By Stephen Macaulay

Donald Trump, self-proclaimed business wizard, is currently on trial, being prosecuted by the New York County — which includes Manhattan — district attorney’s office.

A grand jury determined that there are 34 counts related to falsifying business records that had the effect of keeping from the public information about Trump’s alleged extra-marital undertakings.

Essentially the dubious activities are predicated on the notion that if Trump, who is sometimes illustrated on T-shirts as having the physique of a WWF wrestler, thereby indicating his virility, was to be exposed having spent a night with an actress whose stage name is “Stormy Daniels,” a vivacious blonde who is more than moderately shapely, an actress who has played lead in such films as Sex Door Neighbors and Love in an Elevator, and this information was to be made public prior to the 2016 presidential election, there could have been some people who would think that this sort of Seventh Commandment-breaking behavior disqualified him from the highest elected position in the U.S. and so wouldn’t have voted for him.

So Trump allegedly instructed his people to pay off Daniels and to do so in a way that was in violation of regulations related to business expenses. 

Several people have stated that the prosecution is because of who the defendant is. On Sunday May 12, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, joined the likes of Jonathan Turley and Mark Levin, by saying on his show: “I doubt the New York indictment would have been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump.”

And Zakaria is probably right.

But what seems to be lost in such statements is the fact that it has nothing to do with his name but that the person in question allegedly falsified business records because he was running for president. 

What’s more, had Bill Clinton not been president, his dalliances with “a subordinate government employee” probably would have gotten him fired were he in the private sector, but he was president.

Trump is innocent until proven guilty. But let’s not accept false equivalencies between Donald Trump and John Doe.

__________________________________________

MONDAY 5/13/24

The New York Times and ProPublica revealed over the weekend that yet another of Donald J. Trump’s business ventures, Chicago’s Trump International Hotel and Tower, has been under scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service since the early ‘10s. 

That’s about five years before Trump first declared his presidential candidacy. In this right column below, Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay writes that other, known Trump business failures led up to one big one during his four years as president, in “Would You Have Him Run Your Business?”

Use the trackbar at the far right to scroll up and down this page for recent posts. Use the trackbar within each column to read to the bottom of the column.

And be sure to read Ken Zino’s left-column piece, “Trump Tanked the Economy, and Biden is Fixing It.”

Then let us know your thoughts, whether you disagree or agree with Macaulay or Zino, or if you would like to defend four years of Trump’s economic policies, your civil comments are very much welcome. Email your civil comments to editors@thehustings.newsand indicate whether you lean left or right in the subject line, so we can post your comments in the appropriate column.