By Stephen Macaulay
A friend of mine said to me yesterday that he’d cast his ballot some weeks earlier. He said, “I didn’t vote for either of those two. As the father of a daughter I couldn’t vote for Trump. As the owner of a small business I couldn’t vote for Biden.”
He voted for Jo Jorgensen, Libertarian candidate for president. Not that he had any illusion that she would win. He just wanted to participate in our democracy.
He told me that this is the second presidential cycle he’s done that.
Mind you he is a well-educated owner of a profitable, family-owned business. Twenty years ago he might have been a Democrat. Now that he is in his 50s, I would have guessed Republican.
His position isn’t exactly “a pox on both of your houses.”
It is more of “I can’t see how either of these people is going to help me.”
As we wait for the results, there is undoubted feeling of rancor among both sides.
Many Trump supporters undoubtedly think that Biden supporters are a bunch of latte-sipping snowflakes who don’t understand the meaning of the word freedom.
And on the Biden side they’re seeing a gang of overweight patrons of outlet malls.
Neither is correct.
Both sides are Americans. Both sides are participating in the electoral process. Both sides think their guy is the right one for the country.
One side is going to be pissed when the last ballot has been counted. Or the last lawsuit settled.
If one wins with the majority of the popular vote but loses the Electoral College, there will be an outcry to abolish that mechanism. Undoubtedly there will be some action.
But is that enough?
Why is it that people like Jo Jorgensen don’t have a snowball’s chance?
Why is it that there are just two parties that seem to matter?
Maybe instead of just going for direct voting there should be more adjustments made to the system as it exists.
Perhaps we should take a page from the British system, which has campaigns running for four weeks. People and parties that are less well-funded than the Republicans and Democrats would not be at the huge disadvantage that they are now. While some would say that the wealthy candidate would just pour it on for those 30 or so days, let’s look at it this way: If you have a glass that you fill with water, at some point it is full and no matter how much more you put in it there won’t be more. Arguably the same could be said for political ads.
You won’t be happy today.
I won’t be happy today.
But do you know who won’t be unhappy?
My friend who voted Libertarian.
Macaulay is The Hustings’ pundit-at-large.
—–