-column debate.

Also in this column…

• Stephen Macaulay comments on whether the Build Back Better plan compromises will leave anyone satisfied by $1.75 trillion worth of social programs. 

•David Iwinski on the future of nation building by the U.S. government.

Help us build a better social news media site. Send your civil comments on these and News & Notes issues to editors@thehustings.news

_____

By Stephen Macaulay

Glenn Youngkin held Donald Trump at arm’s length during his run for a seat that Thomas Jefferson once occupied. More or less. (It is hard to imagine Jefferson suffering a fool gladly or otherwise.)

It seems that Trump was more interested in Youngkin than vice versa. Trump probably saw that Youngkin was a contender, and if that resulted in a victory, then he could take credit for it.

Youngkin isn’t dumb. He knew that there was more downside to being against Trump than being rather non-committal about the whole thing (relatively speaking: various other Republican candidates have shown embarrassing subservience to their defeated leader).

Youngkin, who points out on his website that he started his working career “washing dishes and frying eggs at a diner in Virginia Beach,” spent his career at The Carlyle Group. The Carlyle Group? “We manage $293 billion in assets. . . .” It is probably as far away from cooking two eggs over with a side of ham as you can get.

Again, according to youngkinforgovernor.com, while at the investment firm “His efforts have helped fund the retirements of teachers, police officers, firefighters and other frontline public servants and supported hundreds of thousands of American jobs.” One also assumes that his efforts helped pad the coffers of those who never ate eggs in a diner, people whose names are conceivably in the Pandora Papers.

Under the headline “Why I’m Running,” Youngkin’s first sentence is telling: “I’m not a politician.” Somehow that is laudable. Would you go to a dentist who was running to head the local dentist’s association who wasn’t a dentist him-or herself? There is a certain Trumpyness now associated with the “I’m not a politician” stance, but it is far from being definitive. (When Rick Snyder ran for the governorship of Michigan in 2010 the non-politician venture capitalist presented himself as “One Tough Nerd.” That’s separating oneself from being a politician.)

He goes on to point out, “I’m guided by my faith, values, and an unshakeable belief that Virginia should be the best.” Perhaps the last was inspired by Melania Trump’s anti-bullying campaign, just said somewhat more coherently.

Youngkin notes the ways he has answered when he “heard a call to service”: “ Glenn volunteered to coach multiple youth basketball teams, and he served on the boards of many non-profit organizations, including the Virginia Ready Initiative, Virginia Tech’s Innovation Campus Advisory Board, the Museum of the Bible, and the Meadowkirk Retreat Center.” The man clearly was in the trenches of “service to others.”

This is an interesting humble brag: “When COVID-19 hit Virginia, Glenn and Suzanne founded the Virginia Ready Initiative, a nonprofit, public-private partnership dedicated to helping Virginians who are out-of-work get the training they need to secure in-demand jobs.” When COVID-19 hit Virginia, Glenn didn’t come out in favor of masks and name-checked one of Trump’s former faves, Florida governor Ron DeSantis, when it comes to anti-masking for school children. Perhaps there wouldn’t be so many Virginians out of work were the pandemic under control.

The question of whether other Republicans will follow Youngkin’s playbook is perhaps simply not one that is particularly germane, outside of making claims like “I’m not a politician” and “I’m guided by my faith” and not stepping on Trump. These are tactics, not strategy. That’s the bigger issue.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news

By Todd Lassa

Political observers have seen for weeks Republican Glenn Youngkin’s victory in last Tuesday’s Virginia gubernatorial race, and yet Democrats are scrambling to figure out what, exactly, happened to their candidate, Terry McAuliffe, and who is to blame for his defeat. The race had been seen as a harbinger of the GOP’s future, a canary in the Trumpian coal mine, or at least a good indication of where the party is 10 months after insurrectionists stormed the Capitol to support the ex-president’s Big Lie about November 2020 election fraud. 

The answer is not so obvious. While Donald Trump endorsed Youngkin, a former executive of The Carlyle Group who spent much of his own money from a career in hedge fund management on his first-ever campaign, few consider Youngkin a Trump acolyte. The Wednesday morning pundit reassessment has shifted from considering Virginia a blue state – commonwealth, rather -- for the past 12 years to one that has long been a purple, swing state. 

McAuliffe is an old-guard moderate who did little to explain his platform other than accuse his opponent of Trumpism, and some of his fellow Democrats now lament they did not choose a more progressive candidate in the primary. However, the Viriginia election had high turnout, NPR reports, in which independents gave Youngkin a nine-point margin over McAuliffe. (Biden won independents over Trump in Virginia by a 19-point margin.) A more progressive Democratic candidate probably would not have turned that around.

In the past few weeks, Youngkin’s campaign emphasized education and hit hard against McAuliffe’s debate misstep in which he said that parents shouldn’t be allowed to tell schools what to teach their children. Youngkin hit McAuliffe for acceding to left-wing Democrats, suggesting his opponent supports critical race theory taught in Virginia public schools (it’s not – CRT is college-level study. See our debate on Page 7, with Nic Woods’ center column, “Critical Race Theory: Facts Don’t Matter”).

CRT is a rather Trumpian issue made of nothing. Youngkin’s campaign managed to brush shoulders with the issue without going all-in on Trump and earned the vote of a majority of suburban women as a result.  

Youngkin also campaigned on his fiscal conservatism and plans for tax cuts, including eliminating Virginia’s grocery tax. McAuliffe’s campaign did not respond, instead continuing to try and connect Youngkin closely to Trump.

What does Glenn Youngkin’s victory in the Virginia gubernatorial race tell us about the direction of the GOP? We asked Stephen Macaulay (left column) and Bryan Williams (right column) for their comments.

Please tell us what you think: email editors@thehustings.news

_____
Help make The Hustings a new kind of social news media site. Send us your comments on this debate.

By Bryan Williams

There are so many possible reasons to help explain why Glenn Youngkin won the governor's race in Virginia. It is natural for humans to attach some wider meaning to the results of elections. The old cliched adage, "All politics is local," still rings true.

First, let's not underestimate the fact that Terry McAuliffe is an old hat in Virginia by now. He's already had the job before. I don't think McAuliffe, a Clintonite who's been in the game seemingly forever didn't move the needle much in Old Dominion from 2014-18, so why would he now?

Also, McAuliffe did the one thing that any politician should not do: he angered parents all over the state by saying they don't know what's best for their children's education, and school boards and other elected and non-elected school bureaucrats do. Uh-oh. He practically handed that one to Youngkin. After nearly a year and a half of the disastrous distance learning via Zoom and other pandemic related school shut downs that truly upended the lives of Americans more so than a toilet paper shortage or mask mandates, telling parents they need to butt out of what is taught to their children was just plain dumb miscalculation. But then again, maybe this is truly what Democrats believe?

I imagine that when Virginians heard McAuliffe say that, they gladly shifted their support to the guy who respects a parent’s right to control what is taught to their children. Kudos to Youngkin for running a calm, adult, and finger-on-the-pulse campaign.

_____
Please email your comments to editors@thehustings.news