How to define a liberal? How to define a conservative?

The answers to those questions have been elusive since long before The Hustings began publishing in the autumn of 2020. But the ascendence of Donald J. Trump’s political career as he descended his Golden Elevator in 2015 has made the issue of how to define “left” and “right” even more acute. 

Is former US Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) a RINO for endorsing Kamala Harris for president? How liberal is Harris herself after reversing her stand on fracking?

We are always up for debating such arguments at The Hustings, but if Cheney wants to write a column for us (email us, Ms. Cheney, at editors@thehustings.news) we certainly will post it in the right column, not the left because she may or may not be, officially, a Republican, but she certainly remains a conservative.

In today’s right column, Rich Corbett, a regular reader and occasional contributing pundit for the conservative side calls out The Hustings for posting criticism of Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, in that right column.

And that is what the right – and left – columns are for: civil commentary from pundits and readers from various points on the political spectrum and to foster political discussion with respect for the facts and for readers and writers who may not agree with your point of view. 

The Hustings invites you to join the discussion. Go to the Comments section in any of these columns or email editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your leanings – from moderate liberal to hard-left/progressive or moderate conservative to hard-right/populist in the subject line. 

Don’t forget our regular newsletter/blogs at thehustings.substack.com.

_____
WEDNESDAY 10/9/24
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

SCOTUS will hear arguments Wednesday on whether Oklahoma must execute Richard Glossip, who seeks a new trial in a murder case for which he has been on Death Row for 27 years. Meanwhile, SCOTUSblog's analysis of justices' questions in Tuesday's oral arguments over ghost guns indicates it is likely the court will uphold the Biden administration's 2022 ban on the weapons. Scroll down for details.

WEDNESDAY 10/9/24

Polling is Tight – Kamala Harris leads Donald J. Trump 48.5% to 45.9% in FiveThirtyEight’s latest average of national polls, “accounting for each poll’s recency, sample size, methodology and house effects,” while battleground-state polls are even less conclusive. Among those states, Vice President Harris leads in Nevada, Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan. Ex-President Trump leads in North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Texas, Florida and Montana. Most leads on either side are within the margin of error, however.

Pennsylvania, the Big Kahuna of swing states, is even.

Meanwhile … Democrats are nervous, according to The Hill, which notes that in part that’s a natural state for the party. But the concerns include “grumbling” over Harris’ interview on CBS News 60 Minutes, concerns about static poll numbers (see above), her message – GOP vice presidential candidate JD Vance has attacked Harris’ response on ABC-TV’s The View that she wouldn’t do anything differently in the last four years than President Biden – and her “standing” among not only white, but also Black and Hispanic men.

•••

Ghost of a Chance – The 2024-25 Supreme Court session is just underway, and it appears that in its first big case, a majority of justices appear ready to uphold a 2022 rule by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives banning “ghost guns,” Amy Howe writes in Howe on the Court. The Supremes heard oral arguments Tuesday over ghost guns, which are defined as “unserialized, untraceable firearms.”

Howe’s blog was reposted by SCOTUSblog.

Attorney Peter Patterson, representing challengers of the ATF rule argued the bureau “exceeded its authority by operating outside the bounds set by Congress” in the Gun Control Act of 1968.

Arguing for the rule, US Solicitor Gen. Elizabeth Prelogar said the “whole reason” for obtaining a ghost gun is if you are banned by law from owning a gun, or “you want to use that gun in a crime.”

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, at least one of whom would be necessary to overturn the ban, “appeared skeptical” of the arguments of the challengers’ attorney, Patterson, Howe writes.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
WEDNESDAY 10/9/24
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Editors:

My assumption is either only leftists are reading (the audience) or are writing (the opinion columnists) for The Hustings. Lately, the “Right” column does far more to criticize the Republican candidate running for president than to present an opposing point of view to the Democrats. Either leave it blank or fill it with an opposing POV to the radicals on the left — there’s not much balance if that’s what is supposed to be represented by the columns.

--Rich Corbett

(The author is an occasional guest pundit for The Hustings)

•••

Email your comments to editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line.

_____
WEDNESDAY 10/9/24
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

What are your thoughts and hopes about the escalating war between Israel and Hamas, and now with Hezbollah in southern Lebanon? 

What are the realistic prospects for a ceasefire in Gaza before the end of the year?

Is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enabling a Trump/Vance win in the November 5 US presidential election? Would a Trump administration use Netanyahu’s proposal for Israeli judicial “reform” as a model?

As always, we seek your civil comments on these and other current issues. You can use the Comment section in this column or in the column on the right, if you lean toward political conservatism. 

Or email editors@thehustings.news and please indicate your political leanings in the subject line. 

Sign up for our free Substack newsletter here.

•••

Don't miss these commentaries in the right column ...

"The Art of the Lie," "Laws, Schmaws" and "Advantage: Intellectual Arteriosclerosis?" by never-Trumper Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay.

"Vance Was Rock-Solid" by pro-MAGA contributor Rich Corbett.

And in the left column ...

Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay (again, this time as counterpoint on the vice presidential debate), "About Second Place."

_____
MONDAY 10/7/24

Harris on 60 Minutes – Scroll down to read about Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ interview with Bill Whitaker. Use the trackbar on the near right to scroll down this center column.

TUESDAY 10/8/24

October Surprise Book Club – In 2020, President Trump “secretly sent coveted” coronavirus tests to Russian dictator/President Vladmir Putin for his personal use, The Washington Post reports in a preview of Bob Woodward’s new book, War due in bookstores October 15. Counter to many Trump supporters’ reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, Putin was “petrified of the virus” Woodward writes, and cautioned Trump not to reveal he had sent the medical equipment to Moscow. 

Woodward also writes that early this year Trump ordered an aide away from his Mar-a-Lago office so he could take a call with Putin. The book offers no account of the Trump-Putin conversation.

A reminder … Meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskyy a week ago Friday following the United Nations General Assembly, Trump said of the Ukrainian president; “We have a very good relationship. I also have a very good relationship with President Putin, and you know I think we’re going to get (the war) resolved very quickly.”

•••

The Harris Interview – Would a Harris administration take a harder line on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he continues to resist any serious move to a ceasefire in Gaza? 

Well, maybe. In her 60 Minutes interview with Bill Whitaker Monday night, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris said this; “With all due respect the better question is do we have an important alliance between the American people and the Israeli people? And that answer is ‘yes.’”

Assuming that means a President Kamala Harris would rely on the political will of a more moderate Israeli electorate, it does not bode well for a shift in US policy to potentially withhold arms to press for a ceasefire. 

When Whitaker pressed Vice President Harris on how her administration would pay for expansion of the child tax credit and tax breaks for first-time home buyers, key points in an economic plan that the nonpartisan Committee for Responsible Budget says will add $3 trillion to the federal debt, Harris reiterated the Biden administration argument that the richest, “who can afford it,” should pay their fair share and that good old fashioned bipartisan compromise would get Congress to pass such a plan.

“There are plenty of leaders of Congress who understand and know that the Trump tax cuts blew up the federal deficit,” she said.

About the border … Whitaker also pressed Harris on the “historic flood” of illegal immigrants crossing the border in the first three years of the Biden administration, four times the number who crossed in Donald J. Trump’s final year in office (the COVID-19 pandemic year). Harris argued that illegal immigration has been a long-time problem and that under the Biden administration the “flow” of illegal immigration and flow of fentanyl both have been cut in half.

Where’s Donald?  Whitaker explained that CBS News had an agreement with the Trump campaign to interview the Republican nominee for president – as 60 Minutes has managed since the 1968 presidential election, when the show interviewed both Richard M. Nixon and Hubert Humphrey. Ultimately, Donald J. Trump declined to appear and was interviewed on Fox News Monday night, instead.

--TL

_______________________________________________

One Year of War in Gaza

MONDAY 10/7/24

No End in Sight – On Monday, one year after Hamas’ cross-border terrorist attack on Israel, Hamas is claiming responsibility for rocket fire from Gaza to the Tel Aviv area, wounding two, according to Haaretz, which reports about 35 rockets have been fired into Israel in recent days. The Israeli Defense Force has directed northern Gaza residents to evacuate southward, while Iran has warned the IDF against retaliation for the missile attacks. 

Hamas still holds 101 hostages taken during the attacks a year ago, according to the BBC.

The region is as far away from forming a Palestinian state as it has been since the state of Israel was formed in 1948. 

Meanwhile … Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu appears to be gaining support from his constituency after facing severe criticism over being surprised by the attack one year ago. 

In President Biden’s first briefing room appearance, last Friday, he was asked whether he thought Netanyahu was trying to influence the US election. [It’s a question we asked in a Substack post last April.] Biden responded that no presidential administration has been a stronger ally of Israel than his own. But that says nothing of Biden’s relationship with Netanyahu, with whom he has been working to reach a ceasefire in Gaza for much of the last year.

“And whether he’s trying to influence the election, I don’t know,” Biden said, according to The Hill, “but I’m not counting on that.”

Clearly, he has not had any reason to count on Netanyahu, who is pressing forward in his efforts for judicial reform, even during the war. 

The Bibi Files … “Bibi” Netanyahu has been pushing these judicial reforms while under yearslong investigation, along with his wife and son, for bribery, fraud and breach of trust. His own immunity against these charges appear to rely on remaining in office.

Netanyahu is scheduled to testify in December, according to WNYC radio’s On the Media, which last weekend reported on a documentary by Alexii Bloom, The Bibi Files, which relies on leaked footage of police interrogations with the Israeli PM. 

“We all started with the fact that the prime minister does not respect the law,” says Israeli journalist Raviv Drucker in the doc. “Anyone that has dared to touch Mr. Netanyahu is doomed.”

What about Harris?  Would a Harris administration handle negotiations with Netanyahu over a cease fire agreement with Hamas any differently? It’s a crucial question, and one that may be answered too late to help Kamala Harris win the crucial swing state of Michigan, which has a large Palestinian and Middle-Eastern diaspora.

Would a President Harris take a harder line than Biden on shipping arms to Israel if Netanyahu continues to resist ceasefire in Gaza?

Do we have a “real close ally” in Netanyahu? CBS News reporter Bill Whitaker asks Harris in an interview that airs on 60 MinutesMonday night.

“I think with all due respect the better question is do we have an important alliance between the American people and the Israeli people. And the answer is ‘yes.’”

•••

The Last US Election? – World’s richest man/Bond villain/Tesla and SpaceX CEO/X-Twitter owner and “free speech absolutist” Elon Musk made his first appearance at a Trump rally last Saturday, and it probably is not his last. It was Trump’s return to Butler, Pennsylvania, site of an assassination attempt July 13, where Musk wore a black MAGA hat and a black “Occupy Mars” t-shirt, Fox News reports.

“Just to be a pest to everyone. You know, people on the street, everywhere: Vote, vote, vote!. Fight, fight, fight. Vote, vote, vote,” Musk said, and then he began jumping up and down, according to the foxnews.com account. 

What Fox News did not report (perhaps you have to watch its video) is that Musk asserted, according to The New York Times; “President Trump must win to preserve the Constitution. He must win to preserve democracy in America. If they don’t, this will be the last election. That’s my prediction.”

Maybe we won’t have to vote again whether Donald J. Trump or Kamala Harris wins the November 5 election? 

Remember that at The Believers Summit in West Palm Beach, Florida later in July, hosted by Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point Action, Trump “called on Christians to flood the polls in November,” according to The Poynter Institute’s PolitiFact, and promised if they vote for Trump, they “won’t have to vote again” in four years.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

In my neighborhood in a suburb of Detroit, the number of Trump lawn signs vastly outnumber those for Harris. The signs are graphically consistent, with the dominating factor being the names Trump and Vance. 

The differences are found just below the top of the signs.

Sometimes it says “Promises Kept.” This is a curious statement. Near as I can tell, the only promise Trump kept was to appoint justices to the Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. Wade. What is somewhat ironic about that situation is the pertinent justices, when questioned in the Senate about their positions regarding Roe v. Wade, cited stare decisis, saying that this is settled law. Then they, in effect, broke their implicit promises and treated it as though it wasn’t.

One of the things often noted today is that there were no wars during Trump’s term in office thanks to his mastery of international affairs, which included siding with Vladmir Putin and sending and receiving love letters to and from Kim Jong Un. Presumably that lack of a war is meant to underscore that he would “keep us safe.”

But a promise to keep us safe seems to have been shattered given that in 2020 350,821 Americans died from COVID — something that he repeatedly assured the public would “just go away.”

To be sure Trump didn’t cause COVID. But his administration’s efforts to mitigate the effects of the virus was something short of robust.

And to put that number of COVID deaths into context, 58,220 Americans died in the war in Vietnam, or 17% of the number of Americans who died from COVID during Trump’s last year in office.

Which lead to another of the slogans on the signs, the now-familiar “Make America Great Again.”

Presumably this now implies that things were “Great” during his administration. As the deaths from COVID indicate, perhaps not so much.

When Barrack Obama took office in January 2009 the U.S. unemployment rate was 7.8%. As you may recall, the economy in 2008-2009 was in horrible shape.

When Obama left office in 2017 the unemployment rate dropped to 4.7%.

So when Trump came into office he started with a 4.7% unemployment rate.

He left with a 6.4% unemployment rate.

What’s “Great” about that? Well, I guess you could say the 14.8% unemployment rate that occurred in April 2020, while he was still in office, makes that 6.4% really, really good.

And speaking of Obama, about whom Trump has nothing good to say, the average GDP growth rate during his time in office was 2.3%. He inherited the economic conditions from the Great Recession, so that’s at least positive.

One would imagine that under Trump the Gross Domestic Product soared.

Nope. 2.3%.

So how “Great” did Trump make America?

And finally, there’s this slogan on a Trump sign:

“No More Bullshit!”

This, I must confess, is a mystery to me. The Biden-Harris Administration has done plenty of things that can be vigorously criticized, but one thing that seems evident about the both of them is that they are anything but bullshit artists.

So while on that subject I submit this from a speech Trump gave on September 27 at Macomb County Community College in Warren, Michigan.

He opened by talking about voting. “I will, once and for all secure our elections.” There is little evidence that 2020 was unsecure, so arguably he secured that election, although he has spent the past many years arguing against that.

The next sentence, “We’re going to go to paper ballots.” Odd that there are supporters like Peter Thiel, who has made a fortune on digital technologies.

Then Trump said, “We’re going to have same-day voting, voting ID.”

But within a matter of seconds he told the crowd, “Whether you vote earlier, absentee, by mail, or in person, we are going to protect the vote.”

Didn’t he just say “We’re going to have same-day voting”? And didn’t he vote early this past August in Florida?

But people vote about the economy more than election methodologies.

Trump said:

“We had the greatest economy in the history of our country and we were just getting started actually. But we had the greatest economy, the greatest employment for everybody, men, women, African-American, Hispanic-American, Asian-American, everybody, young people with a diploma, without a diploma.”

Well, as we have seen, to call the economy or the employment rate “the greatest” is quite a stretch. What’s more, the current unemployment rate is 4.1%, which is better than the 6.4% he left with.

Now, Trump claimed that illegal immigrants are taking the jobs of Americans. So, of course, when the issue is immigration, he has to talk about the Wall.

Trump:

“We built more wall than I said I was going to build. And then we had 200 miles of wall ready to go. It was all fabricated, all made to the highest specifications of Border Patrol and ICE, and it was all set. And then we got more votes than any sitting president has ever gotten by far. And they say we lost the election, so let’s leave it at this. You know what? We have one coming up in 39 days, so that’ll be a wonderful replacement. 

Wonderful replacement.”

This one is really chock full of, well, bullshit.

During the 2016 campaign Trump said he’d build 1,000 miles of wall. Then he ratcheted that back to 450 miles of wall. Then when he left office U.S. Customs and Border Protection revealed there were 80 miles of new wall built. There were 452 miles in total, so that means 372 miles of replacement, reconstruction and secondary wall.

Mexico paid for none of it.

And amusingly enough, during the Obama administration there were 299 miles of vehicle barriers and 350 miles of pedestrian fencing built.

Then there was the clever use of a modifier in his statement regarding the number of votes he received as a sitting president.

Obama was the last sitting president who ran for reelection prior to Trump. 

In terms of votes, Obama received 65,915,795 votes in 2012 compared with Trump’s 74,223,234 in 2020.

However, Obama’s number is 51.06% of the total votes cast in ’12 while Trump’s number is 46.8% of the total popular votes cast in ‘20.

So while, yes, Trump got more popular votes than Obama did, he got fewer votes on a percentage basis.

And then there’s the fact that Joe Biden received 81,282,632 votes, or 51.3% of the popular vote, which is even better than Obama’s 51.06% and significantly better than Trump’s 46.8%.

Final example: China. While Trump has called Xi Jinping a “brilliant man,” China is as much of a boogie man as illegal aliens.

Trump told the assembled in Warren:

“I charged hundreds of billions of dollars to China in tariffs and taxes. No other president has ever charged China 10 cents, and we’ve taken hundreds of billions of dollars.”

As the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) wrote in July 2022, “Two years ago, President Donald Trump signed what he called a ‘historic trade deal’ with China that committed China to purchase $200 billion of additional US exports before December 31, 2021. Today the only undisputed ‘historical’ aspect of that agreement is its failure.”

Huh? Isn’t he the consummate dealmaker?

PIIE continues, “In the end, China bought only 58% of the US exports it had committed to purchase under the agreement, not even enough to reach its import levels from before the trade war. Put differently, China bought none of the additional $200 billion of exports Trump’s deal promised.”

Where do those “hundreds of billions of dollars” come from? Well, a non-trivial amount is from the pockets of people like those in Warren, every time they shop for goods at the local Walmart that are made in China. They are paying the price of tariffs.

The truth is hard. Bullshit is easy.

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings, writing primarily for the right column.

_____
MONDAY 10/7/24

That question is still up for debate at The Hustings. Email editors@thehustings.news with your thoughts and with your political leanings (independent of your pick for winner in the Vance v. Walz event) in the subject line.

Scroll down this page with the trackbar on the far right to read our center-column analysis, “Ohio Normal Meets Minnesota Nice,” with right-column commentary by guest contributing pundit Rich Corbett and left-column commentary by Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay.

You’ll not that Macaulay is back in the right column at the top of the page with his latest commentary, “Laws, Schmaws.”

Further down the page in the right column, don’t miss Macaulay’s “Advantage: Intellectual Arteriosclerosis” and “Where Have You Gone, Edward Gibbon?”

Sign up for our free newsletter at thehustings.substack.com.

_____
THURSDAY 10/3/24

The US economy added 254,000 jobs in September for an unemployment rate of 4.1%, which the Labor Department says is virtually unchanged from August’s 4.2% rate. Greatest jobs gains came in food service and drinking places, health care, government, social assistance and construction. [CHART: Bureau of Labor Statistics]

FRIDAY 10/4/24

Dock Strike Ends – Just in time to avoid discernable damage to the Harris/Walz campaign, the International Longshoreman’s Association representing tens of thousands of East Coast and Gulf Coast dockworkers ended a three-day strike by tentative agreement with the United States Maritime Alliance, which represents ocean carriers and port operators. Dockworkers will receive a 62% wage increase over the six years of the contract, after its union called for 77% to the US Maritime Alliance’s 50% offer, according to NPR’s All Things Considered.

The parties also agreed to extend the current contract to January 15 to allow the two sides to negotiate other issues of the contract, including the Longshoreman’s Association’s call for a ban on potentially job-reducing automation at the ports.

•••

Which State for Melania? — Prior to the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last July, MAGA critics were raising the issue of apparent absence of First Lady Melania Trump as her husband racked up the usual number of rallies and call-ins to Fox News. Then she showed up bigtime at the RNC as if to assure the MAGA faithful that the Trumps’ marriage was solid. 

Now in the face of GOP presidential candidate Donald J. Trump’s flippy-floppy position on abortion rights – currently, that it’s a states’ rights issue – Melania Trump has revealed she is full-out in favor of abortion rights. 

Mrs. Trump “doubled down” in her first public statement following The Guardian’s report that her memoir, Melania reads; “It is imperative to guarantee that women have autonomy in deciding their preference of having children, based on their own convictions, free from any intervention or presence from government.”

Is the October surprise coming from inside the house? … No doubt the absolute anti-abortion MAGA supporters who made nothing of Melania Trump’s disparaging remarks about Christmas decorations at the White House a few years ago will not make much, if anything, of these words in Melania when it hits bookstore shelves next Tuesday, October 8. But it does raise the question of where Melania Trump is living, or would prefer to live: New York, where abortion is legal, or Florida, where it is illegal after week six.

About Melania … CNN media correspondent Hadas Gold on Thursday reported that the publisher of Melania for Skyhouse Publishing requested the cable news network pay a fee of $250,000 to interview Melania Trump for her book. CNN declined.

--TL

_______________________________________________

Trump on Jan. 6 – Then-President Trump tweeted about attacking Mike Pence from the White House over his vice president’s refusal to reject Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory in the formal vote count January 6, 2021, according to a 165-page filing by special counsel Jack Smith (via Politico). The filing unsealed Wednesday by Tanya S. Chutkan, US District Court judge for the District of Columbia reveals that Pence, who faced a gallows mock-up on the Capitol Grounds that day “took extensive notes about meetings” with Donald J. Trump and his outside advisors, according to NPR’s Up First podcast.

The distinction regarding Trump’s meeting with “outside” advisors is important because Smith’s filing is a response to the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision that gives sitting presidents virtually unlimited immunity for official acts. Smith’s filing indicates prosecutors believe they have sufficient evidence to convict Trump in the face of the court’s summer ruling.

The filing alleges Trump engaged in an effort, not as president, but as a private citizen and candidate for office, to overturn the election, says CQ Roll Call. Chutkan is now gathering information from both sides of United States of America v. Donald J. Trump about which allegations prosecutors can pursue and which would be off-limits, as well as how to handle other outstanding issues in the case. 

The case will not go to court before the November 5 presidential election of course, and if Trump wins that election, it has no future.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_____
THURSDAY 10/3/24

By Stephen Macaulay

It is fair to say that all readers of The Hustings are law-abiding citizens. Meaning that we don’t do things like shoplift when we go pick up a prescription at CVS — you know, grab a package or razors or a stick of antiperspirant, whatever might not be locked behind a Plexiglas screen.

In fact, most Americans of all walks of life are law-abiding citizens.

So when someone says something about a way to address crime, we are probably interested because when those objects from CVS take the five-finger discount out of the store, we all eventually pay.

Convicted felon Donald Trump announced his plan for reducing theft during a speech in Erie, Pennsylvania, last weekend:

“One rough hour — and I mean real rough — the word will get out and it will end immediately, you know? It will end immediately.”

The “rough hour” would be undertaken by law enforcement.

Presumably some people get pumped up by talk like that. After all, they think, they’re not criminals, they don’t steal things, so why not?

Why not have the people who serve and protect beat the hell out of people so those miscreants will never think about lifting even a free, proffered snack at Costco?

Maybe because it is against the law.

It is really sad that the man who wants to lead the country — a country that was heretofore one where people are expected to abide by the law, even if it means stopping at a red light in the middle of the night on a deserted street — is encouraging people to break the law — people whose job and sworn duty it is to uphold the law.

What if police officers were encouraged not only to smack down shoplifters but even other infractions? Forget the protections of the Fifth Amendment. Wait, that was to be suspended, too, on day one, along with the rest of the founding laws of the U.S.A.

What kind of country would this be? Certainly not the one that one that people have pledged to uphold and defend.

And what’s “Great” about that?

_____
THURSDAY 10/3/24

By Stephen Macaulay

As of August/early September JD Vance had a favorability rating of 36% among Americans and Tim Walz edged him out by 5%, at 41%, according to Gallup.

This means that Walz was tied with Mike Pence in 2020 and Vance was tied with Mike Pence in 2016.

Mike Pence is likely not voting for either of the two men.

But what Gallup also found was that 19% of U.S. adults don’t know who Walz is and 17% don’t know who Vance is.

Which puts the two men squabbling on TV with each other in perspective.

What’s more, the citizens of Houston, Detroit, Baltimore, Kansas City, Atlanta, and San Diego all had something else to view last night that was a solid concern of more than a slice of their populations: Major League Baseball playoff games.

The last time the Tigers were in the playoffs, for example, Obama was president.

While John Nance Garner is the name of an individual that only Ken Jennings might get (“Who was the 32nd vice president?”), his comparison of the office to a bucket of warm spit is equaled by Will Rogers’ lesser-known “The man with the best job in the country is the vice-president. All he has to do is get up every morning and say, ‘How is the president?’”

Vance and Walz could have wrestled in a bucket of warm spit for nine minutes rather than the 90 spent talking and the effect might have been better.

It is commonly said that the purpose of a vice-presidential candidate is to serve as an attack dog for whoever is running for the top job. It is a shame that Don Rickles died in 2017 because he would have been superlative in that role.

But last night the two men were not attack dogs so much as somewhat-civil surrogates for their partners in politics.

Walz looked uncomfortable at the start, as though he wished he was wearing a Cabella’s cap and fishing at Lake Winnibigoshish.

Vance was his usual basilisk-like self.

The outlets that did fact-checking of what the candidates said pretty much indicated that Vance held forth with a litany of lies, although there was the tendency to be more euphemistic about what Vance said (“Misleading”? Really?). All I can say is that Vance must spend a whole lot of time in the confession booth.

While Walz wasn’t exactly a choir boy in some of his answers, The Washington Post’s fact checker seemed to go out of his way to throw shade at Walz, as though they were afraid the multiple “This is false” declarations appended to Vance’s lies would be a bit much for the readers.

Walz claimed:

“Donald Trump had four years. He had four years to do this. And he promised you, America, how easy it would be. ‘I’ll build you a big, beautiful wall, and Mexico will pay for it.’ Less than 2% of that wall got built, and Mexico didn’t pay a dime.”

And the Post assessed:

“The percentage is exaggerated. About 458 miles of a border barrier was built during Trump’s presidency, but most of it (373 miles) was replacement for existing primary or secondary barriers that were dilapidated or outdated, according to a January 22, 2021, report by Customs and Border Protection. About 52 miles was new primary wall, and 33 miles was new secondary wall. Trump had promised to build 1,000 miles of barrier, so even taking the lower numbers gets Trump 8.5 percent.”

Well, that’s one way of slicing the numbers. Another way is this:

The length of the border between the U.S. and Mexico is 1,954 miles. When Trump talked about his Wall, he didn’t mean fixed up portions or secondary structures. It was going to be a sight to behold, one that would strike fear into the hearts of anyone who dared gaze at it with a notion of trying to surmount it. (Fear, incidentally, is what the Trump-Vance team is big on when it comes to other countries.)

So Trump built 52 miles of wall. Which is 2.66% of 1,954.

Still, the overall assessment is that it was a tie.

In other words, fairly irrelevant.

Although there are those who claim there are those who are undecided or independent who’d be swayed one way or another — get serious:

  1. People vote for the person running for president, not the vice president.
  2. There was a lot of good baseball on last night.

Macaulay is pundit-at-large for The Hustings. A never-Trump conservative, his commentaries most often appear in our right column.

_____
WEDNESDAY 10/2/24

By Todd Lassa

How to summarize Tuesday’s debate on CBS News Tuesday night between Republican veep nominee Sen. JD Vance of Ohio and Democratic veep nominee Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota? 

It was nothing like Veep the TV show, except for the almost self-referential -self-stereotyping of Minnesota nice by Walz, who started out shaky and nervous on the way to finding a bit of sympatico with Vance on a couple of issues. He even apologized a couple of times for interrupting Vance and CBS News moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan.

Walz’s presence strengthened while discussing the abortion issue as Vance tried to advance Trump’s argument that it is all about states’ rights and falsely claimed the first Trump administration strengthened universal health care rather than repeatedly attempt to appeal Obamacare.

Walz and Vance agreed on the need to build affordable housing, 3 million units according to Walz, while Vance insisted it’s an immigration problem and consistently blamed Vice President Harris for letting in millions of illegals in the past three-and-a-half years. 

They agreed housing should not be commodities for financial institutions to manipulate and that local and state regulations that stifle construction of such housing should be eased, though neither knew how. Nor did either candidate mention how NIMBY is the key issue in stifling affordable housing construction.

Vance did raise the problem of the Harris/Walz home-building program triggering real estate inflation with up-front downpayment aid for, the Republican senator suggested, illegal aliens, which would pile on to the inflation for which he said Kamala Harris also is responsible. 

Vance noted the Trump-Vance solution is to seize federal lands and build the needed housing on it. Vance also repeated Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” mantra, prompting Walz to ask; “Are we going to drill and build houses on the same federal land?”

Vance and Walz agreed on the need for federal money to pay for paid medical leave “to make families stronger,” according to Vance. 

“I think there is a bipartisan solution here,” Walz responded. Trump/Vance seeks a $5,000 child-care tax credit while Harris/Walz have called for $6,000 for newborns followed up with $3,000 for children more than six-months old. Vance added a “school choice” style element in the way early child care is provided, saying churches and small-town communities should be eligible to receive such federal monies.

Though vice presidential debates are considered inconsequential auditions for a job not worth a bucket of warm spit, both Vance and Walz offered more substance and detail on policy proposals than Trump and Harris did in their single meeting. 

Whereas Vance repeatedly criticized Harris for failing to do anything about illegal immigration and inflation while she has been President Biden’s veep, Walz called out the Trump administration’s tax cuts mostly for the rich and its resulting $8 trillion increase in the federal debt. The Democrat cited warnings from economists -- including economists from the Wharton School (Trump’s alma mater) – that the Trump/Vance proposed tariffs would spur much higher inflation than we’ve had since the pandemic.

Without using the word “tariff,” Vance said the heart of Trump’s plan is to cut taxes, “but penalize companies that are shipping jobs overseas.”

Vance and Walz argued, civilly, it must be said, over the January 6th Capitol insurrection and freedom of speech. 

Vance cited Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as Trump supporters. Walz said the Harris campaign’s support ranges from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) to former veep Dick Cheney to Taylor Swift. (Expect an all-caps Trump response to the latter on Truth Social.)

Finally, Walz pressed Vance on Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and noted that Mike Pence was not on the stage with him as a result of those efforts.

“Did he lose the 2020 election?” Walz asked Vance.

“Tim, I’m focused on the future. ...” 

Who won?: Did JD Vance win this one, or at least soften his image enough to improve his low favorability ratings, or was Tim Walz the winner? Email your thoughts about the vice-presidential debate to editors@thehustings.news and please, indicate your political leanings (those on the left are allowed to admit Vance won, and those on the right can give the win to Walz) in the subject line. Or simply enter your comments in the left or right column.

_____
WEDNESDAY 10/2/24

By Rich Corbett

As a conservative voter, my reaction to the vice-presidential debate is that Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) was rock-solid. He reinforced Republican strength when it comes to the economy, border and foreign policy stability. 

Vance was likable, polite, connectable, professional and convincingly competent. By Vance answering the moderators with … “you asked the question, so I’ll answer the question” … it reminded voters just how few answers we have received from Kamala Harris on her flip-flopped positions. As a running mate, he definitely is an asset to former President Donald Trump. 

As for Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN), he did no harm to Kamala Harris. He was good enough on the Democrat positions in talking about health care and abortion, but less convincing that Trump is a “threat to democracy” or that Americans would see much change from the last three-and-a-half years. His defense over his past embellishments such as a visit to Hong Kong and Tiananmen Square in his non-answer, “I’m a knucklehead at times,” was memorable, but a reminder that politicians mislead — lie — if they think it will benefit their political future. 

If voters came to the debate not knowing JD Vance or with a negative impression, he likely improved his stature and may have advanced the Trump/Vance ticket. For Tim Walz and his “neighborly guy” image, it disappeared to what seemed artificial anger over January 6th. He appeared far more nervousness than Vance and had difficulty in defending himself and Harris, but quickly deflect into to blaming Trump. It was a hard sell after three-and-a-half years of Biden/Harris. 

Corbett is a longtime reader and a contributor to The Hustings’ right column.

_____
WEDNESDAY 10/2/24

Tune in CBS News at 9 pm Eastern time Tuesday, October 1, when Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) faces Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) in the campaign season’s only vice-presidential debate, from New York City. NPR also will carry the debate live. 

Then come to The Hustings for analysis and help us choose the debate’s winner. Use the Comment section in this column if you lean left (regardless of who you think won the debate) or the Comment section in the right column if you lean right (again, regardless of who you think won the debate).

Or email editors@thehustings.news and indicate your political leanings in the subject line. 

Meanwhile, check out Pundit-at-Large Stephen Macaulay’s latest commentaries from the never-MAGA right, including “Advantage: Intellectual Arteriosclerosis?”, “Where Have You Gone, Edward Gibbon?”, “The Art of the Fraud” and “First Impression.” 

Don’t miss guest contributor Kate McLeod’s left-column take on the Harris-Trump debate, “No Debate Inflation.”

More left and right commentaries on the September 10 presidential debate, including a pro-Trump column by guest contributor Rich Corbett, can be found on page 2.

Be sure to subscribe to our free newsletter at thehustings.substack.com.

_____
MONDAY 9/30/24
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

Jimmy Carter, 39th president of the United States, celebrates his 100th birthday Tuesday.

MONDAY 10/1/24

It's War -- Iran launched missiles toward Israel about 7:30 pm local time Tuesday, Israeli military spokesman Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari confirmed, according to The Hill. Iran's attack came just after the US warned that one was imminent.

•••

Israel’s Incursion – It’s not all-out war in Southern Lebanon yet, as the Israeli military pushed its ground incursion there to target Hezbollah militants that it says pose an immediate threat to Northern Israeli communities, NPR’s Morning Edition reports. 

Meanwhile … The US has expressed support for Israel’s “limited operation” and continued to push for a diplomatic resolution, Haaretz reports. At the same time, Russia has strengthened ties with Hamas, according to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

While Blinken and the US are determined to prevent all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah, some analysts believe it is too late for that, especially because of the positive effect last Friday’s airstrike killing Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has had on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s popularity among Israelis.

--Compiled and edited by Todd Lassa

_______________________________________________

MONDAY 9/30/24

Friends, Enemies, Interests

By Todd Lassa

America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests.  – Henry Kissinger

If Israel is not a permanent “friend” of the United States, it has been a close interest for a very long time, 76 years, and in turn it has been dealing with the same enemies in its region for much of that time.

Last Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the United Nations he had intended on staying home where he had a war to fight rather than attend the annual General Assembly, but “after I heard the lies and slanders leveled at my country by many of the speakers at this podium, I decided to come here and set the record straight. I have decided to come here to speak for my people. …

“The truth is, Israel seeks peace. Israel yearns for peace. Israel has made peace and will make peace again,” he continued. Shortly after, the Israeli Defense Force began dropping bombs on Lebanon. The next day one of those bombs killed Hassan Nasrallah, feared and much-hated leader since 1992 of Hezbollah, the Lebanese militia group backed by Israel’s greatest enemy, Iran.

Nasrallah’s death will not be lamented by anyone who shared that UN podium with Netanyahu. A terrorist in the eyes of Israelis, and not just the hardliners to Netanyahu’s right, Nasrallah wanted every Muslim to join in the struggle to destroy Israel as a nation, according to his obituary in The New York Times. Already, his death at the hand of Israel has boosted Netanyahu’s standing and popularity there, according to NPR’s Morning Edition, which points out that two weeks ago, Hezbollah had a stronger army than Lebanon’s.

Escalation of Israel’s attacks on Southern Lebanon to all-out war is, explicitly, what the Biden administration does not want, as these bombings distract from Israel’s relentless bombing of Gaza. Although Iran is said to prefer to avoid direct conflict with Israel, its leaders have pledged revenge on Nasrallah’s death.

Realpolitik dictates it is not in the Biden administration’s interests to sanction its friend/interest Israel with any meaningful withholding of arms deliveries. Netanyahu knows he will not see change whether the next administration is led by Donald J. Trump or Kamala Harris.

Elsewhere in New York last Friday … Ukraine does not enjoy such a luxury. At Trump Tower Friday, the ex-president, with an uncomfortable-looking President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at his side, said if he wins the November 5 election, repeated the campaign pledge that he will quickly negotiate a solution that is “good for both sides.”

Trump spoke to the press at his tower before the two entered a private meeting where the Ukrainian president outlined his plan for ending the war with Russia.

“We have a very good relationship,” Trump continued. “I also have a very good relationship with President Putin, and you know, I think we’re going to get it resolved very quickly.”

Zelenskyy tried to assert that Trump’s relationship with Ukraine is better than Trump’s relationship with Russia, but the Republican president let it be known where his interests — his friendships? — lie: “Ah, I see. But it takes two to tango.”

_____
MONDAY 9/30/24
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news

By Stephen Macaulay

Right for America, a super PAC backing Donald Trump for president, is running a $37.2-million TV ad buy concentrating on Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, according to Axios.

A focus of the ads is on how Kamala Harris has changed her views on things, like fracking, since she ran for president for the 2020 election.

The 2020 Harris campaign officially began on January 21, 2019.

The 2020 Harris campaign officially ended on December 3, 2019.

Not much of a campaign.

But here’s the thing: Harris is doing what most of us do when we get additional information about something:

She changed her opinion about it.

Certainly part of her action is predicated on political considerations.

But let’s say it is 50-50: a changed opinion/playing for votes.

Now let’s compare this with Donald Trump who has made claims about things—lots of things—and then simply ignores them when they don’t come to be.

Arguably his most famous has to do with immigration at the southern border.

More specifically, the Wall that not only was he going to build, but that he was going to have Mexico pay for.

The amount of Wall that he built was, well, not much in the grand scheme of things.

And as for the Mexican government putting up even recycled rebar. . .well, that didn’t happen, either.

Unquestionably the number of illegal immigrants from below the southern border was a fraction under Trump than Biden, but it had little to do with the Wall, which was in effect nothing more than a political symbol. (The existing walls and fencing that were there when he took office undoubtedly helped reduce some of the illegal border crossings, but that was something already in place and far more comprehensive than anything than happened under his watch.)

Then there is the issue of tariffs.

Trump announced at a rally in Michigan recently, “Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented.”

He has long supported tariffs.

Yet economists—pretty much across the political spectrum—realize that tariffs are taxes on consumers.

Trump looks at it as though it some somehow the tariffs are paid for by the exporting country.

Which is simply not the case.

So rather than protecting the consumer or the domestic producers of whatever it is that tariffs are applied to (and apparently, he’d like them to be applied to everything), tariffs simply increase costs at the local cash register.

It sounds good.

But rather than a surefire way to increase economic well being for American citizens, it is a Three Card Monte: no way you can’t pick the queen.

So given all of the information available about the essential ineffectiveness of tariffs, did he change his mind about them?

Of course not.

Does he change his mind about anything, or does he exhibit mental arteriosclerosis?

What’s better: someone with the mental aptitude to change her mind or someone who is set in their ways, something not uncommon for those pushing 80.

_____
MONDAY 9/30/24
COMMENTS: editors@thehustings.news